Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:34:55.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promotion, Social Identity, and Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Jeffrey Budziak
Jeffrey Budziak*
Affiliation:
Western Kentucky University
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Presidents regularly fill judicial vacancies through promotion. However, the effect of promotion on judicial behavior has been largely unexplored. I theorize that promotion affects judicial behavior through psychological motives associated with social identity. I test this expectation by examining the decisions of promoted court of appeals judges. Promoted judges are less likely to vote to reverse, but this effect fades as appellate court experience increases. The effect is stronger when promoted judges review former colleagues. I argue that social identity theory best explains these patterns and discuss the importance of promotion and social identity for the study of judicial behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Fall 2016 , pp. 267 - 290
Copyright
© 2016 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks Larry Baum, Danny Lempert, Steve Wasby, three anonymous reviewers, and the editor for insights and advice on this work. He also thanks Nathan Dalrymple for his research assistance on this project. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Any errors contained herein are exclusively the responsibility of the author.

References

Baum, Lawrence. 1980. “Responses of Federal District Judges to Court of Appeals Policies: An Exploration.” Political Research Quarterly 33 (2): 217–24.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. 1982. “A Self-Presentational View of Social Phenomena.” Psychological Bulletin 91 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F. 1998. “The Self.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, 4th ed., ed. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner, 680–740. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Becker, Ernest. 1968. The Structure of Evil. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2009. Advice and Dissent: The Struggle to Shape the Federal Judiciary. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick C. 2016. U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Treul, Sarah A., Johnson, Timothy R., and Goldman, Jerry. 2011. “Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 73 (2): 572–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2010. Federal District Court Judge Ideology Data. http://clboyd.net/ideology.html.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2015. “The Hierarchical Influence of Courts of Appeals on District Courts.” Journal of Legal Studies 44 (1): 113–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braman, Eileen. 2012. “Embracing Complexity in Legal Decision Making: A Psychological Approach.” Law and Courts Newsletter 22 (3): 18–22.Google Scholar
Brenner, Saul, and Hagle, Timothy M. 1996. “Opinion Writing and Acclimation Effect.” Political Behavior 18 (3): 235–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55 (3): 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B., and Miller, Norman E. 1984. “Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspective in Desegregation.” In Groups in Conflict: The Psychology of Desegregation, ed. Brewer, Marilynn B. and Miller, Norman E., 123–46. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rupert. 2000. “Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (6): 745–78.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudeny, James J., and Ditslear, Corey. 2001. “Designated Diffidence: District Court Judges on the Courts of Appeals.” Law and Society Review 35 (3): 565–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Songer, Donald. 2000. “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Information Model of the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review 94 (1): 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Carrubba, Clifford J. 2012. “A Theory of Opinion Writing in a Political Hierarchy.” Journal of Politics 74 (2): 584–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan Matthew. 2002. Inside Appellate Courts: The Impact of Court Organization on Judicial Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Paul M. Jr., 2008. “The Consistency of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 861–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Paul M. Jr., 2012. “The Contribution of Psychology to Law and Courts Research.” Law and Courts Newsletter 22 (3): 6–12.Google Scholar
Collins, Paul M. Jr.,, and Martinek, Wendy L. 2011. “The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (1): 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Frank B., and Tiller, Emerson. 1998. “Judicial Partisan and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals.” Yale Law Journal 107 (7): 2155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Landes, William, and Posner, Richard A. 2013. The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Quinn, Kevin M., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2009. “Circuit Effects: How the Norm of Federal Judicial Experience Biases the Supreme Court.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157 (3): 833–80.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael W., Hettinger, Virginia A., and Peppers, Todd. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 623–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagle, Timothy M. 1993. “‘Freshman Effects’ for Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1142–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haire, Susan B., Songer, Donald R., and Lindquist, Stefanie A. 2003. “Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary: A Hierarchical Perspective.” Law and Society Review 37 (1): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., Spriggs, James F. II, and Stenger, Anthony A. 2013. “The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis.” Journal of Politics 75 (4): 894–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A., Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Martinek, Wendy L. 2003. “Acclimation Effects and Separate Opinion Writing in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (4): 792–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Rick H., Kernis, Michael H., Leary, Mark R., and Baldwin, Mark W. 1999. Selfhood: Identity, Esteem, Regulation. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., and Stefko, Joseph V. 2004. “Acclimation and Attitudes: ‘Newcomer’ Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 121–29.Google Scholar
Kaheny, Erin B., Brodie Haire, Susan, and Benesh, Sara C. 2008. “Change over Tenure: Voting, Variance and Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2011a. “Hierarchical and Collegial Politics on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Politics 73 (2): 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2011b. “Panel Composition and Voting on the United States Courts of Appeals over Time.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2013. “Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P., and Leoni, Eduardo L. 2007. “Using Graphs Instead of Tables in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (4): 755–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David E., and Mitchell, Gregory, eds. 2010. The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford Unviersity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, Drew Noble. 2011. “Acclimation Effects and the Chief Justice: The Influence of Tenure and Role on the Decisional Behavior of the Court’s Leader, 1888–2007.” American Politics Research 39 (4): 682–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R. 2012. “Political Constraints on Legal Doctrine: How Hierarchy Shapes the Law.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 765–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, Mark R., Haupt, Alison L., Strausser, Kristine S., and Chokel, Jason T. 1998. “Calibrating the Sociometer: The Relationship between Interpersonal Appraisals and the State Self-Esteem.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (5): 1290–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, Banks, and Curry, Brett. 2009. “Expertise, Experience, and Ideology on Specialized Courts: The Case of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.” Law and Society Review 43 (4): 839–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Banks, and Curry, Brett. 2013. “Experts Judging Experts: The Role of Expertise in Reviewing Agency Decision Making.” Law and Social Inquiry 38 (1): 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemacheck, Christine L. 2007. Strategic Selection: Presidential Nomination of Supreme Court Justices from Herbert Hoover through George W. Bush. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Randazzo, Kirk A. 2008. “Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in U.S. District Courts.” American Politics Research 36 (5): 669–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revesz, Richard L. 1997. “Environmental Regulation, Ideology, and the D.C. Circuit.” Virginia Law Review 83 (8): 1717–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C. K., and Carp, Robert A. 1996. Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Savchak, Elisha Carol, Hansford, Thomas G., Songer, Donald R., Manning, Kenneth L., and Carp, Robert A. 2006. “Taking It to the Next Level: The Elevation of District Court Judges to the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenker, Nathaniel, and Gentleman, Jane F. 2001. “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap between Confidence Intervals.” American Statistician 55 (3): 182–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kevin M. 2006. “Understanding Judicial Hierarchy: Reversals and the Behavior of Intermediate Appellate Judges.” Law and Society Review 40 (1): 163–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, Gregory C., Heise, Michael, and Morriss, Andrew P. 1998. “Charting the Influence on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning.” New York University Law Review 73 (5): 1377–1500.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R. 2008. The Original U.S. Appeals Courts Database, 1925–1996. Columbia, SC: Judicial Research Initiative.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court–Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 673–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Sheehan, Reginald S., and Haire, Susan B. 2000. Continuity and Change on the United States Courts of Appeals. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., Schkade, David, Ellman, Lisa M., and Sawicki, Andres. 2006. Are Judges Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, Michael G., Bundy, Robert P., and Flament, Claude. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2): 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Phillip E., Bernzweigh, Jane, and Gallant, Jack L. 1985. “Supreme Court Decision Making: Cognitive Style as a Predictor of Ideological Consistency of Voting.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (5): 1227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Sandra L., Camp Keith, Linda, Noble Lanier, Drew, and Ogundele, Ayo. 1998. “‘Acclimation Effects’ for Supreme Court Justices: A Cross-Validation, 1888–1940.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 690–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrightsman, Lawrence S. 1999. Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant? New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, Christopher, and Barnes Bowie, Jennifer. 2010. “Ideological Influence on Decision Making in the Federal Judicial Hierarchy: An Empirical Assessment.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1212–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuk, Gary, Barrow, Deborah J., and Gryski, Gerald S. 2004. Attributes of U.S. Federal Judges Database. Columbia, SC: Judicial Research Initiative.Google Scholar