Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:54:59.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Juscelino Kubitschek and the 1960 Presidential Election*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Sheldon Maram
Sheldon Maram
Affiliation:
Sheldon Maram is Professor in the Department of History, California State University, Fullerton.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Brazilian specialists have long recognised the importance of the 1960 presidential elections, which set in motion a process that culminated in a 21—year military dictatorship. Only in 1989 did Brazilians witness once again the direct election of a president. Nonetheless, scholarly literature on this event is sparse and often tends toward the ahistorical view that the election of Jânio Quadros in 1960 was part of an inexorable process. Almost entirely ignored are the reasons why Brazil's largest political party, the Partido Social Democrático or PSD, nominated for president a weak candidate, Marshal of the Brazilian Army Henrique Teixeira Lott.1

Clearly, Lott himself was not part of a praetorian guard that imposed his candidacy. Indeed, the Marshal was a reluctant candidate, who offered to withdraw in October 1959 in favour of a ‘national unity candidate’.2 In my view Lott's nomination had much more to do with a complex series of manoeuvres carried out by Brazil's president Juscelino Kubitschek (1956–61) than with his own actions. For Kubitschek, the political parties and presidential aspirants in 1960 were merely pawns in his highly personalistic vision of the political process. Constitutionally barred from seeking immediate re—election, Kubitschek initially manoeuvred to induce his party, the PSD, not to run its own presidential candidate. When this effort failed, he displayed, at the very least, ambivalence regarding the fate of the party's candidate.

An analysis of Kubitschek's actions and motivations presents methodological challenges to the historian. Historians traditionally rely heavily on written documentation to support their analysis of actions and motivations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 123 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For one of the exceptions to this pattern, see Hippolito, Lucia, De Raposas e Reformistas: o PSD e a expêriência democrática brasileira (1941–1964) (Rio de Janeiro, 1985), pp. 199–210.Google Scholar

2 Burton, Ralph, American Consul, Sāo Paulo, to US Department of State, Washington D.C., no. 732.521/10–259, Records of the Departments of State Relating to Internal Political and National Defense Affairs of Brazil, 1955–1959, National Archives Microfilm Publications, Roll 8;Google Scholar US Embassy, Rio de Janeiro, to Department of State, Washington, D.C., 732.00/10–2359, Roll 3; da Costa, Joffre Gomes, Marechal Henrique Lott (Rio de Janeiro, 1960), p. 423Google Scholar; Falcāo, Armando, Tudo a Declarar (Rio de Janeiro, 1989), pp. 189–190.Google Scholar

3 Francisco de Assis Barbosa, interview by author, 4 Aug. 1989, Rio de Janeiro.

4 Affonso Heliodoro, interview by author, 6 June 1989, Brasília; José Sete Câmara, interview by author, 11 Aug. 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Lúcio Martins Meira, interview by author, 18 July 1989, Rio de Janeiro.

5 Carlos Heitor Cony, interview by author, 18 May 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Sarah Kubitschek, interview by author, 16 Aug. 1989, Rio de Janeiro.

6 See note 4.

7 Sarah Kubitschek, interview, 16 Aug. 1989; Lucas Lopes, interview by author, 14 Aug. 1990, Rio de Janeiro; Armando Falcāo, interview by author, 23 Aug. 1990, Rio de Janeiro.

8 Costa, , Lott, pp. 59, 120–121, 126, 162 and 195.Google Scholar

9 Manchete, 9 Jan. 1960, p. 12.Google Scholar

10 Archer, Renato, Depoimento, interviews by Hippolito, Lúcia, transcript, Fundaçāo Getúlio Vargas, Centro de Pesquisa e Documentaçāo de História Contemporânea do Brasil-História Oral [FGV/CPDOC], 1977–1978, Rio de Janeiro, p. 254.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., pp. 255–256.

12 Filho, Osvaldo Lima, Depoimento, interviews by Camargo, Aspásia et al. , transcript, FGV/CPDOC, 1978–1979, Recife, Pernambuco, pp. 90–91.Google Scholar

13 de Abreu, Ovídio, Depoimento, transcript, FGV/CPDOC, 1977, Rio de Janeiro, p. 17.Google Scholar The ‘domestic’ auto industry consisted of foreign companies forced and encouraged by government policy to manufacture in Brazil using a percentage of domestically produced auto parts, together with Brazilian companies that had emerged to supply the new demand for auto parts and accessories.

14 Dulles, John W. F., Unrest in Brazil: Political–Military Crises 1955–1964 (Austin, 1970), pp. 20, 22, 26, 32–47, 53–58, 65 and 79Google Scholar; Dulles, John W. F., Maria Victoria de Mesquita Benevides, O Governo Kubitschek: Desenvolvimento Económico e Estabilidade Política, 3rd ed. (Rio de Janeiro, 1979), p. 149Google Scholar and passim.

15 Benevides, , O Governo Kubitschek, pp. 114–115Google Scholar; Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 56–58, 260–271 and 276–283.Google Scholar

16 Bastos, A. and Walker, Thomas W., ‘Partidos e Forças Políticas em Minas Gerais’, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Político, vol. 31 (May 1971), pp. 128–138, 150–154Google Scholar; Time: Latin American Edition, 13 Feb. 1956, pp. 22–27Google Scholar; Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 35, 45–47Google Scholar; Benevides, , O Governo Kubitschek, pp. 65–66, 70 and 111–113.Google Scholar

17 Lafer, Celso, ‘The Planning Process and the Political System in Brazil: A Study of Kubitschek's Target Plan – 1956–1961’, unpubl. PhD diss., Cornell University, 1970, pp. 23–24Google Scholar; Goodman, David E., ‘Industrialization and Economic Policy in Brazil in the Post-War Period’, unpubl. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1967, pp. 87–88 and 94.Google Scholar

18 Archer, , Depoimento, p. 45.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., p. 159; Renato Archer, interviews by author, 25 July and 12 Aug. 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Jurema, Abelardo, Depoimento, interviews by Camargo, Aspásia et al. , transcript, FGV-CPDOC, 1977, Rio de Janeiro, p. 200Google Scholar; Archer, , Depoimento, pp. 68 and 265Google Scholar; Kubitschek, Juscelino, Men Caminho Para Brasília, Vol. I: A experiência da humildade (Rio de Janeiro, 1974), pp. 232, 268–269.Google Scholar

20 ‘Adelmar Costa Carvalho’, JK158, Secretária da Presidência da República, Arquivo Nacional, Rio de Janeiro.

21 Lúcio Meira, 18 July 1989, interview.

22 Archer, , Depoimento, p. 250.Google Scholar

23 Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 145–150Google Scholar; Manchete, 20 Sept. 1958, p. 30.

24 Archer, , Depoimento, p. 195Google Scholar; Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 161–162, 170–171Google Scholar; Archer, 12 Aug. 1989, interview.

25 Archer, , Depoimento, p. 101Google Scholar; Manchete, 20 Sept. 1958, p. 30.

26 Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 161 and 170–180Google Scholar; Archer, , Depoimento, p. 32Google Scholar; Archer, 12 Aug. 1989, interview.

27 For example, one Ala Moça member, Renato Archer, in the early days of the new administration got involved in a public squabble with General Juarez Távora, Kubitschek's UDN opponent in the 1955 presidential race. In the debate, Archer defended the administration, but Kubitschek felt that it showed extraordinarily poor judgement to attack Távora, who was very popular with the officer corps at a time when the government feared a military coup. Archer, , Depoimento, pp. 149–159 and 192.Google Scholar

28 Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 181–182, 204–205Google Scholar; de Melo, José Joffity Bezerra, Depoimento, interviews by Raposo, Eduardo and Camargo, Aspásia, transcript, FGV-CPDOC, 1977–1978, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 177 and 180–181Google Scholar; Archer, , Depoimento, p. 253Google Scholar; Costa, , Lott, p. 411.Google Scholar

29 Archer, , Depoimento, pp. 251–254.Google Scholar

30 Magalhāes, Juracy, Minhas Memórial Provisórias: Depoimento prestado ao CPDOC, edited by de Abreu, Alzira Alves et al. (Rio de Janeiro, 1982), p. 143.Google Scholar

31 Kubitschek, Juscelino, Meu Caminho para Brasília, vol. 3: 50 Anos em 5 (Rio de Janeiro, 1978), p. 285.Google Scholar

32 Archer, , Depoimento, p. 48.Google Scholar

33 Cleantho de Paiva Leite, interview by author, 10 Aug. 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Diário Carioca (Rio de Janeiro), 1 Feb. 1957Google Scholar; US Embassy, Rio de Janeiro to Department of State, 732–00/99–858, Roll 2.

34 Archer, , Depoimento, p. 252.Google Scholar

35 Lucas Lopes, interview by author, 27 July 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Roberto Campos, interview by author, 24 July 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Sarah Kubitschek, interviews by author, 1 and 16 Aug. 1989, Rio de Janeiro; Lafer, , ‘The Planning Process’, p. 210Google Scholar; Gosling, David, ‘Brasília’, Third World Planning Review, 1979, p. 44.Google Scholar

36 Lopes, 27 July 1989 interview; Campos, 24 July 1989 interview. Lopes and Campos both left the Kubitschek government after Lopes had a heart attack and Kubitschek abandoned a short-lived economic stabilisation plan.

37 ‘Contas Nacionais do Brasil, 1947–1965’, Revista Brasileira de Economia, Ano 20, no. 1 (March 1966), pp. 82–3.Google Scholar These figures are for all agencies of the federal government except the so-called ‘mixed’ companies.

38 These themes are discussed in Maram, Sheldon, ‘Juscelino Kubitschek and the Politics of Exuberance, 1956–1961’, Luso-Brazilian Review, vol. 27, no. 1 (summer 1990), pp. 42–43.Google Scholar

39 See, for example, San Tiago Dantas' 3 Nov. 1959 account of a private meeting involving Kubitschek, key advisors and political figures, and Lott to discuss the possibility of a national unity candidate in ‘Relatório para o Sr. Joāo Goulart’, AP47–1, Arquivo de Francisco Clementine de San Tiago Dantas [ASTD], Arquivo Nacional.

40 Falcāo, 24 Aug. 1990 interview, Notably, Amaral Peixoto suggested a similar argument to explain Kubitschek's opposition to a presidential candidate strongly identified with the PSD in Camargo, Aspásia et al. , Artes da politico: Diálogo com Amaral Peixoto (Rio de Janeiro, 1986), p. 429Google Scholar

41 For a discussion of the UDN and PSD's philosophical and political points of convergence and conflict, see Benevides, , O Governo Kubitschek, pp. 132–139Google Scholar; Benevides, Maria Victoria Mesquita, A UDN e o Udenismo: Ambigüidades do Liberalismo Brasileiro (1941–1965) (Rio de Janeiro, 1981), p. 107.Google Scholar

42 For an excellent summary analysis of the political changes during the 1950s, see Skidmore, Thomas E., Politics in Brazil, 1930–1964: An Experiment in Democracy (London and New York, 1967), pp. 166–186.Google Scholar

43 Wainer, Samuel, Minha Razāo de Viver: Memórial de um Reporter, ed. by Nunes, Augusto, 10th edn. (Rio de Janeiro, 1988), pp. 222–223.Google Scholar

44 Jurema, , Depoimento, p. 202Google Scholar; Hippolito, , De Raposas, p. 198Google Scholar; Manchete, 4 Oct. 1958, p. 72Google Scholar; Archer, , Depoimento, p. 250.Google Scholar

45 For examples, see correspondence in EAP55.12.12 (Código Provisorio), AN, Pastas 1–2, Arquivo de Ernâni do Amaral Peixoto [AEAP], FGV-CPDOC, Rio de Janeiro.

46 Hippolito, , De Raposas, p. 144.Google Scholar

47 See the discussion of congressional votes done by de Carvalho, Maria Isabel Valadāo, ‘A Colaboraçāo do Legislative para o Desempenho do Executive durante o Governo JK’, unpubl. MA thesis, IUPERJ, 1977, pp. 49–52Google Scholar; Hippolito, , De Raposas, pp. 72–74.Google Scholar On philosophical convergence between PSD and UDN in the latter part of the Kubitschek administration, see Benevides, , UDN, p. 107.Google Scholar

48 Benevides, Maria Victoria, O PTB e o Trabalhismo: Partido e Sindicato em Sāo Paulo (1945–1964) (Sāo Paulo, 1989), pp. 35–36Google Scholar; D'Araujo, Maria Celina Scares, O Segundo Governo Vargas, 1951–1954: Democracia, Partidos e Crise Politico (Rio de Janeiro, 1982), pp. 104–113.Google Scholar

49 Juracy Magalhāes, interview by author, 14 Aug. 1990, Rio de Janeiro.

50 Kubitschek, Juscelino, Discursos Proferidos no segundo ano do mandate presidencial, 1957 (Rio de Janeiro, 1958), p. 266.Google Scholar

51 Magalhāes, , Minhas Memórial, p. 143.Google Scholar This praise of Kubitschek and his programme continued even after the efforts for Magalhāes’ candidacy had proven unsuccessful. See, for example, the typewritten transcript of interview in which he praised Kubitschek for ‘modifying old patterns of government actions’ and his ‘pioneering attitude’ in JM p.i. 60.03.00, Arquivo de Juraci Magalhāes [AJM], FGV-CPDOC, Rio de Janeiro, Note that in the text I spelled Magalhāes’ first name Juracy, consistent with the spelling in his memoirs. FGV-CPDOC uses Juraci, the more recent spelling.

52 Kubitschek, , A experiência, p. 16Google Scholar; Heliodoro, 6 June 1989, interview; Chaves, Joāo Pacheco, Depoimento, interviews by Hippolito, Lúcia, transcript, FGV/CPDOC, 1977–1978, Rio de Janeiro, p. 38.Google Scholar

53 See Maram, , ‘Juscelino Kubitschek’, pp. 42–43.Google Scholar

54 Archer, , Depoimento, pp. 256–257Google Scholar; Camargo, et al. , Artes da politico: Diálogo com Amaral Peixoto, p. 428Google Scholar; Hippolito, , Depoimento, pp. 200–203Google Scholar; Alzira Vargas do Amaral Peixoto, interview by author, 16 Aug. 1990, Rio de Janeiro. On efforts to return, see 13 June 1957 letter from Ulysses Guimares to Amaral Peixoto, EAP 55.12.27 AN, Pasta 2 and 6 March 1958 from Amaral Peixoto to José Maria Alkmin, EAP, Emb, AEAP.

55 Joffily, , Depoimento, p. 180Google Scholar; Costa, , Lott, pp. 411–412 and 414.Google Scholar

56 Hippolito, , De Raposas, p. 205.Google Scholar

57 Lacerda, Carlos, Depoimento, 3rd ed. rev. (Rio de Janeiro, 1987), p. 253Google Scholar; Sarah Kubitschek, 1 and 16 Aug. 1989 interviews. Sarah, Juscelino's wife, thought that despite the Marshal's ‘closed’ personality, he would make an excellent president.

58 Falcāo, , Tudo, pp. 109–110.Google Scholar

59 Letter from San Tiago Dantas to Joāo Goulart, 10 June 1959, AP47–1, ASTD.

60 See note 2.

61 ‘Relatório’, 3 Nov. 1959, AP47–1, ASTD.

62 Kubitschek, , 50 Anas em 5, p. 285.Google Scholar

63 Lacerda, , Depoimento, p. 236.Google Scholar

64 Ibid., p. 247.

65 Carvalho, Cid, Depoimento, interviews by Hippolito, Lúcia and Guido, Maria Cristina, transcript, FGV/CPDOC, p. 37Google Scholar; Archer, , Depoimento, p. 262.Google Scholar

66 ‘Gabinete do Governador’, JM 59.06.02 cgb, AJM.

67 Kubitschek, , 50 Anos em 5, pp. 387–388.Google Scholar

68 Lott, Henrique Teixeita, Depoimento, interviews by Farah, Paulo Cesar and de Farias, Inês Cordeiro, transcript, FGV/CPDOC, 1978, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 175–176.Google Scholar

69 Carvalho, Cid, Depoimento, p. 32Google Scholar; Dulles, , Unrest, p. 106.Google Scholar

70 See note 35; ‘Retrospecto do Custo da Vida 1944/1963’, Conjuntura Econômica, vol. 9 (Aug. 1963), pp. 119–123.Google Scholar

71 Kubitschek, , 50 Anos em 5, p. 324Google Scholar; Manchete, 28 Jan. 1961, p. 72.Google Scholar

72 Wainer, , Minhas Razēo, p. 222.Google Scholar

73 Affonso Heliodoro, interview by author, 6 June and 4 July 1989, Brasília; Cony, 18 May 1989 interview; Bloch, Adolfo, O Pilāo, 2nd vol. (Rio de Janeiro, 1988), p. XXXI.Google Scholar

74 Cony, 18 May 1989 interview; Bloch, p. XXXI; on typical coverage, see, e.g. Manchete, 31 Jan. 1959, pp. 42–51Google Scholar; 7 Feb. 1959, pp. 6–11; 6 Feb. 1960, pp. 30–73; 20 Feb. 1960, pp. 16–31.