Article contents
The Extradition of Marcos Pérez Jiménez, 1959–63: Practical Precedent for Enforcement of Administrative Honesty?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Extract
Honesty in high public office has always been difficult to enforce. Arguments of executive privilege often block prosecution of presidents who have illicitly enriched themselves; likewise, the divisiveness which accompanies judicial action against a head of state contributes to the reluctance of politicians to initiate such action. When the public official in question is living in exile, the task of the courts is compounded. Prosecution then may depend upon the existence of an extradition treaty in which the alleged crimes are specified and upon the good will of the country where the politician enjoys asylum.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977
References
1 Certified copy of the record of sworn declaration of assets, Mathes Papers, Zimmerman Library, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; see also Appendices A and B, Plaintiff's Memorandum of the Facts, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
2 Pineda, Leonardo Ruíz was killed by Seguridad Nacional (SN) police force on 21 Oct. 1952; Antonio Pinto Salinas by SN on 11 June 1953; both were members of the outlawed Accioacute;n Democr´tica party and were leading the subversive fight to overthrow Perez's dictatorship.Google Scholar
3 After Pérez left Venezuela in Jan. 1958, a provisional governing junta ruled Venezuela until elections were held in Dec. 1958; Rómulo Betancourt of Acción Democr´tica won the election and took office in 1959.Google Scholar
4 de Venezuela, República, Procuraduría de Ia Nación, Informe al Congreso Nacional 1957–1958 (Caracas, 1959), p. 699.Google Scholar
5 Repúblics de Venezuela, Comisión investigadora ley contra ci enriquecimiento ilícito de funcionarios o empleados públicos, Informe presentado al Con greso Nacional correspondiente al periodo 1959–1964 (Caracas, 1965), p. 20;Google ScholarEl Nacional, 26 Mar. 1958, p. 1, 23 Sept. 1958, p. 27.Google Scholar
6 Repúiblica de Venezuela, Procuraduriá de Ia Naci´n, Informe al Con greso Nacional 1957–1958, pp. 23, 27.Google Scholar
7 Disposiciones Transitorias, 20, 25, 22, Venezuelan Constitution 1961.Google Scholar
8 República de Venezuela, Ministerio de Justicia, Memoria y Cuenta 1959 (Caracas, 1960), p. 379.Google Scholar
9 El Nacional, 15 Aug. 1959, p. 1.Google Scholar
10 Moore, John Bassett, A Digest of International Law (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1906), 4:343.Google Scholar
11 Interview with Westwood, Howard, 18 Nov. 1969.Google Scholar
12 Interview with Velásquez, Ramón, 4 June 1970.Google Scholar
13 Cayula, José and Pachano, David, ‘El Juicio del siglo’, Elite 2219 (6 04 1968), pp. 44–5. Source for this article was a detailed report sent to the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry by the chargé d'affaires involved in these activities. Some of this material also appeared in various parts of the trial transcripts.Google Scholar
14 The Miami Herald, 11 Sept. 1959, p. 2.Google Scholar
15 The New York Times, 28 Mar. 1959, p. 16.Google Scholar
16 In December 1958, the average judge in Miami had 450 pending cases as compared to a United States average of 238 cases. Four visiting judges helped to lighten the load in Miami during the winter. The Miami Herald, 17 May 1959, p. 5; 19 May 1959, p.6; 17 June 1959, p. 2.Google Scholar
17 Cayuela and Pachano, op. cit., 45.Google Scholar
18 Pérez liméncz v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, 19, 507 (5th Cir., 1962), 2:529–34.Google Scholar
19 Ibid., 2:595.
20 Ibid., 2:462; 3:388.
21 Some Venezuelan works which treat illicit enrichment are the following: Morillo, Gilberto, El Enriquecimienro Ilícito en Venezuela (Caracas, 1965);Google ScholarMartin, Américo, Los Feces Gordos (Valencia, Venez, 1975)Google ScholarRangel, José Vicente, Quien encubre a los culpables? (Caracas, 1975);Google ScholarQuilarque, Pedro (ed.), Contribución al estudio dcl enriquecimiento ilícito de fun. cionarios y empleados públicos en Venezuela, 1813–1959 (Caracas, 1973).Google Scholar
22 Order of 13 Nov. 1959, Ord¯er of 23 Nov. 1959, Petition for writ of prohibition of mandamus, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
23 The Miami Herald, 11 June 1963, p. 7; Memorandum for Intervenor M. Aristeguieta, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
24 Annex No. 6, Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
25 Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, pp. 152–4, 140–3, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
26 Ibid.
27 Certified copy of the record of sequestration of a valise of General Jiménez, Marcos Péz, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
28 Jiménez, Flor Pérez to Plaza, Teniente Vincio, 24 Jan. 1958, Mathes Papers;Google ScholarJiménez, Marcos Pérez to Pena, Diogenes, 24 Oct 1958, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
29 Certified copy of the record of sequestration of a valise of General Marcos Pérez Jiménez, Mathes Papers; List of the assets of General Marcos Pérez Jiménez when he fled the country, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
30 Pérez Jiménez v. Arisieguieta & Maguire, 4:961–69.Google Scholar
31 Morilo, Gilberto, El Enriquecimiento llicito en Venezuela (Caracas, Secretar´a Nacional de Fuerza Democrática Popular, 1965), p. 88.Google Scholar
32 Perez Jiménez v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, 3:860–70; 4:961–69.Google Scholar
33 Davis, Wallace M. to Jimnez, Marcos Péz, 27 Nov. 1957, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
34 Plaintiff's Evidence, 4:59–61, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 5:119–21; 9:82, 127, 128; Plaintiff's memorandum on the facts, Mathes Papers.
36 Plaintiff's Evidence, 6:59; 7:114, 138, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
37 Ibid., 7:115.
38 Ibid., 7: 168; Plaintiff's memorandum on the facts, Mathes Papers.
39 Ibid.
40 Plaintiff's Evidence, 7:168, 175, 187–89, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
41 Ibid., 7:174–86 passim.
42 Ibid., 8:9–10.
43 Whiteman, Marjorie (ed.), Digest of International Law (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State, 1968), 6:1000.Google Scholar
44 Ibid., p. 1007; Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers; Pérez Jiménez v. Aristeguieta &s Maguire, 2:443; 9:2644.Google Scholar
45 Memorandum for intervenor on the merits …, Mathes Papers; The New York Times, 8 Sept. 1960, p. 13.Google Scholar
46 Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers; Whiteman, 6:848.Google Scholar
47 Pérez jiménez v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, 9:2500, 2644.Google Scholar
48 Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
49 Whiteman, op. cit., 6: 766.Google Scholar
50 Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
51 Pérez Jiménez v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, 9:2640.Google Scholar
52 Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
53 Ibid.
54 Ibid., Memorandum in reply to defendant's memorandum in support of his motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers; Pérez Jiménez v. Aristeguicta & Maguire, 10:2819–20.Google Scholar
55 Memorandum in support of defendant's motion to dismiss, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
56 Defendant's exhibit B., Mathes Papers; Pérez Jiménez v. Arisreguieta & Maguire, II:3036–38, 3041, 3049.Google Scholar
57 Betancourt, Rómulo, Ls Reuolución democr´tica en Venezuela 1959–1963: documentos del gobierno presidido por Rómulo Betancourt (Caracas: Imprenta Nacional, 1968), I: 139.Google Scholar
58 Motion to leave to intervene, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
59 Westwood, Howard to Mathes, William, 29 Mar. 1961, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
60 Pérez Jiménez v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, 10:2794.Google Scholar
61 sInterview with Westwood, Howard, 18 Nov. 1969.Google Scholar
62 See for example Carrillo, Leonardo Altuve, Yo juí embajador de Pérez jiménez (Caracas, 1973) for accounts of attempted bribery of United States oflicials.Google Scholar
63 Certification to the Secretary of State, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
64 Pérez Jiménez v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, I:78–79, 169, 572; 2:322–30.Google Scholar
65 The Miami Herald, 18 June 1961. Pérez Jiménez v. Aristeguieta & Maguire, 5:134.Google Scholar
66 Pérez Iiméncz v. Arisleguieta & Maguire, 2:296, 390.Google Scholar
67 The Miami Herald, 14 Oct. 1962, p. 18;Google ScholarThe New York, 26 July 1963, p. 2.Google Scholar
68 The Arizona Republic, 13 July 1963, p. 6;Google ScholarThe Miami Herald, 20 Dec. 1962, p. 6; 16 Oct. 1962, p. 6.Google Scholar
69 The Miami Herald, 19 Mar. 1963, p. 25.Google Scholar
70 Ibid., 18 Dec. 1962, p. 1.
71 Ibid., 16 Feb. 1963, p. 8.
72 Ibid., 16 May 1962, p. 14.
73 Ibid., 17 June 1963, p. 23.
74 Memorandum for M. Aristeguieta, Mathes Papers.Google Scholar
75 Ibid.
76 The Miami Herald, 1 July 1963, p. 15.Google Scholar
77 Paris, Enrique Tejera to Rusk, Dean, 22 July 1963, Archive 59–95, Supreme Court Archives, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
78 Rusk, Dean to Paris, Enrique Tejera, 12 Aug. 1963Google Scholar, Ibid.
79 Whiteman, 6:1061–62.Google Scholar
80 The Miami Herald, 15 Aug. 1963, p. 2. 16 Aug. 1963, p. 2.Google Scholar
81 Ibid., 17 Aug. 1963, pp. 1, 2; Memorandum for M. Aristeguieta, Mathes Papers.
82 Declaración Indagatoria, Archive 59–95, Supreme Court Archives, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
83 Ibid.
84 Ibid.
85 The New York Times, 2 Aug. 1968, p. 2;Google ScholarxCatal´, José Agustin (ed.), Proceso a on exdictador (Caracas: José Agustín Catl´a, 1969), pp. 397–98.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by