Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:44:53.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patulous nasolacrimal duct with air reflux: a complication of submucosal diathermy of the inferior turbinate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

P M Puttasiddaiah*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales, UK
C R Whittet
Affiliation:
Cardiff University School of Medicine, Swansea, Wales, UK
G N Shuttleworth
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, Wales, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Paramesh M Puttasiddaiah, Department of Otolaryngology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea SA6 6NL, Wales, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Submucosal diathermy to the inferior turbinate is a widely practised procedure to improve the nasal airway when nasal obstruction is due to hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate. This paper reports a case of an unusual nasolacrimal complication following submucosal diathermy to the inferior turbinate, and reviews the relevant literature.

Case report

A 33-year-old male patient developed a patulous nasolacrimal duct opening following submucosal diathermy of the inferior turbinate. This resulted in spontaneous reflux of air and nasal mucus on to the ocular surface.

Conclusion

This newly recognised complication of submucosal diathermy to the inferior turbinate indicates the need to be aware of the potential risk to the nasolacrimal system with this technique.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr P M Puttasiddaiah takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Bron, AJ, Tripathi, RC, Tripathi, BJ. Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit, 8th edn. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997;7980Google Scholar
2Williams, HO, Fisher, EW, Golding-Wood, DG. ‘Two-stage turbinectomy’: sequestration of the inferior turbinate following submucosal diathermy. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:1416Google Scholar
3Simpson, JF, Groves, J. Submucosal diathermy of the inferior turbinates. J Laryngol Otol 1958;72:292301Google Scholar
4Talat, M, El-Sabawy, E, Baky, FA, Raheem, AA. Submucous diathermy of the inferior turbinates in chronic hypertrophic rhinitis. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:452–60Google Scholar
5Von Haacke, NP, Hardcastle, PF. Submucosal diathermy of the inferior turbinate and the congested nose. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1985;47:189–93Google Scholar
6Woodhead, CJ, Wickham, MH, Smelt, GJ, MacDonald, AW. Some observations on submucous diathermy. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:1047–9Google Scholar
7Premachandra, DJ, Bull, TR, Mackay, IS. How safe is submucosal diathermy? J Laryngol Otol 1990;104:408–9Google Scholar
8White, A, Murray, JA. Intranasal adhesion formation following surgery for chronic nasal obstruction. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1988;13:139–43Google Scholar
9Keh, SM, Shakeel, M, Chapman, A, Maini, SK. Osteomyelitis and necrosis of inferior turbinate following submucous diathermy to the inferior turbinate. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 2012;41:E4750Google Scholar
10Waite, DW, Whittet, HB, Shun-Shin, GA. Technical note: computed tomographic dacryocystography. Br J Radiol 1993;66:711–13Google Scholar
11Biro, N, Murchison, AP, Pribitkin, EA, Rosen, MR, Bilyk, JR. Air reflux and other sequelae following endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29:386–8Google Scholar