Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:34:24.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Innocent Infants or Abusive Patriarchs? Spousal Homicides, the Punishment of Indians and the Law in Colonial Mexico, 1740s–1820s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2006

VICTOR M. URIBE-URAN
Affiliation:
Department of History-College of Law, Florida International University.

Abstract

This article examines numerous spousal homicides occurring all over New Spain (colonial Mexico) during the last seven decades of the colonial period. After killing their spouses, sometimes in an extremely brutal manner, a considerable number of the defendants managed to get away with little more than a slap on the wrist. I argue here that this was not due to the fact that written laws were dead letters. After examining general patterns of spousal homicides, I focus on the legal treatment and punishment afforded to indigenous criminals, several of who were drunk at the time of their crimes. Being an ‘Indian’ or committing a crime while drunk – both characteristics of many defendants in the records – were treated as a mitigating circumstance under law and led to the acquittal of several of the accused. Royal graces, an important legal mechanism, also played a significant role in easing the severity of the treatment of these and other domestic criminals. The judicial treatment of spousal murders thus did not reflect a considerable gap between law and practice at the time. Punishment derived from a complex combination of socio-cultural factors and longstanding legal prescriptions, doctrines and traditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank the Office of the Provost under Dr. Mark Rosenberg, the College of Arts and Sciences formerly under Dean Arthur Herriott, and the Latin American and Caribbean Center and its director, Dr. Eduardo Gamarra, all at Florida International University, as well as the US National Endowment for the Humanities for the generous financial support provided to conduct research for this essay and the larger book project to which it is related. I am grateful for the criticism and help with copy-editing kindly provided by my friend Alisa Newman and three anonymous referees for the Journal of Latin American Studies, whose comments were most insightful. I also wish to acknowledge the valuable criticism of Sonya Lipsett-Rivera, Noble David Cook, and Alexandra Parma Cook. The suggestions for further reading provided by Professor Jaime Rodríguez and Bianca Premo's kind assistance in sharing information from her unpublished research are also greatly appreciated.