Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:25:07.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Court Influence on US Supreme Court Opinions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Jennifer Bowie  and
Elisha Carol Savchak
Jennifer Bowie*
Affiliation:
University of Richmond, USA
Elisha Carol Savchak
Affiliation:
Elon University, USA
*
Contact the corresponding author, Jennifer Bowie, at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite our understanding that the US Supreme Court influences lower courts in a top-down fashion, we examine whether state courts influence Supreme Court work, namely, its majority opinions. This study of lower court influence on Supreme Court opinion writing investigates whether and when justices borrow language from state court opinions. While our fundamental interest is in whether the writings of state court judges are influential in Supreme Court opinions, we further investigate whether justices’ biases against elected judiciaries and favor for appointed systems play a role here. Our original data set includes Supreme Court cases reviewing state court decisions from 1995 to 2015. Results show that the potential for lower court influence differs for appointed versus elected state court judges, lending valuable insight into the discussion of judicial power and institutional design. Meanwhile, state courts play an important role in the development of law at the Supreme Court.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 2022 , pp. 139 - 165
Copyright
© 2022 Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A prior version of this article was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 31–September 4, 2017. We would like to thank Chantel Baker for her invaluable research assistance. Replication materials are available in the JLC Dataverse at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/KMRWUS.

References

Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2016. U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Louis A. 2016. WCopyfind. http://plagiarism.bloomfieldmedia.com/z-wordpress/software/wcopyfind/.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam, and Maya Sen. 2017. “The Politics of Selecting the Bench from the Bar: The Legal Profession and Partisan Incentives to Introduce Ideology into Judicial Selection.” Journal of Law and Economics 60 (4): 559–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris, and Melinda G. Hall. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris. 2016. Judicial Elections in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Terry. 1995. “Consensual Norms and the Freshman Effect on the United States Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 76 (1): 222–31.Google Scholar
Bowen, Terry, and John M. Scheb II. 1993. “Freshman Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1921–1991.” Judicature 76 (5): 239–43.Google Scholar
Bowie, Jennifer, and Elisha Carol Savchak. 2019. “Understanding the Determinants of Opinion Language Borrowing in State Courts.” In Research Handbook on Law and Courts, ed. Susan M. Sterett and Lee Demetrius Walker, 267–79. Northampton, MA: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Jennifer Barnes, and Donald R. Songer. 2009. “Assessing the Applicability of Strategic Theory to Explain Decision Making on the Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2): 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Jennifer Barnes, Donald R. Songer, and John Szmer. 2014. The View from the Bench and Chambers: Examining Judicial Process and Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann Hall. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1206–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Laura Langer, and Melinda Gann Hall. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics 62 (1): 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Rorie L. Spill. 2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 83 (2): 504–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Saul, and Timothy M. Hagle. 1996. “Opinion Writing and Acclimation Effect.” Political Behavior 18 (3): 235–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1983. “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts.” Political Behavior 5 (1): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts.” American Political Science Review 79 (1): 178–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory, and John R. Wright. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82 (4): 1109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Tom S. Clark, and Jason P. Kelly. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review 108 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Tom S. Clark, and Jee-Kwang Park. 2012. “Judicial Independence and Retention Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (2): 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon. 2007. “Beyond Accountability and Independence: Judicial Selection and State Court Performance.” Judicature 90 (5): 226–32.Google Scholar
Carp, Robert, and C. K. Rowland. 1983. Policymaking and Politics in the Federal District Courts. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., G. Mitu Gulati, and Eric A. Posner. 2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather Than Appointed Judiciary.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 26 (2): 290–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Paul M., Jr., Pamela Corley, and Jesse Hamner. 2014. “Me Too? An Investigation of Repetition in U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Briefs.” Judicature 97 (5): 228–34.Google Scholar
Collins, Paul M. 2015. “The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content.” Law and Society Review 49 (4): 917–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C. 2008. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Influence of Party Briefs.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (3): 468–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., Paul M. Collins Jr., and Bryan Calvin. 2011. “Lower Court Influence on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. 2013. The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., and Justin Wedeking. 2014. “The (Dis)advantage of Certainty: The Importance of Certainty in Language.” Law and Society Review 48 (1): 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 2007. Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Andrew D. Martin. 2003. “The Norm of Prior Judicial Experience and Its Consequences for Career Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court.” California Law Review 91 (4): 903–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Judicial Center. 2020. Judicial Writing Manual: A Pocket Guide for Judges. 4th ed. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Fettig, Shawn C., and Sara C. Benesh. 2016. “Be Careful with My Court: Legitimacy, Public Opinion, and the Chief Justices.” In The Chief Justice: Appointment and Influence, ed. David J. Danelski and Artemus Ward, 374–94. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fix, Michael P., and Bailey R. Fairbanks. 2020. “The Effect of Opinion Readability on the Impact of U.S. Supreme Court Precedents.” Social Science Quarterly 101 (2): 811–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, Michael P., and Benjamin Kassow. 2020. US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, Michael P., Justin T. Kingsland, and Matthew D. Montgomery. 2017. “The Complexities of State Court Compliance with U.S. Supreme Court Precedent.” Justice System Journal 38 (2): 149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2012. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg, and Damon M. Cann. 2014. “Judicial Independence and Opinion Clarity on State Supreme Courts.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 14 (2): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H., and Keith Hope. 1972. “Occupational Grading and Occupation Prestige.” In The Analysis of Social Mobility, ed. Keith Hope, 1–73. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hagle, Timothy M. 1993. “‘Freshman Effects’ for Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1142–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics 49 (November): 1117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 54 (May): 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95 (2): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2016. “Celebrity Justice: Supreme Court Edition.” Green Bag 19 (2D): 157–73.Google Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia, Stefanie Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2003. “Acclimation Effects and Separate Opinion Writing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (4): 792–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences of Federal Appellate Decision Making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Rachael K., Andrew D. Martin, Jonathan David Shaub, and Emerson H. Tiller. 2012. “A Positive Theory and Empirical Analysis of Strategic Word Choice in District Court Opinions.” Journal of Legal Analysis 4 (2): 407–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Sanford C. Gordon. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David, and Darby Morrisroe. 1999. “The Prestige and Influence of Individual Judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Legal Studies 28 (2): 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Bert M. 2015. Justices on the Ballot: Continuity and Change in State Supreme Court Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Meghan E., and Joseph V. Ross. 2016. “Understanding the Length of State Supreme Court Opinions.” American Politics Research 44 (4): 710–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Claire S. H. 2013. “Preferences and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials: Evidence from State Trial Court Judges.” American Economic Review 103 (4): 1360–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melone, Albert P. 1990. “Revisiting the Freshman Effect Hypothesis: The First Two Terms of Justice Anthony Kennedy.” Judicature 74 (6): 6–13.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1954. “The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950.” Stanford Law Review 6 (4): 613–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1977. “Toward a Theory of Citations: An Empirical Study of the Citation Practice of the California Supreme Court in 1950, 1960, and 1970.” Southern California Law Review 50 (3): 381–428.Google Scholar
Miller, Jess. 2013. “Lawyers and Opera: Supreme Court Edition.” Chautauquan Daily, July 29. https://chqdaily.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/lawyers-and-opera-supreme-court-edition/.Google Scholar
Mott, Rodney L. 1936. “Judicial Influence.” American Political Science Review 30 (2): 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Rachel K. Hinkle. 2018. “Crafting the Law: How Opinion Content Influences Legal Development.” Justice System Journal 39 (2): 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, David M. 1997. “The Rehnquist Court’s Shrinking Plenary Docket.” Judicature 81 (2): 58–65.Google Scholar
O’Brien, David M. 2020. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. 12th ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., and David A. Simon. 2012. “Explaining the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Docket.” William and Mary Law Review 53 (4): 1219–86.Google Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., Alexander Tahk, Patrick C. Wohlfarth, and Amanda C. Bryan. 2015. “Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts: An Empirical Examination of Selection and Retention Methods.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 15 (2): 211–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., and Justin Wedeking. 2011. “Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions.” Law and Society Review 45 (4): 1027–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., Justin Wedeking, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (1): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretti, Terri L. 2007. “Where Have All the Politicians Gone? Recruiting for the Modern Supreme Court.” Judicature 91 (3): 112–22.Google Scholar
Perry, H. W., Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2005. “Judicial Behavior and Performance: An Economic Approach.” Florida State University Law Review 32 (4): 1259–80.Google Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. 2006. “Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Lawmaking.” University of Chicago Law Review 73 (3): 933–64.Google Scholar
Randazzo, Kirk A., Richard W. Waterman, and Jeffrey A. Fine. 2006. “Checking the Federal Courts: The Impact of Congressional Statutes on Judicial Behavior.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 1003–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice, and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16 (4): 652–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Michael K., and Todd A. Curry. 2020. Creating the Law: State Supreme Court Opinions and the Effect of Audiences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2007. “Roberts’s Rules.” Atlantic, January–February. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/01/robertss-rules/305559/.Google Scholar
Savchak, Elisha Carol, and Jennifer Barnes Bowie. 2016. “A Bottom-Up Account of State Supreme Court Opinion Writing.” Justice System Journal 37 (2): 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, and Bryan A. Garner. 2008. Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges. St. Paul, MN: Thomas/West.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Christopher W. 2013. “Beyond the Opinion: Supreme Court Justices and Extrajudicial Speech.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 88 (2): 487–528.Google Scholar
Schoenherr, Jessica A., and Ryan C. Black. 2019. “The Use of Precedents in U.S. Supreme Court Litigant Briefs.” In Research Handbook on Law and Courts, ed. Susan M. Sterett and Lee Demetrius Walker, 114–29. Northampton, MA: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kevin M. 2006. “Understanding Judicial Hierarchy: Reversals and the Behavior of Intermediate Appellate Judges.” Law and Society Review 40 (1): 163–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Mark. 2018. “Roberts, Trump Spar in Extraordinary Scrap over Judges.” AP News, November 21. http:// https://apnews.com/article/c4b34f9639e141069c08cf1e3deb6b84.Google Scholar
Smith, Christopher E., Joyce Ann Baugh, Thomas R. Hensley, and Scott Patrick Johnson. 1994. “The First-Term Performance of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.” Judicature 78 (2): 74–80.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court–Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 673–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J., Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, Theodore J. Ruger, and Sara C. Benesh. 2017. Supreme Court Database. Version 2017. Release 01. http://Supremecourtdatabase.org.Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F., II. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (3): 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudt, Nancy, Barry Friedman, and Lee Epstein. 2008. “On the Role of Ideological Homogeneity in Generating Consequential Constitutional Decisions.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2): 361–86.Google Scholar
van Geel, T. R. 2008. Understanding Supreme Court Opinions. 6th ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, Sandra L., Linda Camp Keith, Drew Noble Lanier, and Ayo Ogundele. 1998. “‘Acclimation Effects’ for Supreme Court Justices: A Cross-Validation, 1888–1940.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 690–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wydick, Richard C. 1998. Plain English for Lawyers. 5th ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael, and Justin Wedeking. 2020. “The Sources and Consequences of Political Rhetoric.” Journal of Law and Courts 8 (2): 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar