Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T20:54:39.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Treatment using diffuse laser energy of cochlear and vestibular fistulas caused by cholesteatoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2019

S Basu
Affiliation:
Department of ENT Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust, Gloucester, UK
J Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust, Gloucester, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr John Hamilton, Dept. of ENT Surgery, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

To measure the outcomes of laser treatment of cholesteatoma covering cochlear and vestibular fistulas.

Methods

Cholesteatoma matrix over the fistula was denatured; the power density was sufficient only to gradually heat, but not vaporise, the keratin-forming matrix. The denaturing speed was controlled so that the integrity of the fistula cover was maintained. The change in bone conduction threshold and the residual rate of cholesteatoma at the fistula were measured.

Results

Thirty-six fistulas were assessed. There were seven cochlear fistulas. All were 5 mm or less in maximum length. For the entire group, the average change in bone conduction threshold was −0.3 dB. For cochlear fistulas, the average change in bone conduction was + 0.2 dB. The distribution of hearing results for the entire group was Gaussian; the apparent changes in hearing could be attributed to errors associated with testing. All patients underwent second-stage surgery. In all cases, the cholesteatoma was completely cleared from the fistula site. There were no facial palsies.

Conclusion

Laser denaturing of cholesteatoma matrix over fistulas measuring 5 mm or less of vestibular apparatus and the cochlea is effective at eliminating cholesteatoma, and is not associated with cochlear hearing loss or facial palsy.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr J Hamilton takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Mustafa, A, Heta, A, Kastrati, B, Dreshaj, S. Complications of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma during a 10-year period in Kosovo. Eur Arch Otolaryngol 2008;265:1477–82Google Scholar
2Rosito, LS, Netto, LS, Teixeira, AR, da Costa, SS. Sensorineural hearing loss in cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:214–17Google Scholar
3Smyth, GD, Gormley, PK. Preservation of cochlear function in the surgery of cholesteatomatous labyrinthine fistulas and oval window tympanosclerosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;96:111–18Google Scholar
4Lim, J, Gangal, A, Gluth, MB. Surgery for cholesteatomatous labyrinthine fistula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017;126:205–15Google Scholar
5Ritter, FN. Chronic suppurative otitis media and the pathologic labyrinthine fistula. Laryngoscope 1970;80:1025–35Google Scholar
6Hamilton, JW. Efficacy of the KTP laser in the treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:135–9Google Scholar
7Hamilton, JW. Systematic preservation of the ossicles in cholesteatoma surgery using a fibre-guided laser. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:1104–8Google Scholar
8American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186–7Google Scholar
9Ikeda, R, Kobayashi, T, Kawase, T, Oshima, T, Sato, T. Risk factors for deterioration of bone conduction hearing in cases of labyrinthine fistula caused by middle ear cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012;121:162–7Google Scholar
10Katsura, H, Mishiro, Y, Adachi, O, Ogino, K, Daimon, T, Sakagami, M. Long-term deterioration of bone-conduction hearing level in patients with labyrinthine fistula. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:69Google Scholar