Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:49:24.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Osseous and Cartilaginous Formations in the Tonsils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

Irwin Moore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , April 1924 , pp. 195 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLOGRAPHY

Albert, Henry, and Douglis, Minnie G., (Iowa, U.S.A.), “Bone Metaplasia in the Tonsil,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1917, xxvi., 909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselmi, G. (Naples), Sulla presenza di noduli cartilaginei e di perle epitheliali nelle tonsille, Napoli, 1907Google Scholar
Anselmi, G. (Naples), Centralblatt fur Laryngol., 1909, xxv., 409.Google Scholar
Ardenne, (Bordeaux), “Des tumeurs benignes de l'amygdale,” Thèse de Bordeaux, 1896Google Scholar
Ardenne, (Bordeaux), Centralblatt fur Laryngol., 1897, xiii., 414.Google Scholar
Bacher, J. A. (San Francisco), “Styloid Process in Tonsillectomy, Californ. State Journ. Med., 1922, xx., 99.Google Scholar
Carter, W. W. (New York), “Growth of Bone in the Tonsil,” New York Med. Rec., 1905, Ixvii., 174Google Scholar
Carter, W. W. (New York), Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1906, xv., 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cary, Edward G., (New York), “Cartilaginous and Bony Nodules in the Tosils,” Proc. New York Path. Soc., 1916, N.S., xvi., 173.Google Scholar
Casselberry, (Chicago), Discussion on Richardson's case of “Elongated Styloid Process,” Laryngoscape, 1909, xix., 771.Google Scholar
Chievitz, J. H. (Copenhagen), “Untersuchungen über die Verknöcherung der Menschi. Kehlknorpels,” Archiv. f. Anat. u. Entwcklngsgsch, 1882, 304.Google Scholar
Coakley, Cornelius G., (New York), Discussion on Newcomb's paper, “Bone and Cartilage in the Tonsil,” Trans. Amer. Laryngol. Assoc., 1904, xxvi., 75.Google Scholar
Corson, G. R. S. (Pottsville, U.S.A), “Bony Projections into the Tonsils: Case Report,” Pennsylvania Med. Journ., 1922, xxv., 788.Google Scholar
Debierre, (Paris), Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, 1885.Google Scholar
Deichert, H. (Göttingen), “Über Knorpel-und Knochenbildung un den Tosillen,” Archiv. fur Path. Anat. und Phys., 1895, cxli., 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwight, , Thomas, (Boston, Mass.), “Styloid-hyoid Ossification,” Ann. Surg., 1907, xlvi., 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, , Prof, W. H. “On the Connection of the Hyoid Arch with the Cranium,” Report Brit. Assoc. Advancement Science, 1870, 136.Google Scholar
Forman, Jonathan, (Ohio Univ., U.S.A.), “The Occurrence of Nodules of Cartilage in the Tonsil,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1918, xxvii., 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, L. W. (Washington), Cited by Charles W. Richardson, “Elongated Styloid Process,” Laryngoscope, 1909, xix., 771.Google Scholar
Grosvenor, Lorenzol N., (So. Dakota, U.S.A.), “Chodroma and Osteoma in the Faucial Tonsils,” Laryngoscope, 1908, xviii., 487Google Scholar
Grosvenor, Lorenzol N., (So. Dakota, U.S.A.), “Chodroma and Osteoma in the Faucial Tonsils,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1908, xvii., 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, W. E. (Milwaukee, U.S.A.), “Cartilage and Bone in the Tonsils,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1916, xxv, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Wenzel, (St Petersburg), “Über enorm lange Processus Styloides der Schläfenbeine,” Archiv. f. Path. Anat., Leipzig, 1870, L, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünwald, L. (Jena), “Ein Beitrag zur Entstehung und Bedulung der Geumenmadeln,” Anat. Anzeiger, Jena, 1910, xxxvii., 150;Google Scholar
Grünwald, L. (Jena), “Die Knorpel-und Knocceninseln an und in den Gaumenmandeln,” Archiv. f. Ohren., Leipzig, 1912–1913, xc., 212.Google Scholar
Halkin, H. (Liège), “Contribution à l'ossification dans les amygdales,” Bull. Acad. Roy. de med. de Belg. Brux., 1905, 45, xix., 383.Google Scholar
Hammar, J. Aug. (Upsala), “Das Schicksal der zweiten Schlundspalte zur Vergleichenden embryologie und Morphologie der Tonsillen,” Archiv. f. Micros. Anat., 1903, lxi., 404.Google Scholar
Heisler, J. C. (Philadelphia), Text-Book of Embryologie, 3rd Edition, 1907.Google Scholar
Herxheimer, Karl (Frankfurt), “Gewebsmissbildungen,” Schwalbes. Morphologie der Missbildungen, 1913, iii., 10.Google Scholar
Hill, William, “Discussion on Herbert Tilley's Case,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1922, xv. (Sect. Laryngol.), 48.Google Scholar
Hillkowitz, Philip and Gauss, Harry, (Denver), “Cartilage and Bone in the Tonsil,” Laryngoscape, 1923, xxxiii., 865.Google Scholar
His, , Wilhelm, (Leipzig), “Anatomie der Menschlicher Embryonen,” 1885, iii., 82.Google Scholar
Kanthack, A. A., and Pigg, T. Strangeways, “Malignant Enchondroma of the Testis, and a Re-examination of Sir James Paget's Case,” Journ. Path. and Bact., 1898, vi., 96.Google Scholar
Kölliker, Albert, (Zurich), Entwickelungsgesch. des Menschen u. d. höheren Theire, 2nd Edition, Leipzig, 1879Google Scholar
Kölliker, Albert (Zurich), cited by Newcomb in Art, “Bone and Cartilage in the Tonsil,” Trans. Amer. Laryngol. Assoc., 1904, xxvi., 75.Google Scholar
Kostanecki von, K. (Berlin), “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Missbildungen in der Kopf-und Halsgegend,” Archiv. f. Path. Anat. und Phys., 1891, cxxiii., 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, H. (Berlin), “Die Geschwülste der Submaxillar Speicheldrüse,” Beiträge Z. klin. Chirurg., 1896, xvi. 181.Google Scholar
Kyle, J. J. (Philad.), “Anatomy and Diseases of the Styloid Epiphyses,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol., 1909, xvii., 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, Double (Paris), Traité des Variations des Os du Crâne, Paris, 1903.Google Scholar
Lubarsch, O. (Posen), “Über Knochenbildung in Lymphknoten und Gaumenmandeln” (Aus der Path. Anat. Abteilung d. Kgl, Hygien Inst. in Posen), Archiv. fur Path. Anat. und Phys., 1904, clxxvii., 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucae, A. (Berlin), “Historisch-kritische Beiträge zur Physiologie des Gehörorganes,” Archiv. f. Ohren., Leipzig, 1897, xlii., 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, Robert, (Copenhagen), “Les Hyperkeratoses et les Cartilages Tonsillaires,” Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, 1918, i., 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macalister, , Alexander, , “A Text-Book of Human Anatomy,” 1889, 596.Google Scholar
Marchand, F. (Leipzig), Über die Beziehungen der Pathologischen Anatomie zur Entwicklungsgeschichte, besonders zur Keimblattiehre, Verhandl. d. Gesellsch. Deutsche. Naturf. u. Aerzte, 1900, 172.Google Scholar
de Marchettis, Dominicus, (Padova), “Observavi tamen aliquando processum styloideum usque ad cornua ossis hyoidei pervenire, ipsisque valido nezu devinci,” de Marchettis. Anatomia. Patavii, 1652, cap. xiii., 205.Google Scholar
Mantchik, H. (Geneva), “Reacherches sur le Tissu Cartilagineux des Amygdales,” Archiv. Internat. de Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol., 1922, N.S., xxviii., 257.Google Scholar
Milligan, William, “Discussion on Herbert Tilley's Case,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1922, xv. (Sect. Laryngol.), 48.Google Scholar
Moore, Irwin, “Discussion on Herbert Tilley's Case,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1922, xv. (sect. Laryngol.), 48.Google Scholar
Mosher, H. P. (Boston, Mass.), Discussion on Richardson's case.Google Scholar
Myles, , Robert, C. (New York), Discussion on Richardson's case.Google Scholar
Newcomb, James E., (New York), “Bone and Cartilage in the Tosil,” Trans. Amer. Laryngol. Assoc., 1904, xxvi., 75; also Discussion on Richardson's case.Google Scholar
Nösske, H. (Leipzig), “Über Knorpel-and Knochenbildung in den Tonsillen,” Deutsche Zeitschr. f. Chirurgie, 1903, lxvi., 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orth, (Göttingen), Festschrift zu Viruchow's fünfzigjähriges Doktorjubiläum, Göttingen, 1893,“ Über Metaplasie,” XVI. Congrès Internat. de Med., 1909, Sect.4b, 1910.Google Scholar
Parsons, F. G. “The Topography and Morphology of the Human Hyoid Bone,” Journ. of Anat. and Phys., 1908–1909, xliii., 279.Google Scholar
Petrow, N. N. (Leipzig), “Über Knochen-und Knorpelbildung in den Mandeln,” Centralblatt f. Laryngol., 1903, xix,, 498.Google Scholar
Pollak, K. (Wiesbaden), “Beiträge zut Metaplasiefrage” (Arb. a. d. Pathol. Anat. Abteil. d. Kgl. Hygien. Institi. in Posen), Wiesbaden, 1901.Google Scholar
Porter, F. T. (Dublin), “Abnormal Styloid Process,” Dublin Quart. Journ Med. Sci., 1873, lvi., 73.Google Scholar
Georges Portmann and Spalaikovitch (Bordeaux), “Contribution à Pétude du Tissu Cartilagineux Amygdalien,” Rev. de Laryngol., d'Otol., et de Rhinol., 1923, xliv., 543.Google Scholar
Price-Brown, J. (Toronto), Discussion on Richardson' case, Laryngoscope, 1909, xix., 771.Google Scholar
Reitmann, Karl, (Vienna), “Über das Vorkommen von Knorpel u. knochen in den Gaumentonsillen,” Monatsc. f. Ohren., 1903, xxxiv., 321.Google Scholar
Retterer, E. (Paris), “Origine et Évolution des Amygdales chez les Mammifères,” Journ. de l'Anatom. et de la Physiologie, 1888, xxiv.Google Scholar
Richards, George L., (Fall River, Mass.), “An Unusual Anomaly of the Faucial Tonsil,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1901, xxxvii., 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Charles W., (Washington), “Elongated Styloid Process,” Laryngoscope, 1909, xix., 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, John O., (Rochester, N.Y.), Discussion on Newcomb's paper, Trans. Amer. Laryngol. Assoc., 1904, xxvi., 82.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, F. J. (Göttingen). See Deichert's article in Archiv. fur Path. Anat. und Phys., 1895, cxli., 435.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (Berlin), “Muskel und Knorpel in Tonsillen,” Centralblatt f. Laryngol., 1901, xvii., 492.Google Scholar
Rückert, A. (Göttingen), “Über Knochen- und Knorpelfunde in den Tonsillen,” Archiv. für Path. Anat. und Phys., 1904, clxxvii., 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Hilaire, Geoffroy (Paris), “Des os anterieurs de la poitrine ou de l'Hyoide,” Philosophie Anatomique, 1818, 139 et 177.Google Scholar
Sappey, P. C. (Paris), Traité d'Anatomie, descriptive, 3rd Edition, 1876–1879.Google Scholar
Schech, , Philip, Philip (Munich), Dis. of the Mouth, Throat, and Nose, Trans. by Blaikie, R. H. (Edin.), 1886, 187.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, B. G. J. (Leipzig), “Über Knorpel u. Knochenbildung in den Gaumenmandeln,” Freiburg, 1905.Google Scholar
Shattock, S. G. “Rhabdomyoma of the Urinary Bladder,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1910, iii. (Path. Sect.), 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Alex. W., (Atlanta), “On Bony Growths invading the Tonsil,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1896, xxvii., 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Thaden, Karl, (Lübeck), “Entzündung des Proc. Styloideus dext,” Deutsche Ztschr. f. Chir., Leipzig, 1875, v., 518.Google Scholar
Theodore, E. (Strasburg), “Über Knorpel und Knochen in den Gaumenmandeln,” Archiv. f. Ohrenhk. Leipzig, 1912, xc., 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, Herbert, “A Rare Bony Tumour (Compact Osteoma) of the Left Tonsil,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1922, xv(sect. Laryngol.), 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toepfer, Hans (Berlin), “Über Muskeln und Knorpel in den Tonsillen,” Archiv. fur Larynol. und Rhinol., 1901, xi., 1. (A water-coloured plate is published with this paper, also histological detail.)Google Scholar
Turner, A. Logan, “An Unusual Tonsillar Appendage and its Relation to Cartilage Formations in the Tonsil,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1923, xvi. (Sect. Laryngol.), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. Logan, and Sprunt, Thomas, “An Uncommon Tonsillar Appendage and its Relationship to Cartilage Formation in the Tonsil,” Journ. Laryngol. and Otol., 1923, xxxviii., 179. (With three illustrations of the tumour, and three Microscopical Sections.)Google Scholar
Urbantschitsch, (Vienna), “Zur Anat. d. Tuba Eustachii des Menschen,” Jahrbücher der Gesellschaft, Wiener Aerzte, 1875.Google Scholar
Virchow, (Berlin), Descendenz und Pathologie, 1898, ciii., 1.Google Scholar
Walsham, Hugh, “On the Occurrence of Cartilaginous and Bony Nodules in the Tonsils,” Lancet, 1898, ii., 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinlechner, (Vienna), “Abgeirrter Kastaniengrosser Schilddrüsenknoten um untersten Ende der hinteren Wand des Schlundkopfes mitbeschwerden, etc,” Aerztl. Ber. d. k. k. allg. Krankenh- zu Wien (1881), 1882, 231.Google Scholar
Weller, Carl Vernon (Michigan), “The Incidence and Histopathology of Bone and Cartilage in the Tonsil,” Ann. Otol., Rhinol., and Laryngol. 1923, xxxii., 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W. C. (Louisville, Kentucky), “Ossification of Capsule of Tonsil in an Adult,” Kentucky Med. Journ., Bowling Green, 1911–1912, ix., 870.Google Scholar
Wingrave, , Wyatt, , “A Note on the Occurrence of Cartilaginous and Bony Nodules in the Tonsils,” Lancet, 1898, ii., 750;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingrave, Wyatt, “Subpharyngeal Cartilage of the Tonsil,” Proc. laryngol. Soc. Lond., 1898, v., 34.Google Scholar
Wright, A. J. M. “Portion of a Stylo-hyoid Process,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1922, xv. (Sect. Laryngol.), 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahn, F. Wilhelm (Geneva), “Über Congenitale Knorpelreste am Halse,” Achiv. fur Path. Anat und Phys., 1889, cxv. 47.Google Scholar
Ziegler, (Freiburg), Lehrbuch der speciellen Pathol. Anatomie, 1902, 526Google Scholar
Ziegler, (Freiburg), Lehrbuch d. Allg. Path., Jena, 1906, ii., 568.Google Scholar
Zuckerkandl, Emil, (vienna), “Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Tuba Eùstachii,” Monatsc. f. Ohrem.,1873–1874.Google Scholar