Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:01:26.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Judging Is Power

A Gender Perspective on the French and American Judiciaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Adélaïde Remiche
Adélaïde Remiche*
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
*
Contact the corresponding author, Adélaïde Remiche, at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the feminization of the judiciary in France and in the United States through the prism of the “imagined judge,” that is, the judge as he or she is represented in a specific legal culture. The French imagined judge is a knowledgeable automaton mechanically applying the law entirely created by the parliament, while his or her American counterpart is a decision maker well equipped to solve social problems. Interpreting the gender composition of the judiciary through the intellectual device of the imagined judge leads to a crucial observation: there is a correlation between the conceptualization of the imagined judge as a being exercising power, as in the United States, and the continued underrepresentation of women on the bench. From this observation comes an important hypothesis: the conceptualization of judging as an act of power works to keep women off the bench.prism

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 95 - 114
Copyright
© 2015 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank David Klein, the three anonymous reviewers, Julie Allard, Laura Hilly, Noémie Goldman, Yseult Marique, Simona Lastrego, Benoit Remiche, Nicole Dewandres, Robert Salvesen, Laura Van den Eynde, as well as the participants in a panel at the 2013 annual meeting of the Law and Society Association and at the International Symposium, “The Judge Is a Woman,” held at the Université Libre de Bruxelles on November 7 and 8, 2013, for their insightful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

Aldisert, Ruggero J. 1980. “The Nature of the Judicial Process: Revisited.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 49 (1): 1–48.Google Scholar
Aliotta, Jilda M. 1994. “Justice O’Connor and the Equal Protection Clause: A Feminine Voice.” Judicature 78 (5): 232–35.Google Scholar
Allan, D., and D. Wall. 1987. “The Behavior of Women State Supreme Court Justices: Are They Token or Outsiders?” Justice System Journal 12 (2): 232–44.Google Scholar
Allard, Julie. 2009. “Le juge en France, un statut en peine évolution?” Archives de Philosophie du Droit, no. 52:355–66.Google Scholar
Allard, Julie. 2013. “L’office du juge: Entre sacré et politique.” In La prudence et l’autorité. L’office du juge au XXI siècle. Rapport de l’Institut des Hautes Études sur la Justice, ed. Antoine Garapon, Sylvie Perdriolle, Boris Bernabé, and Charles Kadri. Paris: Institut des Hautes Etudes sur la Justice.Google Scholar
Beiner, Theresa M. 1999. “What Will Diversity on the Bench Mean for Justice?” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 6 (1): 113–52.Google Scholar
Bell, David V. J. 1975. Power, Influence, and Authority: An Essay in Political Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, John. 2008. French Legal Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bessière, Céline, and Muriel Mille. 2013. “Le juge est (souvent) une femme: Conceptions du métier et pratiques des magistrates et magistrats aux affaires familiales.” Sociologie du Travail 55 (3): 341–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 1993. “La magistrature Française au féminin: Entre spécificité et banalisation.” Droit et Société 25:489–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 1996. “Les femmes et les cours: La difficile mise en oeuvre de l’égalité des sexes dans l’accès à La Magistrature.” Genèses 22 (1): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 1999. “Les magistrates en France: Des stratégies particulières?” In Les femmes et le droit: Constructions idéologiques et pratiques sociales, ed. Anne Devillé and Olivier Paye, 149–69. Bruxelles: Facultés Universitaires Saint Louis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 2003a. “De la difficile entrée des femmes dans la magistrature à la féminisation du corps.” In Justice et différence de sexe, ed. Christine Bard and Jean-Jacques Petit. Rennes: Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 2003b. “La justice: Une affaire de femmes.” In La justice, d’un siècle à l’autre, ed. Jean-Pierre Royer. Paris: Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 2003c. “Male Strategies in the Face of the Feminisation of a Profession: The Case of French Judiciary.” In Women in the World’s Legal Professions, ed. Ulrike Schultz and Gisela Schaw, 401–18. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 2004. “La contribution des magistrates au débat sur la justice.” In Intellectuelles: Du genre en histoire des intellectuels, ed. Nicole Racine and Michel Trebitsch, 259–74. Bruxelles: Complexe/CNRS-IHTP.Google Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 2010. “L’exercice de la justice au prisme du genre: Un non-objet?” In Figures de femmes criminelles, de l’antiquité à nos jours, ed. L. Cadiet, F. Chauvaud, C. Gauvard, and P. Schmitt Pantel, 329–42. Paris: Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boigeol, Anne. 2013. “Feminisation of the French ‘Magistrature’: Gender and Judging in a Feminised Context.” In Gender and Judging, ed. Ulrike Schultz and Gisela Schaw, 125–43. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Bong Yu, S. 1999. “The Role of the Judge in the Common Law and in Civil Law Systems: The Cases of the United States and European Countries.” International Area Studies Review 2:35–46.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui-Xuan, Olivia. 2007. “Le conseil d’état: Quelle composition réelle?” Pouvoirs 123 (4): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacouault-Bitaud, Marlaine. 2001. “La feminisation d’une profession est-elle le signe d’une baisse de prestige?” Travail, Genre et Sociétés 5 (1): 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capitant, Henri. 1898. Introduction à l’étude du droit civil. Notions générales. 5th ed. Paris: Pedone.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. 1970. “Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective.” California Law Review 58 (5): 1017–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. 1985. “Repudiating Montesquieu: The Expansion and Legitimacy of Constitutional Justice.” Catholic University Law Review 35 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Cardozzo, Benjamin. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cataldo, B., C. Gillam, F. Kempin, J. Stockton, and C. Weber. 1965. Introduction to Law and the Legal Process. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques. 2000. “Dossier: Justice et politique (III). Présentation.” Droit et Société 44/45: 9–12.Google Scholar
Conseil Supérieur de la Magistrature. 2012. Rapport d’acitivité 2012. Paris: Conseil.Google Scholar
Cooney, Sean. 1993. “Gender and Judicial Selection: Should There Be More Women on the Courts?” Melbourne University Law Review 19 (20): 20–44.Google Scholar
Coontz, Phyllis. 2000. “Gender and Judicial Decisions: Do Female Judges Decide Cases Differently than Male Judges?” Gender Issues 18 (4): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan. 1967. “Continental Lawyer in an American Law School: Trials and Tribulations of Adjustment.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 116 (8): 1363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Sue. 1993. “Do Women Judges Speak in ‘a Different Voice’? Carol Gilligan, Feminist Legal Theory and the Ninth Circuit.” Wisconsin Women’s Legal Journal 8 (143): 143–73.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind. 2010. “Female Justices, Feminism, and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-examination.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 21 (2): 297–338.Google Scholar
Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature. 2010. La répartition des femmes et des hommes dans la magistrature. http://www.enm-justice.fr/_uses/lib/5757/DP_Feminisation_magistrature_20100216.pdf.Google Scholar
Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature. 2011. Profil de la promotion 2011 des auditeurs de justice issus des trois concours d’accès et du recrutement sur titres. Bourdeaux: Ecole Nationale.Google Scholar
Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature. 2012. Dossier de presse - 30 Janvier 2012. Bourdeaux: Ecole Nationale.Google Scholar
Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature. 2013. Profil de la promotion 2013 des auditeurs de justice issus des trois concours d’accès et du recrutement sur titres. Bourdeaux: Ecole Nationale.Google Scholar
Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature. 2014. Profil de La Promotion 2014 Des Auditeurs de Justice Issus Des Trois Concours D’accès et Du Recrutement Sur Titres. Bourdeaux: Ecole Nationale.Google Scholar
Elliott, Heather. 2001. “The Difference Women Judges Make: Stare Decisis, Norms of Collegiality, and Feminine Jurisprudence—a Research Proposal.” Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 16 (1): 41–52.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, E. Allan, and Steve Sheppard. 1996. An Introduction to the Legal System of the United States. New York: Oceana.Google Scholar
Favoreau, Louis, et al. 2013. Droit constitutionnel. 15th ed. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Federal Judicial Center. 2014a. “Biographical Directory of Federal Judges, 1789–Present.” http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/judges.html.Google Scholar
Federal Judicial Center. 2014b. “Judicial Salaries.” http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/judges_salaries.html.Google Scholar
Felix, Antonia. 2011. Sonia Sotomayor: The True American Dream. Repr. New York: Berkley Trade.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael D. A. 2008. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell/Reuters.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine, and Ioannis Papadopoulos. 2003. Juger en Amérique et en France: Culture juridique Française et common law. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
García-Villegas, Mauricio. 2006. “Comparative Sociology of Law: Legal Fields, Legal Scholarships, and Social Sciences in Europe and the United States.” Law and Social Inquiry 31 (2): 343–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Barbara Luck. 1990. “Judicial Recruitment and Racial Diversity on State Courts: An Overview.” Judicature 74 (28): 28–34.Google Scholar
Gruhl, John, Cassia Spohn, and Susan Welch. 1981. “Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (2): 308–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gryski, Gerard S., Eleanor C. Main, and William J. Dixon. 1986. “Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases.” Journal of Politics 48 (1): 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo, and Patrizia Pederzoli. 2002. The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Trans. Cheryl Thomas. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1990. “Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?” In Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Linda Nicholson, 157–75. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hepperle, H., and L. Crites, eds. 1978. Women in the Courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Hourquebie, Fabrice. 2010. Le pouvoir juridictionnel en France. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Ifill, Sherrilyn A. 1997. “Judging the Judges: Racial Diversity, Impartiality and Representation on State Trial Courts.” Boston College Law Review 39 (1): 95–149.Google Scholar
Ifill, Sherrilyn A. 2000. “Racial Diversity on the Bench: Beyond Role Models and Public Confidence.” Washington and Lee Law Review 57 (2): 405–95.Google Scholar
Jamin, Christophe. 2011. “Le rendez-vous manqué des civilistes Français avec le réalisme juridique: Un exercice de lecture comparée.” Droits 51:137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Andrew L. 2000. Cardozo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Herma Hill, and Geraldine Sparrow. 2001. “Workshop on Judging: Does Gender Make a Difference?” Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 16 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J. 2012. Gender and Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., and T. Uhlman. 1977. “Sisterhood in the Courtroom: Sex of Judge and Defendant in Criminal Case Disposition.” Social Science Journal 14 (2): 77–88.Google Scholar
Lasser, Mitchel. 2004. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2005. “American Legal Realism.” In The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. W. Edmundson and M. Golding, 50–66. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lips, Hilary M. 1991. Women, Men, and Power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Lundmark, Thomas. 2012. Charting the Divide between Common and Civil Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Philippe. 2008. Introduction à l’étude du droit. 12th ed. Paris: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Manning, Jennifer E., and Ida A. Brudnick. 2014. Women in the United States Congress, 1917–2014: Biographical and Committee Assignment Information, and Listings by State and Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine. 1993. “Women on the Bench: A Different Voice.” Judicature 77 (3): 126–28.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine, and Barry Pyle. 1999. “Gender, Race, and Partisanship on the Michigan Supreme Court.” Albany Law Review 63 (4): 1205–36.Google Scholar
Massie, T., S. W. Johnson, and S. M. Gubala. 2002. “The Impact of Gender and Race in the Decisions of Judges on the United States Courts of Appeals.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting. http://artsandsciences.sc.edu/poli/psrw/MassieJohnsonGubala.pdf.Google Scholar
