Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:36:42.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brazil 1870–1914 – The Force of Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

José Murilo De Carvalho
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although in the literature there is almost a consensus that there was an advance of modernity in Brazil after 1870, tradition was sufficiently strong to maintain the values of a rural, patriarchal and hierarchical society. This modernity assumed characteristics that distinguished it from the classic model, represented by the Anglo-Saxon experience. In the period between 1870 and 1914 the ground was cleared for the conservative modernisation of the 1930s.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 24 , Supplement S1 , March 1992 , pp. 145 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For an overview of the period see Bethell, Leslie (ed.), Brazil: Empire and Republic 1822–1930 (Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, De Holanda, Sérgio Buarque, História Geral de Civilização Brasileira, II, vol. v: Do Império à República (São Paulo, 1977)Google Scholar, and Fausto, Boris (ed.), História Geral da Civilização Brasileira, III: Brasil Republicano, vols. I and II (São Paulo, 1977).Google Scholar On intellectual and scientific progress, see De Barros, Roque Spencer Maciel, A ilustração Brasileira e a idéia de Universidade, unpubl. PhD diss., Univ. of São Paulo, 1959Google Scholar, and Stepan, Nancy, Beginnings of Brazilian Science. Oswaldo Cruz, Medical Research and Policy, 1890–1920 (New York, 1976).Google Scholar On social and cultural modernization see Freyre, Gilberto, Ordem e Progresso, 3rd edn. (Rio de Janeiro, 1977)Google Scholar, Lobato, Monteiro, ‘Jeca Tatu’ in Problema Vital (São Paulo, 1918)Google Scholar, Needell, Jeffrey D., A Tropical Belle Epoque: Elite Culture and Society in Turn-of-the-Century Rio de Janeiro (Cambridge, 1987)Google Scholar, Foot-Hardman, Francisco, Trem Fantasma. A Modernidade na Selva (São Paulo, 1988).Google Scholar On the role of São Paulo, see Schwartzman, Simon, São Paulo e o Estado National (São Paulo, 1975).Google Scholar On the working-class movement see Fausto, Boris, Trabalho Urbano e Conflito Social (São Paulo, 1977).Google Scholar

2 On the reactions to modernity coming from rural populations, see, for Da Cunha, Canudos Euclides, Rebellion in the Backlands (Chicago, 1944)Google Scholar; for the Constestado, Monteiro, Duglas Teixeira, Os Errantes do Novo Século (São Paulo, 1974)Google Scholar; for Cava, Padre Cícero Ralph Della, Miracle at Joazeiro (New York, 1970)Google Scholar; for messianic movements in general, De Queiroz, Maria Isaura Pereira, O Messianismo no Brasil e no Mundo, 2nd edn. (São Paulo, 1977)Google Scholar and O Campesinato Brasileiro (São Paulo, 1973)Google Scholar, and Souto-Maior, Armando, Quebra-Quilos. Lutas Sociais no Outono so do Império (São Paulo, 1978), for the revolt of Quebra-Quilos.Google Scholar

3 On the politics of rural oligarchies see Leal, Victor Nunes, Coronelismo: The Municipality and Representative Government in Brazil (Cambridge, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Vianna, Oliveira, Populações Meridionais do Brasil, 2nd edn. (São Paulo, 1922).Google Scholar

4 On the urban reactions to modernity see Sevcenko, Nicolau, Literature como Missão. Tensões Sociaies e Criação Cultural na Primeira República (São Paulo, 1983)Google Scholar, De Carvalho, José Murilo, Os Bestializados. O Rio de Janeiro e a Repúblics que não Foi (São Paulo, 1987)Google Scholar, Graham, Sandra Lauderdale, ‘The Vintém Riot and Political Culture: Rio de Janeiro, 1880’, HAHR, vol. 60, no. 3 (1980), pp. 431–449Google Scholar, and De Lourdes Mónaco Janotti, Maria, Os Subversives da República (São Paulo, 1986).Google Scholar

5 On the content of modernity, see Bastos, Tavares, A Província, 2nd edn. (São Paulo, 1937)Google Scholar, Prado, Eduardo, A ilusão Americana, 2nd edn. (São Paulo, 1902)Google Scholar, Rodó, José Enrique, Ariel (Montevideo, 1900)Google Scholar, Morse, Richard M., O Espelho de Próspero. Cultura e Idéias nas Américas (São Paulo, 1988)Google Scholar, Lobato, Monteiro, Problema Vital (São Paulo, 1918)Google Scholar, De Queiroz, Sueli Robles Reis, Os Radicais da República. Jacobinismo: Ideologia e Ação, 1893–1897 (São Paulo, 1986)Google Scholar, Murilo De Carvalho, José, A Formaçãao das Almas: O imaginário da República no Brasil (São Paulo, 1990).Google Scholar

6 See Mayer, Arno J., The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (New York, 1981).Google Scholar

7 See Romero, Sílvio, O Brasil Social (Rio de Janeiro, 1907)Google Scholar, and Sales, Alberto, ‘Balanço Político: Necessidade de uma Reforma Constitucional’, in Paim, Antônio (ed.), Plataforma Político do Positivismo Ilustrado (Brasília, 1980), pp. 63–75.Google Scholar

8 On the Positivists, see Lins, Ivan, História do Positivismo no Brasil, 2nd edn. (São Paulo, 1967).Google Scholar