Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:38:22.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcomes following tympanoplasty surgery using porcine-derived small intestinal submucosa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

K Pollaers ,
P Bumbak  and
J Kuthubutheen
K Pollaers*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
P Bumbak
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
J Kuthubutheen
Affiliation:
Division of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Katherine Pollaers, ENT Department, Perth Children's Hospital, 15 Hospital Ave, Nedlands, WA6009, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +61 (08) 6457 4899
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To determine the outcomes of tympanoplasty surgery using porcine-derived small intestinal submucosa.

Method

A retrospective audit was conducted in a hospital setting. Thirty-five adult and paediatric patients who received a small intestinal submucosa graft as part of tympanoplasty surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent either simple tympanoplasty (n = 26) or complex tympanoplasty as part of a concurrent otological procedure such as atticotomy and mastoidectomy. The main outcome measures were rate of tympanic membrane closure and change in four-frequency mean air–bone gap.

Results

Thirty-one patients had a follow-up period of longer than two months. Closure was obtained in 22 patients (71 per cent). The mean air–bone gap improved from 20.7 to 12.3 dB HL in the simple tympanoplasty group and from 22.3 to 12 dB HL in the complex tympanoplasty group.

Conclusion

Tympanoplasty surgery with small intestinal submucosa is a viable option for patients where autologous graft is not available or in order to minimise donor site morbidity.

Keywords

Tympanic MembraneMyringoplastyTympanoplastyTissue Scaffolds
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 136 , Issue 4 , April 2022 , pp. 304 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr K Pollaers takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Tan, HE, Santa Maria, PL, Eikelboom, RH, Anandacoomaraswamy, KS, Atlas, MD. Type I tympanoplasty meta-analysis: a single variable analysis. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:838–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Eredità, R. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) myringoplasty in children: a randomized controlled study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:1085–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yawn, RJ, Dedmon, MM, O'Connell, BP, Virgin, FW, Rivas, A. Tympanic membrane perforation repair using porcine small intestinal submucosal grafting. Otol Neurotol 2018;39:e332–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizer, F. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II: the study. Laryngoscope 1997;107:26–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, C, Bassila, M, Lazar, RH, Long, TE, Stagner, S. Adipose tissue plug myringoplasty: an alternative to formal myringoplasty techniques in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;101:617–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayache, S, Braccini, F, Facon, F, Thomassin, J. Adipose graft: an original option in myringoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:158–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djalilian, H. Revision tympanoplasty using scar tissue graft. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:131–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, AL. Endoscope or microscope-guided pediatric tympanoplasty? Comparison of grafting technique and outcome. Laryngoscope 2017;127:2659–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redaelli De Zinis, LOR, Berlucchi, M, Nassif, N. Double-handed endoscopic myringoplasty with a holding system in children: preliminary observations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017;96:127–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar