Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:06:43.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Social Class on Activity Preferences of Comunidades Eclesiais de Base (CEBs) in the Archdiocese of São Paulo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

W. E. Hewitt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of interpretations have recently emerged which attempt to explain the nature and sociopolitical implications of Roman Catholic base Christian communities (CEBs) in Brazil. Most studies have tended to describe these small, informal lay groups as a predominantly lower-class phenomenon which is facilitating the self-liberation of the poor from the weight of centuries-old political and economic oppression.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , May 1987 , pp. 141 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 CNBB (Conferência Nacional dos Bispos do Brasil, ), Comunidades Eclesiais de Base na Igreja do Brasil (São Paulo, Edições Paulinas, 1983), p. 13.Google Scholar

2 Baraglia, Mariano, Evolução das Comunidades Eclesiais de Base (Petrópolis, Vozes, 1974).Google Scholar

3 Michel, Irmão, ‘Comunidades Católicas de Base são o fruto de colaboraçã;o entre duas classes sociais, a pobre e a média,’ Revista Eclesiástica Brasileira 42, 03 1982; p. 120.Google Scholar

4 CNBB, Comunidades; Igreja na base (São Paulo, Edições Paulinas, 1977), pp. 20–1.Google Scholar

5 See, for example, Dom Luis Gonzaga Fernandes, ‘Gênese, Dinâmica, e Perspectiva das CEBs do Brasil, ,’ REB 42, 09 1982, pp. 456–64.Google Scholar

6 CNBB, Comunidades Eclesiais de Base, p. 19.Google Scholar

7 Personal interview with Dom Paulo Evaristo Arns, May, 1984.

8 Barreiro, Alvaro, Basic Ecclesial Communities, translated by Campbell, Barbara (Maryknoll, Orbis, 1982)Google Scholar; Betto, Frei, O Que É Comunidade Eclesial de Base? (São Paulo, Brasiliense, 1981)Google Scholar, and ‘As Comunidades Eclesiais de Base como Potencial de Transformação da Sociedade Brasileira’, REB 40, 09 1983, pp. 494–503Google Scholar; Boff, Clodovis, ‘CEBs e Práticas de Libertação’, REB 40, 12 1980, pp. 595–625Google Scholar; Boff, Leonardo, ‘Theological Characteristics of a Grass-roots Church’, in The Challenge of Basic Christian Communities, Torres, Sergio and Eagleson, John (ed.), translated by Drury, John (Maryknoll, Orbis, 1981), pp. 124–44Google Scholar, and ‘CEBs: a Igreja inteira na base’, REB, 43, 09 1983, pp. 459–69Google Scholar; Deelen, Gottfried, ‘The Church on its Way to the People: Basic Christian Communities in Brazil’, Cross Currents, 30, 1980, pp. 385–408Google Scholar; Pretto, Hermilo E., ‘A Eclesiologia das CEBs’, Vida Pastoral, 07–08 1983 pp. 21–6.Google Scholar

9 Betto, Frei, O Que É Comunidade, p. 46.Google Scholar

10 Boff, Leonardo, ‘CEBs: a Igreja inteira na base’, p. 469.Google Scholar

11 Betto, Frei, ‘As Comunidades Eclesiais de Base como Potencial’, p. 509.Google Scholar

12 Wanderley, Luiz Eduardo W., ‘Comunidades Eclesiais de Base (CEBs) e Educação Popular’, REB 41, 12 1981, p. 686.Google Scholar

13 CNBB, , Comunidades: Igreja na base, pp. 20–1.Google Scholar

14 Gregory, Afonso, ‘Dados Preliminares sobre Experièncias de Comunidades Eclesiais de Base no Brasil,’ in Comunidades Eclesiais de Base; Utopia ou Realidade in Gregory, Afonso, (ed.) (Petrópolis, Vozes, 1973).Google Scholar

15 Bruneau, Thomas C., The Church in Brazil (Austin, University of Texas Press, 1982), p. 140.Google Scholar

16 de São Paulo, Governo do Estado, Subdivisão do Município de São Paulo em Áreas Homogéneas (São Paulo, Secretaria de Economia e Planejamento, Governo do Estado de São Paulo, 1977).Google Scholar

17 Earnings in Brazil are commonly expressed as multiples of the monthly minimum salary established by the federal government. At the time of the research, one minimum salary was equivalent to approximately US$50. Five minimum salaries would therefore amount to about US$250.