Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:15:50.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Symposium

Comments on Scholarship Measuring Judicial Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Kevin M. Quinn
Kevin M. Quinn*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, USA
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This issue of the Journal of Law and Courts features articles devoted to measuring the personality traits of US Supreme Court justices. In this brief comment, I attempt to do the following. First, I briefly summarize Hall et al. (2021) and Black et al. (2021). Here I pay special attention to some of the methodological issues that give rise to the disagreement between these authors. Second, I provide some general thoughts on the enterprise of attempting to measure personality traits of US Supreme Court justices. While I am generally skeptical of the utility of such an enterprise, I could be convinced of its value. Accordingly, I attempt to lay out what a skeptic like myself would like to see in order to be convinced of the intellectual value added of work in this area.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Fall 2021 , pp. 337 - 343
Copyright
© 2021 Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article was reviewed by the editor, Tom S. Clark.

References

Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2021. “On Estimating Personality Traits of US Supreme Court Justices.” Journal of Law and Courts 9 (2): 371–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Jack. 2010. “The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations.” Psychological Inquiry 21 (1): 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C. 2010. Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Greiner, D. James, and Donald B. Rubin. 2011. “Causal Effects of Perceived Immutable Characteristics.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (3): 775–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K., Gary E. Hollibaugh Jr., Jonathan D. Klingler, and Adam J. Ramey. 2021. “Attributes beyond Attitudes: Personality Traits on the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 9 (2): 345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396): 945–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mairesse, François, Marilyn A. Walker, Matthias R. Mehl, and Roger K. Moore. 2007. “Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30:457–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, James W., and Laura A. King. 1999. “Linguistic Styles: Language Use as an Individual Difference.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1296–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, Kevin M., Burt L. Monroe, Michael Colaresi, Michael H. Crespin, and Dragomir R. Radev. 2010. “How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 209–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar