Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:49:55.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autos over Rails: How US Business Supplanted the British in Brazil, 1910–28

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Richard Downes
Richard Downes
Affiliation:
Richard Downes is Director of Communications, North-South Center, University of Miami.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dynamics of Brazil's transportation sector early in this century reveal much about how and why US industries conquered the Brazilian market and established a sound basis for investment. Especially during the 1920s, US companies responded to the transportation needs of Brazil's rapidly growing economy and won the major share of its automobile and truck markets. This was crucial because of the automobile's central role as a leading sector of the world's economy during this period. Sales and then direct investment by US firms in automobile assembly plants placed US business on a more secure foundation than British investment, prominent in a sector losing the vitality exhibited in the nineteenth century: railroads. Rail systems slowed their extension into the immense Brazilian interior while the automobile flourished, promoted by a powerful Brazilian lobby for automobilismo reinforced by efforts of US business and government. This process illustrates how the Brazilians' interpretation of their economic needs coincided with pressures exerted by US industry to create a permanent US presence within Brazil's economy. How Henry Ford replaced Herbert Spencer as the foremost symbol of industrialism in early twentieth century Brazil sheds light on the personal and political dynamics of international business competition.1

Rapid economic growth in the early twentieth century thrust a host of new local and regional demands upon Brazil's woefully inadequate transportation sector. Capital formation rose without interruption from 1901 onwards and reached very high levels immediately prior to World War I; more than 11,000 industrial firms producing over 67% of the economy's 1920 industrial output came into being between 1900 and 1920.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , October 1992 , pp. 551 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘The “leading sector” is that segment of the economy “moving ahead more rapidly than the average, absorbing a disproportionate volume of entrepreneurs, [and] stimulating requirements to sustain it.’ Rostow, Walt W., The World Economy: History & Prospect (Austin, 1978), pp. 104–105, 185 and 208–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For Spencer's image as a proponent of industrialism, see Graham, Richard, Britain and the Onset of Modernization in Brazil, 1850–1914 (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Baer, Werner, The Brazilian Economy: Growth and Development, 3rd edn. (New York, 1989), pp. 25, 28, 30 and 32.Google ScholarDownes, E. Richard, ‘The Seeds of Influence: Brazil's “Essentially Agricultural” Old Republic and the United States, 1910–1930’, (PhD Diss., Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1986), p. 214.Google Scholar

3 Baer, , The Brazilian Economy, p. 27Google Scholar; Revista da Sociedade Rural Brasileira (SRB), vol. 4 (1924), pp. 113–114.Google Scholar

4 Branner, John C., Cotton in the Empire of Brazil: The Antiquity, Methods and Extent of its Cultivation; Together with Statistics of Exportation and Home Consumption (Washington, 1885), pp. 25–26Google Scholar; Dutra, Joāo, O sertāo e o centro (Rio de Janeiro, 1938), p. 163.Google Scholar See also Duncan, Julian S., Public and Private Operation of Railways in Brazil (New York, 1932).Google Scholar

5 See Graham, , Britain and the Onset, p. 30.Google Scholar Railroad construction recovered between 1905 and 1913 precisely when the milreis regained some strength against foreign currency. For exchange rates see Holloway, Thomas H., Immigrants on the Land: Coffee and Society in Sao Paulo, 1886–1934 (Chapel Hill, 1980), p. 181.Google Scholar For annual new railroad construction, see Brazil, Inspectoria de Estradas de Ferro, Federal, Estatística 1934 (Araguary, Minas Gerais, 1936), p. 45.Google Scholar

6 Topik, Steven, ‘The Evolution of the Economic Role of the Brazilian State’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 2 (1979), pp. 336–337.Google Scholar

7 Duncan, , Public and Private Operation of Railways, pp. 206–207Google Scholar; do Sul, Rio Grande, Mensagem, p. 50.Google Scholar

8 TS (typescript), Rolfs, P. H., ‘Human Waste’, n.d., Box 2, Peter Henry Rolfs Archives, (PHRA), University of Florida.Google Scholar

9 Duncan, , Private and Public Operation of Railways, pp. 70 and 79.Google Scholar

10 ‘Estradas de ferro’, Retrospecto Comercial do Jornal do Comercio (RC do “JC”), 1919, pp. 127 and 129Google Scholar; Wirth, John D., Minas Gerais in the Brazilian Federation, 1889–1937 (Stanford, 1977), p. 179Google Scholar; USC (US Consul)-Bahia to SS (US Secretary of State), 2 Aug. 1921, 832.77/63, RG 59, US National Archives (USNA).

11 ‘O problema ferroviario’, RC do “JC”, 1919, pp. 130 and 132.Google Scholar

12 Simpson, Roy J. et al. , Domestic Transportation: Practices, Theory, and Policy (Boston: 1990), pp. 62–63Google Scholar; Cárdenas, Enrique, La industrialización mexicana durante la Gran Depresion (México: 1987), p. 161Google Scholar: Weiss, Joseph, ‘The Benefits of Broader Markets Due to Feeder Roads and Market News: Northeast Brazil’, (PhD Diss., Cornell University, 1971)Google Scholar; Letter, Prefeitura Municipal de Garanhuns, Pernambuco, to Inspectoria de Obras Contra as Seccas, 28 August 1915, M (Maço)-215 A, Brazilian National Archive. There appears to have been no empirical comparison of the merits of expanding Brazil's railroad system versus creating a national highway system. Even today such comparisons are complex, involving assumptions about pick up and delivery costs, length of haul, traffic density, energy costs, source of capital, and interest and exchange rates. See Heflebower, Richard B., ‘Characteristics of Transportation Modes’, in Fromme, Gary (ed.), Transport Investment and Economic Development (Washington, 1965), pp. 43–46Google Scholar, and Brown, Robert T., ‘The “Railroad Decision” in Chile’, inGoogle Scholaribid., pp. 264–266.

13 Under the Empire provinces and property owners had been responsible for building and maintaining roads, and hopes for an adequate road system often fell victim to vague contracts, skimming contractors and the whims of weather. As one account of the Empire's agricultural experience summarised, ‘most highways were mere dirt paths, poorly designed, that permitted only the passage of mule teams, ox carts, and horses during the dry season’. Stein, Stanley J., Vassouras: A Brazilian Coffee County, 1850–1900 (Cambridge, 1957), pp. 94–110Google Scholar; Lobo, Eulalia Maria Lahmeyer, Historia político-administrativa da agricultura brasileira, 1808–1889 (Brasilia, n.d.), p. 64.Google Scholar

14 Business interests were almost equally represented. See Automovel Club de Paulo, S., Annuario 1921 (N.P., n.d.), pp. 48–75.Google Scholar

15 Decree 8, 324, 27 Oct. 1910, and ‘Regulamento…’, Colecçāo das Leis de 1910 (Rio de Janeiro, 1915), vol. II, no. 2, p. 1, 151.Google Scholar

16 TS, ‘Estradas de Rodagem’, p. 2, 21 June 1911, 1911.06.21, Arquivo Raul Soares (ARS)Google Scholar; Auto-Propulsāo, col. I, no. 7 (1915), p. 9Google Scholar; Gerais, Minas, Inspectoria de Estradas de Rodagem, As estradas de rodagem no estado… (Rio de Janeiro, 1929), p. vii.Google Scholar

17 U.S. Consul, Sāo Paulo (USC-SP) to U.S. Secretary of State (SS), 50 June 1922, 832.154/33, RG 59, USNA. Grande do Sul, Rio, Mensagem, 1912, p. 26Google Scholar; Bertarelli, Ernesto, ‘As vias comuns de communicacao nos estados agricolas’, O Progresso, vol. I, no. 10 (1914), p. 4Google Scholar; Brasil Industrial, vol. 2, no. 15 (1915), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar Only one percent of the Old Republic's 113,000 kilometres of roads were paved by 1930. See Sheerwood, Arthur R., ‘Brazilian Federal Highways and the Growth of Selected Urban Areas’, (PhD Diss., New York University, 1967), p. 30.Google Scholar

18 Crandall also hoped that good roads would lead to broad social change in the Northeast, where ‘a few men of great power hold their positions independent of justice’ while the majority lay ‘reduced to poverty or to living as bandits’. Brazil, Inspectoria de Obras Contra as Seccas, Geografia, geologia, supprimento d'agua, transportese afudagem nos estados orientaes do norte do Brasil: Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Parahyba [Roderic Crandall], 2nd edn. (1923; rpt.: Rio de Janeiro, 1977), pp. 54, 55–58, 75 and 129.

19 ‘Obras contra as seccas’, RC do ‘JC’, 1917, p. 163Google Scholar; USC-Pernambuco to SS, 26 July 1919, 832.154/28, USNA. The federal government also had ordered studies of the Rio-Petrópolis road in 1911 but did not assist reconstruction until the late 1920s. See Decree 8571, 22 Feb. 1911, in M-151, Ministerio de Viaçāo e Obras Públicas, Brazilian National Archive.

20 Quoted in Boletím Agrícola, 10 (1916), p. 483.Google Scholar

21 Brasil Industrial, vol. 3, no. 29 (1919), p. 49Google Scholar; USACG to SS, 15 June 1918, 832.154/19, Record Group (RG) 59, USNA; Paraná, , d'Estado dos Negocios, Secretaria, Fazenda, , Agricultura e Obras Públicas, Relatório, 1919 (Curitiba, 1919), vol. II, pp. 548–549Google Scholar; Martins, Romario, ‘As estradas de rodagem no Paraná’, Brasil Agrícola, vol. 2 (1917), pp. 262–264Google Scholar; Paraná, , Mensagem, 1917, p. 32.Google Scholar‘Estradas de rodagem’, Boletím [MAG], vol. I, no. 3 (1925), p. 391.Google Scholar

22 Brazil, Ministerio de Agricultura, Industria e Comercio (MAG), Relatório, 1918, p. 89Google Scholar; Brazil, Inspectoria Federal de Obras Contra as Seccas, Estradas de rodagem e carroçaveis construidas no Nordeste Brasileiro pela Inspectoria Federal de Obras Contra as Seccas nos annos 1919 a 1925 (Rio de Janeiro, 1927), p. 232Google Scholar; Brazil, Primeiro Congresso Panamericano, Annex 5; ‘Mappa demonstrativa das estradas de rodagem…’, 10 Aug. 1925, 10.08.25, Arquivo lldefonso Simoēs Lopes (AISL). Cavalcanti, José F. Brandāo, ‘Em prol do algodao’, A Lavoura, vol. 24 (1920), pp. 269–270.Google Scholar

23 Lucas, C. P. J., ‘The Good Roads Movement in Brazil’, Bulletin of the American Chamber of Commerce, S. Paulo, vol. 3, no. 8 (1922), p. 4Google Scholar; Joāo Suassuna to Epitácio Pessoa, 30 Jan. 1925, P-61, AEP; ‘As grandes estradas do Nordeste’, O Automóvel, 8, no. 101 (1923), pp. 23–25Google Scholar; Girāo, Raimundo, História económica do Ceará (Ceará, 1947), p. 433.Google Scholar

24 Landulpho Alves de Almeida to lldefonso Simoēs Lopes, 25 July 1917, pp. 12, 16, 18, 14.12.15, AISL.

25 ‘Missāo Carlos Moreira’, Brazil, MAG, Relatório, 1918, p. 254Google Scholar; de Lima, José Custodio Alves, Conferencia sobre estradas de rodagem e aproveitamento dos sentenciados (Sáo Paulo, 1917), pp. 10–11 and 15–19.Google Scholar

26 [US] Highway Research Board, Ideas & Actions: A History of the Highway Research Board, 1920–1970 (Washington, n.d.), pp. 2–3Google Scholar; American Highway Improvement Association, The Official Good Roads Year Book of the United States (Washington, 1912), pp. 8–25Google Scholar; Gregory, Gladys, ‘The Development of Good Roads in the United States’, (M.A. thesis, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1926), pp. 13–18.Google Scholar

27 Automóvel Club do Brasil, Primeira Exposiçāo de automobilismo, auto-propulsāo e estradasde rodagem (Rio de Janeiro, 1925), p. 5Google Scholar; Jornal do Commercio [Sāo Paulo], I June 1917, p. 4, col. 3Google Scholar; U.S. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce (USBFDC), Motor Roads in Latin America (Washington, 1925), pp. 129–130Google Scholar; Decree 1707, 13 Sept. 1917, ‘Estradas de rodagem’, Boletím [Bahia], vol. I, no. 2 (1917), p. 70Google Scholar; vol. I, no. 4 (1917), p. 72.

28 A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. I (1921), p. 6Google Scholar; Automóvel Club de Sáo Paulo, Annuario 1921, pp. 49–162.Google Scholar

29 ‘A necessidade de estradas’, A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. 4 (1921), p. 21Google Scholar; ‘A Sociedade Rurale Brasileira collabora com a A.P.E.R.’, Annaes da SRB, vol. I (1920), p. 6Google Scholar; De Barros, C. A. Monteiro, ‘Pela solidariedade brasileira’, A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. I (1921), p. 12.Google Scholar

30 Bulletin of the American Chamber of Commerce, Paulo, S., vol. I, no. I (1920), p. 1Google Scholar; vol. 2, no.5; (1922), p. 36; U.S. Consul, Sao Paulo (USC-SP) to SS, 8 Sept. 1915, pp. I, 4, 16, 102.1/139 RG 59, USNA; A Evoluçāo Agrícola, vol. 6, nos. 69–70 (1915), back cover. Jornal do Commercio [Sāo Paulo], 21 Nov. 21, 1915, p. 9, cols. 2, 3Google Scholar; USC-SP to SS, I Sept. 1922, p. 2, 164.12/560, RG 59, USNA. Firestone began to conduct business in its own right in Brazil in 1923. See Brazil, Ministerio do Trabalho, Industria e Comercio, Sociedades mercantis autorizadas a functionar no Brasil (1808–1946) (Rio de Janeiro, 1947), p. 134.Google Scholar

31 Bulletin of the American Chamber of Commerce, Paulo, S., vol. I, no. I (1920), p. 4Google Scholar; vol. I, no. 12 (1921), p. 12; Brazilian—American, vol. 2, no. 50 (Oct. 9, 1920), p. 15Google Scholar; Samson, L. Romero, ‘O problema da Viacão no Brasil’, A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. 3 (1921), pp. 13–14Google Scholar; vol. I, no. 4 (1921), p. 23; See also advertisement, A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. 2 (1921), inside cover.Google Scholar

32 USC-SP to SS, 28 Jan. 28, 1920, 632.11171/19, RG 59, USNA; Boas Estradas, vol. I, no. 4 (1921), p. 23; Bulletin of the American Chamber of Commerce, Paulo, S., vol. 2, no. 3 (1921), p. 1.Google Scholar

33 ‘A estrada de rodagem de S. Paulo a Itú’, A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. 11 (1922), pp. 37–38Google Scholar; USC-SP to SS, 19 Oct. 1923, pp. 2–3, 832.154/36, RG 59, USNA; ‘Third Sāo Paulo Highway Conference’, Bulletin of the Pan American Union (BP AU), vol. 58 (1924), pp. 182–183.Google Scholar

34 USC-SP to SS, 14 Oct. 1926, 832.154/74, RG 59, USNA; Howard T. Oliver to Fred I. Kent, 5 Feb. 1926, 033.3211/210 (attachment), RG 59, USNA; USC-SP to SS, 10 Oct. 1927, 832.154/86, RG 59, USNA.

35 ‘Notable Automobile Endurance Test in Sāo Paulo, Brazil’, BP AU, vol. 60 (1926), pp. 1,110, and 1,117.Google Scholar

36 Pyke Johnson to Francis White, Latin American Div., US Department of State (USDS), 8 Dec. 1923, 515.4C1/-, RG 59, USNA; Walter C. John to SS, 13 March 1924, 515.4C1/27, RG 59, USNA. Dotación Carnegie para la Paz Internacional, Conferencias internacionales americanas, 1889–1936 (Washington, 1938), pp. 214 and 274–275.Google Scholar

37 Brazil, Ministerio da Viaçāo e Obras Públicas, Primeiro Congresso Panamericano de Estradas de Rodagem: Relatório da Delegaçāo do Brasil (N.P., 1928), pp. 4–5Google Scholar; Pyke Johnson to Francis White, Latin American Div., USDS, 8 Dec. 1923, 515.4C1/-, RG 59, USNA; Paulo, Sāo, Secretaria da Agricultura, Commercio e Obras Públicas, Commissáo Pan-Americana de Estradas de Rodagem Reunida nos Estados Unidos… (Sāo Paulo, 1925), p. 6Google Scholar; E. S. Gregg, Memo, Transportation Div., Commerce Department, 18 Jan. 1924, 515.4C1/5, RG 59, USNA.

38 SS to U.S. Embassy, Rio de Janeiro (USE-RJ), 15 March 1924, 515.4C1/23d, RG 59, USNA; Brazil, Primeiro Congresso Panamericano, pp. 6–11; Paulo, Sāo, Commisāo Panamericana, p. 47.Google Scholar

39 Paulo, Sāo, Commissao Panamericana, pp. 12, 85 and 90.Google Scholar

40 J. Walter Drake [Assistant Secretary of Commerce] to SS, 14 Jan. 1925, 515.4D1/1, RG 59, USNA; ‘Reunioés semanaes da SRB’, Revista da SRB, vol. 6, no. 61 (1925), p. 278Google Scholar; ‘Brazilian Federation for Highway Education’, BP AU, vol. 61, Primeiro Congresso Panamericano, p. 25.

41 Drake to SS, 25 Jan. 1925, 515.4D1/1, RG 59, USNA; Quoted in Brazil, Primeiro Congresso Panamericano, p. ii.

42 Brazil, Primeiro Congresso Panamericano, p. ii; ‘Estradas de Rodagem’, Boletim [MAG], 15, 2, no. 4 (1927), p. 429.Google Scholar

43 USC-Pernambuco to SS, 23 Aug. 1923, 832.154/154, RG 59, USNA; USC-Pernambuco to SS, 11 Feb. 1926, 832.154/67, RG 59, USNA.

44 The check for 4:872$ represented one percent of receipts from the sale of 50 Chevrolets. General Motors, vol. I, no. 6 (1926), p. 19; Long, Richard C. ‘Highways in Rio Grande do Sul’, quoted in Brazilian Business, vol. 7, no. 6 (1927), p. 9.Google Scholar

45 The Automóvel Club was called the Automóvel Club Brasileiro until 1919. Automóvel Club do Brasil, Annuario de 1929 (Rio de Janeiro, n.d.), pp. 13 and 16; ‘Rio-Petrópolis’, O Automóvel, vol. 9, no. 102 (1923), p. 5Google Scholar; ‘A Estrada Rio-Petrópolis’, A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. 3, no. 28 (1923), p. 40.Google Scholar

46 Brazil, Directoria de Estatística Commercial, Commercio Exterior do Brasil: Importaçāo, Exportaçāo 1913–1918 (Rio de Janeiro, 1921), vol. I, p. 120Google Scholar; Elliott, Lillian Elwyn, Brazil Today and Tomorrow (New York, 1917), pp. 127–128.Google Scholar Diplomats, however, prefered more expensive models. In a confidential telegram to the Brazilian Chargé in Washington, Foreign Minister da Gama ordered a draw upon a London account of $6, 219.23 to purchase a Phiama auto for da Gama. Embassy of Brazil, Washington (EBW) to Ministerio de Relaçōes Exteriores (MRE), 4 March 1919, M-232, 2, 11, Arquivo Histórico do Itamaratí (AHI). Pearse, Arno S., Brazilian Cotton (Manchester, 1923), p. 141Google Scholar; Inspectoria Federal de Obras Contra as Seccas, Segundo Distrito, TS, ‘Transcripçāo de trechos de Relatórios…’, P-61, Arquivo Epitácio Pessoa (AEP); Torrend, Camillo, ‘Excursāo a Goyaz’, Boletim [MAG], vol. 15, no. 6 (1926), p. 770.Google Scholar

47 Noticias Ford, vol. 8, no. 2 (1979), p. 3Google Scholar; Wilkins, Mira and Hill, Frank E., American Business Abroad: Ford on Six Continents (Detroit, 1964), pp. 93–94.Google Scholar Ford's plant was not the first auto assembly plant in Brazil. In 1904 Luiz and Fortunato Grassi organised a company that in 1907 assembled the first Fiat to operate in Brazil. The same company in the 1920s sold both Ford and General Motors truck chasses for their products. See Almeida, José, A implantaçāo da industria automobilística no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro, 1972), pp. 4–5, 14Google Scholar; Nascimento, Benedicto Heloiz, Formaçāo da industria automobilística brasileira: político de desenvolvimento industrial em uma economia dependente (Sāo Paulo, 1976), p. 14.Google Scholar‘A expansāo do Ford no Brasi’, Automobilismo, vol. I, no. I (1926), p. 20.Google Scholar

48 Wilkins, and Hill, , American Business, pp. 146 and 148Google Scholar; A Estrada de Rodagem, vol. I, no. 4 (1921), p. 11Google Scholar; vol. 1, no. 1 (1921), p. 14.

49 ‘Um grande acontecimento automobilístico’, O Automobilismo, vol. 2, no. 8 (1927), pp. 12–16Google Scholar; TS, General Motors do Brasil, Public Relations Department, ‘Curiosidades históricas’, 1972, p. 4Google Scholar; General Motors do Brasil, Public Relations Department, ‘General Motors do Brasil — 57 annos de emprendimento industrial’, 1982, p. 1, both in Arquivo, General Motors do Brasil, Sāo Caetano do Sul, Sāo Paulo [hereafter referred to as AGMB.]Google Scholar

50 Brazil, Institute Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Annuario estatístico 1939/1940 (Rio de Janeiro, n.d.), vol. v, p. 1,304Google Scholar; ‘Quadro do crescimento…’, O Automobilismo, vol. 4, no. 42 (1929), pp. 31–36.Google Scholar The ratio of automobiles to total population remained much lower than in the United States, where every state except Alabama had a higher ratio of cars to population. Even with Alabama's ratio, Sāo Paulo would have had 400,000 autos, instead of less than 39,000. See Automobilismo, vol. I, no. 1 (1926), p. 26.Google Scholar

51 Gerais, Minas, Estradas de Rodagem, p. 4Google Scholar; USC-Bahia to SS, 8 Oct. 1924, 832.513/-, RG 59, USNA; Bahia, Mensagem, 1926, p. 245.Google Scholar

52 ‘A caravana Ford-Fordson…’, O Automobilismo, vol. I, no. 3 (1926), pp. 36–37Google Scholar; USC-SP to SS, 30 Sept. 1926, 832.154/73, RG 59, USNA; ‘O grande circo Chevrolet’, General Motors Brasileira, vol. 5, no. 52 (1930), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

53 B. F. O'toole [Latin American Div., USBFDC] to N. Y. District Office, USBFDC, 10 Oct. 1925, Box 2232, RG 151, USNA; TS, General Motors do Brasil, untitled scrapbook, n.d., pt. I, p. I, AGMB.

54 General Motors, scrapbook, pp. 4, 65 TS, ‘Office Bulletin (26 Nov. 1926)’, scrapbook, AGMB, Ford retained a dominant market share, however, in 1930: 54.9% versus General Motor's 17.1%.Google ScholarWilkins, and Hill, , American Business, p. 202.Google Scholar

55 ‘Homeagem ao snr. V. E. Lucca’, O Automobilismo, vol. 2, no. 13 (1927), p. 20.Google Scholar

56 Howard T. Oliver to Fred I. Kent, 5 Feb. 1926, 033.3211/210, RG 59, USNA.

57 USE-RJ to SS, I July 1926, 033.3211/211, RG 59, USNA; Robert Kaiser, USDS, Memorandum, n.d., encl. to Thomas A. MacDonald, Bureau of Public Roads, to R. E. Olds, Assist. SS, 24 Aug. 1926, 033.3211/213, RG 59, USNA.

58 Kaiser, Robert, Memorandum, pp. 2–3, 6.Google Scholar

59 New York Times (NYT), 19 April 1927, p. 9, col. I.Google Scholar

60 Antônio, F. P.de Wright, Almedia, Desafio americano a preponderancia britanica no Brasil, 1808–1850 (Sāo Paulo, 1978)Google Scholar; Strauss, Norman, ‘Rise of American Growth in Brazil: Decade of the 1870's’, Americas, vol. 32 (1976), pp. 437–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarSmith, Herbert H., Brazil: The Amazons and the Coast (New York, 1879), p. 492Google Scholar; Graham, , Britain and the Onset, pp. 298–318Google Scholar; Burns, E. Bradford, The Unwritten Alliance: Rio Branco and Brazilian-American Relations (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

61 Rosenberg, Emily S., ‘Anglo-American Economic Rivalry in Brazil During World War I’, Diplomatic History, vol. 2, no. 2 (1978), p. 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar; John I. Merrill [Central and South American Telegraph Company] to EBW, 2 April 1917, M-234, 2, 7, AHI; Manoel Coelho Rodrigues to MRE, 16 July 1919, M-234, 2, 12, AHI; USE-RJ to SS, 21 Oct. 1914, 300.115/1343, RG 59, USNA; USE-RJ to SS, 23 Oct. 1916 and Memorandum, Solicitor, USDS, 16 Nov. 1916, both in RG 59, 332.114B46, USNA.

62 TS, ‘General Situation in Brazil’, 9 Dec. 1917, ONI Files, WA-7, Brazil, USNA; Confidential encl. to USE-RJ to SS, 18 April 1918, 632.1116/1, RG 59, USNA.

63 USE-RJ to SS, 16 May 1918, 033.4132/5, RG 59, USNA; Roy W. Howard, Telegram to United Press International (UPI), New York, 14 May 1918, L-46, P-I, N-76, AEP.

64 USC-PA to SS, 19 June 1919, 800.8830/205, RG 59, USNA.

65 Smith, Joseph, ‘American Diplomacy and the Naval Mission to Brazil’, Inter-American Economic Affairs, vol. 35, no. I (1981), pp. 85–86Google Scholar; Hilton, Stanley E., ‘The Armed Forces and Industrialists in Brazil: the Drive for Military Autonomy (1889–1954)’, Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 62 (1982), p. 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

66 USC-London, Memorandum, 28 Nov. 1923, 033.4132/13, RG 59, USNA; The Times, 28 Nov. 1923Google Scholar; Brazil, Directoria de Estatística Commercial, Commercio Exterior do Brasil: Importaçāo, Exportaçāo, Movimento Maritimo 1919–1923 (Rio de Janeiro, 1928), pp. 23–25Google Scholar; The Times, 22 March 1924, p. 22, col. I; 2 Feb. 1924, p. 12, col. 3.

67 The Times, 22 March 1924, p. 22, col. I; British Financial Commission, ‘Report Submitted to His Excellency the President of the United States of Brazil…’, 23 Feb. 1924, p. 27, 033.4132/40, RG 59, USNA.

68 British Financial Commission, ‘Report’, pp. 27–28 and 33.Google Scholar

69 USE-RJ to SS, 5 March 1924, 033.4132/30, RG 59, USNA; USE-RJ to SS, 11 Oct. 1924, 033.4132/39, RG 59, USNA and encl., Jornal do Brasil, 11 Oct. 1924; O Paiz, 9 Oct. 1924.

70 ‘Roads and Cars in Brazil’, Monthly Bulletin of the British Chamber of Commerce in Brazil, vol. 5, no. 51 (1923), pp. 90 and 96Google Scholar; ‘Why we need American ships’, Bulletin of the American Chamber of Commerce, S. Paulo, vol. 4, no. 5 (1923), p. 5. In 1922 ‘vehicles for hire’, was the most important category of automobiles registered in Rio de Janeiro. Of 4,645 autos, more than 44% (2,047) were for hire while 40% (1,847) were ‘private cars’. USACG to SS, 31 July 1922, 832.797/2, RG 59, USNA.Google Scholar

71 ‘Na Rua Solon…’, Noticias Ford, vol. 8, no. 2 (1979), p. 4Google Scholar; ‘O commercio de automovers em Sāo Paulo’, O Automobilismo, vol. 3, no. 24 (1928), pp. 27–29Google Scholar; TS, General Motors do Brasil, Production Control, ‘Units Produced Cumulative Through 1945’, 1959, AGMBGoogle Scholar; ‘A filial da GMB na Bahia’, General Motors Brasileira, vol. 3, no. 26 (1928), p. 7Google Scholar; O Automobilismo, vol. I, no. 5 (1926), p. 45Google Scholar; USBFDC, The Automotive Market in Brazil (Washington, 1930), p. 9Google Scholar; USBFDC, Commerce Yearbook 1930 (Washington, 1930), vol. II, pp. 161–162.Google Scholar

72 ‘O commercio de automoveis em Sāo Paulo’, O Automobilismo, vol. 2, no. 24 (1928), p. 34Google Scholar; ‘Caravana Ford-Fordson’, O Automobilismo, vol. I, no. 3 (1926), pp. 36–37Google Scholar; Brazil, Ministerio do Trabalho, Industria e Commercio, Sociedades mercantis autorizadas a funcionar no Brasil (1808–1946) (Rio de Janeiro, 1947), pp. 131–142Google Scholar; Brazilian American, vol. 3, no. 70 (1921), p. 37Google Scholar; Ambassador Morgan to Raul Soares, 8 March 1923, 23–30–08/1, ARS. Sales of gasoline by Standard Oil of New Jersey also probably increased significantly during this period. Established in Brazil through a subsidiary in 1896, by the war years annual profits from the company's Brazilian operations consistently topped $1 million. Gibb, George S. and Knowlton, Evelyn H., History of Standard Oil Company (New Jersey): The Resurgent Years, 1911–1927 (New York, 1955), pp. 182 and 197.Google Scholar

73 Calculated from figures compiled from consular reports by USBFDC. See USBFDC, The Automotive Market in Brazil (Washington, 1930), p. 9Google Scholar; USBFDC, Commerce Yearbook 1930 (Washington, 1930), vol. II, p. 76.Google Scholar

74 Mathews, R. C. O., Feinstein, C. H., and Odling-Smee, J. C., British Economic Growth (Stanford, 1982), p. 467Google Scholar; Foreman-Peck, James, A History of the World Economy: International Relations Since 1950 (Totowa, N.J.: 1983), p. 221.Google ScholarRostow, , The World Economy, pp. 70–74.Google Scholar

75 [José Bento] Lobato, Monteiro, How Henry Ford is Regarded in Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, 1926), pp. 4 and 8.Google ScholarNist, John, The Modernist Movement in Brazil: A Literary Study (Austin, 1967), p. 20.Google Scholar Monteiro Lobato represented the Brazilian expression of ‘Fordismus’, an international study of Ford's ideas and techniques. See Wilkins, and Hill, , American Business, pp. 151–152.Google Scholar

76 ‘As estradas de rodagem’, Boletím [MAG], vol. 14, part I, no. 3 (1925), p. 388Google Scholar; Boletím [MAG], vol. 16, part I, no. I (1927), pp. 31 and 35Google Scholar; U.S. Consul General, Rio de Janeiro (USACG-RJ) to SS, 7 Nov. 1928, RG 59, 832.51/531, USNA.

77 ‘O tráfego rodoviario’, Boletím [MAG], vol. 17, part 2, no. I (1928), p. 65.Google Scholar