Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:10:23.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Book Review Symposium on Michael McNally's Defend the Sacred - Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891.

Review products

Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2021

Dana Lloyd
Dana Lloyd*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Global Interdisciplinary Studies, Villanova University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

religious freedomIndigenous sovereigntyIndigenous lawfederal Indian law
Type
Book Review Symposium on Defend the Sacred
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 167 - 169
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 42 U.S.C. § 1996.

2 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb.

3 Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 U.S. 439 (1988).

4 Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, 479 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2007), reversed, 535 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), certiorari denied, 556 U.S. 1281 (2009).

5 Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).

6 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. Army Corps of Engineers, 985 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 2021).

7 In re Conservation District Use Application HA-3568, 431 P.3d 752 (Hawai'i 2018).

8 Yurok Tribal Council, “Resolution 19–40: Resolution Establishing the Rights of the Klamath River,” May 9, 2019, http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload833.pdf.

9 See Minnesota Department of Natural Resources v. White Earth Band of Ojibwe, No. 21-cv-1869, 2021 WL 4034582, at *1 n. 1 (District of Minnesota Sept. 3, 2021) (denying an injunction to prohibit the case from proceeding in tribal court). For a draft copy of the tribal court complaint, see Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Manoomin v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (White Earth Nation of Ojibwe Tribal Court Aug. 4, 2021), https://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/manoomin-et-al-v-dnr-complaint-w-exhibits-8-4-21.pdf (accessed on August 16, 2021).

10 The Law, Rights, and Religion Project challenged this narrative of religious freedom as principally a conservative Christian endeavor in its 2019 report: Reiner, Elizabeth, et al. , Whose Faith Matters? The Fight for Religious Liberty beyond the Christian Right (New York: Law, Rights, and Religion Project, 2019)Google Scholar, https://lawrightsreligion.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Images/Whose%20Faith%20Matters%20Full%20Report%2012.12.19.pdf.

11 Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831).

12 25 U.S.C §§ 3001-3013 (2000).