Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:04:25.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextualizing the “Black Box”

State Institutions, Trial Venue, and Civil Jury Verdicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Tao L. Dumas
Tao L. Dumas*
Affiliation:
The College of New Jersey
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars sometimes refer to the civil jury decision-making process as a “black box,” because researchers cannot view juries’ interior workings. However, state institutions structure the environment in which disputes arise and determine the rules courts apply, while environmental factors condition courts’ responses to claims. This article utilizes an original data set of civil jury verdicts in five states to examine the influence of cross-state institutional variation and trial location on courts’ dispute resolution and resource allocation functions. The results indicate that institutions and trial location significantly influence patterns of winners and losers, while case-specific factors predict the amount awarded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Fall 2016 , pp. 291 - 312
Copyright
© 2016 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Gerber, Alan. 1996. “The Effects of Filing Fees and Petition Requirements on U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21:249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avraham, Ronene. 2007. “Current Research on Medical Malpractice Liability.” Journal of Legal Studies 36:183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2003. “Judicial Elections and Judicial Independence: The Voters Perspective.” Ohio State Law Journal 64:13–29.Google Scholar
Bonneau, Chris. 2006. “Vacancies on the Bench: Open-Seat Elections for State Supreme Courts.” Justice System Journal 27:143–59.Google Scholar
Bonneau, Chris. 2007. “Campaign Fundraising in State Supreme Court Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 88:68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, Brian H. 1998. “From Compassion to Compensation: The Effect of Injury Severity on Mock Jurors’ Liability Judgments.” Journal of Applied Psychology 28:1477–1502.Google Scholar
Bornstein, Brian H., and Rajki, Michelle. 1994. “Extra-Legal Factors and Product Liability: The Influence of Mock Jurors’ Demographic Characteristics and Intuitions about the Cause of an Injury.” Behavioral Science and the Law 12:127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovbjerg, Ronald R., Sloan, Frank A., Dor, Avi, and Ruey Hsieh, Chee. 1991. “Juries and Justice: Are Malpractice and Other Personal Injuries Created Equal?” Law and Contemporary Problems 54:5–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Politics 52:360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Gann Hall, Melinda. 1993. “Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent.” Journal of Politics 55:914–35.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Gann Hall, Melinda. 1995. “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 48:5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Gann Hall, Melinda. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59:1206–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Melinda Gann Hall. 2001. “Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1:81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Richard. 1996. Regression Models: Censored, Sample Selected, or Truncated Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M. 2007. “Justice for Sale? Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisionmaking.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M., Bonneau, Chris, and Boyea, Brent. 2009. “Campaign Contributions in Judicial Decisions in Partisan and Nonpartisan Elections.” In New Directions in Judicial Politics, ed. McGuire, Kevin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chin, Audrey, and Peterson, Mark A. 1985. Deep Pockets, Empty Pockets: Who Wins in Cook County Jury Trials? Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Denove, Chris F., and Imwinkelried, Edward J. 1995. “Jury Selection: An Empirical Investigation of Demographic Bias.” American Journal of Trial Advocacy 19:285–341.Google Scholar
Diamond, Shari Seidman, Saks, Michael J., and Landsman, Stephan. 1998. “Juror Judgments about Liability and Damages: Sources of Variability and Ways to Increase Consistency.” DePaul Law Review 48:301–22.Google Scholar
Dumas, Tao L., and Haynie, Stacia L. 2012. “Building an Integrated Model of Trial Court Decision-Making: Predicting Plaintiff Success and Awards across Circuits.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 12:103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore. 1991. “The Relationship between Plaintiff Success before Trial and at Trial.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Statistics in Society 154:111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, LaFountain, Neil, Ostrom, Brian, Rottman, David, and Wells, Marin T. 2002. “Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study.” Cornell Law Review 87:743–68.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Wells, Martin. 2002. “Trial Outcomes and Demographics: Is There a Bronx Effect?” Texas Law Review 80:1839–62.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1990. “Connecting Litigation Levels and Legal Mobilization: Explaining Interstate Variation in Employment Civil Rights Litigation.” Law and Society Review 24:145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleisher, Richard. 1993. “Explaining the Change in Roll-Call Voting Behavior of Southern Democrats.” Journal of Politics 55:327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9:95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1999. “Farther Along.” Law and Society Review 33:1113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, Amihai, and Robbins, Marc. 1985. “Congressional Responsiveness to Constituency Change.” American Journal of Political Science 29:259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Deborah, Samis, Sarah, Bender, Edwin, and Weiss, Rachel. 2005. The New Politics of Judicial Elections. Washington, DC: Justice at Stake Campaign.Google Scholar
Greene, Edie, and Bornstein, Brian. 2003. Determining Damages: The Psychology of Jury Awards. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Samuel R., and Syverdu, Kent D. 1991. “Getting to No: A Study of Settlement Negotiations and the Selection of Cases for Trial.” Michigan Law Review 90:319–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haire, Susan Brodie, Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Hartley, Roger. 1999. “Attorney Expertise, Litigant Success, and Judicial Decision-Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Law and Society Review 33:667–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haire, Susan Brodie, and Moyer, Laura P. 2008. “Attorney Expertise, Litigant Success, and Judicial Decisionmaking in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Southern Illinois Law Review 32:596–609.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts and American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95:315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, Valerie P. 2008. “Faking It? Citizen Perceptions of Whiplash Injuries.” In Civil Juries and Civil Justice: Psychological and Legal Perspectives, ed. Bornstein, Brian et al. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., and Ermann, M. David. 1989. “Responses to Corporate versus Individual Wrongdoing.” Law and Human Behavior 13:151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., and Reyna, Valerie F. 2011. “To Dollars from Senses: Qualitative Translation in Jury Damage Awards.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8:120–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, Andrew F. 1999. “The Effect of Judicial Institutions on Uncertainty and the Rate of Litigation: The Election versus Appointment Status of Judges.” Journal of Legal Studies 28:205–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid, Schkade, David A., and Payne, John W. 1998. “A Case Study of Juror and Jury Judgments in Civil Cases: Deciding Liability for Punitive Damages.” Law and Human Behavior 22:287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Stacia L., and Sill, Kaitlyn. 2007. “Experienced Advocates and Litigation Outcomes: Repeat Players in the South African Supreme Court of Appeal.” Political Research Quarterly 60:443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47:153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O. 1994. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. 2nd ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Helland, Eric, and Tabarrock, Alexander. 2002. “The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Tort Awards.” American Law and Economics Review 4:341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helland, Eric, and Tabarrock, Alexander. 2003. “Race, Poverty, and American Tort Awards: Evidence from Three Data Sets.” Journal of Legal Studies 32:27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersch, Joni, and Viscusi, W. Kip. 2004. “Punitive Damages: How Judges and Juries Perform.” Journal of Legal Studies 33:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydebrand, Wolf V. 1977. “The Context of Public Bureaucracies: An Organizational Analysis of Federal District Courts.” Law and Society Review 11:759–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Gordon, Sanford C. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science 48:247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymann, David A., Black, Bernard, Silver, Charles, and Sage, William M. 2009. “Estimating the Effect of Damages Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases: Evidence from Texas.” Journal of Legal Analysis 1:355–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, John R. 1984. To Serve the People: Congress and Constituency Service. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., Wahlbeck, Paul J., and Spriggs, James F. 2006. “The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 100:99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Sherman. 2010. “A Message from ATRA President, Sherman Joyce.” November 14. http://www.atra.org/about/.Google Scholar
Kohler-Hausmann, Issa. 2011. “Community Characteristics and Tort Law: The Importance of County Demographic Composition and Inequality to Tort Trial Outcomes.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8:413–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2003. “The Government Gorilla: Why Does Government Come Out Ahead in Appellate Courts?” In In Litigation: Do the “Haves Still Come Out Ahead”? ed. Kritzer, Herbert M. and Silbey, Susan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leogrande, William, and Jeydel, Alana S. 1997. “Using Presidential Election Returns to Measure Constituency Ideology: A Research Note.” American Politics Quarterly 25:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCoun, Robert J. 1987. Getting Inside the Black Box: Toward a Better Understanding of Civil Jury Behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
MacCoun, Robert J. 1996. “Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the ‘Deep-Pockets’ Hypothesis.” Law and Society Review 30:121–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marder, Nancy S. 1998. “Juries and Damages: A Commentary.” DePaul Law Review 48:427–52.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 1995. “Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success.” Journal of Politics 57:187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Denise, ed. 2009a. The Alabama Jury Verdict Reporter. 8 vols.Google Scholar
Miller, Denise, ed. 2009b. The Indiana Jury Verdict Reporter. 10 vols.Google Scholar
