Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:51:21.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transorbital approach to infratemporal fossa: novel technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2011

A Mishra*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Chatrapati Shahuji Maharaj (CSM) Medical University (King George Medical College), Lucknow, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Anupam Mishra, Professor Otolaryngology, CSMMU, (KGMC), A-1/19, Sector H, Aliganj, Lucknow (UP), India E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To present a conservative surgical approach, via the transorbital route, for selected cases of infratemporal fossa involvement or inferolateral orbital tumours extending to the infratemporal fossa.

Design:

Case series report.

Setting:

Department of ENT, CSM Medical University (King George Medical College), Lucknow, India.

Participants:

One patient.

Main outcome measures:

Operative feasibility, intra-operative access, post-operative morbidity and cosmesis.

Results:

This novel and relatively conservative technique provides excellent exposure in selected cases of infratemporal fossa involvement and has minimal post-operative morbidity. Cosmesis is excellent, as osteotomy is not required and scarring is minimal. There is no risk of trismus, Vth or VIIth cranial nerve injury, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and haemostasis is easily achieved.

Conclusion:

Classical, open approaches to the infratemporal fossa involve considerable morbidity, while conservative approaches have their limitations. Diagnostic uncertainty over a small infratemporal fossa mass (perhaps an extension from an inferolateral orbital tumour) is an uncommon clinical challenge. The transorbital approach described is suited to benign and early malignant tumours, and has excellent results when combined with orbital exenteration (if needed). This paper discusses this approach's technical details and feasibility in different clinical situations, and compares it with other infratemporal fossa approaches.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Infratemporal fossa approach. In: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/851375-media [12 March 2009]Google Scholar
2Fisch, U. The infratemporal fossa approach for the lateral skull base. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1984;17:513–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Sekhar, LN, Schramm, VL Jr, Jones, NF. Subtemporal-preauricular infratemporal fossa approach to large lateral and posterior cranial base neoplasms. J Neurosurg 1987;67:488–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Terz, JJ, Young, HF, Lawrence, W Jr.Combined craniofacial resection for locally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck II. Carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses. Am J Surg 1980;140:618–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Janecka, IP, Sen, CN, Sekhar, LN, Arriaga, M. Facial translocation: a new approach to the cranial base. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:413–19Google Scholar
6Cocke, EW Jr, Robertson, JH, Robertson, JT, Crook, JP Jr.The extended maxillotomy and subtotal maxillectomy for excision of skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:92104Google Scholar
7Kronlein, RV. The pathology and operative procedure of orbital dermoid [in German]. Beitr Klin Chir 1938;4:149–63Google Scholar
8Jones, BR. Surgical approaches to the orbit. Trans Ophthalmological Society UK 1970;90:269308Google ScholarPubMed