Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:53:33.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Courts and Pocketbooks

Macroeconomic Judicial Behavior across Methods of Judicial Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Douglas Rice
Douglas Rice*
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars studying judicial behavior have identified a host of factors theoretically and empirically connected to judicial decision making. One recent theory identifies economic conditions—which have implications for the decisions of voters and politicians—as influencing the voting behavior of US Supreme Court justices. Yet the US Supreme Court is a unique judicial institution addressing limited—though indisputably important—economic cases every year. State courts, on the other hand, address a multitude of issues every year with economic ramifications. Building on the rich body of literature examining state courts of last resort, I analyze whether judges, across a variety of methods for judicial selection and retention, respond to temporary changes in the state of the economy. Results indicate that the responses of state supreme court judges to changes in the state of the economy are conditional on the electoral vulnerability of the justice. This research thus offers considerable insight into judicial behavior under different selection mechanisms and the conditional influence of the state of the economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Fall 2014 , pp. 327 - 347
Copyright
© 2014 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Michael Berkman, Tom Clark, David Klein, Chris Zorn, and several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this research.

References

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1995. “Economics, Issues, and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 39:714–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “Economics, Entitlements and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 42:1349–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna, and Partin, Randall. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89 (1): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna, and Partin, Randall. 1998. “Economic and Referendum Voting and the Problem of Data Choice: A Reply.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 1003–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Delia, and Alimadhi, Ferdinand. 2007. “logit.mixed: Mixed Effects Logit Model.” In Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software, by Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.Google Scholar
Baker, Scott, Feibelman, Adam, and Marshall, William. 2009. “Justices as Economic Fixers: A Response to a Macrotheory of the Court.” Duke Law Journal 58 (7): 1627–44.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2003. “Judicial Elections and Judicial Independence: The Voter’s Perspective.” Ohio State Law Journal 64:13–41.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan, and Owens, Ryan. 2009. “Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence.” Journal of Politics 71:1062–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina, Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54:389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul. 2007. “State Supreme Court Data Project.” http://www.ruf.rice.edu/˜pbrace/statecourt/.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52:360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Gann Hall, Melinda. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59:1206–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Gann Hall, Melinda. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics 62:387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Thomas, Epstein, Lee, and Staudt, Nancy. 2009a. “Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court.” Duke Law Journal 58:1191–1230.Google Scholar
Brennan, Thomas, Epstein, Lee, and Staudt, Nancy. 2009b. “The Political Economy of Judging.” Minnesota Law Review 93:1503–34.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory, Wright, John, and Zorn, Christopher. 1999. “Strategic Voting and Gatekeeping in the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (3): 549–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory, and Zorn, Christopher. 1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42:874–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom, and Kelly, Jason. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review 108 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom, and Jee-Kwang Park. 2012. “Judicial Independence and Retention Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (2): 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas, and Wright, Gerald. 1998a. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas, and Wright, Gerald. 1998b. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections: A Rejoinder.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 1008–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela. 1985. “The Impact of Group Economic Interests on Political Evaluations.” American Politics Quarterly 13:139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Mackuen, Michael, and Stimson, James. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Wright, Gerald, and McIver, John. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23:485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95:315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Bonneau, Chris. 2006. “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1982. “The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 26:312–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory, and Gordon, Sanford. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science 48:217–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. 2007. Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan, Heather Larsen-Price, and Wilkerson, John. 2009. “Representation and American Governing Institutions.” Journal of Politics 71:277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan. 2007. “Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23:421–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1978. “Explaining Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 71:44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11:129–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65:131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura, and Wilhelm, Teena. 2005. “The Ideology of State Supreme Court Chief Justices.” Judicature 89 (2): 78–86.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey, and Phillips, Justin. 2009. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad. 1991. “Prospective Economic Voting in U.S. House Elections, 1956–88.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (2): 239–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32:137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory. 1992. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on Presidential Voting, 1956–1988.” American Journal of Political Science 36:829–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57:45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard, Stanley, Harold, and Vogel, Ronald. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 936–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Economic Review 77 (2): 293–97.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, Herman. 1941. “Division of Opinion among Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1939–1941.” American Political Science Review 35 (5): 890–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Mark, and Kritzer, Herbert. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96:305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudt, Nancy, and He, Yilei. 2010. “The Macroeconomic Court: Rhetoric and Implications of New Deal Decision-Making.” Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy 5:87–117.Google Scholar
Stimson, James, Mackuen, Michael, and Erikson, Robert. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Ernest, and Blondel, Erin. 2009. “Does the Supreme Court Follow the Economic Returns? A Response to a Macrotheory of the Court.” Duke Law Journal 58:1759–82.Google Scholar