Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:41:05.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sidestepping the State: Practices of Social Service Commodification among Nicaraguans in Costa Rica and Nicaragua

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2017

CAITLIN E. FOURATT  and
KOEN VOOREND
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Costa Rica, there is a widespread belief among the public and policymakers that the country's ‘exceptional’ universal healthcare system represents a magnet for Nicaraguan immigrants. However, examining immigrants’ actual access to social policy demonstrates the importance of legal and extra-legal mechanisms of exclusion that go hand in hand with official recognition of human rights. This paper critically assesses the relationship between migrants and the state, and public social policy in particular, in both sending and receiving country. We analyse the extent to which Nicaraguan migrant families on both sides of the Costa Rica–Nicaragua migration system incorporate public social protection in their welfare strategies. Drawing on two sets of qualitative data, we find that, on both sides of the border, migrants and their families display very similar commodified practices of welfare strategies, side-stepping the state and purchasing services in the private sector.

Spanish abstract

En Costa Rica existe la creencia generalizada entre el público y los diseñadores de políticas de que el sistema de salud universal ‘excepcional’ del país representa un imán para los migrantes nicaragüenses. Sin embargo, cuando se examina el acceso real a las políticas sociales se demuestra la importancia de los mecanismos de exclusión legal y extralegal que van de la mano con el reconocimiento oficial de los derechos humanos. Este artículo evalúa críticamente la relación entre migrantes y el estado, especialmente las políticas sociales públicas, tanto en el país de origen como en el de destino. Analizamos el grado en que las familias migrantes nicaragüenses en ambos lados del sistema migratorio Costa Rica–Nicaragua incorporan la protección social pública dentro de sus estrategias de bienestar. A partir de datos cualitativos de dos fuentes, encontramos que en ambos lados de la frontera los migrantes y sus familias muestran prácticas mercantiles de bienestar muy similares, basadas en circunvenir al estado y comprar servicios al sector privado.

Portuguese abstract

Na Costa Rica há uma crença generalizada entre público e decisores políticos de que o ‘excepcional’ sistema universal de saúde do país age como um ímã para imigrantes da Nicarágua. No entanto, ao examinar o acesso que os imigrantes realmente têm às políticas sociais, revela-se a importância de mecanismos de exclusão legais e extralegais paralelos ao reconhecimento oficial dos direitos humanos. Este artigo avalia de maneira crítica a relação entre migrantes e o Estado, em particular no que diz respeito à política pública social, em ambos os países recebendo e enviando migrantes. Analisamos o quanto famílias Nicaraguenses nos dois lados do sistema de migração Costa Rica–Nicarágua incorporam proteção pública social em suas estratégias de bem-estar. Baseando-nos em duas fontes de dados qualitativos, descobrimos que em ambos os lados da fronteira, migrantes e suas famílias demonstram práticas mercantilizadas muito similares de estratégias de bem-estar, evitando o estado e adquirindo serviços diretamente do setor privado.

Keywords

migrationremittanceshealthcarelegalitysocial servicesbureaucracymigraciónremesassistema de saludlegalidadservicios socialesburocraciamigraçãoremessassaúdelegalidadeserviços sociaisburocracia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 441 - 468
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bonilla-Carrión, Roger, ‘Seguro social y usos de servicios de salud entre personas nicaragüenses en Costa Rica’, in Sandoval, Carlos (ed.), El mito roto: Inmigración y emigración en Costa Rica (San José: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2007), pp. 145–60Google Scholar.

2 Ibid.; Solís, Pedro J., ‘El fenómeno de la xenofobia en Costa Rica desde una perspectiva histórica’, Revista de Filosofía de La Universidad de Costa Rica, 47: 120–1 (2010), pp. 92–7Google Scholar.

3 Voorend, Koen and Bermúdez, Karla Venegas, ‘Tras de cuernos, palos. Percepciones sobre Costa Rica como imán de bienestar en la crisis del seguro social’, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 145 (2014), pp. 13–33Google Scholar.

4 Franzoni, Juliana Martínez and Voorend, Koen, ‘The Limits of Family and Community Care: Challenges for Public Policy in Nicaragua’, in Razavi, Shahra and Staab, Silke (eds.), Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care: Worlds Apart, vol. 8 (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 122–40Google Scholar.

5 Fouratt, Caitlin, ‘“Those Who Come to Do Harm”: The Framing of Immigration Problems in Costa Rican Immigration Law’, International Migration Review, 48: 1 (2014), pp. 144–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fouratt, Caitlin, ‘Temporary Measures: The Production of Illegality in Costa Rican Immigration Law’, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39: 1 (2016), pp. 144–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Voorend, Koen, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty: Social Policy and Migration Control in Costa Rica’, Transnational Social Review, 4: 2–3 (2014), pp. 207–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; García, Carlos Sandoval, ‘Contestar la hostilidad antiinmigrante en Costa Rica. Un proyecto de ciencias sociales públicas en curso’, in González, Miren Llona (ed.), Entreverse: Teoría y metodología práctica de las fuentes orales (Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2012), pp. 217–40Google Scholar, available at https://investiga.uned.ac.cr/cicde/images/entreverse.pdf (last access 30 Aug. 2017).

6 The words of focus-group participants and interviewees are translated from Spanish into English by the authors, using pseudonyms to ensure their anonymity.

7 Bonilla-Carrión, ‘Seguro social y usos de servicios de salud’.

8 Franca Janna Van Hooren, ‘Caring Migrants in European Welfare Regimes: The Policies and Practice of Migrant Labour Filling the Gaps in Social Care’ (European University Institute, Florence, 2011), available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/17735 (last access 10 Aug. 2017); Sainsbury, Diane, ‘Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms in Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16: 3 (2006), pp. 229–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hjerm, Mikael, ‘Integration into the Social Democratic Welfare State’, Social Indicators Research, 70: 2 (2005), pp. 117–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Banting, Keith, ‘Looking in Three Directions: Migration and the European Welfare State in Comparative Perspective’, in Bommes, Michael and Geddes, Andrew (eds.), Immigration and Welfare: Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State (London and New York: Routledge, 2003), pp. 13–33Google Scholar; Faist, Thomas, ‘Immigration, Integration and the Welfare State’, in Bauböck, Rainer, Heller, Agnes and Zolber, A. R. (eds.), The Challenge of Diversity: Integration and Pluralism in Societies of Immigration (Aldershot: Avebury, 1996), pp. 227–50Google Scholar, available at http://www.popline.org/node/309440 (last access 10 Aug. 2017); Morissens, Ann, ‘Migration, Welfare States and the Incorporation of Migrants in Different Welfare Regimes’, UNRISD Flagship Report on Poverty (Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development [UNRISD], 2008)Google Scholar, available at http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(http://AuxPages)/8BDE3DF39F415843C1257A5D0056587F/$file/MorrissensWeb.pdf (last access 10 Aug. 2017).

9 Fischer, Andrew M., ‘Towards Genuine Universalism within Contemporary Development Policy’, IDS Bulletin, 41: 1 (1 Jan. 2010), pp. 36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mkandawire, Thandika and UNRISD, Targeting and Universalism in Poverty Reduction (Geneva: UNRISD, 2005)Google Scholar, available at http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf/ab82a6805797760f80256b4f005da1ab/955fb8a594eea0b0c12570ff00493eaa/$FILE/mkandatarget.pdf (last access 10 Aug. 2017).

10 James F. Hollifield, ‘Immigration and the Politics of Rights. The French Case in Comparative Perspective’, in Bommes and Geddes (eds.), Immigration and Welfare, p. 109.

11 Jacobson, David, Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Favell, Adrian, ‘The Nation-centered Perspective’, in Giugni, Marco and Passy, Florence (eds.), Dialogues on Migration Policy (Oxford: Lexington Books, 2006), pp. 45–56Google Scholar; Sharma, Aradhana, ‘Introduction: Rethinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’, in Sharma, Aradhana and Gupta, Akhil (eds.), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader (Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, 2009), pp. 1–41Google Scholar; Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu, Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

12 Guiraudon, Virginie and Lahav, Gallya, ‘A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate: The Case of Migration Control’, Comparative Political Studies, 33: 2 (2000), p. 164CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Sassen, Saskia, Losing Control?: Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 95Google Scholar.

