Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:34:03.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The septal body revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2008

S Elwany*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria University, Egypt
S A Salam
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria University, Egypt
A Soliman
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria University, Egypt
A Medanni
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria University, Egypt
E Talaat
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Alexandria University, Egypt
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Samy Elwany, Apartment 605, 4 Kfr Abdou Street, Roushdey, Alexandria 21529, Egypt. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

The term septal body refers to a thickened area of the nasal septum which is located superior to the inferior turbinate and anterior to the middle turbinate. Despite its important role in changing nasal airflow resistance, it has received little attention. Clinically, a well developed septal body may be misdiagnosed as high septal deviation.

Aim:

The aim of the present study was to reassess the histological characteristics of the septal body mucosa and the morphometric differences between it and the adjacent septal mucosa. This information was then used to determine the exact location and surface area of the septal body.

Materials and methods:

The study was performed on 30 cadaveric specimens (60 sides). Serial numbered sections of the whole septal mucosa were stained with haematoxylin and eosin as well as periodic acid Schiff – Alcian blue. Morphometric analysis was performed to determine the histological differences between the septal body mucosa, the anterior septal mucosa and the inferior septal mucosa. The precise boundaries of the septal body area were then defined in a manner similar to the Mohs micrographic surgical technique.

Results:

The histological characteristics of the septal body mucosa included thick (more than 60 µm), pseudostratified, ciliated respiratory epithelium with goblet cells, abundant seromucinous glands and many blood sinusoids. Morphometric analysis showed that the septal body mucosa had thicker epithelium and more glandular acini and blood sinusoids than the rest of the septal mucosa. Mapping of the septal body area showed that its anterior end was 2.2 ± 0.3 cm (mean ± standard deviation) behind the caudal edge of the septal cartilage, and its inferior border was 1.1 ± 0.2 cm above the floor of the nose. The mean horizontal diameter of the septal body was 2.0 ± 0.15 cm, and the mean vertical diameter was 1.5 ± 0.11 cm.

Conclusions:

The present study determined the morphometric characteristics of the septal body as well as its location and surface area. The intimate relationship of the septal body to the internal nasal valve and the histological characteristics of its mucosa should stimulate research into its potential role in modifying nasal airflow pattern and resistance, and its role in changing the humidity and temperature of the inspiratory air stream.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cole, P. The four components of the nasal valve. Am J Rhinol 2003;17:107–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Ng, BA, Ramsey, RG, Corey, JP. The distribution of nasal erectile mucosa as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Ear Nose Throat J 1999;78:159, 163–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Haight, JS, Gardiner, GW. Nasal cryosurgery and cautery: should the septum be treated and is a diagnosis relevant? J Otolaryngol 1989;18:144–50Google ScholarPubMed
4 Constantian, MB, Clardy, RB. The relative importance of septal and nasal valvular surgery in correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:3854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Grymer, LF. Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995;105:429–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Courtiss, EH, Goldwyn, RM. The effects of nasal surgery on airflow. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Saunders, MW, Jones, NS, Kabala, J, Lowe, J. An anatomical, histological and magnetic resonance imaging study of the nasal septum. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995;20:434–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Unlu, HH, Celik, O, Demir, MA, Eskiizmir, G. Pleomorphic adenoma originated from the inferior nasal turbinate. Auris Nasus Larynx 2003;30:417–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Kelly, JT, Prasad, AK, Wexler, AS. Detailed flow patterns in the nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:323–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Jareoncharsri, P, Thitadilok, V, Bunnag, C, Ungkanont, K, Voraprayoon, S, Tansuriyawong, P. Nasal endoscopic findings in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1999;17:261–7Google ScholarPubMed
11 Sulsenti, G, Palma, P. Tailored nasal surgery for normalization of nasal resistance. Facial Plast Surg 1996;12:333–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Uzun, L, Savranlar, A, Beder, LB, Ugur, M, Cinar, F, Ozdemir, H et al. Enlargement of the bone component in different parts of compensatorily hypertrophied inferior turbinate. Am J Rhinol 2004;18:405–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Rowe-Jones, J. Nasal surgery: evidence of efficacy. Septal and turbinate surgery. Rhinology 2004;42:248–50Google ScholarPubMed
14 Wexler, D, Braverman, I, Amar, M. Histology of the nasal septal swell body (septal turbinate). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:596600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Grevers, G, Kamargakis, W, Welsch, U. Morphological variability of smooth muscle cells in human nasal swell bodies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253:147–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Berger, G, Hammel, I, Berger, R, Avraham, S, Ophir, D. Histopathology of the inferior turbinate with compensatory hypertrophy in patients with deviated nasal septum. Laryngoscope 2000;110:2100–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Schmidt, J, Zalewski, P, Olszewski, J, Olszewska-Ziaber, A, Mloczkowski, D, Pietkiewicz, P. Histopathological verifications and clinical indications in the inferior turbinoplasty [in Polish]. Otolaryngol Pol 2001;55:545–50Google ScholarPubMed
18 Campbell, RM, Barrall, D, Wilkel, C, Robinson-Bostom, L, Dufresne, RG Jr. Post-Mohs micrographic surgical margin tissue evaluation with permanent histopathologic sections. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:655–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Vuyk, HD, Lohuis, PJ. Mohs micrographic surgery for facial skin cancer. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:265–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Shriner, DL, McCoy, DK, Goldberg, DJ, Wagner, RF Jr. Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:7997CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Wexler, DB, Davidson, TM. The nasal valve: a review of the anatomy, imaging, and physiology. Am J Rhinol 2004;18:143–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Lindemann, J, Kuhnemann, S, Stehmer, V, Leiacker, R, Rettinger, G, Keck, T. Temperature and humidity profile of the anterior nasal airways of patients with nasal septal perforation. Rhinology 2001;39:202–6Google ScholarPubMed
23 Lindemann, J, Leiacker, R, Stehmer, V, Rettinger, G, Keck, T. Intranasal temperature and humidity profile in patients with nasal septal perforation before and after surgical closure. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:433–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Cole, P, Haight, JS, Cooper, PW, Kassel, EE. A computed tomographic study of nasal mucosa: effects of vasoactive substances. J Otolaryngol 1983;12:5860Google ScholarPubMed
25 Alper, F, Karasen, RM, Kantarci, M. A massive superior concha bullosa: case report and literature review. Rhinology 2004;42:3840Google ScholarPubMed
26 Griffin, JE Jr, Caloss, R. Nasal deformities. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2004;12:3174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Lam, SM, Williams, EF 3rd. Anatomic considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2002;18:209–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed