Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:52:37.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective, comparative, cohort study comparing the rhinogram, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 and Heath-Related Quality of Life questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2010

P M Patel ,
S Maskell ,
R Heywood ,
N Eze  and
J Hern
P M Patel*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
S Maskell
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
R Heywood
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
N Eze
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
J Hern
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Parag M Patel, 51 Severn Drive, Esher KT10 0AJ, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Many outcome measures exist for rhinosinusitis. However, few are used in the clinical setting due to their long completion times.

Objective:

To assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the rhinogram, compared with two validated rhinosinusitis outcome measures: the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 and the Heath-Related Quality of Life questionnaire.

Methods:

Fifty-one patients were entered into a prospective, comparative, cohort study using all three outcome measures one week pre-operatively and three months post-operatively. Outcome scores were then correlated using non-parametric Spearman's rank correlation and chi-square testing for the diagnostic criteria of all three outcome measures.

Results:

Statistically significant correlations were found between all three outcome measures for all symptom scores, individually as well as combined (p < 0.01 for all calculations). Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the rhinogram, compared with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 and the Heath-Related Quality of Life questionnaire, showed statistical significance (p < 0.05; chi-square test).

Conclusion:

The rhinogram is a reliable, valid and responsive rhinosinusitis outcome measure which can assist patient diagnosis and management in the clinical setting. Due to its quick completion time, this outcome measure could be used in rhinology out-patient clinics.

Keywords

RhinitisSinusitisOutcome Assessment
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 124 , Issue 6 , June 2010 , pp. 623 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fokkens, W, Lund, V, Bachert, C, Clement, P, Hellings, P, Holmstrom, M et al. EAACI position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps executive summary. Allergy 2005;60:583–601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Stewart, MG. Outcomes research: an overview. ORL J Otorhinolaryngology Relat Spec 2004;66:163–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Ellwood, P. Outcomes management: the impetus and impact. Health Systems Review 1992;25:24–26Google ScholarPubMed
4 Lund, VJ, Mackay, IS. Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 1993;31:183–4Google ScholarPubMed
5 Atlas, SJ, Metson, RB, Singer, DE, Wu, YA, Gliklich, RE et al. Validity of a new health-related quality of life instrument for patients with chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 2005;115:846–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Piccirillo, JF, Merritt, MG Jr, Richards, ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:41–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Morley, AD, Sharp, HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems – which is best? Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:103–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 White, P. Subjective scoring systems in rhinology. ENT News 2004;12: http://www.pinpointmedical.com/article_read.php?id=471&publication=ent-news&link_id=3Google Scholar
9 Atlas, SJ, Gallagher, PM, Wu, YA, Singer, DE, Gliklich, RE, Metson, RB et al. Development and validation of a new health-related quality of life instrument for patients with sinusitis. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1375–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Hopkins, C, Browne, JP, Slack, R, Lund, V, Topham, J, Reeves, B et al. The national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:390–8Google Scholar