Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:14:42.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Indigenous Peoples’ Success in State Supreme Courts: Party Capability, Judicial Selection, and Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Rebecca A. Reid  and
Todd A. Curry
Rebecca A. Reid
Affiliation:
University of Texas at El Paso, USA
Todd A. Curry*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at El Paso, USA
*
Contact the corresponding author, Todd A. Curry, at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The struggles Indigenous Peoples face are unique from other minority groups living in the United States because they exist in an odd, semisovereign status. While the US Constitution outlines that First Nations are sovereign entities, current federal law and policies hold that tribes are simultaneously sovereign and not sovereign. Using an original data set consisting of all cases involving Indigenous Peoples before state supreme courts from 1995 to 2010, we find Indigenous Peoples are more likely to receive positive judicial outcomes when the judiciary is elected and the indigenous population of the state is relatively high.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring 2021 , pp. 69 - 87
Copyright
© 2021 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

As members of the El Paso region, we acknowledge that we are in the unceded territories of the Indigenous Peoples who are the guardians and keepers of this land, both throughout history and in contemporary times: the Tigua, Mansos, Sumas, Ndé, the Piros, Mescalero Apache, Chiricahua Apache, Tarahumara, Yaqui, Jumano, Comanche, Kiowa, Rarámuri, Tohono O’odham, Yaqui, Kickapoo, Diné, Hopi, Zapotec, Mixtec, Aztec-Nahua-Mexica, Huichol, Tepehuan, Coahuilteco, Chichimeca, and the other Native communities who comprise our multinational region. As scholars and people who reside and work in these lands, we respect and honor the millennia-long history of Native peoples on this land and their ongoing presence today.

