Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T11:59:35.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Colin Glennon  and
Logan Strother
Colin Glennon
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Logan Strother*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
Contact the corresponding author, Logan Strother, at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Judicial politics scholars routinely posit that the behavior of Supreme Court justices is motivated in important part by concerns of institutional maintenance, that is, by a desire to maintain the Court’s unusually large store of institutional legitimacy. Previous work on this topic, however, has focused almost exclusively on the influence of such motivation on judicial decision making. We contend that if institutional maintenance is an important goal, it should be observable in other contexts as well. We examine televised mass-media interviews with Supreme Court justices from 1998 to 2016 and find that legitimacy reinforcement is the predominant goal reflected in justices’ rhetoric in those interviews.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Fall 2019 , pp. 241 - 261
Copyright
© 2019 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors thank Chris Krewson, Mikel Norris, and the anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Alito, Samuel. 2009. Interview by Brian Lamb, C-SPAN, September 2.Google Scholar
American, Press Institute. 2014. “How Americans Get Their News.” https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/how-americans-get-news/.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex. 2016. “The Public’s Motivated Response to Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Justice System Journal 37 (4): 318–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A., and Amy, Gangl. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media’s Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology 27 (4): 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher, D. Johnston. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 184–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” Journal of Politics 68 (3): 697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2016. “Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 788–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., Lee, Epstein, and Andrew, D. Martin. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braman, Eileen. 2016. “Exploring Citizen Assessments of Unilateral Executive Authority.” Law and Society Review 50 (1): 189–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braman, Eileen and Beth, Easter. 2014. “Normative Legitimacy: Rules of Appropriateness in Citizens’ Assessments of Individual Judicial Decisions.” Justice System Journal 35 (3): 239–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. 1999. Interview by Bill Moyers, Frontline, PBS, November 23.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. 2009. Interview by Brian Lamb, C-SPAN, June 17.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1987. The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2010. All Judges Are Political—except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2011. “The Rule of Law Is Dead! Long Live the Rule of Law!” In What’s Law Got to Do with It? What Judges Do, Why They Do It, and What’s at Stake, ed. Charles Geyh, 306–27. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James, L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, Christopher, Peter K. Enns and Patrick, C. Wohlfarth. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and David, M. Glick. 2015a. “Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and David, M. Glick. 2015b. “Issue-Specific Opinion Change: The Supreme Court and Health Care Reform.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79 (4): 881–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 971–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Cornell and Howard Gillman, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Celia. 1996. “The Sociology of Professions and the Profession of Gender.” Sociology 30 (4): 661–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Stephen M. 2011. American Politicians Confront the Court: Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farganis, Dion and Justin, Wedeking. 2011. “‘No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews’: An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Nominee Candor from Harlan to Kagan.” Law and Society Review 45 (3): 525–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2006. “Taking Law Seriously.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 23 (3): 469–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Milton, Lodge, and Benjamin, Woodson. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law and Society Review 48 (4): 837–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Michael, J. Nelson. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10:201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Michael W., Bethany, Blackstone, and Richard, L. Vining. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 70 (2): 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 2009. Interview by Brian Lamb, C-SPAN, July 1.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 2014. Interview by Marvin Kalb, C-SPAN, April 17.Google Scholar
Haire, Susan B., and Laura, P. Moyer. 2015. Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the US Court of Appeals. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 352–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2016. “Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination: Reframing, Resolving, and Replacing the (Counter) Majoritarian Difficulty.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (2): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., and Theiss-Morse., E. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Elena. 2010. Interview by Susan Swain, C-SPAN, December 9.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2016a. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning Is and How to Measure It.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0417.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2016b. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 2: Unanswered Questions.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2007. “Party, Policy, or Duty: Why Does the Supreme Court Invalidate Federal Statutes?” American Political Science Review 101 (2): 321–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2010. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M., and Logan, Strother. 2016. “Judicial Impact.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Anthony. 1999. Interview by Bill Moyers, Frontline, PBS, November 23.Google Scholar
Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Rorie, Spill Solberg. 2007. “Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts: Explaining Justices’ Responses to Constitutional Challenges.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (1): 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linos, Katerina and Kimberly, Twist. 2016. “The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods.” Journal of Legal Studies 45 (2): 223–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Sandra Day. 2002. Interview by Charlie Rose, Charlie Rose, PBS, February 28.Google Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L., Brett, W. Curry, and Bryan, W. Marshall. 2011. Decision Making by the Modern Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Barbara A. 1999. The Priestly Tribe: The Supreme Court’s Image in the American Mind. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Roberts, John. 2009. Interview by Susan Swain, C-SPAN, June 19.Google Scholar
Ross, William G. 1988. “Extrajudicial Speech: Charting the Boundaries of Propriety.” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 2:589–632.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 2008. Interview by Lesley Stahl, 60 Minutes, April 27.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 2012. Interview by Brian Lamb, C-SPAN, July 19.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 2014. Interview by Marvin Kalb, C-SPAN, April 17.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold, J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Chad, Westerland, and Stefanie, A. Lindquist. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, Margaret, Todd L. Pittinsky and Nalini, Ambady. 1999. “Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance.” Psychological Science 10 (1): 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Dan and Nicholas, Scurich. 2011. “Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (4): 709–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot and Jennifer, A. Segal. 1998. Television News and the Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotomayor, Sonia. 2013a. Interview by Barbara Walters, The View, ABC, May 6.Google Scholar
Sotomayor, Sonia. 2013b. Interview by Jon Stewart, The Daily Show, Comedy Central, January 21.Google Scholar
Stevens, John Paul. 2007. Interview by Howard Rosenburg, Nightline, ABC, January 2.Google Scholar
Stevens, John Paul. 2009. Interview by Brian Lamb, C-SPAN, June 24.Google Scholar
Stevens, John Paul. 2011. Interview by Charlie Rose, Charlie Rose, PBS, October 18.Google Scholar
Strother, Logan. 2016. “Beyond Kelo: An Experimental Study of Public Opposition to Eminent Domain.” Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2): 339–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strother, Logan. 2017. “How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases.” Political Communication 34 (4): 571–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strother, Logan. 2019. “Case Salience and the Influence of External Constraints on the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 7 (1): 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmer, John, Robert K. Christensen and Erin, B. Kaheny. 2015. “Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (2): 553–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2012. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Clarence. 2007. Interview by Steve Kroft, 60 Minutes, CBS, September 27.Google Scholar
Thomas, Clarence. 2009. Interview by Susan Swain, C-SPAN, June 29.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57:375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Kenneth, A. Rasinski. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law and Society Review 25 (3): 621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westin, Alan F. 1962. “Out-of-Court Commentary by United States Supreme Court Justices, 1790–1962: Of Free Speech and Judicial Lockjaw.” Columbia Law Review 62 (4): 633–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrightsman, Lawrence. 2006. The Psychology of the Supreme Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilis, Michael A. 2015. The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar