Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:26:12.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Student-selected components: bringing more ENT into the undergraduate curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2006

R M Newbegin
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Newcastle, Middlesbrough, UK
J C Rhodes
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Newcastle, Middlesbrough, UK
L M Flood*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
H C Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr L M Flood, Department of ENT, The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Exposure to otolaryngology is currently minimal in the UK undergraduate medical curriculum. This may lead to difficulties in attracting graduates into higher ENT surgical training and in ensuring a reasonable standard of ENT knowledge amongst primary care practitioners.

A recent innovation, of which many ENT units may be unaware, is the introduction to the undergraduate curriculum of ‘student-selected components’. Like the traditional elective, this allows students to undertake an attachment to a speciality and department of their choice. Units which do not regularly teach medical students but which have a welcoming and enthusiastic approach to undergraduate training may well be ideal hosts.

This paper introduces the concepts underlying student-selected components, outlines the preparation required and offers a template for such an attachment, for which ENT is ideally suited.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2Howard, D, Kwame, I, Frampton, S. Otorhinolaryngology – head & neck surgery in the undergraduate curriculum. ENT News 2005;13:3940Google Scholar
3Mace, AD, Narula, AA. Survey of current undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:217–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Prideaux, D. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Curriculum design. BMJ 2003;326:268–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Gordon, J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: One to one teaching and feedback. BMJ 2003;326:543–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hutchinson, L. Educational environment. BMJ 2003;326:810–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Hajioff, D, Birchall, M. Medical students in ENT outpatient clinics; appointment times, patient satisfaction and student satisfaction. Med Educ 1999;33:669–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Lee, MS, Montague, ML, Hussain, SS. Student perceived benefit from otolaryngology theatre attendance. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:293–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Montague, ML, Hussain, SS. Patient perceptions of the otolaryngology ward round in a teaching hospital. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:314–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Morrison, J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation. BMJ 2003;326:385–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed