Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:16:33.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Judicial Replacement

The Case of US State Supreme Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Nancy B. Arrington
Nancy B. Arrington*
Affiliation:
Emory University
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Employing a matching design on US state supreme court vacancies and replacements from 1970 to 2016, I demonstrate that patterns of judicial replacement are gendered. Vacancies made by women are filled by women at a greater rate than vacancies made by men, and vacancies made by men are filled by men at a greater rate than vacancies made by women. To examine whether these patterns of replacement have systematically suppressed or advantaged the selection of women judges, I compare judicial selections to the gender composition of lawyers. Women are selected to state supreme courts at rates that parallel the gender diversity of lawyers over time, which suggests that gendered patterns of replacement have neither advantaged nor excluded women from state supreme courts in the aggregate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , Spring 2018 , pp. 127 - 154
Copyright
© 2018 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thank you to Jeffrey Staton, Beth Reingold, Adam Glynn, the members of the Emory Law and Courts Working Group, and the reviewers for all their thoughtful feedback and suggestions.

References

Acker, Joan. 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21 (5): 565–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alozie, Nicholas O. 1988. “Black Representation on State Judiciaries.” Social Science Quarterly 69:979–86.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicholas O. 1990. “Distribution of Women and Minority Judges: The Effects of Judicial Selection Methods.” Social Science Quarterly 71 (2): 315–25.Google Scholar
Alozie, Nicholas O. 1996. “Selection Methods and the Recruitment of Women to State Courts of Last Resort.” Social Science Quarterly 77 (1): 110–26.Google Scholar
Andrews, Elaine. 2016. “Many Good Reasons for Gov. Walker to Appoint a Woman to the Alaska Supreme Court.” Anchorage Daily News, May 2.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakalar, Libby. 2016. “Wanting One Woman on Alaska Supreme Court Is Not ‘Reverse Sexism.’” Anchorage Daily News, May 4.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2006. “The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws: What Happens When You Kick Men Out and Let Women In?” Politics and Gender 2 (1): 102–9.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew D. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, K. A., and Spill, Rorie L. 2001. “Clinton and Diversification of the Federal Judiciary.” Judicature 84 (5): 256–61.Google Scholar
Bratton, K. A., and Spill, Rorie L. 2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 83 (2): 504–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbon, Susan, Houlden, Pauline, and Berkson, Larry. 1982. “Women on the State Bench: Their Characteristics and Attitudes about Judicial Selection.” Judicature 65 (6): 294–305.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen. 2006. “Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women’s Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament, 1900–1979.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 28 (2): 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Beverly Blair. 1978. “Women Judges: The End of Tokenism.” In Women in the Courts, ed. Hepperle, Winifred L. and Crites, Laura. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Cook, Beverly Blair. 1984. “Women Judges: A Preface to Their History.” Golden Gate University Law Review 14:573–610.Google Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2002. “Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Simon Rosenthal, Cindy, 370–96. Congressional Studies Series 4. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2008. “Gender Quotas—Controversial but Trendy.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 10 (3): 322–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind. 2009. “Female Justices, Feminism, and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-examination.” Working Paper no. 283, University of Chicago, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drachman, Virginia G. 2001. Sisters in Law: Women Lawyers in Modern American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Martin, Andrew D. 2003. “The Norm of Prior Judicial Experience and Its Consequences for Career Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court.” California Law Review 91:903–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin M., and Andersen, Seth S. 1999. “Diversity and the Judicial Merit Selection Process: A Statistical Report.” Research on Judicial Selection, 1999, 2–39.Google Scholar
Evans, David C. 2003. “A Comparison of the Other-Directed Stigmatization Produced by Legal and Illegal Forms of Affirmative Action.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (1): 121–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farhang, Sean, and Wawro, Gregory. 2004. “Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation under Panel Decision Making.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20 (2): 299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 717–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg. 2011. “Diversifying State Supreme Courts.” Law and Society Review 45 (3): 761–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Linda S. 2013. “Tokens, Role Models, and Pedagogical Politics: Lamentations of an African American Female Law Professor.” Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law, and Justice 6 (1): 81–92.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani, Fine, Michelle, Balin, Jane, Bartow, Ann, and Lee Stachel, Deborah. 1994. “Becoming Gentlemen: Women’s Experiences at One Ivy League Law School.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143 (1): 1–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E., Battle, William S., Keller, Chris E., and Andrew Lee, R.. 1998. “Type of Affirmative Action Policy: A Determinant of Reactions to Sex-Based Preferential Selection?” Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (2): 190–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilman, Madeline E., Block, Caryn J., and Lucas, Jonathan A. 1992. “Presumed Incompetent? Stigmatization and Affirmative Action Efforts.” Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (4): 536–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E., Block, Caryn J., and Stathatos, Peter. 1997. “The Affirmative Action Stigma of Incompetence: Effects of Performance Information Ambiguity.” Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 603–25.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie, Caul Kittilson, Miki, and Andrews Bond, Elizabeth. 2014. “Gender, High Courts, and Ideas about Representation in Western Europe.” In Representation: The Case of Women, ed. Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., 103–17. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iacus, Stefano M., King, Gary, and Porro, Giuseppe. 2011. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junn, Jane. 1997. Assimilating or Coloring Participation? Gender, Race, and Democratic Political Participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J. 2008. “Thinking about Gender and Judging.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 15 (1–2): 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Sally J. 2012. “Choosing Judges: A Bumpy Road to Women’s Equality and a Long Way to Go.” Michigan State Law Review 2012:1499–528.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J. 2013. Gender and Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J., and Windett, Jason. 2012. “Diffusion of Innovation or State Political Culture? Explaining the First Woman State Supreme Court Justices.” Paper prepared for the 2012 State Politics and Policy Conference, Houston. http://2012sppconference.blogs.rice.edu/files/2012/02/Kenney_Windett_SPPC_Draft.pdf.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Malami, Melissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2006. “The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals.” Political Analysis 14:131–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Gender Quotas, Norms, and Politics.” Politics and Gender 2 (1): 110–18.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, Judith Long. 1975. “The Psychology of Tokenism: An Analysis.” Sex Roles 1 (1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolick, David. 1991. “Women’s Milestone: Majority on Minnesota Court.” New York Times, February 22.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine. 1981. “Women on the Federal Bench: A Comparative Profile.” Judicature 65:306–13.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine. 1991. “Judicial Gender and Judicial Choices.” In Gender and Policymaking: Studies of Women in Office, ed. Dodson, Debra, 49–61. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Martin, Patricia Yancy, Reynolds, John R., and Keith, Shelley. 2002. “Gender Bias and Feminist Consciousness among Judges and Attorneys: A Standpoint Theory Analysis.” Signs 27 (3): 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, John H. 2014. Handbook of Biological Statistics. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Sparky House.Google Scholar
Milyo, Jeffrey, and Schosberg, Samantha. 2000. “Gender Bias and Selection Bias in House Elections.” Public Choice 105 (1–2): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Karen, and Segal, Jeffrey. 1990. “Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and the Supreme Court’s Reaction to Its First Female Member.” Women and Politics 10 (2): 95–103.Google Scholar
O’Regan, Valerie R. 2000. Gender Matters: Female Policymakers’ Influence in Industrialized Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 1997. “Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis.” Social Science Research 26 (4): 442–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and McGhee, Eric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics and Gender 9 (4): 439–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peresie, Jennifer L. 2005. “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Yale Law Journal 114:1759–90.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Redfield, Sarah E. 2009. “The Educational Pipeline to Law School—Too Broken and Too Narrow to Provide Diversity.” Pierce Law Review 8 (3): 347–81.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2008. Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2018. “Who Leads What? Legislative Leadership and Intersections of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity.” Working paper, Emory University.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, and Harrell, Jessica. 2010. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement: Does Party Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 280–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remiche, Adélaïde. 2015. “When Judging Is Power: A Gender Perspective on the French and American Judiciaries.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (1): 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rikleen, Lauren Stiller. 2015. “Women Lawyers Continue to Lag behind Male Colleagues: Report on the Ninth Annual NAWL National Survey on Retention and Promotion of Women in Law Firms.” National Association of Women Lawyers, Chicago.Google Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly 70 (4): 956–68.Google Scholar
Salmond, Rob. 2006. “Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2): 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Nancy, and Curry, Brett. 2010. “Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike, and Shaw, Gisela. 2013. “Introduction: Gender and Judging; Overview and Synthesis.” In Gender and Judging, ed. Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela. Oxford: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg, R. L. Spill, and Bratton, K. A.. 2005. “Diversifying the Federal Bench: Presidential Patterns.” Justice System Journal 26 (2): 119–33.Google Scholar
Summers, Russel J. 1991. “The Influence of Affirmative Action on Perceptions of a Beneficiary’s Qualifications.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21 (15): 1265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdini, Melody E., and Shortell, Christopher. 2016. “Women’s Representation in the Highest Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Appointment of Female Justices.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 865–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Margaret S. 2006. “In a Different Path: The Process of Becoming a Judge for Women and Men.” Judicature 90 (3): 104–13.Google Scholar
Williams, Margaret S. 2008. “Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Margaret S., and Thames, Frank C. 2008. “Women’s Representation on High Courts in Advanced Industrialized Countries.” Politics and Gender 4 (3): 451–71.Google Scholar