References

Adler, E., Scott, Adam F. Cayton, and Griffin, John D.. 2018. “Representation When Constituent Opinion and District Conditions Collide.” Political Research Quarterly 71:681–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akee, Randall K. Q., and Taylor, Jonathan B.. 2014. “Social and Economic Change on American Indian Reservations: A Databook of the US Censuses and the American Community Survey, 1990–2010.” http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52557b58e4b0d4767401ce95/t/5379756ce4b095f55e75c77b/1400468844624/AkeeTaylorUSDatabook2014-05-15.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert T. 2012. “Negotiating Jurisdiction: Retroceding State Authority over Indian Country Granted by Public Law 280.” Washington Law Review 87:915–64.Google Scholar
Anderson, Terry L., and Parker, Dominic P.. 2008. “Sovereignty, Credible Commitments, and Economic Prosperity on American Indian Reservations.” Journal of Law and Economics 51 (4): 641–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Dewi Ioan. 2016. The Erosion of Tribal Power: The Supreme Court’s Silent Revolution. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Blackhawk, Maggie., 2019. “Federal Indian Law as Paradigm within Public Law.” Harvard Law Review 132 (7): 1787–877.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam, and Woodruff, Michael. 2015. “A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 31:472–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrows, John., 2002. Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Boshart, Rod., 2018. “Judge Blocks Iowa Voter ID Law.” Sioux City Journal, July 25. https://siouxcityjournal.com/news/state-and-regional/judge-blocks-iowa-voter-id-law/article_ff72b743-a554-53c0-a21e-238cbfe4dc3c.html.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2015. “Litigant Status and Trial Court Appeal Mobilization.” Law and Policy 37:294–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52:360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics 62:387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldarone, Richard P., Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S.. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” Journal of Politics 71:560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corntassel, Jeff, and Witmer, II Richard. 2008. Forced Federalism: Contemporary Challenges to Indigenous Nationhood. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Curry, Todd A., and Fix, Michael P.. 2019. “May It Please the Twitterverse: The Use of Twitter by State High Court Judges.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 16 (4): 379–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, Todd A., and Hurwitz, Mark S.. 2016. “Strategic Retirements of Elected and Appointed Justices: A Hazard Model Approach.” Journal of Politics 78 (4): 1061–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daku, M., Soroka, S., and Young, L. 2015. Lexicoder, version 3.0. http://www.lexicoder.com.Google Scholar
Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina, Grajzl, Peter, and Guse, A. Joseph. 2014. “Jurisdiction, Crime, and Development: The Impact of Public Law 280 in Indian Country.” Law and Society Review 48:127–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duthu, N. Bruce. 2008. American Indians and the Law. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Evans, Laura E. 2011. “Expertise and Scale of Conflict: Governments as Advocates in American Indian Politics.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 663–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M. 2014. “The Seminole Tribe and the Origins of Indian Gaming.” Florida International University Law Review 9:255–75.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc., 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9:95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K., and Windett, Jason Harold. 2013. “New Data on State Supreme Courts.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 13:427–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics 49 (4): 1117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann.. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23 (4): 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Stacia L. 1994. “Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 56:752–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David, and Baum, Lawrence. 2001. “Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 54:709–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, Dimitri, and Duell, Dominik. 2015. “Social Identity and Electoral Accountability.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 671–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Stephen Andrew, and Rand, Kathryn R. L. 2009. “The Hand That’s Been Dealt: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act at 20.” Drake Law Review 57:413–43.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10:134–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monture, Patricia A. 2009. “Women and Risk: Aboriginal Women, Colonialism, and Correctional Practices.” In First Voices: An Aboriginal Women’s Reader, ed. Patricia A. Monture and McGuire, Patricia D., 414–22. Toronto: Inanna Publications and Education.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Bryan., 2018. “Tribal Leaders Tell Senate Voting Barriers Are Persistent, Systemic.” Cronkite News, July 17. https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2018/07/17/tribal-leaders-tell-senate-voting-barriers-are-persistent-systemic/.Google Scholar
Pommersheim, Frank., 2012. Broken Landscapes: Indians, Indian Tribes, and the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, K. R. L. 2007. “Caught in the Middle: How State Politics, State Law, and State Courts Constrain Tribal Influence over Indian Gaming.” Marquette Law Review 90:971–1008.Google Scholar
Rausch, C., 2007. “The Problem with Good Faith: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act a Decade after Seminole.” Gaming Law Review 11 (August): 423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Rebecca A., and Curry, Todd A.. 2019. “Conflicts in Indigenous Law: The Impact of Courts and Federalism in the United States and Common Law Nations.” In Research Handbook on Law and Courts, ed. Susan Sterett and Lee Walker, 351–64. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Romano, Michael K., and Curry, Todd A.. 2019. Creating the Law: State Supreme Court Opinions and the Effect of Audiences. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Ben., 2016. Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights: International and Regional Jurisprudence. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D.. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83:557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillet, Mary., 2009. “Ensuring Indigenous Women’s Voices Are Heard.” In First Voices: An Aboriginal Women’s Reader, ed. Monture, Patricia A. and McGuire, Patricia D., 207–11. Toronto: Inanna Publications and Education.Google Scholar
Skopek, T. A., Engstrom, R., Hansen, K. and 2005. “All That Glitters … : The Rise of American Indian Tribes in State Political Behavior.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 29 (4): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Sheehan, Reginald S., and Susan Brodie Haire. 1999. “Do the Haves Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter’s Framework to Decisions of the US Courts of Appeals.” Law and Society Review 33:811–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmer, John, Songer, Donald R., and Bowie, Jennifer. 2016. “Party Capability and the US Courts of Appeals: Understanding Why the ‘Haves’ Win.” Journal of Law and Courts 4:65–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. B., and Kalt, J. P. 2005. American Indians on Reservations: A Databook of Socioeconomic Change between the 1990 and 2000 Censuses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project of American Indian Economic Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Turkewitz, Julie., 2018. “For Native Americans, a ‘Historic Moment’ on the Path to Power at the Ballot Box.” New York Times, January 4. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/native-american-voting-rights.html.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David E., and Lomawaima, K. Tsianina. 2002. Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Windett, Jason H., Harden, Jeffrey J., and Hall, Matthew E. K. 2015. “Estimating Dynamic Ideal Points for State Supreme Courts.” Political Analysis 23:461–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yellow Bird, Michael. 1999. “What We Want to Be Called: Indigenous Peoples’ Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Identity Labels.” American Indian Quarterly 23 (2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Reid and Curry Supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 214.2 KB