Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:10:10.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patient burden of centralization of head and neck cancer surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2006

R.S. Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK.
Julie Hewett
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK.
S.A. Hickey
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the impact on patients of proposals to centralize head and neck oncology services in the UK. A retrospective audit of the 2001–2002 head and neck cancer database at South Devon district general hospital identified 85 patients (50 males: 35 females; median age 66 years; range 29–93) diagnosed with head and neck cancer. The total number of hospital visits for diagnostic, therapeutic and other management services were recorded (median number of visits 28; range 1–78). Using this data, the extra distance required to travel to a potential regional cancer centre located in Bristol during the first six months of management was extrapolated. It was calculated that each patient would have to travel on average an extra 5333 miles (median 5658; range 185–13 759). Published documents advocating centralization of oncology services make no reference to the patient burden of geographic relocation of medical services. Agencies involved with restructuring oncology services must recognize the non-clinical impact of centralization and make some provision to overcome the burden facing patients and their carers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Royal Society of Medicine Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)