Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:43:30.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuro-axonal recruitment: A result of selective compression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Ernst Lehnhardt
Ernst Lehnhardt*
Affiliation:
Hannover, W. Germany
*
Prof. Dr. E. Lehnhardt: Director of ENT-DepartmentMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, P.O.B. 61180, D-3000 Hannover 61, W. Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many acoustic neurinomas and CPA tumours present an audiometric picture of positive-recruitment hearing impairment although often the CMs are not significantly impaired (according to ECochG) and because, even in the case of a small acoustic neuroma, the interpeak latency between wave I and V (ERA) is increased in the majority of cases. Recruitment cannot be explained, in these cases, as an expression of an accompanying vascular inner ear lesion. Therefore, we attempt to interpret the differential audiometric picture to the various patterns of damage of the auditory nerve. The finding of tone decay is seen as an expression of myelin damage corresponding to the hearing loss in multiple sclerosis.

The absence of any degree of tone decay excludes an isolated damage of the myelin sheaths; hearing loss then results from a disturbance also of the associated axons. At such a stage, where there is a functional loss to part of the neural fibres but with intact myelinated residual fibres, the result could be the phenomenon of recruitment for suprathreshold stimulation. This theory of selective compression is compared to an isolated efferent lesion theory as the cause for recruitment in AN and CPA tumours.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 104 , Issue 3 , March 1990 , pp. 185 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carhart, R. (1957) Clinical determination of abnormal auditory adaptation. Archives of Otolaryngology 65: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denny-Brown, D., Brenner, C. (1944) Paralysis of nerve induced by direct pressure and by tourniquet. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 51: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, M. R. (1974) The vestibular acoustic system. Chapter 10, pp 301–340, vol. 16, part 1 ‘Tumours of the Brain and Skull’ in Handbook of Clinical Neurology, ed. by Vinkin, P. J., and Bruyn, G. W.North Holland Publ., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. P. (1937) Measuring the sensation of loudness. A new approach to the physiology of hearing and the functional and differential diagnostic tests. Archives of Otolaryngology 26: 514–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, K. D., Lehnhardt, E. (1981) Genese der verschiedenen sensorischen und neuralen Hörschäden–ihre Abgrenzbarkeit von der Lärmschwerhörigkeit. In: Begutachtung der Schwerhörigkeit bei Lämarbeitern, ed. by Lehnhardt, E., and Plath, P.Springer, Berlin—Heidelberg—New York, p. 1–13.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A., Norên, G. (1988) Audiological findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngologica, 105: 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerger, J. F. (1962) The SISI test. International Audiology 1, 246–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. W. (1968) Auditory test results in 500 cases of acoustic neurinomas. Archives of Otolaryngology, 103: 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, D. T. (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64: 1386–1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langenbeck, B. (1949) Das überschwellige Gehör des Schwerhörigen und seine Messung auf Grund eigener Versuche. Zeitschrift für Laryngologie, Rhinologie und Otologie, 28: 463–480.Google Scholar
Lehnhardt, E. (1977) Audiometrische Abgrenzung der Altersschwerhörigkeit von der Lärmschadigung des Gehörs. Forschungsbericht Süddeutsche Eisen- und Stahl-Berufsgenossenschaft Mainz.Google Scholar
Luescher, E., Zwislocki, J. (1984) Eine einfache Methode zur monauralen Bestimmung des Lautheitsausgleichs. Archiv für Ohr-, Nasen- und Kehlkopf-Heilkunde, 155: 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, O. (1952) Threshold of reflex contraction of muscles of middle ear and recruitment of loudness. Archives of Otolaryngology, 55: 536–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochoa, J., Fowler, T. J. H., Gilliat, R. W. (1972) Anatomical changes in peripheral nerves compressed by a pneumatic tourquinet. Journal of Anatomy, 113: 433–435.Google Scholar
Probst, R. (1989) Discussion to paper LEHNHARDT “Kritik der überschwelligen Tests” Arbeitstagung 1989 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Audiologen und Neurootologen, Wien 6.–8. April.Google Scholar
Schuknecht, H. F. (1976) Pathology of the Ear, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar