Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:56:22.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retrospective study of 116 patients with non-organic voice disorders: efficacy of mental imagery and laryngeal shaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2008

M S Voerman ,
A P M Langeveld  and
M A van Rossum
M S Voerman
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
A P M Langeveld
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
M A van Rossum*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Maya van Rossum, Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Fax: +31 71 5266910 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To report the short- and long-term results of two techniques (mental imagery and manual shaking of the larynx) in patients with non-organic dysphonia or aphonia.

Design:

Retrospective review of patient records, plus follow-up survey (questionnaire).

Setting:

Academic teaching hospital.

Patients:

One hundred and sixteen patients with moderate to severe non-organic dysphonia or aphonia.

Outcome:

Cure (i.e. normal voice) and improved voice quality, judged by clinicians and patients.

Results:

One hundred (86 per cent) of the 116 patients were cured. Ninety-four (81 per cent) patients regained their normal voice within one therapy session. The follow-up survey revealed that 43 of the 87 (49 per cent) patients who responded had not had a relapse since therapy ended. Of those patients suffering relapse, 15 successfully applied mental imagery in order to retrieve their voice, compared with three patients who applied shaking of the larynx.

Conclusion:

Mental imagery, combined if necessary with manual therapy, is an effective therapeutic technique in patients with non-organic voice disorders.

Keywords

Non-OrganicDysphoniaAphoniaMental Imagery
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , pp. 528 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bridger, MWM, Epstein, R. Functional voice disorders. A review of 109 patients. J Laryngol Otol 1983;97:1145–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Roy, N, Leeper, HA. Effects of manual laryngeal musculoskeletal tension reduction technique as a treatment for functional voice disorders. J Voice 1993;7:242–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Roy, N. Functional dysphonia. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:144–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Sama, A, Carding, PN, Price, S, Kelly, P, Wilson, JA. The clinical features of functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope 2001;111:458–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Baker, J. Psychogenic voice disorders and traumatic stress experience; a discussion paper and two case reports. J Voice 2003;17:308–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Schalen, L, Andersson, K. Differential diagnosis and treatment of psychogenic voice disorder. Clin Otolaryngol 1992;17:225–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Van Harten, PN, Schutte, HK. Psychogenic aphonia; an easily cured conversion disorder [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1992;136:790–3Google Scholar
8 Carding, PN, Horsley, IA, Docherty, GJ. A study of the effectiveness of voice therapy in the treatment of 45 patients with nonorganic dysphonia. J Voice 1999;13:72–104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Roy, N, Bless, DM, Heisy, D, Ford, CN. Manual circumlaryngeal therapy for functional dysphonia: an evaluation of short- and long-term treatment outcomes. J Voice 1997;11:321–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Altman, KW, Atkinson, C, Lazarus, C. Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review. J Voice 2003;19:261–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 House, A, Andrews, HB. The psychiatric and social characteristics of patients with functional dysphonia. J Psychosom Res 1987;31:483–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 House, A, Andrews, HB. Life events and difficulties preceding the onset of functional dysphonia. J Psychosom Res 1988;32:311–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Baker, J. Psychogenic dysphonia: peeling back the layers. J Voice 1998;12:527–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Andersson, K, Schalen, L. Etiology and treatment of psychogenic voice disorder: results of a follow-up study of 30 patients. J Voice 1998;12:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Shergill, SS, Bullmore, ET, Brammer, MJ, Williams, SCR, Murray, RM, McGuire, PK. A functional study of auditory verbal imagery. Psychol Med 2001;31:241–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Mulder, T, De Vries, S, Zijlstra, S. Observation, imagination and execution of an effortful movement: more evidence for a central explanation of motor imagery. Exp Brain Res 2005;163:344–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Lotze, M, Halsband, U. Motor imagery. J Physiol (Lond) 2006;99:386–95Google ScholarPubMed
18 Kleber, B, Birbaumer, N, Veit, R, Trevorrow, T, Lotze, M. Overt and imagined singing of an Italian aria. Neuroimage 2007;36:889–900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Stinear, CM, Byblow, WD, Steyvers, M, Levin, O, Swinnen, SP. Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 2006;168:157–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Özdemir, E, Norton, A, Schlaug, G. Shared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking. Neuroimage 2006;33:628–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Yágüez, L, Nagel, D, Hoffman, H, Canavan, AGM, Wist, E, Hömberg, V. A mental route to motor learning: improving trajectorial kinematics through imagery training. Behav Brain Res 1998;90:95–106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Drost, HA. Psychogenic voice disorders [in Dutch]. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, 1992Google Scholar
23 Bandler, R, Grinder, J. The Structure of Magic. A Book about Language and Therapy. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books, 1975Google Scholar
24 Wyke, BD. Laryngeal myotatic reflexes and phonation. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1974;26:249–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Guenther, FH, Ghosh, SS, Tourville, JA. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang 2006;96:280–301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Harris, C, Richards, C. Functional aphonia in young people. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:610–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Sundberg, J. The Science of the Singing Voice. Dekalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press, 1987Google Scholar
28 Rubin, JS, Greenberg, M. Psychogenic voice disorders in performers: a psychodynamical model. J Voice 2002;16:544–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Roy, N, Bless, DM, Heisy, D. Personality and voice disorders: a multitrait-multidisorder analysis. J Voice 2000;14:521–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Millar, A, Deary, IJ, Wilson, JA, MacKenzie, K. Is an organic/functional distinction psychologically meaningful in patients with dysphonia? J Psychosom Res 1999;46:497–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Kinzl, J, Biebl, W, Rauchegger, H. Functional aphonia: psychosomatic aspects of diagnosis and therapy. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1988;40:131–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Tsunoda, K, Soda, Y. Successful therapy for psychological aphonia. Laryngoscope 1996;106:119Google ScholarPubMed
33 Günther, V, Mayr-Grafl, A, Miller, C, Kinzl, H. A comparative study of psychological aspects of recurring and non-recurring functional aphonias. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253:240–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Driskell, JE, Copper, C, Moran, A. Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Sport Psychology 1994;79:481–92Google Scholar
35 Langheim, FJ, Callicott, JH, Mattay, VS, Duyn, JH, Weinberger, DR. Cortical systems associated with covert music rehearsal. Neuroimage 2002;16:901–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed