Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T18:55:12.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insecure Institutions

A Survivalist Theory of Judicial Manipulation in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Gretchen Helmke ,
Yeonkyung Jeong  and
Jae-Eun C. Kim
Gretchen Helmke*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, USA
Yeonkyung Jeong
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, USA
Jae-Eun C. Kim
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, USA
*
Contact the corresponding author, Gretchen Helmke, at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most theories of judicial politics are built around explaining the puzzle of judicial independence. This article instead theorizes explicitly about the conditions under which politicians are prone to manipulate their courts. By positing that courts can partly endogenously shape leaders’ fate at the hands of legislative opponents, we argue that greater political insecurity leads presidents to gut judicial independence, not shore it up. Drawing on a novel data set of judicial crises across 18 Latin American countries following the third wave of democratization, we show that variation in judicial crises is systematically correlated with the president’s risk of nonelectoral instability as captured by the history of past presidential crises, presidential power, and antigovernmental protests. To identify whether the effects of protest on judicial manipulation are causal, we use an instrumental variable approach based on international commodity prices weighted for each country.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Fall 2022 , pp. 265 - 285
Copyright
© 2022 Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was presented at the conference “Defending Human Rights in Times of Constitutional Crises” held in May 2018 at the University of Chicago, where participants provided invaluable feedback. We are also extremely grateful for comments from three anonymous reviewers. Replication materials are available in the JLC Dataverse at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/jlc.

References

Alemán, Eduardo, and Tsebelis, George. 2005. “Presidents, Parties, and Agenda Control in Latin America.” Working paper.Google Scholar
Álvarez, Michael E., and Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2010. “Presidential and Democratic Breakdowns in Latin America: Similar Causes, Different Outcomes.” In Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America: Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies, ed. Llanos, Mariana and Marsteintredet, Leiv. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Aydın, Aylin. 2013. “Judicial Independence across Democratic Regimes: Understanding the Varying Impact of Political Competition.” Law and Society Review 47 (1): 105–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aytaç, S. E., and Stokes, S.. 2020. “Why Protest?” Wilson Quarterly 44 (1). https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/the-power-of-protest/why-protest.Google Scholar
Banks, A. S., and Wilson, K. A.. 2017. Cross-National Time-Series data archive. Jerusalem: Databanks International. http://www.databanksinternational.com.Google Scholar
Campello, Daniela, and Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2016. “Presidential Success and the World Economy.” Journal of Politics 78 (2): 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 2003. “Presidentialism and Representative Institutions.” In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael, 63–92. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2009. “Palace Intrigue: Missiles, Treason, and the Rule of Law in Bolivia.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (2): 351–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M., Clayton, Katherine P., Helmke, Gretchen, Nyhan, Brendan, Sanders, Mitchell, and Stokes, Susan C. 2018. “Party, Policy, Democracy, and Candidate Choice in U.S. Elections.” http://brightlinewatch.org/us-elections.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2009. “A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnola, Andrea, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2011. “The Rise (and Fall) of Judicial Review.” In Courts in Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Ríos-Figueroa, Julio. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2015. “The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela.” Journal of Democracy 26 (2): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, A., and Nelson, M. J.. 2019. “The Costs (and Benefits) of Court Curbing: Experimental Evidence from the United States.” Working paper. http://mjnelson.org/papers/DN_Packing.pdf.Google Scholar
Epperly, Brad. 2013. “The Provision of Insurance? Judicial Independence and the Post-tenure Fate of Leaders.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 247–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperly, Brad. 2018. “(Re)examining the Insurance Model of Judicial Independence across Democracies.” Journal of Law and Courts 6 (2): 405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2001. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law and Society Review 35 (1): 117–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Weingast, Barry R. 1992. “A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (2): 263–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Jodi S. 2008. Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Gely, Rafael, and Spiller, Pablo T. 1992. “The Political Economy of Supreme Court Constitutional Decisions: The Case of Roosevelt’s Court-Packing Plan.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (1): 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2002. “Constitutional Courts in New Democracies: Understanding Variation in East Asia.” Global Jurist Advances 2 (1): Article 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz. 2018. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Graham, M., and Svolik, M. W.. 2019. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” Working paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3354559.Google Scholar
Gruss, Bertrand, and Kebhaj, Suhaib. 2019. “Commodity Terms of Trade: A New Database.” Working paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3333745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 96 (2): 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2010. “The Origins of Institutional Crises in Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 737–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2017. Institutions on the Edge: Inter-branch Crises in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, Jeong, YeonKyung, Kim, Jae-Eun C., and Ozturk, Seda. 2019. “Upending Impunity: Prosecuting Presidents in Contemporary Latin America.” Working paper. https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/uploads/7/0/3/2/70329843/helmke_jeong_ozturk2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, Victor J., and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2003. “Presidential Impeachment and the Politics of Survival: The Case of Colombia.” In Checking Executive Power: Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective, ed. Baumgartner, Jody C. and Kada, Naoko, 65–79. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2000. “The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions.” Law and Social Inquiry 25 (1): 91–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2006. “Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America.” Comparative Politics 38 (4): 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Edwards, Margaret E. 2009. “Failed Presidencies: Identifying and Explaining a South American Anomaly.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1 (2): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Charles D. 2004. Fujimori’s Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngh Hun, and Bahry, Donna. 2008. “Interrupted Presidencies in Third Wave Democracies.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 807–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, Kriszta, and Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2018. “The Fragility of an Independent Judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland—and the European Union.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51 (3): 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. M., and Posner, R. A.. 1975. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 875–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Christopher. 1998. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 30 (4): 423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2008. “Bolivia’s Constitutional Breakdown.” Journal of Democracy 19 (4): 110–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Llanos, Mariana, and Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2010. “Conclusions: Presidential Breakdowns Revisited.” In Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America: Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies, ed. Llanos, Mariana and Marsteintredet, Leiv. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, P. C. 2003. “The Limits to Judicialization: Legislative Politics and Constitutional Review in the Iberian Democracies.” PhD diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., and Schwartz, T.. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, Sonia, and Weingast, Barry R. 2013. “Self-Enforcing Constitutions: With an Application to Democratic Stability in America’s First Century.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 29 (2): 278–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2006. “Minority Presidents and Democratic Performance in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 48 (3): 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times. 2019. “Bolivian Leader Evo Morales Steps Down.” November 10.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2021. “Former Bolivian Leader Is Arrested for Ouster of Morales.” March 12.Google Scholar
North, D., and Weingast, B.. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, Jack. 2021. “Organizing Authoritarian Coercion: Trading Off Insider and Outsider Threats.” Working paper, University of Rochester. http://www.jackpaine.com/work-in-progress.html.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popova, M. 2010. “Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (10): 1202–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1994. “The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2): 721–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rasmusen, Eric. 1997. “Judicial Independence in a Civil Law Regime: The Evidence from Japan.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 13 (2): 259–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and McCall Rosenbluth, Frances. 1993. Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reuters, . 2018. “Venezuela Says Taking Over Banesco for 90 Days, Arrests 11 Top Bank Executives.” May 3.Google Scholar
Sanchez Urribarri, R. A. 2011. “Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court.” Law and Social Inquiry 36 (4): 854–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2006. “Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2003. “‘When the Devil Turns …’: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review.” Journal of Legal Studies 32 (1): 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 2004. “Latin American Presidencies Interrupted.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, G. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 346–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, G. 2004. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, G. 2015. “Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varol, Ozan O. 2014. “Stealth Authoritarianism.” Iowa Law Review 100: 1673–742.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott P. and Shugart, Matthew S., 225–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, K. 1999. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar Jr.,, and Campello, Daniela. 2020. “Endogenous Policy Making.” Journal of Politics 82 (2): 800–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Helmke et al., supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 90.1 KB