14 Quotation from Guiraudon and Lahav, ‘A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate’, p. 164; see also Sharma, ‘Introduction: Rethinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’; Soysal, Limits of Citizenship.

15 Banting, ‘Looking in Three Directions’; Hollifield, ‘Immigration and the Politics of Rights’; Sainsbury, ‘Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective’; Guiraudon and Lahav, ‘A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate’.

16 Joppke, Christian, ‘Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity’, Citizenship Studies, 11: 1 (1 Feb. 2007), pp. 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Guiraudon and Lahav, ‘A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate’.

18 Kalir, Barak, ‘Moving Subjects, Stagnant Paradigms: Can the “Mobilities Paradigm” Transcend Methodological Nationalism?’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39: 2 (2013), pp. 311–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Agustín, Laura Ma, ‘Forget Victimization: Granting Agency to Migrants’, Development, 46: 3 (2003), pp. 30–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kyle, David and Siracusa, Christina A., ‘Seeing the State like a Migrant. Why so Many Non-Criminals Break Immigration Laws’, in van Schendel, Willem and Abraham, Itty (eds.), Illicit Flows and Criminal Things: States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2005), pp. 153–76Google Scholar.

19 De Genova, Nicholas, ‘Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 31 (2002), pp. 419–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gonzales, Roberto G. and Chavez, Leo R., ‘“Awakening to a Nightmare”: Abjectivity and Illegality in the Lives of Undocumented 1.5-Generation Latino Immigrants in the United States’, Current Anthropology, 53: 3 (2012), pp. 255–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McIlwaine, Cathy, ‘Legal Latins: Creating Webs and Practices of Immigration Status among Latin American Migrants in London’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41: 3 (2015), pp. 493–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Willen, Sarah S., ‘Toward a Critical Phenomenology of “Illegality”: State, Power, Criminalization, and Abjectivity among Undocumented Migrant Workers in Tel Aviv, Israel’, International Migration, 43 (2007), pp. 8–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Walters, William et al. , The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

21 Thomas, F. and Gideon, Jasmine (eds.), Migration, Health and Inequality (London: Zed Books, 2013)Google Scholar.

22 Soysal, Limits of Citizenship, p. 134.

23 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Fouratt, ‘Temporary Measures’; Voorend and Venegas Bermúdez, ‘Tras de cuernos, palos’; Sandoval García, ‘Contestar la hostilidad antiinmigrante en Costa Rica’.

24 Mauricio Lopez, ‘The Incorporation of Nicaraguan Temporary Migrants into Costa Rica's Healthcare System: An Opportunity for Social Equity?’, PhD. dissertation, University of Windsor, 2012, available at http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/502/ (last access 10 Aug. 2017).

25 Ibid.; Dobles, I., Vargas, G. and Amador, K., Inmigración: Psicología, identidades y políticas públicas. La experiencia nicaragüense y colombiana en Costa Rica (San José: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2014)Google Scholar. ‘Regular migratory status’ means ‘legal migratory status’ (officially approved by the Migration Department); we prefer the terms ‘regular/ise’ to ‘legal/ise’ because of the negative connotations of ‘legal/illegal’ and because ‘regular/ise’ is used in the policy language and is thus more accurate.

26 Faist, Thomas, ‘Immigration, Integration and the Ethnicization of Politics’, European Journal of Political Research, 25: 4 (1994), pp. 439–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pribble, J., ‘The Politics of Building Municipal Institutional Effectiveness in Chile’, Latin American Politics and Society, 57: 3 (2015), pp. 100–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sainsbury, ‘Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective’.

27 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Kron, Stefanie, ‘Gestión migratoria en Norte y Centroamérica: Manifestaciones y contestaciones’, Anuario de Estudios Centroamericanos, 37 (2011), pp. 53–85Google Scholar; Sandoval García, ‘Contestar la hostilidad antiinmigrante en Costa Rica’.

28 Lopez, ‘The Incorporation of Nicaraguan Temporary Migrants into Costa Rica's Healthcare System’.

29 Goldade, Kathryn, ‘“Health Is Hard Here” or “Health for All”?’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23: 4 (2009), pp. 483–503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Santos, Sara Leon Spesny Dos, ‘Undeserving Mothers? Shifting Rationalities in the Maternal Healthcare of Undocumented Nicaraguan Migrants in Costa Rica’, Anthropology and Medicine, 22: 2 (2015), pp. 191–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

30 Bonilla-Carrión, ‘Seguro social y usos de servicios de salud’; Castillo, J., ‘Características de la atención de los extranjeros en los servicios de salud de la Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social 1997–2002’, in Presidencia Ejecutiva, Dirección Actuarial y de Planificación Económica (San José: CCSS, 2003)Google Scholar.

31 Devesh Kapur, ‘Remittances: The New Development Mantra?’, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (New York and Geneva: UNCTAD, 2004), available at http://unctad.org/en/Docs/gdsmdpbg2420045_en.pdf (last access 26 Aug. 2017); Castles, Stephen, de Haas, Hein and Miller, Mark J., The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World (New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)Google Scholar.

32 Grabel, I., ‘Remittances, Political Economy and Economic Development in Migration in a Globalising World’, DevelopmentISSues, 11: 2 (2009), p. 16Google Scholar.

33 Ibid., p. 17.

34 Hernandez, Ester and Coutin, Susan Bibler, ‘Remitting Subjects: Migrants, Money and States’, Economy and Society, 35 (2006), p. 198CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 United Nations, International Migration Wallchart (New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015), available at http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/wallchart/docs/MigrationWallChart2015.pdf (last access 10 Aug. 2017).

36 Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INEC), X censo nacional de población y VI de vivienda 2011: Resultados generales (San José: INEC, 2011)Google Scholar; Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de Argentina (INDEC), Censo nacional de población, hogares y viviendas 2010 (Buenos Aires: INDEC, 2010)Google Scholar; Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas de Chile (INE), XVIII censo nacional de población y VII de vivienda o censo de población y vivienda 2012 (Santiago: INE, 2012)Google Scholar.

37 INEC, VIII censo nacional de población, Costa Rica 1984 (San José: INEC, 1984)Google Scholar; INEC, IX censo nacional de población, 2000 (San José: INEC, 2001)Google Scholar. While Costa Rica is a net-immigration country, this should not hide the fact that it also has significant migration outflows, especially to the United States. See, for example, Morúa, Carmen Caamaño, Entre ‘Arriba’ y ‘Abajo’. La experiencia transnacional de la migración de costarricenses hacia Estados Unidos (San José: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2011)Google Scholar.

38 INEC, IX censo nacional de población, 2000; INEC, X censo nacional de población y VI de vivienda 2011.

39 Baumeister, Eduardo, Fernández, Edgar and Acuña, Guillermo, Estudio sobre las migraciones regionales de los nicaragüenses (Guatemala City: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales, 2008)Google Scholar.

40 INEC, X censo nacional de población y VI de vivienda 2011. However, this figure does not include the entirety of an unknown share of irregular migrants who are active in informal labour markets.

41 Morales, Abelardo and Castro, Carlos, Migración, empleo y pobreza (San José: FLACSO Costa Rica, 2006), p. 44Google Scholar; Sandoval (ed.), El mito roto.

42 Voorend, Koen and Rivera, Francisco Robles, Migrando en la crisis. La fuerza de trabajo inmigrante en la economía costarricense (San José: IOM/MTSS, 2011)Google Scholar.

43 Sandoval (ed.), El mito roto.

44 García, Sandoval, ‘Contestar la hostilidad antiinmigrante en Costa Rica’; González, H. and Mejía, Gabriela Isabel Horbaty, Nicaragua y Costa Rica: Migrantes enfrentan percepciones y políticas migratorias (San José: Migración Intrafronteriza en América Central, Perspectivas Regionales, 2005)Google Scholar, available at http://ccp.ucr.ac.cr/noticias/migraif/pdf/horbaty.pdf (last access 10 Aug. 2017); Campos, Anyelick and Tristán, Larissa, Nicaragüenses en las noticias. Textos, contextos y audiencias (San José: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2009)Google Scholar; Solís, ‘El fenómeno de la xenofobia en Costa Rica’.

45 Sandoval-García, Carlos, Threatening Others: Nicaraguans and the Formation of National Identities in Costa Rica (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2004)Google Scholar; available in Spanish: Sandoval, Carlos, Otros amenazantes. Los nicaragüenses y la formación de identidades nacionales en Costa Rica, 1st edn (San José: Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, 2002)Google Scholar.

46 IDESPO, UNFPA, and Foro Permanente sobre Población Migrante, Memoria final, mesa redonda: La población migrante en Costa Rica y su tratamiento en los medios de comunicación (Heredia: IDESPO, 2000)Google Scholar; Nowalski, Jorge and Barahona, Manuel, Asimetrías económicas, sociales y políticas en Costa Rica: Hacia una calidad de vida digna (San José: PNUD, CIDH, 2003)Google Scholar.

47 Sandoval-García, Threatening Others, p. 444.

48 Sandoval García, ‘Contestar la hostilidad antiinmigrante en Costa Rica’.

49 Dobles, Vargas and Amador, Inmigración; Goldade, ‘Health Is Hard Here’.

50 Babb, Florence E., ‘From Cooperatives to Microenterprises: The Neoliberal Turn in Postrevolutionary Nicaragua’, in Phillips, Lynne (ed.), The Third Wave of Modernization in Latin America: Cultural Perspectives on Neoliberalism (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1998), pp. 109–22Google Scholar; Mendieta, Francisco Javier Mojica, Acciones del Estado costarricense para enfrentar la demanda de servicios de salud, educación y vivienda de población nicaragüense en Costa Rica (Heredia: IDESPO/Universidad Nacional, 2003)Google Scholar.

51 Nowalski, Jorge, Asimetrías económicas, laborales y sociales en Centroamérica: Desafíos y oportunidades (San José: FLACSO, 2002)Google Scholar.

52 Baumeister, Eduardo, Migración internacional y desarrollo en Nicaragua, Series ‘Población y Desarrollo’, 67 (Santiago: CEPAL, 2006)Google Scholar.

53 Monge-González, Ricardo, Céspedes-Torres, Oswald and Vargas-Aguilar, Juan Carlos, South–South Remittances: The Costa Rica–Nicaragua Corridor (San José: Inter-American Development Bank, January 2011)Google Scholar, available at http://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/5430 (last access 10 Aug. 2017).

54 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Fouratt, ‘Temporary Measures’; Voorend, K., ¿Universal o excluyente? Derechos sociales y control migratorio interno en Costa Rica (Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2013)Google Scholar; Voorend, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty’.

55 Noy, Shiri and Voorend, Koen, ‘Social Rights and Migrant Realities: Migration Policy Reform and Migrants’ Access to Health Care in Costa Rica, Argentina, and Chile’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17: 2 (2016), pp. 605–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Voorend, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty’.

56 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Kron, ‘Gestión migratoria en Norte y Centroamérica’.

57 Voorend, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty’.

58 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Voorend, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty’.

59 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Fouratt, ‘Temporary Measures’; Voorend, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty’.

60 Franzoni, Juliana Martínez and Voorend, Koen, ‘Who Cares in Nicaragua? A Care Regime in an Exclusionary Social Policy Context’, Development and Change, 42: 4 (2011), pp. 995–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), CEPALSTAT Databases and Statistical Publications (Santiago, Chile: ECLAC, 2015), available at http://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_CEPALSTAT/estadisticasIndicadores.asp?idioma=i (last access 27 Aug. 2017).

