Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:34:21.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving On and Moving Back: Rethinking Inequality and Migration in the Latin American City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2010

BRYAN R. ROBERTS
BRYAN R. ROBERTS
Affiliation:
Bryan R. Roberts is a C. B. Smith Sr. Chair in US–Mexico Relations at the Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies, and Professor of Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the similarities and differences between contemporary urban organisation and that of the 1960s in Guatemala City and other Latin American cities, mainly using data taken from a re-study of low-income neighbourhoods in Guatemala City. It looks at the impact of sharper patterns of residential segregation, changes in migration patterns, rising levels of crime and violence, and the increase in the relationships of the urban poor with external actors, such as governments and NGOs. Severe inequality persists, but is mediated by an improvement in living standards, by the range of consumer goods accessible to the poor, and by community- and family-based adaptation.

Abstract

Este artículo se centra en las similitudes y las diferencias entre la organización urbana contemporánea y la existente en los años 60 en la ciudad de Guatemala y otras ciudades latinoamericanas, mayoritariamente utilizando la información tomada de un nuevo trabajo sobre barrios de bajos ingresos en la Ciudad de Guatemala que habían sido estudiados previamente por el autor. Se examina el impacto de patrones más agudos de segregación residencial, los cambios en las formas de migración, los elevados niveles de crimen y violencia y el incremento en las relaciones entre los pobres urbanos con actores externos, como gobiernos y ONGs. La desigualdad severa persiste, aunque está mediada por un mejoramiento en los estándares de vida, por la variedad de bienes de consumo accesibles a los pobres y por la adaptación basada en la comunidad y la familia.

Abstract

Baseando-se principalmente em dados obtidos em um estudo revisado acerca dos bairros de renda baixa na Cidade da Guatemala, este artigo concentra-se nas semelhanças e diferenças entre a organização urbana contemporânea e a da década de 1960 na Cidade da Guatemala e outras cidades latino-americanas. O impacto dos padrões de segregação habitacional mais desiguais, as mudanças nos padrões de migração, os níveis crescentes de criminalidade e violência e o aumento nas relações entre pobres urbanos e agentes externos, como governos e ONGs, são analisados. A desigualdade severa persiste, mas está sendo mediada por uma melhora em padrões de habitação, pela ampla gama de bens de consumo acessíveis aos pobres e por adaptações realizadas por comunidades e famílias.

Keywords

residential segregationcrime and violencemigrationinequalitypovertycommunity organisationsegregación residencialcrimen y violenciamigracióndesigualdadorganización comunitariaSegregação habitacionalcrime e violênciamigraçãodesigualdadepobrezaorganização comunitária
Type
Commentary
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 587 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bryan R. Roberts, Organizing Strangers: Poor Families in Guatemala City (Austin TX, 1973).

2 These studies explored Latin American urbanisation and urban residential segregation through collaboration with researchers in Buenos Aires, Campinas, Mexico City, Lima, Montevideo, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo and Santiago de Chile. Alejandro Portes, Bryan R. Roberts and Alejandro Grimson (eds.), Ciudades latinoamericanas: un análisis comparativo en el umbral del nuevo siglo (Buenos Aires, 2005); Bryan R. Roberts and Robert Wilson (eds.), Urban Segregation and Governance in the Americas (New York, 2009).

3 This a collaborative research project of third-generation housing and its policy implications in ten Latin American cities, of which Guatemala City is one, coordinated by Peter Ward of the LBJ School of Public Affairs and the Department of Sociology of the University of Texas at Austin (www.lahn.utexas.org).

4 Janice Perlman, The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro (Berkeley CA, 1976); Perlman, Janice, ‘The Metamorphosis of Marginality in Rio De Janeiro’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 39, no. 1 (2004), pp. 189–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Caroline O. N. Moser, Ordinary Families, Extraordinary Lives: Assets and Poverty Reduction in Guayaquil, 1978–2004 (Washington DC, 2009).

5 The fieldwork for the re-study is mainly being carried out by the poverty research team of the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), Guatemala, headed by Marcel Arevalo, Vicente Quino and Federico Estrada, and by two sociology graduate students, Sergio Cabrera of the University of Texas at Austin and Julio Osorio of the University of Houston. I have drawn heavily on their insights and data for this paper. Their energy and commitment have been invaluable under field conditions that are much more difficult than I encountered in 1966 and 1968.

6 Orlandina de Oliveira and Bryan R. Roberts, ‘Urban Growth and Urban Social Structure in Latin America, 1930–1990’, in Leslie Bethell (ed.), Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. 6, part 1 (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 253–324; Baer, Werner, ‘Import Substitution and Industrialization in Latin America’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 7, no. 1 (1972), pp. 95–122Google Scholar; Alan Gilbert, The Latin American City (London, 1998), pp. 23–38.

7 Eduardo Antonio Velásquez, Desarrollo capitalista, crecimiento urbano y urbanización en Guatemala, 1940–1984 (Guatemala City, 1989).

8 Ibid., pp. 129, 139, 232–59.

9 The Exploding Cities was the title of a conference and a book edited by Peter Wilsher and Rosemary Righter (London, 1975) which focused on cities in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia.

10 Bryan R. Roberts, Cities of Peasants (London, 1978), pp. 159–75.

11 Lauchlin Currie, Accelerating Development: The Necessity and the Means (New York, 1966); Turner, John F. C., ‘Housing Priorities, Settlement Patterns, and Urban Development in Modernizing Countries’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 34, no. 6 (1968), pp. 354–63Google Scholar.

12 Gino Germani, Estructura social de la Argentina (Buenos Aires, 1955), pp. 76–7.

13 Roberts, Organizing Strangers, pp. 34–41.

14 The statistics on the two neighbourhoods are taken from the original questionnaires, which have now been coded and the data entered electronically; this was not feasible in the late 1960s.

15 Arnold L. Epstein, Politics in an Urban African Community (Manchester, 1958); J. Clyde Mitchell (ed.), Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns (Manchester, 1969).

16 William P. Mangin, ‘The Role of Regional Associations in the Adaptation of Rural Migrants to Cities in Peru’, in Richard Adams and Dwight Heath (eds.), Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America (New York, 1965), pp. 311–23; Anthony Leeds, ‘The Concept of the “Culture of Poverty”: Conceptual, Logical, and Empirical problems, with Perspectives from Brazil and Peru’, in Eleanor Leacock (ed.), The Culture of Poverty: A Critique (New York, 1971), pp. 226–84; Jorge Balán, Harley Browning and Elisabeth Jelin, Men in a Developing Society (Austin TX, 1973), pp. 317–23.

17 Xavier Albó, ‘La Paz/Cukiyawu: The Two Faces of a City’, in Teófilo Altamirano and Lane Hirabayashi (eds.), Migrants, Regional Identities and Latin America Cities (Arlington VA, 1995), pp. 113–50; Lane Hirabayashi, Cultural Capital: Mountain Zapotec Migrant Associations in Mexico City (Tucson AZ, 1993); Lourdes Arizpe, Campesinado y migración (Mexico City, 1985); Lourdes Arizpe, Indígenas en la ciudad de México: el caso de las Marías (Mexico City, 1975).

18 Santiago Bastos and Manuela Camus, Los mayas de la capital (Guatemala City, 1995).

19 Bryan R. Roberts, ‘The Interrelationships of City and Provinces in Peru and Guatemala’, in Wayne Cornelius and Felicity Trueblood (eds.), Latin American Urban Research, vol. 4 (Beverly Hills CA, 1974), pp. 207–35; Norman Long and Bryan R. Roberts, Miners, Peasants and Entrepreneurs: Regional Development in Central Peru (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 161–4.

20 Larissa Lomnitz, Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown (Orlando FL, 1977); Mercedes González de la Rocha, The Resources of Poverty: Women and Survival in a Mexican City (Oxford, 1994).

21 Roberts, Bryan R., ‘Protestant Groups and Coping with Urban Life’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 73, no. 6 (1968), pp. 753–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laurel Bossen, The Redivision of Labour: Women and Economic Choice in Four Guatemalan Communities (Albany NY, 1984), pp. 188–245.

22 Oscar Lewis, La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty (New York, 1968), pp. xlii–lii; Roberts, Organizing Strangers, pp. 5–6; Leeds, ‘The Concept of the “Culture of Poverty”’, pp. 226–84; Larissa Lomnitz, ‘The Social and Economic Organization of a Mexican Shantytown’, in Cornelius and Trueblood (eds.), Latin American Urban Research, vol. 4, pp. 135–56; Perlman, The Myth of Marginality, pp. 146–9; Moser, Ordinary Families, Extraordinary Lives, pp. 10–11.

23 Nelson, Joan, ‘The Urban Poor: Disruption or Political Integration in Third World Cities?’, World Politics, vol. 22, no. 3 (1970), pp. 393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Lúcio Kowarick, ‘The Logic of Disorder: Capitalist Expansion in the Metropolitan Area of Greater Sao Paulo’, Discussion Paper, Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, 1977.

25 Turner, ‘Housing Priorities’, pp. 354–63.

26 Perlman, The Myth of Marginality, pp. 75–8; Peter M. Ward, Mexico City: The Production and Reproduction of an Urban Environment (Boston MA, 1990), pp. 52–3.

27 Alan Gilbert and Peter M. Ward, Housing, the State and the Poor: Policy and Practice in Three Latin American Cities (Cambridge, 1985).

28 Amanda Morán, Condiciones de vida y tenencia de la tierra en asentamientos precarios de la ciudad de Guatemala (Guatemala City, 2000), Table 16.

29 Bryan R. Roberts, ‘The Provincial Urban System and the Process of Dependency’, in Alejandro Portes and Harley L. Browning, Current Perspectives in Latin American Urban Research (Austin TX, 1976), pp. 112–20.

30 Bryan R. Roberts and John F. C. Turner, ‘The Self-Help Society’, in Wilsher and Righter (eds.), The Exploding Cities, pp. 126–37.

31 Vekemans, Roger and Giusti, Jorge, ‘Marginality and Ideology in Latin American Development’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 5, no. 11 (1969), pp. 221–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Germani, Estructura social de la Argentina.

33 Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Transformación ocupacional y crisis social en América Latina (Santiago de Chile, 1989).

34 Juan Pablo Pérez Sáinz, Manuela Camus and Santiago Bastos, Todito, todito es trabajo: indígenas y empleo en Ciudad de Guatemala (Guatemala City, 1992), Table 1.6.

35 De Oliveira and Roberts, ‘Urban Growth and Urban Social Structure’, pp. 284–5.

36 Manuela Camus, La colonia Primero de Julio y la ‘clase media emergente’ (Guatemala City, 2005).

37 Alejandro Portes and Roberts, Bryan R., ‘The Free Market City: Latin American Urbanization in the Years of the Neoliberal Experiment’, Studies in Comparative National Development, vol. 40, no. 1 (2005), pp. 43–82Google Scholar.

38 Portes, Roberts and Grimson (eds.), Ciudades latinoamericanas.

39 See Vestex Guatemala website (www.vestex.com.gt/vx/), accessed 8 Sep. 2009.

40 Deanne Lanoix Termini, ‘Socio-Economic and Demographic Characteristics of the Population of Guatemala City’, unpubl. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1968, Table XVIII; José Florentín Martínez, El proceso de urbanización en Guatemala (Guatemala City, 2006), Table 3.28. The informal sector is measured by the non-professional self-employed, unpaid workers, domestic servants, non-professional workers and owners of enterprises of five or less workers. In Termini's statistics it is measured by lack of social security coverage, which is likely to result in a higher estimate of informality.

41 Federico Estrada, ‘Migración, inserción laboral y redes: nuevas formas de inserción socio-económica en la Ciudad de Guatemala’, in Jesús García-Ruiz (ed.), Identidades fluidas, identificaciones móviles (Guatemala City, 2006).

42 Portes and Roberts, ‘The Free Market City’, Table 2.

43 Martínez, El proceso de urbanización, Table 2.14.

44 These data are taken from the microdata of the 2002 XI Censo de Población of Guatemala (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 2004).

45 Termini, ‘Socio-Economic and Demographic Characteristics’, p. 15; Martínez, El proceso de urbanización, Fig. 49.

46 Bryan R. Roberts, ‘Citizenship, Social Policy and Population Change’, in Christopher Abel and Colin Lewis (eds.), Exclusion and Engagement (London, 2002), pp. 111–30.

47 Duhau, Emilio, ‘División social del espacio metropolitano y movilidad residencial’, Papeles de Población, vol. 36 (2003), pp. 161–210Google Scholar.

48 Roberts, Organizing Strangers, pp. 55–6.

49 Ibid., pp. 133–4.

50 Pierre Rosanvallon, The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State (Princeton NJ, 2000), pp. 98–100.

51 Ruben Kaztman, Fernando Filgueira and Fernando Errandonea, ‘Respuesta de los sectores populares urbanos a las transformaciones del mercado y del territorio en Montevideo’, in Portes, Roberts and Grimson (eds.), Ciudades latinoamericanas, pp. 441–508; Ruben Kaztman and Alejandro Retamoso, ‘Residential Segregation in Montevideo: Challenges to Educational Segregation’, in Roberts and Wilson (eds.), Urban Segregation, pp. 97–120.

52 Roberts and Wilson (eds.), Urban Segregation, pp. 1–18; Francisco Sabatini, Cáceres, Gonzalo and Cerda, Jorge, ‘Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: tendencias de las tres últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción’, Revista EURE, vol. 27, no. 82 (2001), pp. 21–42Google Scholar.

53 Alfonso Iracheta and Smolka, Martim O., ‘Access to Serviced Land for the Urban Poor: The Regularization Paradox in Mexico’, Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, vol. 2, no. 8 (2000), pp. 757–89Google Scholar.

54 Andrés Villarreal and Erin Hamilton, ‘Residential Segregation in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, 1990–2000’, in Roberts and Wilson (eds.), Urban Segregation, pp. 101–18.

55 Patricio Solis-Gutierrez, ‘Structural Change and Work Lives: Transformations in Social Stratification and Occupational Mobility in Monterrey, Mexico’, unpubl. PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin, 2002.

56 Sabatini, Cáceres and Cerda, ‘Segregación residencial’.

57 Manuel Tironi, Nueva pobreza urbana: vivienda y capital social en Santiago de Chile, 1985–2001 (Santiago de Chile, 2003).

58 Mario Alfonso Bravo Soto, Proceso de Urbanizacion, segregación social, violencia urbana y ‘barrios cerrados’ en Guatemala 1944–2002 (Guatemala, 2007).

59 See the ‘Barrio Querido’ section of the Municipality of Guatemala's website, at www.muniguate.com.

60 Caldeira, Teresa P. R., ‘Fortified Enclaves: The New Urban Segregation’, Public Culture, vol. 8 (1996), pp. 303–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Anuario estadístico de educación, 2007 (Guatemala City, 2008), accessed through www.mineduc.gob.gt/estadistica/2008/main.html.

62 United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Central America and Mexico Gang Assessment, Annex 2: Guatemala Profile (Washington DC, 2006).

63 Briceño-León, Roberto and Zubillaga, Verónica, ‘Violence and Globalization in Latin America’, Current Sociology, vol. 50, no. 1 (2002), pp. 19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Prensa Libre, 12 Sep. 2009, www.prensalibre.com.

65 Zaluar, Alba, ‘Perverse Integration: Drug Trafficking and Youth in the Favelas of Rio de Janeiro’, Journal of International Affairs, vol. 53, no. 2 (2000), pp. 653–71Google Scholar; Licia Valladares, Edmond Préteceille, Bianca Freire-Medeiros and Filippina Chinelli, ‘Río de Janeiro en el viraje hacia el nuevo siglo’, in Portes, Roberts and Grimson (eds.), Ciudades latinoamericanas, pp. 123–80.

66 Roberts, Bryan R. and Portes, Alejandro, ‘Coping with the Free Market City: Urban Collective Action in Latin America at the End of the Century’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 41, no. 1 (2006), pp. 57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Albert Hirschman, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States (Cambridge MA, 1970).

68 Roberts, Organizing Strangers, pp. 320–7.

69 USAID, Gang Assessment, Annex 2.

70 World Bank, Poverty in Guatemala (Washington DC, 2003).

71 See the ministry's website, at www.segeplan.gob.gt.

72 Bossen, The Redivision of Labour, pp. 188–245.

73 Roberts, Organizing Strangers, p. 327.

74 Ibid., pp. 133, 257.

75 Ibid., p. 325; Bossen, The Redivision of Labour, p. 220.

76 Alejandro Portes and John Walton, Urban Latin America: The Political Condition from Above and Below (Austin TX, 1976); Portes, Alejandro, ‘Rationality in the Slum: An Essay in Interpretative Sociology’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 14, no. 3 (1972), pp. 268–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Georg Simmel, ‘The Poor’, in Donald Levine (ed.), Individuality and Social Forms (Chicago IL, 1971[1908]).