Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:59:28.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective morbidity following radial free flap reconstruction in head and neck tumour patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

A Minkara ,
M R Simmons ,
A Goodale  and
Y J Patil
A Minkara
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center/College of Medicine, Ohio, USA
M R Simmons
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cincinnati Medical Center/College of Medicine, Ohio, USA
A Goodale
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center/College of Medicine, Ohio, USA
Y J Patil*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center/College of Medicine, Ohio, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Yash Patil, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, ML 0528, Cincinnati, OH, USA E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +1 513 558 5203
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Evaluation of post-operative donor site disability remains unaddressed in radial forearm free flap cases. This study aimed to assess donor site dysfunction following radial forearm free flap harvest using validated general, disease-specific and site-specific disability questionnaires.

Methods

In this retrospective case series of 24 patients at a tertiary academic medical centre, patients were assessed using the Short Form 36 Health Survey, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. One-sample z-tests were performed, comparing means of the cohort to controls.

Results

Compared to population controls, the cohort had higher mean scores for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (18.22 vs 10.1, p < 0.01), and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire bothersome index (21.44 vs 13.77, p = 0.04), and a lower mean score for the Short Form 36 Health Survey physical component (38.88 vs 50, p < 0.01), indicating a greater disability for the cohort compared to controls.

Conclusion

Radial forearm free flap harvest causes significant long-term donor site disability in head and neck tumour patients. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire is a concise tool for measuring this dysfunction.

Keywords

Head and Neck NeoplasmsFree Tissue FlapsReconstructive Surgical ProcedureForearmUpper ExtremityQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 3 , March 2019 , pp. 230 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr Y Patil takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented at the Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Cancer Symposium, 18–20 February 2016, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

References

1Shepherd, KL, Fisher, SE. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer: from diagnosis to three months post-treatment. Oral Oncol 2004;40:751–7Google Scholar
2Orlik, JR, Horwich, P, Bartlett, C, Trites, J, Hart, R, Taylor, SM. Long-term functional donor site morbidity of the free radial forearm flap in head and neck cancer survivors. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;43:1Google Scholar
3Yang, GF, Chen, PJ, Gao, YZ, Liu, XY, Li, J, Jiang, SX et al. Forearm free skin flap transplantation: a report of 56 cases. 1981. Br J Plast Surg 1997;50:162–5Google Scholar
4Evans, GR, Schusterman, MA, Kroll, SS, Miller, MJ, Reece, GP, Robb, GL et al. The radial forearm free flap for head and neck reconstruction: a review. Am J Surg 1994;168:446–50Google Scholar
5Ho, T, Couch, M, Carson, K, Schimberg, A, Manley, K, Byrne, PJ. Radial forearm free flap donor site outcomes comparison by closure methods. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:309–15Google Scholar
6Al-Hayder, S, Elberg, JJ, Charabi, B. Clinical outcome and health-related quality-of-life following microsurgical reconstruction in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137:541–5Google Scholar
7Nehrer-Tairych, GV, Millesi, W, Schuhfried, O, Rath, T. A comparison of the donor-site morbidity after using the prelaminated fasciomucosal flap and the fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap for intraoral reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2002;55:198–202Google Scholar
8Sardesai, MG, Fung, K, Yoo, JH, Bakker, H. Donor-site morbidity following radial forearm free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;37:411–16Google Scholar
9de Bree, R, Hartley, C, Smeele, LE, Kuik, DJ, Quak, JJ, Leemans, CR. Evaluation of donor site function and morbidity of the fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1973–6Google Scholar
10Tschiesner, U, Rogers, SN, Harreus, U, Berghaus, A, Cieza, A. Content comparison of quality of life questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:627–37Google Scholar
11McHorney, CA, Ware, JE Jr, Raczek, AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247–63Google Scholar
12Ware, JE, Kosinski, M, Bjorner, JB, Turner-Bowker, DM, Gandek, B, Maruish, ME. User's Manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, 2007Google Scholar
13Swiontkowski, MF, Engelberg, R, Martin, DP, Agel, J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1245–60Google Scholar
14Hunsaker, FG, Cioffi, DA, Amadio, PC, Wright, JG, Caughlin, B. The American Academy Of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:208–15Google Scholar
15Goldstein, DP, Ringash, J, Bissada, E, Jaquet, Y, Irish, J, Chepeha, D et al. Evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires used for the assessment of shoulder disability after neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2014;36:1453–8Google Scholar
16Infante-Cossio, P, Torres-Carranza, E, Cayuela, A, Hens-Aumente, E, Pastor-Gaitan, P, Gutierrez-Perez, JL. Impact of treatment on quality of life for oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:1052–8Google Scholar
17Bardsley, AF, Soutar, DS, Elliot, D, Batchelor, AG. Reducing morbidity in the radial forearm flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:287–92; discussion 93–4Google Scholar
18Loeffelbein, DJ, Al-Benna, S, Steinstrasser, L, Satanovskij, RM, Rohleder, NH, Mucke, T et al. Reduction of donor site morbidity of free radial forearm flaps: what level of evidence is available?. Eplasty 2012;12:e9Google Scholar
19Skoner, JM, Bascom, DA, Cohen, JI, Andersen, PE, Wax, MK. Short-term functional donor site morbidity after radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap harvest. Laryngoscope 2003;113:2091–4Google Scholar
20Richardson, D, Fisher, SE, Vaughan, ED, Brown, JS. Radial forearm flap donor-site complications and morbidity: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:109–15Google Scholar
21Lutz, BS, Wei, FC, Chang, SC, Yang, KH, Chen, IH. Donor site morbidity after suprafascial elevation of the radial forearm flap: a prospective study in 95 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:132–7Google Scholar
22Brown, MT, Couch, ME, Huchton, DM. Assessment of donor-site functional morbidity from radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap harvest. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:1371–4Google Scholar
23Swanson, E, Boyd, JB, Manktelow, RT. The radial forearm flap: reconstructive applications and donor-site defects in 35 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:258–66Google Scholar
24Riecke, B, Kohlmeier, C, Assaf, AT, Wikner, J, Drabik, A, Catala-Lehnen, P et al. Prospective biomechanical evaluation of donor site morbidity after radial forearm free flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:181–6Google Scholar
25Bozec, A, Demez, P, Gal, J, Chamorey, E, Louis, MY, Blanchard, D et al. Long-term quality of life and psycho-social outcomes after oropharyngeal cancer surgery and radial forearm free-flap reconstruction: a GETTEC prospective multicentric study. Surg Oncol 2018;27:23–30Google Scholar
26Connolly, TM, Sweeny, L, Greene, B, Morlandt, A, Carroll, WR, Rosenthal, EL. Reconstruction of midface defects with the osteocutaneous radial forearm flap: evaluation of long term outcomes including patient reported quality of life. Microsurgery 2017;37:752–62Google Scholar
27Gao, N, Fu, K, Lou, WH. Comparison of free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps versus free forearm flap for reconstruction in elderly patients undergoing glossectomy [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2017;52:34–8Google Scholar
28Yuan, Y, Zhang, P, He, W, Li, W. Comparison of oral function: free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps versus vascularized free forearm flap for reconstruction in patients undergoing glossectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1500.e1–6Google Scholar
29Elfring, T, Boliek, CA, Winget, M, Paulsen, C, Seikaly, H, Rieger, JM. The relationship between lingual and hypoglossal nerve function and quality of life in head and neck cancer. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:133–40Google Scholar
30Cheng, YS, Li, WL, Xu, L, Xu, ZF, Liu, FY, Sun, CF. Assessment of quality of life of oral cancer patients after reconstruction with radial forearm free flaps [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013;48:161–4Google Scholar
31Li, W, Xu, Z, Liu, F, Huang, S, Dai, W, Sun, C. Vascularized free forearm flap versus free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment of quality of life. Head Neck 2013;35:1808–13Google Scholar
32Li, X, Sun, Q, Guo, S. Functional assessments in patients undergoing radial forearm flap following hemiglossectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:e172–5Google Scholar
33Gurney, TA, Eisele, DW, Orloff, LA, Wang, SJ. Predictors of quality of life after treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:262–7Google Scholar
34Rhemrev, R, Rakhorst, HA, Zuidam, JM, Mureau, MA, Hovius, SE, Hofer, SO. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction after radial forearm free flap reconstructions of intraoral malignancy resections. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:588–92Google Scholar
35Thone, M, Karengera, D, Siciliano, S, Reychler, H. Reconstruction of the mobile tongue malignant tumor excision: quality-of-life assessment in 19 patients [in French]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2003;104:19–24Google Scholar
36Futran, ND, Haller, JR. Considerations for free-flap reconstruction of the hard palate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:665–9Google Scholar
37Zhao, Y, Xiang, JZ, Liu, FY. Assessment of life quality of for patients after tongue reconstruction with radial forearm free flap, anterolateral thigh perforator flap or submental island flap [in Chinese]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2017;26:111–14Google Scholar
38Sinclair, CF, Gleysteen, JP, Zimmermann, TM, Wax, MK, Givi, B, Schneider, D et al. Assessment of donor site morbidity for free radial forearm osteocutaneous flaps. Microsurgery 2012;32:255–60Google Scholar
39Deleyiannis, FW, Sacks, JM, McLean, KM, Russavage, JM. Patient self-report of disability of the upper extremity following osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1479–84Google Scholar
40Riecke, B, Assaf, AT, Heiland, M, Al-Dam, A, Grobe, A, Blessmann, M et al. Local full-thickness skin graft of the donor arm–a novel technique for the reduction of donor site morbidity in radial forearm free flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:937–41Google Scholar