Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:28:03.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prominent ears: A follow-up study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Frede Nielsen ,
Søren Kristensen  and
Michael Crawford
Frede Nielsen
Affiliation:
Esbjerg, Denmark
Søren Kristensen*
Affiliation:
Esbjerg, Denmark
Michael Crawford
Affiliation:
Esbjerg, Denmark
*
Søren Kristense, M. D. ENT Department, Sct. Joseph's Hospital, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Following a minimum observation time of 14 months, 74 patients having undergone surgical correction of prominent ears were re-examined. The applied surgical technique was modified from Stenström and Warrer utilizing the scoring technique and subcutaneous matters chrome catgut sutures for fixation. Satisfactory results were achieved in more than 95 percent of the patients. When assesed by both the patient and the surgeon. Only few complications were revealed

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , March 1985 , pp. 221 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chongchet, V. (1963) A method of antihelix reconstruction. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 16: 268–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Converse, J. M., and Wood-Smith, D. (1963) Technical Details in the Surgical Correction of the lop Ear Deformity. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 31: 118–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erich, J. B. (1957) Protrusion of the Ears. Laryngoscope, 67: 448–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, P. H. R. (1981) Prominent Ears and their Surgical Correction. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 95: 881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, V. W., and Staindl, O. (1978) Die modifizierte ‘Stenstrom-Plastik’ zur Behandlung der abstehenden Ohrmuschel. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 128: 397–399.Google Scholar
Stenström, S. J., and Heftner, J. (1978) The Stenström Otoplasty. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 5: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, A. J. (1968) Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 41: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mustarde, J. C. (1963) The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 16: 170–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, G. W., Klabunde, E. H., and Bergeron, V. L. (1947) Useful procedures in plastic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2: 358–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, O. R., Dommerby, H. O., and Rosborg, J. (1983) Aures alatae, en efterundersøgelse af 159 patienter opereret a.m. Stenströom/Warrer. Ugeskrift for Laeger (Copenhagen), 145: 653–656.Google Scholar
Staindl, O. (1980) Zur Korrektur der abstehenden Ohrmuschel. HNO (Berlin), 28: 234–240.Google Scholar
Stenström., S. J. (1963) A ‘Natural’ Technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 32: 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrer, H. (1970) Prominent ears, a technique for plastic correction. Act Oto-Laryngologica (Stockholm). 263: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar