Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:46:29.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Support for Nationalization and State Building in the Early American Republic

The Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Charles U. Zug
Charles U. Zug*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado–Colorado Springs, USA
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

House deliberations over healthcare legislation in 1798 show members of the Fifth US Congress debating the constitutional basis of small government assumptions about states’ rights and federal power, asking why the regime’s principles should not be understood as requiring direct federal intervention in the lives of socially and economically vulnerable groups irrespective of states’ authority. Extending the current scholarly debate over nationalization and state building in early American thought, I suggest that questions alleged by many scholars to have been excluded from political and constitutional debate in the early republic were, in cases like this, robustly contested.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Fall 2021 , pp. 283 - 304
Copyright
© 2021 Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Justin Wedeking and the four anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful criticisms and suggestions, as well as the participants of the 2019 Shawnee Trail Conference at the University of Colorado–Colorado Springs, who provided feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I am particularly grateful to Gary J. Jacobsohn for his support and for urging me to undertake this project in the first place.

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1998. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Adler, William. 2012. “State Capacity and Bureaucratic Autonomy in the Early United States.” Studies in American Political Development 26 (2): 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American State Papers. 1883. 5th Congress, 2nd Session. Foreign Relations: Vol. 1, pp. 44–46, No. 14. Speech of President John Adams. Washington, DC: Gales and Seaton.Google Scholar
Annals of Congress. 1798. 5th Cong., 2nd sess.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2011. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2013. “The New Originalism and the Uses of History.” Fordham Law Review 82 (2).Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian. 2009. A Government Out of Sight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Sotirios A. 2003. Welfare and the Constitution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy. 2012. “Still Unprecedented: Recycling the Same Two Examples of Supposed Economic Mandates.” Volokh Conspiracy, April 13.Google Scholar
Bell, Thomas R. 2018. “Perverse Politics: Recess Appointments, Noel Canning, and the Limits of Law.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Thomas R. 2019. “Perverse Politics: The Legal Subversion of the Constitution’s Political Architecture.” PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Campbell, Harry J. 1974. “The Congressional Debate over the Seaman’s Sickness and Disability Act of 1798.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48 (3): 423–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Currie, David. 2001. The Constitution in Congress: The Jeffersonians, 1801–1829. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dearborn, John A. 2019a. “The Political Efficacy of Ideas: Budgeting versus National Security Reform in the Development of the Modern Presidency.” Paper presented at the 2019 WPSA Conference.Google Scholar
Dearborn, John A. 2019b. “American Imperial Development.” Journal of Politics 81 (2): e44–e49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edling, Max. 2003. A Revolution in Favor of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elhauge, Einer. 2011. “The Irrelevance of the Broccoli Argument against the Insurance Mandate.” New England Journal of Medicine, December 21.Google Scholar
Elhauge, Einer. 2012a. “If Health Insurance Mandates Are Unconstitutional, Why Did the Founding Fathers Back Them?” New Republic, April 12.Google Scholar
Elhauge, Einer. 2012b. “A Response to Critics on the Founding Fathers and Health Insurance Mandates.” New Republic, April 18.Google Scholar
Fatovic, Clement. 2015. The Founding and the Idea of Economic Inequality. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1978. The Constitution between Friends. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James, and William Forbath. 2014. “The Anti-oligarchy Constitution.” Boston University Law Review 94: 671.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gerstle, Gary. 2015. Liberty and Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Phillip. 2012. “Phillip Hamburger on the Maritime Acts.” Volokh Conspiracy, April 19.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Phillip. 2014. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 2001. The Federalist, ed. George Carey and James McClellan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hatcher, William B. 1940. Edward Livingston. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
House Journal. December 26, 1797. 5th Cong., 2nd sess.Google Scholar
Jackson, Andrew. 1834. “President Jackson’s Message of Protest to the Senate.” Avalon Project. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ajack006.asp.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 1986. The Supreme Court and the Decline of Constitutional Aspiration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. 1997. “Governmental Institutions as Agents of Change: Rethinking American Political Development in the Early Republic, 1787–1835.” Studies in American Political Development 11 (2): 347–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, Dawn E. 2004. “Functional Departmentalism and Nonjudicial Interpretation: Who Determines Constitutional Meaning?” Law and Contemporary Problems 67 (3): 105–48.Google Scholar
King, Desmond, and Robert C. Lieberman. 2009. “Ironies of State Building.” World Politics 61 (3): 547–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopel, David. 2010. “An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen.” Volokh Conspiracy, April 2.Google Scholar
Larson, Edward J. 2016. George Washington, Nationalist. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 2002. “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. 2014. “Speech on the Dred Scott Decision at Springfield, Illinois, June 26, 1857.” In Lincoln’s Selected Writings, ed. David S. Reynolds. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 2009. The End of Liberalism. 40th anniversary ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry. 2012. Creating the Administrative Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Donald G. 1966. Congress and the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morone, James A. 2003. Hellfire Nation. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mullan, Fitzhugh. 1989. Plagues and Politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol, and Julie Novkov. 2014. State Building from the Margins. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, William J. 1996. The People’s Welfare. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Oberg, Barbara B., ed. 2009. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 1994. “Beyond the Iconography of Order.” In The Dynamics of American Politics, ed. Larry Dodd and Calvin Jillson. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen. 2011. “Have We Abandoned a Constitutional Perspective on American Political Development?” Review of Politics 73 (2), 295–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Richard, ed. 1845. Public Statutes at Large of the United States of America. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Post, Robert, and Reva Siegel. 2004. “Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy.” California Law Review 92:1027–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2018. “Present at the Creation: The State in Early American Political History.” Journal of the Early Republic 38 (1): 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 2014. “Ideas and the Spiral of Politics: The Place of American Political Thought in American Political Development.” American Political Thought 3 (1): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storing, Herbert J. 1982. What the Anti-federalists Were For. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert J. 1995. “The Problem of Big Government.” In Toward a More Perfect Union, ed. Joseph M. Bessette. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Syrett, Harold C., ed. 1966. Papers of Alexander Hamilton. Vol. 11. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, George. 2011. “A Reply to Orren and Skowronek.” Review of Politics 73 (2): 301–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, George. 2014. “Political Thought and Political Development.” American Political Thought 3 (1): 114–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. 1997. “Constitutional Abdication.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 47 (4): 1331–57.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. 2003. “Deliberation between Institutions.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. 2017 (1987). The Rhetorical Presidency. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K., and Nicole Mellow. 2018. Legacies of Losing in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 2012. “A 1798 ‘Federal Law Requiring the Seamen to Buy Hospital Insurance for Themselves’?” Volokh Conspiracy, April 13.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2002. “Conceptualizing Culture.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 713–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 1999. Constitutional Construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2005. “Hearing about the Constitution in Congressional Committees.” In Congress and the Constitution, ed. Keith Whittington and Neal Devins. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 2008. “Law and the American State, from the Revolution to the Civil War: Institutional Growth and Structural Change.” In Cambridge History of Law in America, ed. Michael Grossberg and Christopher Tomlins. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeisberg, Mariah. 2013. War Powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E., 2003. “Stephen Skowronek’s Building a New American State and the Origins of American Political Development.” Social Science History 27 (3): 425–41.Google Scholar
Zug, Charles U., and Connor M. Ewing. 2018. “What Happened to the State of the Union Address? Originally, It Helped the President and Congress Deliberate.” Washington Post, January 30.Google Scholar