Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:30:16.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Empirical Analysis of “Tort Tales”

How Cultural Memes Influence Attitudes on Tort Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Neil Malhotra*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
*
Contact the corresponding author, Neil Malhotra, at [email protected].

Abstract

This research note investigates how “tort tales”—cultural memes about the American civil legal system—affect citizens’ attitudes on tort reform. While legal scholarship has extensively analyzed “tort tales” using qualitative approaches, this analysis introduces quantitative methods from political psychology. I explore a case study of Stella Liebeck, the woman who spilled coffee on herself and successfully sued McDonald’s. An experiment embedded in an original survey of 742 Americans shows that exogenously providing people with information about the legal urban legend increased support for tort reform. Further, those with incorrect interpretations of the story are most supportive of tort reform initiatives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2015 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertson, Bethany, and Shana Kushner Gadarian. 2014. “Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information.Political Psychology 35:133–64.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W., and Lee Postman. 1947. The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Brian F. Schaffner. 2011. “Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-mode Comparison.” Working Paper 1868229, Social Science Research Network.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Paul, and Michael Asimow. 2006. Reel Justice. Kansas City, MO: McMeel.Google Scholar
Brunvand, Jan H. 1981. The Vanishing Hitchhiker: American Urban Legends and Their Meanings. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Degh, Linda. 1971. “The ‘Belief Legend’ in Modern Society.” In American Folk Legend: A Symposium, ed. W. D. Hand, 55–68. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degh, Linda. 1994. American Folklore and the Mass Media. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1980. “The Kentucky Fried Rat: Legends and Modern Society.Journal of the Folklore Institute 17:222–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. 2005. “Social Cognition and the Normality of Prejudgment.” In On the Nature of Prejudice, ed. John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, and Laurie A. Rudman, 36–53. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1998. “An Oil Strike in Hell: Contemporary Legends about the Civil Justice System.Arizona Law Review 40:717–52.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 2005. “CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll.” January 7–9.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2007. “Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling.Statistical Science 22:153–64.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Haltom, William, and Michael McCann. 2004. Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Melissa A., and John Reynolds. 2009. “Incorporating Categorical Information into Regression Models: The Utility of Dummy Variables.” In Handbook of Data Analysis, ed. Melissa A. Hardy and Alan Bryman, 209–36. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Heath, Chip, Chris Bell, and Emily Sternberg. 2001. “Emotional Selection in Memes: The Case of Urban Legends.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11:1028–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 2006. “How Much Do Conservative Tort Tales Matter?Law and Social Inquiry 31:711–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohm, Steven A. 2006. “The People’s Law versus Judge Judy Justice: Two Models of Law in American Reality-Based Courtroom TV.Law and Society Review 40:693–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Jonathan M., and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2008. “Reassessing the Role of Anxiety in Vote Choice.Political Psychology 29:275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 1997. “Voting Correctly.American Political Science Review 91:585–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael, William Haltom, and Anne Bloom. 2001. “Java Jive: Genealogy of a Juridical Icon.University of Miami Law Review 56:113–78.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.American Journal of Political Science 44:301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Douglas. n.d. “Sample Matching: Representative Sampling from Internet Panels.” Available at http://www.polimetrix.com/documents/YGPolimetrixSampleMatching.pdf.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saladoff, Susan. 2011. Hot Coffee. Home Box Office.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.Cognitive Psychology 5:207–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn, and Douglas Rivers. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18:355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joshua C., and Erin Ackerman. 2012. “‘Tort Tales’ and TV Judges: Amplifying, Modifying, or Countering the Antitort Narrative?Law and Society Review 46:105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar