Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:59:27.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the Absence of Men? Gender, Migration and Domestic Labour in the Southern Ecuadorean Andes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2012

EMMA-JAYNE ABBOTS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Female heads of households in the migrant-exporting community of Jima, Ecuador, are using remittances to employ domestic workers. As both workers and ‘mistresses’ originate from the same mestizo peasant class, these new labour relations do not reflect embedded class inequalities, but are rather emerging as a new mode of distinction between newly prosperous households and those for whom migration has been a less successful strategy. This lends a temporal fragility and fluidity to household relations, as worker and employer seek to define their roles and establish hierarchies. Employers negotiate these tensions not only to reduce their own burden of labour, but also because domestic workers are a symbol of social mobility and help enhance the reputation of migrant men. Thus, while men are physically absent, they continue to inform the reorganisation of the Jimeño household, and there is little to suggest that gender roles are being realigned in a structurally significant manner.

Spanish abstract

Mujeres jefas de hogar en la comunidad exportadora de migrantes de Jima, Ecuador, utilizan las remesas para emplear a trabajadoras domésticas. Ya que tanto las trabajadoras como las ‘patronas’ tienen un mismo origen de clase campesino y mestizo, estas nuevas relaciones laborales no reflejan desigualdades de clase, sino más bien emergen como una nueva forma de distinción entre los nuevos hogares prósperos y aquellos para los que la migración ha sido una estrategia menos exitosa. Esto lleva a una fragilidad y fluidez temporal en las relaciones en el hogar, en la medida en que las trabajadoras y las empleadoras buscan definir sus roles y establecer jerarquías. Las empleadoras negocian estas tensiones no sólo para reducir su propia carga de trabajo, sino porque también las trabajadoras domésticas son un símbolo de movilidad social y ayudan a acrecentar la reputación de los hombres migrantes. Entonces, mientras que los hombres están ausentes físicamente, éstos continúan influyendo en la reorganización del hogar jimeño, y no parece ser que los roles de género se estén realineando de una forma estructuralmente significativa.

Portuguese abstract

Em uma comunidade que exporta migrantes chamada Jima, no Equador, mulheres chefes de família utilizam remessas de dinheiro para empregar trabalhadores domésticos. Como tanto os trabalhadores e quanto as ‘patrôas’ tem origens na mesma classe camponesa mestiça, essas novas relações de trabalho não refletem desigualdades de classe embutidas, mas um novo modo de diferenciação entre famílias recém-afluentes e aquelas nas quais a emigração foi uma estratégia menos bem-sucedida. Isso empresta uma característica temporária, frágil e fluida, às relações domésticas nas quais trabalhadora e empregadora buscam definir seus papéis e estabelecer hierarquias. Empregadoras negociam essas tensões não apenas para reduzir sua própria carga de trabalho, mas também devido ao fato de que ter trabalhadores domésticos simboliza mobilidade social e ajuda a destacar a reputação dos homens que emigraram. Desse modo, embora os homens estejam ausentes fisicamente, eles continuam a influenciar a reorganização da unidade doméstica jimenha, havendo pouco para sugerir que os papéis dos gêneros estão se reconstituindo de uma maneira estruturalmente significante.

Keywords

domestic labourremittancesmigrationleisuregender relationshousehold hierarchiescare chainsEcuadortrabajo domésticoremesasmigracióntiempo librerelaciones de génerojerarquías domésticascadenas de cuidadoEcuadortrabalho domésticoremessas monetáriasmigraçãolazerrelações de gênerohierarquias domésticascare chain (‘rede de cuidados’)Equador
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 71 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (New York: Routledge, 1984)Google Scholar.

2 Kyle, David, Transnational Peasants: Migrations, Networks and Ethnicity in Andean Ecuador (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Deere, Carmen Diana, Household and Class Relations: Peasants and Landlords in Northern Peru (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

3 Harris, Olivia, To Make the Earth Bear Fruit: Ethnographic Essays on Fertility, Work and Gender in Highland Bolivia (London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 2000)Google Scholar.

4 Norman E. Whitten, ‘Introduction’, in Whitten (ed.), Millennial Ecuador: Critical Essays on Cultural Transformation and Social Dynamics (Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 2003), p. 10.

5 Remittance income is dependent on the number of migrant kin living in the United States, and the highest ‘earners’ commonly receive income from their husbands and older children. While average remittance income clusters around US$ 350, some households receive closer to US$ 500, while others receive sporadic payments of US$ 50–100. Pribilsky notes similar clustering around US$ 250, with significant numbers of households receiving US$ 250–500. Pribilsky, Jason, La Chulla Vida: Gender, Migration and the Family in Andean Ecuador and New York City (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2007), p. 75Google Scholar.

6 US Department of Homeland Security, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2005 (Washington, DC, 2006)Google Scholar.

7 Jokisch, Brad and Pribilsky, Jason, ‘The Panic to Leave: Economic Crisis and the “New Emigration” from Ecuador’, International Migration, 40: 4 (2002), pp. 75–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kyle, Transnational Peasants.

8 Jokisch and Pribilsky, ‘The Panic to Leave’, p. 78.

9 Miles, Ann, From Cuenca to Queens: A Story of Transnational Migration (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2004)Google Scholar; Jokisch and Pribilsky, ‘The Panic to Leave’; Kyle, Transnational Peasants; Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida; Mary Weismantel, ‘Mothers of the Patria: La Chola Cuencana and La Mama Negra’, in Whitten (ed.), Millennial Ecuador, pp. 325–54.

10 See Miles, From Cuenca to Queens; Jokisch and Pribilsky, ‘The Panic to Leave’; Kyle, Transnational Peasants; and Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

11 Kyle, Transnational Peasants; Miles, From Cuenca to Queens; Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

12 Kyle, Transnational Peasants, p. 104.

13 See Frøystad, Kathinka, ‘Master–Servant Relations and the Domestic Reproduction of Caste in Northern India’, Ethnos, 68: 1 (2003), pp. 73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rubbo, Anna and Taussig, Michael, ‘Up off Their Knees: Servanthood in Southwest Colombia’, Latin American Perspectives, 10: 4 (1983), pp. 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Young, Grace E., ‘The Myth of Being “Like a Daughter”’, Latin American Perspectives, 14: 3 (1987), pp. 365–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Gill, Lesley, ‘Painted Faces: Conflict and Ambiguity in Domestic Servant–Employer Relations in La Paz 1930–1988’, Latin American Research Review, 25: 1 (1990), pp. 119–36Google Scholar; Hansen, Karen Tranberg, ‘Domestic Trials: Power and Autonomy in Domestic Service in Zambia’, American Ethnologist, 17: 2 (1990), pp. 360–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar, Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005), p. 163Google Scholar.

16 Deere, Household and Class Relations; Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

17 See Miles, From Cuenca to Queens; Kyle, Transnational Peasants; and Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

18 Kyle, Transnational Peasants; Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

19 See Parreñas, Children of Global Migration; Orozco, Amaia Pérez, Global Perspectives on the Social Organization of Care in Times of Crisis: Assessing the Situation, Gender, Migration and Development Series, Working Paper no. 5 (Santo Domingo: UN-INSTRAW, 2009)Google Scholar.

20 Glenn, Evelyn Nakano, ‘From Servitude to Service Work: The Historical Continuities of Women's Paid and Unpaid Reproductive Labour’, Signs, 18: 1 (1992), pp. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Anderson, Bridget, Doing the Dirty Work: The Global Politics of Domestic Labour (London: Zed Books, 2000)Google Scholar. See also Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar, Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration and Domestic Work (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Segura, Denise and Zavella, Patricia (eds.), Women and Migration in the U.S.–Mexico Borderlands: A Reader (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; and Stephen, Lynn, Transborder Lives: Indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California and Oregon (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Gill, Lesley, Precarious Dependencies: Gender, Class and Domestic Service in Bolivia (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), p. 89Google Scholar; Bunster, Ximena and Chaney, Elsa M., Sellers and Servants: Working Women in Lima, Peru (Granby, MA: Greenwood Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

23 Parreñas, Children of Global Migration, p. 23.

24 Pérez Orozco, Global Perspectives, p. 5.

25 Parreñas, Children of Global Migration, p. 29.

26 Anderson, Doing the Dirty Work; María De La Luz Ibarra, ‘Mexican Immigrant Women and the New Domestic Labor’, in Segura and Zavella (eds.), Women and Migration, pp. 286–305.

27 Parreñas, Children of Global Migration, p. 29.

28 See, for example, Miles, From Cuenca to Queens; Kyle, Transnational Peasants; and Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

29 Pérez Orozco, Global Perspectives, p. 10.

30 Parreñas, Children of Global Migration.

31 Kyle, Transnational Peasants; Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

32 Nett, Emily M., ‘The Servant Class in a Developing Country: Ecuador’, Journal of Inter-American Studies, 8: 3 (1966), pp. 437–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See Harbottle, Lynn, Food for Health, Food for Wealth: The Performance of Ethnic and Gender Identities by Iranian Settlers in Britain (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2000)Google Scholar; and Weismantel, Mary J., Food, Gender and Poverty in the Ecuadorian Andes (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

34 See, for example, Gill, ‘Painted Faces’; Goody, Jack, Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Jelin, Elizabeth, ‘Migration and Labor Force Participation of Latin American Women: The Domestic Servants in the Cities’, Signs, 3: 1 (1977), pp. 129–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nett, ‘The Servant Class in a Developing Country’.

35 Gill, Precarious Dependencies, p. 89.

36 Colloredo-Mansfield, Rudi, The Native Leisure Class: Consumption and Cultural Creativity in the Andes (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Ortiz, Sutti, Uncertainties in Peasant Farming: A Colombian Case (London: Athlone Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

37 Anderson, Doing the Dirty Work; Bunster and Chaney, Sellers and Servants; Gill, Precarious Dependencies; Glenn, ‘From Servitude to Service Work’; Parreñas, Servants of Globalization; Pérez Orozco, Global Perspectives; Segura and Zavella, Women and Migration; Stephen, Transborder Lives.

38 Deere, Household and Class Relations; Engels, Frederich, The Origin of Family, Private Property and the State (London: Pathfinder Books, 1972)Google Scholar; Sherry Ortner, ‘Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?’, in Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo and Louise Lamphere (eds.), Women, Culture and Society (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974), pp. 67–87.

39 Colloredo-Mansfield, The Native Leisure Class, p. 207.

40 Veblen, Thorstein, The Theory of the Leisure Class (New York, 1994 [1899])Google Scholar.

41 Young, ‘The Myth of Being “Like a Daughter”’, p. 370.

42 Anderson, Doing the Dirty Work, p. 2.

43 See, for example, Dickey, Sara, ‘Permeable Homes: Domestic Service Household Space and the Vulnerability of Class Boundaries in Urban India’, American Ethnologist, 27: 2 (2000), pp. 462–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gill, Precarious Dependencies; and specifically Young, ‘The Myth of Being “Like a Daughter”’.

44 See Rollins, Judith, Between Women: Domestics and Their Employers (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985)Google Scholar for a discussion of linguistic deference.

45 Brush, Stephen, Mountain, Field and Family: The Economy and Human Ecology of an Andean Valley (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carsten, Janet, The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Village (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

46 See Frøystad, ‘Master–Servant Relations’; and Rubbo and Taussig, ‘Up off Their Knees’.

47 See Emma-Jayne Abbots, ‘It Doesn't Taste as Good from the Pet Shop: Guinea Pig Consumption and the Performance of Class and Kinship in Highland Ecuador and New York City’, in Food, Culture and Society, 14: 2 (2011), pp. 205–24; Nicole Bourque, ‘Eating Your Words: Communicating with Food in the Ecuadorian Andes’, in Joy Hendry and C. W. Watson (eds.), An Anthropology of Indirect Communication (London: Routledge, 2001), pp. 85–100; and Weismantal, Food, Gender and Poverty.

48 Qayum, Seemin and Ray, Raka, ‘Grappling with Modernity: India's Respectable Classes and the Culture of Domestic Servitude’, Ethnography, 4: 4 (2003), pp. 520–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weismantel, Food, Gender and Poverty.

49 Rubbo and Taussig, ‘Up off Their Knees’, p. 15.

50 Gill, Precarious Dependencies, p. 86.

51 Pribilsky, La Chulla Vida.

52 Pérez Orozco, Global Perspectives, p. 5.

53 Parreñas, Children of Global Migration; Pérez Orozco, Global Perspectives.

54 Anderson, Doing the Dirty Work; Glenn, ‘From Servitude to Service Work’. See also Bunster and Chaney, Sellers and Servants; Gill, Precarious Dependencies; Parreñas, Servants of Globalization; Pérez Orozco, Global Perspectives; Segura and Zavella, Women and Migration; and Stephen, Transborder Lives.