Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:37:20.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surveying the Lands of Republican Indígenas: Contentious Nineteenth-Century Efforts to Abolish Indigenous Resguardos near Bogotá, Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2019

Lina del Castillo Open the ORCID record for Lina del Castillo [Opens in a new window]
Lina del Castillo*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of History and Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nineteenth-century republicans across the political spectrum agreed: the Spanish monarchy produced ‘miserable Indians’. Abolishing tribute and privatising communal lands, known as resguardos in New Granada (roughly today's Panama and Colombia), would transform that wretched class into equal citizens. Drawing on late eighteenth-century privatisation efforts by the Spanish Crown, early republican leaders in Gran Colombia inaugurated an era seeking equal access to wealth from communal land for all indigenous community members. After Gran Colombia (the first Colombian Republic, 1819–30) dissolved into New Granada, Ecuador and Venezuela in 1830, New Granada's experiments with indigenous resguardo policies went further. By then, legislative efforts considered the needs of all resguardo members, including unmarried mothers and their illegitimate children. Complex laws, diverse ecological terrain and nuanced social realities required well-trained surveyors to ensure each eligible indigenous family received a fair share of land. Whereas indigenous communities in Pasto, Santa Marta and the Cauca river valley resorted to armed insurrection against liberal policies through the War of the Supremes (1839–42), those in the highlands near Bogotá did not. Instead, these republican indígenas – with their greater access to the levers of power housed in the national capital – chose to engage in the reforms of a decentralising state. This article reveals how contentious experiments seeking republican equality within indigenous resguardos as a path towards abolishing the institution were consistently stymied by efforts to ensure that indigenous community governance and communal landholding remained intact.

Spanish abstract

Los republicanos del siglo XIX de todas las tendencias políticas estaban de acuerdo con una idea: la monarquía española había producido ‘indios miserables’. Se pensó que abolir el tributo y privatizar las tierras comunales, conocidas como resguardos en la Nueva Granada (aproximadamente lo que es hoy Panamá y Colombia) transformarían a esta clase miserable en ciudadanos iguales. Basándose en las medidas de privatización de la Corona española de fines del siglo XVIII, los primeros líderes republicanos de la Gran Colombia (la primera república Colombiana, 1819–30) inauguraron una era que buscaba un acceso igualitario a la riqueza de las tierras comunales para todos los miembros de las comunidades indígenas. Tras la disolución de la Gran Colombia en Nueva Granada, Ecuador y Venezuela en 1830, los experimentos con los resguardos indígenas habían ido más lejos. Para entonces, los esfuerzos legislativos tuvieron en cuenta las necesidades de todos los miembros del resguardo, incluidas madres solteras y sus hijos ilegítimos. Leyes complejas, diversos terrenos ecológicos y realidades sociales específicas requerían de agrimensores bien capacitados para asegurarse que cada familia indígena elegible recibiera una parte justa de terrenos. Mientras que algunas comunidades indígenas en Pasto, Santa Marta y el valle del Cauca recurrieron a la insurrección armada en contra de las políticas liberales en la Guerra de los Supremos (1839–42), aquellas en las tierras altas de Bogotá no lo hicieron. Más bien, estos indígenas republicanos – con su mayor acceso a las palancas del poder establecidas en la capital – se involucraron en las reformas de un estado descentralizador. Este artículo muestra cómo experimentos contenciosos que buscaban una igualdad republicana al interior de los resguardos como camino hacia la abolición de la institución fueron consistentemente bloqueados por otros esfuerzos para asegurar que la gobernanza sobre comunidades indígenas y la tenencia de la tierra se mantuvieran intactas.

Portuguese abstract

Republicanos do século dezanove em todo o espectro político concordaram: A monarquia Espanhola produziu ‘índios miseráveis’. A abolição de tributos e a privatização de terras comunitárias indígenas conhecidas como resguardos em Nova Granada (região que hoje abrange o Panamá e a Colômbia) transformariam essa classe ignorada em cidadãos iguais. Partindo das medidas de privatização da Coroa Espanhola aos fins do século dezoito, os primeiros líderes republicanos da Grã-Colômbia (a primeira república Colombiana, 1819–30) inauguraram uma era que buscava acesso igualitário à riqueza de terras comunitárias para todos os membros da comunidade indígena. Após a Grã-Colômbia ter se transformado em Nova Granada, Equador e Venezuela em 1830, os experimentos de Nova Granada com as políticas de resguardos indígenas foram mais longe. Nessa época, os esforços legislativos consideravam as necessidades do todos os membros do resguardo incluindo mães solteiras e seus filhos ilegítimos. Leis complexas, terreno ecológico diverso e realidades sociais diferenciadas requereram agrimensores bem treinados que pudessem garantir que cada família indígena elegível recebesse uma parte justa de terrenos. Diferentemente das comunidades indígenas em Pasto, Santa Marta e no Vale do Rio Cauca, que recorreram a insurreições armadas contra políticas liberais através da Guerra dos Supremos (1839–42), as comunidades no planalto perto de Bogotá não o fizeram. Ao invés disso esses indígenas republicanos escolheram se engajar com as reformas que o Estado descentralizante ofereceu, tendo grande acesso aos eixos de poder localizados na capital nacional. Este artigo revela como experimentos contenciosos que buscavam igualdade republicana dentro dos resguardos indígenas como maneira de abolir tal instituição foram consistentemente obstruídos através de esforços para assegurar que a governança da comunidades indígena e posse de terra permanecessem intactos.

Keywords

New GranadaColombiaresguardosland surveysrepublicindigenous peoplesNueva GranadaColombiaresguardosmediciones de tierrarepúblicapueblos indígenasNova GranadaColômbiaresguardoslevantamento topográficorepúblicapovos indígenas
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 771 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 People deemed ‘personas miserables’ were exempted from certain legal charges and were afforded special legal protections under the Spanish monarchy. See Cañeque, Alejandro, The King's Living Image: The Culture and Politics of Viceregal Power in Colonial Mexico (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 187–95Google Scholar. See also Hernández, Magdalena Díaz, ‘La identidad de los esclavos negros como miserables en Nueva España: Discursos y acciones (siglos XVI–XVIII)’, in Casares, Aurelia Martín (ed.), Esclavitudes hispánicas (siglos XV–XXI): Horizontes socioculturales (Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2014), pp. 41–57Google Scholar and Paulino Castañeda Delgado, ‘La condición miserable del indio y sus privilegios’, Anuario de Estudios Americanos, 28 (1971), pp. 245–58.

2 Samper, José María, Ensayo sobre las revoluciones políticas y la condición social de las repúblicas colombianas (hispano-americanas) (Paris: Imprenta de E. Thunot y Cia, 1861)Google Scholar.

3 Terms used to refer to indigenous populations shifted from colonial-era ‘indios’ to Bolívar's ‘naturales’ to a new term, ‘indíjena’, with a ‘j’ (which gradually gave way to the modern ‘indígena’, with a ‘g’), meaning ‘indigenous’. For clarity, this article uses the modern spelling ‘indígena’. See Simón Bolívar, ‘Mediante un decreto expedido en el Rosario de Cúcuta …’, in Simón Bolívar, Doctrina del Libertador (Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, 2002), document no. 33, available at , last access 3 Feb. 2019.

4 del Castillo, Lina, Crafting a Republic for the World: Scientific, Geographic, and Historiographic Inventions of Colombia (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Earle, Rebecca, Return of the Native: Indians and Myth-Making in Spanish America, 1810–1930 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Gibson, Charles, The Aztecs under Spanish Rule: A History of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico, 1519–1810 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1964)Google Scholar.

7 González, Margarita, El resguardo en el nuevo reino de Granada (Bogotá: La Carreta, 1979)Google Scholar.

8 Saether, Steinar, ‘Independence and the Redefinition of Indianness around Santa Marta, Colombia, 1750–1850’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 37 (2005), pp. 55–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 For Indian responses to the monarchical crisis and liberal experiments with indigenous citizenship from 1810 to 1819, see Echeverri, Marcela, ‘“Sovereignty Has Lost Its Rights”: Liberal Experiments and Indigenous Citizenship in New Granada, 1810–1819’, in Owensby, Brian and Ross, Richard (eds.), Justice in a New World: Negotiating Legal Intelligibility in British, Iberian, and Indigenous America (New York: New York University Press, 2018), pp. 238–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Colombia's official name and claims to territory changed dramatically over the course of the nineteenth century. The first Republic of Colombia, or Gran Colombia (1819–30), dissolved into Venezuela, Ecuador and the New Granada Republic (today's Colombia and Panama). New Granada lasted from 1831 until 1858. The Granadine Confederation that replaced it lasted from 1858 until 1863. The United States of Colombia replaced the Confederation and lasted from 1863 until 1886. In 1886, the Republic of Colombia returned as a name for the country, but in 1903 Panama seceded.

11 The success of abolishing resguardos in Colombia during the nineteenth century varied by region. For the national level, see Safford, Frank, ‘Race, Integration, and Progress: Elite Attitudes and the Indian in Colombia, 1750–1870’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 72: 1 (1991), pp. 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Villegas, Jorge and Restrepo, Antonio, Resguardos de indígenas 1820–1890 (Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, 1977)Google Scholar; Betty Valencia Villegas, ‘Desintegración del resguardo indígena en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, 1810–1850’, Undergraduate Thesis, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, 1980. For the high plains around Bogotá, see Castillo, Lina del, ‘“Prefiriendo siempre á los agrimensores científicos”: Discriminación en la medición y el reparto de resguardos indígenas en el altiplano cundiboyacense, 1821–1854’, Historia Crítica, 32 (July–Dec. 2006), pp. 68–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; García, Fernando Mayorga, La propiedad territorial indígena en la provincia de Bogotá: Del proteccionismo a la disolución (1831–1857) (Bogotá: Ediciones Academia Colombiana de Jurisprudencia, 2012)Google Scholar. For Santa Marta and the state of Bolívar: Saether, ‘Independence and the Redefinition of Indianness’; Bolívar, Roicer Alberto Flórez, ‘Indígenas y ciudadanía: El problema de los resguardos en el Estado Soberano de Bolívar, 1863–1875’, Historia y Sociedad, 16 (2009), pp. 49–72Google Scholar; de las Aguas, Sergio Paolo Solano, ‘Resguardos indígenas, ganadería y conflictos sociales en el Bolívar Grande, 1850–1875’, Historia Crítica, 34 (July–Dec. 2007), pp. 92–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Cauca see Sanders, James, ‘Belonging to the Great Granadan Family: Partisan Struggle and the Construction of Indigenous Identity and Politics in Southwestern Colombia, 1849–1890’, in Appelbaum, Nancy P., Macpherson, Anne S. and Rosemblatt, Karin Alejandra (eds.), Race and Nation in Modern Latin America (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2003), pp. 56–86Google Scholar; Findji, María Teresa and Rojas, José María, Territorio, economía y sociedad Páez (Cali: Universidad del Valle, 1985)Google Scholar; Muñoz, Fernanda, ‘De tierras de resguardo, solicitudes y querellas: Participación política de indígenas caucanos en la construcción estatal (1850–1885)’, Historia Crítica, 55 (Jan.–March 2015), pp. 153–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Although less directly about resguardos, Jane Rausch's body of work on the llanos frontier examines territoriality, indigenous populations and state formation far from the centre of Bogotá. See Rausch, Jane, From Frontier Town to Metropolis: A History of Villavicencio, Colombia, since 1842 (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2007)Google Scholar.

12 This scholarship is vast and has primarily dealt with Peru, Mexico, Bolivia and Guatemala. See Irurozqui, Martha, ‘Las paradojas de la tributación: Ciudadanía y política estatal indígena en Bolivia, 1825–1900’, Revista de Indias, 59: 217 (1999), pp. 705–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brienen, Marten, ‘The Clamor for Schools: Rural Education and the Development of State–Community Contact in Highland Bolivia, 1930–1952’, Revista de Indias, 62: 226 (2002), pp. 616–49Google Scholar; Gould, Jeffrey, To Die in This Way: Nicaraguan Indians and the Myth of Mestizaje, 1880–1965 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reeves, René, Ladinos with Ladinos, Indians with Indians: Land, Labor, and Regional Ethnic Conflict in the Making of Guatemala (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Platt, Tristan, Estado boliviano y ayllu andino: Tierra y tributo en el norte de Potosí (Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, 1982)Google Scholar; Sarah Chambers, ‘Little Middle Ground: The Instability of Mestizo Identity in the Andes, Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries’, in Appelbaum et al. (eds.), Race and Nation in Modern Latin America, pp. 32–55; Gotkowitz, Laura, A Revolution for Our Rights: Indigenous Struggles for Land and Justice in Bolivia, 1880–1952 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Grandin, Greg, The Blood of Guatemala: A History of Race and Nation (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Art. 21, Lei 3.– Junio 2 de 1834: ‘Adicional á las leyes sobre repartimiento de los resguardos de indíjenas’ allowed provincial authorities to opt out of surveys. See Lino de Pombo (ed.), Recopilación de leyes de la Nueva Granada (Bogotá: Imprenta de Zolio Salazar, por Valentín Martinez, 1845), pp. 101–2. As I show below, several provinces suspended surveys and did so by referring to Art. 21.

14 Craib, Raymond, Cartographic Mexico: A History of State Fixations and Fugitive Landscapes (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004), pp. 100–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Ducey, Michael, ‘Liberal Theory and Peasant Practice’, in Jackson, Robert H. (ed.), Liberals, the Church, and Indian Peasants: Corporate Lands and the Challenge of Reform in Nineteenth-Century Spanish America (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1997), pp. 65–95Google Scholar.

15 Del Castillo, ‘Prefiriendo siempre á los agrimensores científicos’, pp. 68–93.

16 I build on literature that understands the state not as a ‘thing’ but rather as a process, an idea, or a relationship. See Joseph, Gilbert M. and Nugent, Daniel (eds.), Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994), pp. 18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 See and , both URLs last accessed 3 Feb. 2019.

18 Phelan, John Leddy, The People and the King: The Comunero Revolution in Colombia, 1781 (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978), pp. 89–94Google Scholar.

19 Saether, ‘Independence and the Redefinition of Indianness’; de Hincapié, María Teresa Uribe and Lopera, Liliana María López, Las palabras de la guerra: Un estudio sobre las memorias de las guerras civiles en Colombia (Medellín: La Carreta Histórica, 2006), pp. 53–196Google Scholar. The War of the Supremes was waged between various regional leaders in opposition to elected President José Ignacio de Márquez. See further below.

20 Ibid., pp. 85–6. The war – by spreading disease – nevertheless affected indigenous people in the high plains surrounding Bogotá: 5,000 to 6,000 people died of smallpox. See Lleras, Andrés Soriano, ‘La medicina y la enseñanza médica en Colombia’, in Chaparro, Fernando and Sagasti, Francisco R. (eds.), Ciencia y tecnología en Colombia (Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Cultura), p. 215Google Scholar.

21 See Glen Curry, ‘The Disappearance of the Resguardo Indígenas of Cundinamarca, Colombia, 1800–1863’, unpubl. PhD diss., Vanderbilt University, 1981.

22 For a pioneering book in this vein, see Stern, Steve, Peru's Indian Peoples and the Challenge of Spanish Conquest: Huamanga to 1640 (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982)Google Scholar. See also J. Michelle Molina, ‘Fluid Indigeneity: Indians, Catholicism, and Spanish Law in the Mutable Americas’, The Immanent Frame: Secularism, Religion, and the Public Sphere (12 July 2017), available at , last access 14 Nov. 2018; Premo, Bianca, The Enlightenment on Trial: Ordinary Litigants and Colonialism in the Spanish Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herzog, Tamar, and, ‘Colonial Law “Native Customs”: Indigenous Land Rights in Colonial Spanish America’, The Americas, 69: 3 (2013), pp. 303–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yannakakis, Yanna, ‘Indigenous People and Legal Culture in Spanish America’, History Compass, 11: 11 (2013), pp. 931–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Echeverri, Marcela, Indian and Slave Royalists in the Age of Revolutions: Reform, Revolution, and Royalism in the Northern Andes, 1780–1825 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar; Saether, ‘Independence and the Redefinition of Indianness’; Guardino, Peter, Peasants, Politics, and the Formation of Mexico's National State: Guerrero, 1800–1857 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Thurner, Mark, From Two Republics to One Divided: Contradictions of Postcolonial Nationmaking in Andean Peru (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Sanders, ‘Belonging to the Great Granadan Family’; Walker, Charles, Smouldering Ashes: Cuzco and the Creation of Republican Peru, 1780–1840 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tutino, John, From Insurrection to Revolution in Mexico: Social Bases of Agrarian Violence, 1750–1940 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Young, Eric Van, The Other Rebellion: Popular Violence, Ideology, and the Mexican Struggle for Independence, 1810–1821 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Mallon, Florencia, Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

24 Quijano, Anibal, ‘Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism and Latin America’, Nepantla: Views from South, 1: 3 (2000), pp. 533–80Google Scholar; Stein, Stanley and Stein, Barbara, The Colonial Heritage of Latin America: Essays on Economic Dependence in Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Larson, Brooke, Trials of Nation Making: Liberalism, Race and Ethnicity in the Andes, 1810–1910 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 266. On surveyor ineptitude and malfeasance, see Aydée Garcia-Mejia, ‘The Transformation of the Indian Communities of the Bogotá Sabana during the Nineteenth Century Colombian Republic’, unpubl. PhD diss., New School for Social Research, New York, 1989, pp. 53–64, 81, 92–4.

26 Sanders, James, Contentious Republicans: Popular Politics, Race, and Class in Nineteenth-Century Colombia (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Safford, ‘Race, Integration, and Progress’, and del Castillo, ‘Prefiriendo siempre á los agrimensores científicos’.

27 Greer, Allan, Property and Dispossession: Natives, Empires and Land in Early Modern North America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), p. 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Phelan, The People and the King, p. 90.

29 E.g. Report by Oidor [Judge] Andrés Verdugo y Oquendo, 7 May 1757, in Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura, 1: 1 (1963), p. 170.

30 O'Toole, Rachel Sarah, Bound Lives: Africans, Indians, and the Making of Race in Colonial Peru (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2012), pp. 81–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Phelan, The People and the King, pp. 89–94.

32 Bolívar, ‘Mediante un decreto expedido en el Rosario de Cúcuta’.

33 John Lynch dismisses this and other decrees by Bolívar on the Indian question, arguing that they ‘were limited in scope and misguided in intent’, because they made Indians only more vulnerable. See John Lynch, Simón Bolívar: A Life (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006), pp. 154–5. Bolívar was nevertheless well aware of the need to gain legitimacy among indigenous populations, and his decree reflects this.

34 Echeverri, Marcela, ‘Popular Royalists, Empire, and Politics in Southwestern New Granada, 1809–1819’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 91: 2 (2011), pp. 237–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 España, Cortes de Cádiz, Decreto CCXIV de 4 de enero de 1813: ‘Sobre reducir los baldíos y otros terrenos comunes á dominio particular: Suertes concedidas á los defensores de la patria y á los ciudadanos no propietarios’, in Colección de los decretos y órdenes que han expedido las Cortes Generales y Extraordinarias desde 24 de mayo de 1812 hasta 24 de febrero de 1813, vol. 3 (Cádiz: Imp. Nacional, 1813), available at , last access 19 Nov. 2018.

36 [Congreso General de Colombia], ‘Ley 4 de octubre [1821] sobre estincion de los tributos de los indíjenas, distribución de sus resguardos, y esenciones que se les conceden’, in Cuerpo de leyes de la república de Colombia (Caracas: Impr. de V. Espinal, 1840), pp. 87–8.

37 Ibid. For the liberalism of the Cortes de Cádiz, see Rodriguez, Jaime O., ‘We Are Now the True Spaniards’: Sovereignty, Revolution, Independence, and the Emergence of the Federal Republic of Mexico, 1808–1824 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar.

38 Congreso General de Colombia, ‘Ley 4 de octubre [1821] sobre estincion de los tributos’.

39 ‘Boyacá’, in Suplemento a la Gaceta de Colombia, no. 284, 25 March 1827.

40 ‘Decreto del Poder Ejecutivo’, Gaceta de Colombia, no. 379, 19 Dec. 1828, trimestre 30.

41 Ibid.

42 ‘Tesoreria Departamental de Cundinamarca’, Gaceta de Colombia, no. 545, 16 Oct. 1831, trimestre 43; ‘Tesoreria de Bogotá’, Gaceta de la Nueva Granada (hereafter GNG), no. 11, 5 Feb. 1832, trimestre 1; ‘Nombramientos en el ramo de hacienda …’, GNG, no. 15, 19 Feb. 1832.

43 Echeverri, ‘Popular Royalists, Empire, and Politics in Southwestern New Granada’.

44 Nueva Granada, Constitución Política del Estado de Nueva Granada de 1832, in Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, available at , last access 19 Nov. 2018.

45 GNG, no. 9, 29 Jan. 1832, trimestre 1.

46 Ibid.

47 Ibid.

48 For the law, see Lei 2.– Marzo 6 de 1832: ‘Sobre repartimiento de los resguardos de indíjenas’, in Pombo (ed.), Recopilación de leyes de la Nueva Granada, pp. 100–1.

49 Thurner, From Two Republics to One Divided.

50 Samper, Ensayo, pp. 60–4.

51 Ibid., p. 63.

52 Gaceta de Colombia, no. 530, 21 Aug. 1831, trimestre 42.

53 Lei 3.– Junio 2 de 1834: ‘Adicional á las leyes sobre repartimiento de los resguardos de indíjenas’.

54 Ibid.

55 Sanders, ‘Belonging to the Great Granadan Family’, p. 68.

56 Art. 5, Lei 3.– Junio 2 de 1834, p. 101.

57 Lleras, Lorenzo María, Catecismo de agrimensura, apropiado al uso de los granadinos (Bogotá: Imprenta de la Universidad, 1834)Google Scholar, in Biblioteca Nacional de Colombia (hereafter BNC), Fondo Anselmo Pineda, 711, pieza 9, available at , last access 19 Nov. 2018.

58 See Uribe-Uran, Victor, Honorable Lives: Lawyers, Family and Politics in Colombia, 1780–1850 (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000), p. 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sánchez, Jaime Torres and Hurtado, Luz Amanda Salazar, Introducción a la historia de la ingeniería y de la educación en Colombia (Bogotá: Universidad Nacional, 2002), p. 194Google Scholar.

59 Colección de asertos de las materias que se defenderán en certámenes públicos en el Colejio de San Bartolomé … (Bogotá: Nicolás Gómez, 1835), p. 16, catalogued by the BNC, Fondo Anselmo Pineda, 887, pieza 45. For the history of the Colegio de San Bartolomé, see de Zubiría, Roberto, Antonio Vargas Reyes y la medicina del siglo XIX en Colombia (Bogotá: Academia Nacional de Medicina, 2002), pp. 41–5Google Scholar.

60 Lleras, Catecismo, pp. 1–29.

61 Ibid., pp. 29–30.

62 Ibid., pp. 29, 30.

63 Ibid., p. 30.

64 Ibid.

65 El Constitucional de Cundinamarca (Bogotá), 6 Nov. 1836, pp. 195–6.

66 Mantilla, José María, Esposición que el jeneral José María Mantilla, gobernador interino de la provincia de Bogotá, presenta a la cámara de la misma en sus sesiones de 1835 (Bogotá: Nicomedes Lora, 1835), pp. 17–18Google Scholar, catalogued by the BNC, Fondo Anselmo Pineda, 242, pieza 1, available at , last access 5 Dec. 2018.

67 Craib, Cartographic Mexico, p. 115.

68 Art. 4, Lei 3.– Junio 2 de 1834, p. 101.

69 Art. 146, Cap. 21, ‘Concluye la ley que fija los derechos que corresponden a los jueces … ’, Gaceta de Colombia, no. 164, 5 Dec. 1824, trimestre 13.

70 Ibid.

71 Villoría, Ramón, ‘Estracto de la esposición de la provincial de Bogotá, presentado por su gobernador interino, Dr. Ramón Villoría a la Cámara Provincial en sus sesiones de este año’, Gaceta de la Nueva Granada (Bogotá), 22 Oct. 1837Google Scholar, catalogued in BNC, Fondo Anselmo Pineda, VFDUI–1574, pieza 1.

72 Acevedo, Alfonso, Memoria del Gobernador de Bogotá a la Cámara Provincial en sus sesiones de 1843 (Bogotá: n.p., 1843)Google Scholar, BNC, Fondo Anselmo Pineda, 733, pieza 9.

73 ‘El Gobernador nombrará agrimensores para cada distrito parroquial, sin necesidad de propuesta’: in Art. 16, Cap. 3, Ordenanza 15 Sobre repartimiento de resguardos indígenas, 3 Oct. 1836, BNC, Fondo Antiguo, VFDUI–349fa.

74 Lei 3.– Junio 2 de 1834.

75 Herrán, Pedro Alcántara, Esposición del Secretario de Estado en el Despacho del Interior i Relaciones Esteriores del Gobierno de la Nueva Granada, al Congreso Constitucional del año de 1839 (Bogotá: Imp. de N. Lora, 1839), pp. 49–51Google Scholar, catalogued in BNC, Fondo Vergara, 264, pieza 3.

76 Diario de Debates de la Camara del Senado en sus sesiones del año de 1840, pp. 1–2, BNC, Fondo Anselmo Pineda, 365, pieza 1, available at: , last access 3 Feb. 2019.

77 For the fragmenting logic unleashed in New Granada by the abdication of the Spanish kings to Napoleon, see Ardila, Daniel Gutiérrez, Un nuevo reino: Geografía política, pactismo y diplomacia durante el interregno en Nueva Granada (1808–1816) (Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2010), pp. 41–234Google Scholar. For the War of the Supremes, see Uribe de Hincapié and López Lopera, Las palabras de la guerra, pp. 53–196; Earle, Rebecca, ‘The War of the Supremes: Border Conflict, Religious Crusade or Simply Politics by Other Means?’, in Earle, Rebecca (ed.), Rumours of Wars: Civil Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (London: Brookings Institution Press, 2000), pp. 119–34Google Scholar.

78 Repression went beyond indigenous guerrillas to include the men fleeing slavery in Cauca who also joined General José María Obando against the central government. See Uribe de Hincapié and López Lopera, Las palabras de la guerra, pp. 95–7.

79 Lei 4.– Junio 23 de 1843: ‘Sobre proteccion á los indíjenas’, in Pombo (ed.), Recopilación de leyes de la Nueva Granada, pp. 102–3.

80 Art. 7 in Ibid., p. 103. For this post under Spanish rule, see Novoa, Mauricio, The Protectors of Indians in the Royal Audience of Lima: History, Careers and Legal Culture, 1575–1775 (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 ‘Cuadro de los negocios que se han pasado a la segunda comision de peticiones …’, Gaceta Oficial (Bogotá), no. 984, 1 June 1848, p. 340.

82 Art. 21, Lei 3.– Junio 2 de 1834: ‘Adicional á las leyes sobre repartimiento’. For a selection of provinces that delayed or suspended resguardo partitioning by the 1840s, see ‘Extracto de la exposición que el jefe político encargado de la Gobernación de Neiva presentó a la Camara’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1027, 18 Feb. 1849, trimestre 72, p. 49; ‘Informe que el Gobernador de Tuquerres presenta a la H. Camara Provincial’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 969, 6 April 1848, trimestre 69, pp. 217–21, here p. 221; ‘Extracto de la exposición que el Gobernador del Chocó presenta a la Camara Provincial en su última reunion’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1024, 28 Jan. 1849, p. 26.

83 ‘Informe del Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores i Mejoras Internas’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 979, 14 May 1848, pp. 300–4, here p. 302.

84 ‘Informe del Secretario de Gobierno al Congreso Constitucional de 1849’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1032, 25 March 1849, trimestre 72, pp. 93–8, here p. 95.

85 Ordenanza 47 de 5 de Octubre de 1848 (Bogotá), BNC, Fondo Caro, 2057.

86 Hand-written dedication at the top of El Constitucional de Cundinamarca (Bogotá), 24 Sept. 1849, in Biblioteca Luis Ángel Arango, Bogotá, Fondo Hemeroteca, no. topográfico 32819.

87 Appelbaum, Nancy, Mapping the Country of Regions: The Chorographic Commission of Nineteenth-Century Colombia (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 For maps drawn by Colegio Militar students, see Archivo General de la Nación (AGN): Sección Mapas y Planos (SMP) 1, ref. 67; SMP 1, ref. 69; SMP 1, ref. 143; SMP 2, ref. 1246; SMP 2, ref. 1–21; SMP 6, ref, 142; SMP 6, ref. 246; SMP 6, ref. 242 bis.

89 Agustín Codazzi, ‘No oficial: Colejio Militar’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1028, 25 Feb. 1849, pp. 62–4.

90 Arboleda, Luis Carlos, ‘Introducción del sistema métrico decimal en Colombia a mediados del siglo XIX’, Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática, 9: 12 (2014), pp. 73–86Google Scholar.

91 Manuel Ponce [de León], ‘Representación’, El Constitucional de Cundinamarca (Bogotá), 22 Nov. 1851, p. 201.

92 Januario Salgar, ‘Invitación’, El Constitucional de Cundinamarca (Bogotá), 3 Jan. 1852, p. 4.

93 ‘Contrata’, El Constitucional de Cundinamarca (Bogotá), 14 Feb. 1852, pp. 27–8.

94 ‘Provincia de Bogotá: Informe del gobernador de la Cámara Provincial, Indíjenas’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1435, 18 Oct. 1852, pp. 701–2, here p. 701.

95 Secretaría de Guerra, ‘Informe sobre los exámenes del colegio militar’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1336, 7 April 1852, p. 246.

96 El Repertorio, no. 3 (1853), cited in Garcia-Mejia, ‘Transformation of the Indian Communities’, p. 101n76.

97 For decentralization see Paola Ruiz, ‘La génesis del federalismo en la Nueva Granada: Federación y descentralización a mediados del siglo XIX’, unpublished M.A. Thesis, Colegio de México, 2017; del Castillo, Crafting a Republic for the World.

98 J. Miguel Acevedo, ‘Provincia de Cipaquirá: Informe del gobernador a la Cámara Provincial’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1435, 18 October 1852, pp. 702–4, here p. 703.

99 ‘Contrata’, El Constitucional de Cundinamarca (Bogotá), 14 Feb. 1852, pp. 27–8.

100 Garcia-Mejia, ‘Transformation of the Indian Communities’, p. 112.

101 Acevedo, ‘Provincia de Cipaquirá: Informe del gobernador a la Cámara Provincial’, p. 703.

102 Request from the indígenas of Suba and Cota to the provincial chamber, April 1853, AGN, Sección República, Gobernación de Bogotá, vol. 34, fos. 314r–315v, cited in Garcia-Mejia, ‘Transformation of the Indian Communities’, p. 102n77.

103 Gobernación de la provincia de Tequendama, ‘Invitacion’, Gaceta Oficial, no. 1507, 28 April 1853, p. 328–9, here p. 328.

104 ‘Provincia de Bogotá: Informe del gobernador de la Cámara Provincial, Indíjenas’, p. 701.

105 Ibid.

106 Rappaport, Joanne, Cumbe Reborn: An Andean Ethnography of History (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994), p. 24Google Scholar. By 1890, what had formerly been New Granada was known as the Colombian Republic.

107 Ibid., p. 26.

108 José Juan Leiva Millán, El Neo-Granadino (Bogotá), 1 Dec. 1853, p. 441.

109 ‘En cumplimiento del art. 7 del decreto ejecutivo de 31 de Octubre de 1861 sobre “formación de padrones”’, AGN Notarías, Notaría 4a/1888, f.161rv.

110 ‘Copia del Padrón de indígenas comuneros en el Resguardo del Distrito de Suba Año de 1877’, AGN Notarías, Notaría 4a/1888, f. 189r–200rv.

111 ‘Casación: Negocios civiles Corte Suprema de Justicia – Bogotá, diciembre siete de mil ochocientos noventa y cuatro’, Gaceta Judicial: Órgano oficial de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Año X, Bogotá 23 de Febrero 1895, no. 497, pp. 225–9.

112 Antorveza, Adolfo Triana, Legislación indígena nacional: Leyes, decretos, resoluciones, jurisprudencia y doctrina (Bogotá: Librería y Editorial América Latina, 1980), p. 33Google Scholar.

113 ‘Así viven los muiscas que sobreviven en Suba’, El Tiempo (Bogotá), 7 Feb. 2014.