Maveety, Nancy. 2002. “The Study of Judicial Behavior and the Discipline of Political Science.” In Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, ed. Nancy Maveety, 1–51. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen, and Paula A. Monopoli. 2012. “The Gendered State and Women’s Political Leadership: Explaining the American Puzzle.” In Feminist Constitutionalism: Global Perspectives, ed. Beverley Baines, Daphne Barak-Erez, and Tsvi Kahana, 169–87. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekki, Mustapha, ed. 2011. La féminisation des métiers de la justice. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2011. “Asylum in a Different Voice? Judging Immigration Claims and Gender.” In Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform, ed. Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Andrew Schoenholtz, and Philip Schrag, 202–26. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1974. “Legal Education There and Here: A Comparison.” Stanford Law Review 27 (3): 859–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry, and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo. 2007. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1987. “The Supreme Court Term 1986 Forward: Justice Engendered.” Harvard Law Review 101 (10): 10–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat Baron de. 1989. Montesquieu: The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. Anne M. Cohler, Basia M. Miller, and Harold S. Stone. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Bruce Allen. 2014. Scalia: A Court of One. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart, and Lenore Weitzman. 1972. “Sex and the Unbiased Jury.” Judicature 56 (3): 108–11.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara. 2002. “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the Supreme Court’s Reaction to Its Second Female Member.” Women and Politics 24 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Edwin W. 1951. “The Case Method in American Legal Education: Its Origins and Objectives.” Journal of Legal Education 4:1–24.Google Scholar
Peresie, Jennifer L. 2005. “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decision Making in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Yale Law Journal 114 (7): 1759–90.Google Scholar
Ringhand, Lori A., and Paul M. Collins. 2011. “May It Please the Senate: An Empirical Analysis of the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings of Supreme Court Nominees, 1939–2009.” American University Law Review 60 (3): 590–642.Google Scholar
Sager, L. G. 1996. “The Sources and Limits of Legal Authority.” In Fundamentals of American Law, ed. A. B. Morisson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike. 2013. “Introduction: Gender and Judging: Overview and Synthesis.” In Gender and Judging, ed. Ulrike Schultz and Gisela Shaw, 3–47. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2007. Parité! Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna. 1986a. “Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication.” Virginia Law Review 72 (3): 543–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna. 1986b. “The Gender of Judges.” Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice 4 (1): 159–70.Google Scholar
Smith, Susan Moloney. 1994. “Diversifying the Judiciary: The Influence of Gender and Race on Judging.” University of Richmond Law Review 28 (1): 179–204.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., and Kelley A. Crews-Meye. 2013. “Does Judge Gender Matter? Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 81 (3): 750–62.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Sue Davis, and Susan Haire. 1994. “A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts: Gender Effects in the Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Politics 56 (2): 425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotomayor, Sonia. 2014. My Beloved World. Repr. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Stevens, John Paul. 2011. Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2008. The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. Repr. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. 2009. The Constitution of the United States of America: A Contextual Analysis. Vol. 2: Constitutional Systems of the World. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Vogel, Louis. 1984. “Dynamics of Legal Systems and Legal Education: Interactions in the United States and Continental Europe.” Seton Hall Law Review 15 (4): 744–92.Google Scholar
Walker, Thomas G., and Deborah J. Barrow. 1985. “The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications.” Journal of Politics 47 (2): 596–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werdegar, Kathryn Mickle. 2001. “Why a Woman on the Bench?” Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 16 (1): 31–40.Google Scholar
Wermiel, Stephen, and Stern Seth Wermiel. 2010. Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Westergren, Sarah. 2003. “Gender Effects in the Courts of Appeals Revisited: The Data since 1994.” Georgetown Law Journal 92 (3): 689–708.Google Scholar
Wizner, Stephen, and Dennis Curtis. 1980. “‘Here’s What We Do’: Some Notes about Clinical Legal Education.” Faculty Scholarship Series, January. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1856.Google Scholar