Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:59:09.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multi-centre audit of epistaxis management in England: is there a case for a national review of practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2015

A C Hall ,
H Blanchford ,
P Chatrath  and
C Hopkins
A C Hall
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK
H Blanchford
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
P Chatrath
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Queen's Hospital, Romford, UK Department of Otolaryngology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
C Hopkins*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Miss Claire Hopkins, Department of Otolaryngology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK Fax: 0207 188 2212 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The ENT-UK Clinical Audit and Practice Advisory Group initiated a pilot audit to investigate variance in epistaxis management between six units nationwide.

Method:

All patients with a diagnosis of epistaxis who were admitted for in-patient care at six ENT departments between November 2011 and February 2012 were prospectively enrolled.

Results:

A total of 166 patients were included in the study. Variance was demonstrated between the six units in a number of the key outcome areas. Twenty-eight per cent of patients were identified as eligible for operative intervention for epistaxis in one unit, compared with only 12.5 per cent in another.

Conclusion:

There are measurable, patient-relevant outcomes to assess epistaxis management and these can highlight areas of potential improvement. This pilot audit gives a snapshot of modern practice, which shows variance between the six units assessed. A national audit may allow us to improve patient experience and maximise efficiency in delivering emergency care in our most common patient encounter.

Keywords

EpistaxisPrevention & ControlSurgery
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 129 , Issue 5 , May 2015 , pp. 454 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1NHS Hospital Episode Statistics in England and Wales 2011–2012. In: http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk [12 August 2013]Google Scholar
2Final report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Enquiry. In: http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report [21 August 2013]Google Scholar
3Biswas, B, Rafferty, A, Jassar, P. Night emergency cover for ENT in England: a national survey. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:899–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Daudia, A, Jaiswal, V, Jones, N. Guidelines for the management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:618–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Hall, AC, Simons, M, Pilgrim, G, Theokli, C, Roberts, D, Hopkins, C. Epistaxis management at Guy's Hospital, 2009–2011: full audit cycles. J Laryngol Otol 2011;128:82–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar