Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:05:39.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of speech deterioration in post-lingually deafened adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. Cowie ,
E. Douglas-Cowie  and
A. G. Kerr
R. Cowie
Affiliation:
Paper presented at the Section of Otology of The Royal Society of Medicine, 6 March 1981.
E. Douglas-Cowie
Affiliation:
Paper presented at the Section of Otology of The Royal Society of Medicine, 6 March 1981.
A. G. Kerr
Affiliation:
Paper presented at the Section of Otology of The Royal Society of Medicine, 6 March 1981.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 96 , Issue 2 , February 1982 , pp. 101 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Conrad, R. (1979), The Deaf Schoolchild, London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Douglas-cowie, E., and Cowm, R. (in press), ‘Speech degeneration in the post-lingually deaf’ in Hearing Research and Hearing Disorders, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Espir, M. L. E., and Rose, F. C. (1976), Basic Neurology of Speech, Oxford: Blackwell, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Ling, D. (1976), Speech and the Hearing-Impaired Child: Theory and Practice, The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, Inc.Google Scholar
Smith, C. R. (1973), Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children, CUNY Communications Science Laboratory Research Report, 4.Google Scholar