Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Liebman, Benjamin L.
Roberts, Margaret
Stern, Rachel E.
and
Wang, Alice Z.
2017.
Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions: How to Use Text as Data in the Field of Chinese Law.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Tillman, Elizabeth A.
and
Hinkle, Rachael K.
2018.
Of Whites and men: How gender and race impact authorship of published and unpublished opinions in the US courts of appeals.
Research & Politics,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
Feldman, Adam
and
Gill, Rebecca D.
2019.
Power Dynamics in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: The Relationship between Gender and Justice-to-Justice Interruptions.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
173.
Boddery, Scott S.
Moyer, Laura P.
and
Yates, Jeff
2019.
Naming Names: The Impact of Supreme Court Opinion Attribution on Citizen Assessment of Policy Outcomes.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
353.
Och, Malliga
2020.
Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?.
Politics & Gender,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
388.
Patton, Dana
and
Smith, Joseph L.
2020.
Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments.
Journal of Women, Politics & Policy,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 4,
p.
393.
Gleason, Shane A.
2020.
Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 3,
p.
596.
Frankenreiter, Jens
and
Livermore, Michael A.
2020.
Computational Methods in Legal Analysis.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Moyer, Laura P.
Szmer, John
Haire, Susan
and
Christensen, Robert K.
2020.
Diversity, consensus, and decision making: evidence from the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
Politics, Groups, and Identities,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
822.
Liebman, Benjamin L.
Roberts, Margaret E.
Stern, Rachel E.
and
Wang, Alice Z.
2020.
Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
177.
Arstein-Kerslake, Anna
2021.
Legal Capacity & Gender.
p.
1.
Gleason, Shane A.
and
Ivy, Diana K.
2021.
As She Was Saying: The Role of Gender and Narratives in Oral Argument Amicus Success.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
416.
Horrigan, Matthew
2022.
Listening to interruptions: sonic dominance and sonic norms.
Sound Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
219.
Hack, Jonathan S.
and
Jenkins, Clinton M.
2022.
The Attorneys’ Gender: Exploring Counsel Success before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 3,
p.
632.
Eagly, Alice H.
and
Revelle, William
2022.
Understanding the Magnitude of Psychological Differences Between Women and Men Requires Seeing the Forest and the Trees.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 5,
p.
1339.
Chau, Bao Kham
and
Livermore, Michael A.
2023.
Studying Judicial Behavior with Text Analysis.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Gleason, Shane A.
and
Smart, EmiLee
2023.
You Think; Therefore I Am: Gender Schemas and Context in Oral Arguments at the Supreme Court, 1979–2016.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Stephenson, Amber L.
Dzubinski, Leanne M.
and
Diehl, Amy B.
2023.
A cross-industry comparison of how women leaders experience gender bias.
Personnel Review,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
BOYD, CHRISTINA L.
COLLINS, PAUL M.
and
RINGHAND, LORI A.
2024.
Gender, Race, and Interruptions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings.
American Political Science Review,
p.
1.
Black, Ryan C.
Johnson, Timothy R.
Owens, Ryan J.
and
Wedeking, Justin
2024.
Televised Oral Arguments and Judicial Legitimacy: An Initial Assessment.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 2,
p.
777.