62 Juliana Martínez Franzoni and Koen Voorend, Veinticinco años de cuidados en Nicaragua 1980–2005: Poco estado, poco mercado, mucho trabajo no remunerado (Geneva: UNRISD with United Nations Development Programme [UNDP] and Centro de Investigación y Estudios Políticos [CIEP], Universidad de Costa Rica, 2012); Martínez Franzoni and Voorend, ‘The Limits of Family and Community Care’.

63 UNDP, Human Development Report 2015. Work for Human Development (New York: UNDP, 2015)Google Scholar.

64 Banco Central de Nicaragua (BCN), Informe de Remesas Familiares. I Trimestre 2017 (Managua: BCN, División Económica, 2017)Google Scholar, available at http://www.bcn.gob.ni/publicaciones/periodicidad/trimestral/remesas/Remesas_1.pdf (last access 27 Aug. 2017).

65 Martínez Franzoni and Voorend, ‘Who Cares in Nicaragua?’

66 Diana, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 3 May 2014.

67 Mariela, interview, Río Azul, 24 April 2012.

68 Voorend, ‘“Shifting In” State Sovereignty’.

69 Pedro, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014.

70 Isabel, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 3 May 2014.

71 Sofía, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014. In 2012 100 córdobas were worth approx. US$5; 58,000 colones were worth approx. US$114.

72 Fouratt, ‘Temporary Measures’.

73 Yolanda, interview, Río Azul, 14 Feb. 2012.

74 Fouratt, ‘Those Who Come to Do Harm’; Fouratt, ‘Temporary Measures’.

75 Juliana, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 3 May 2014.

76 Carmen, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014.

77 Isabel, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 3 May 2014.

78 Mariela, interview, Río Azul, 24 April 2012.

79 Karla, focus-group discussion, San Ramón, 30 Oct. 2014.

80 Graciela, focus-group discussion, San Ramón, 30 Oct. 2014.

81 Luz, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014.

82 Ruth, interview, Río Azul, 10 April 2012.

83 Karina, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 20 Aug. 2014.

84 Spesny Dos Santos, ‘Undeserving Mothers?’, p. 195.

85 María, focus-group discussion, San Sebastián, 7 Aug. 2014.

86 Sofía, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014.

87 Pablo, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014.

88 Martha, focus-group discussion, Alajuelita, 26 Jan. 2014.

89 Dora, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 20 Aug. 2014.

90 Xinia, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 20 Aug. 2014.

91 Carlos, focus-group discussion, San Sebastián, 7 Aug. 2014.

92 Stefani, focus-group discussion, San Sebastián, 7 Aug. 2014.

93 Isabel, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 3 May 2014.

94 Fabian, focus-group discussion, Carrillo, 18 Oct. 2014.

95 Isabel, focus-group discussion, Pavas, 3 May 2014.

96 Rafaela, interview, Sabanilla, 14 Nov. 2011.

97 Ignacio, focus-group discussion, San Sebastián, 7 Aug. 2014.

98 Stoll, David, El Norte or Bust! How Migration Fever and Microcredit Produced a Financial Crash in a Latin American Town (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar; Miles, Ann, From Cuenca to Queens: An Anthropological Story of Transnational Migration (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Mahler, Sarah J., American Dreaming: Immigrant Life on the Margins (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

99 Kenneth, interview, Granada, 13 June 2012.

100 Marina, interview, Managua, 1 Sept. 2012.

101 Esther, interview, Managua, 17 July 2012.

102 Denizens are people who are citizens of another country with a legal and permanent resident status in their adopted country: Hammar, T., Democracy and the Nation State. Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration (Aldershot: Avebury, 1990)Google Scholar.

103 Dobles, Vargas and Amador, Inmigración; Juliana Martínez Franzoni, La seguridad social en Costa Rica: Percepciones y experiencias de quienes menos tienen y más la necesitan (Washington, DC: Unidad para la Igualdad de Género en el Desarrollo and Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo), available at http://services.iadb.org/wmsfiles/products/Publications/882713.pdf (last access 27 Aug. 2017); Franzoni, Juliana Martínez and Ancochea, Diego Sánchez, Good Jobs and Social Services: How Costa Rica Achieved the Elusive Double Incorporation (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.