Miller, Denise, ed. 2009c. The Kentucky Jury Verdict Reporter. 12 vols.Google Scholar
Miller, Denise, ed. 2009d. The Tennessee Jury Verdict Reporter. 5 vols.Google Scholar
Moller, Erik K., Pace, Nicholas M., and Carroll, Stephen J. 1999. “Punitive Damages in Financial Injury Jury Verdicts.” Journal of Legal Studies 28:283–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nice, David, and Cohen, Jeffrey. 1983. “Ideological Consistency among State Party Delegations to the U.S. House, Senate, and National Conventions.” Social Science Quarterly 64:871–79.Google Scholar
Overland, Sean G. 2009. The Juror Factor: Race and Gender in America’s Civil Courts. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
Paik, Myungo, Black, Bernard S., Hyman, David A., and Silver, Charles. 2012. “Will Tort Reform Bend the Cost Curve? Evidence from Texas.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9:173–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, George, and Klein, Benjamin. 1984. “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation.” Journal of Legal Studies 13:1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Bryk, Anthony S. 2001. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, Jennifer K. 2005. “Evaluating Juries by Comparison to Judge.” Florida State University Law Review 32:443–77.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary R., and Vidmar, Neal. 2002. “The ‘Bronx Jury’: A Profile of Civil Jury Awards in New York Counties.” Texas Law Review 80:1889–99.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. K., Traficanti, Tina, and Vernon, Erin. 2010. “Every Jury Trial Is a Bench Trial: Judicial Engineering of Jury Disputes.” In The Psychology of Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Klein, David and Mitchell, Gregory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H., and Shepherd, Joanna M. 2007. “Tort Reform and Accidental Deaths.” Journal of Law and Economics 50:221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saks, Michael J. 2002. “Trial Outcomes and Demographics: Easy Assumptions versus Hard Evidence.” Texas Law Review 80:1877–87.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Joan, Browne, Mark, and Duck Lee, Han. 1997. “The Effects of State Tort Reforms on Claim Filings.” Risk Management and Insurance Review 1:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamon, Neal I., ed. 2009. Personal Injury Judgments Hawaii. 6 vols.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna M. 2008. “Tort Reforms’ Winners and Losers: The Competing Effects of Care and Activity Levels.” UCLA Law Review 55:905–77.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna M. 2009. “Money, Politics, and Impartial Justice.” Duke University Law Journal 58:623–85.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Kuersten, Ashlyn, and Kaheny, Erin. 2000. “Why the Haves Don’t Always Come Out Ahead: Repeat Players Meet Amici Curiae for the Disadvantaged.” Political Research Quarterly 53:537–56.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Sheehan, Reginald S., and Brodie Haire, Susan. 1999. “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter’s Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925–1988.” Law and Society Review 33:811–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Ronald M., Geoghegan, Kathy, Myers, John G., Sirinek, Kenneth R., Corneille, Michael G., Mueller, Deborah, Dent, Daniel L., Wolf, Steven E., and Pruitt, Basil A. Jr. 2011. “Malpractice Risk and Cost Are Significantly Reduced after Tort Reform.” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 212:463–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, Cass R., Hastie, Reid, Payne, John W., Schkade, David A., and Viscusi, W. Kip. 2002. Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmer, John, Johnson, Susan W., and Sarver, Tammy A. 2007. “Does the Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada.” Law and Society Review 41:279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabarrock, Alexander, and Helland, Eric. 1999. “Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards.” Journal of Law and Economics 42:157–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar, Neil. 1995. Medical Malpractice and the American Jury: Confronting Myths about Jury Incompetence, Deep Pockets, and Outrageous Damage Awards. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidmar, Neil, Gross, Felicia, and Rose, Mary. 1998. “Jury Awards for Medical Malpractice and Post-verdict Adjustments of Those Awards.” DePaul Law Review 48:265–72.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil, and Rice, Jeffery J. 1993. “Assessments of Noneconomic Damage Awards in Medical Malpractice: A Comparison of Jurors and Legal Professionals.” Iowa Law Journal 78:883–911.Google Scholar
Waldfogel, Joel. 1995. “The Selection Hypothesis and the Relationship between Trial and Plaintiff Victory.” Journal of Political Economy 103:229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Stanton, Cartwright, Bliss, Kagan, Robert A., and Friedman, Lawrence M. 1987. “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in the State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970.” Law and Society Review 21:403–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Jeff, Creel Davis, Belinda, and Glick, Henry R. 2001. “The Politics of Torts: Explaining Litigation Rates in the American States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1:128–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Jeff, Tankersley, Holley, and Brace, Paul. 2010. “Assessing the Impact of State Judicial Structures on Citizen Litigiousness.” Political Research Quarterly 63:796–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeiler, Kathryn. 2010. “Medical Malpractice Liability Crisis or Patient Compensation Crisis?” DePaul Law Review 59:675–93.Google Scholar