Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:24:53.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Ear Function in Normal and Pathological Ears

Presenting Author: John Rosowski

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

John Rosowski
John Rosowski*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstracts
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 130 , Supplement S3: Abstracts for the 10th International Conference on Cholesteatoma , May 2016 , pp. S61
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Learning Objectives: - New measurements of TM motion tell us more about its function in normal and pathological ears. - Besides being of use in diagnosing the presence of middle-ear effusion, WBI can aid in the diagnosis of ossicular and other conductive disorders. - Normal 'third-window's affect the response of the inner-ear to non-ossicularly conducted sound.

Introduction: In recent years multiple technical and research developments expanded our understanding of the workings of the normal and pathological ear: New measurements of normal and pathological tympanic-membrane (TM) function, new ways to asses ossicular disorders, and an improved understanding of the effect of cochlear ‘third-windows’.

Methods: The clinic-based techniques of Wide-Band acoustic Immittance (WBI) and Laser-Doppler Vibrometry (LDV) are described along with experimental techniques: Digital Opto-Electronic Holography (DOEH), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), and inner-ear sound pressure measurements.

Results: WBI and scanning LDV and OCT shed new light on the function of the TM. DOEH, without scanning, reveals the temporal response of over 100,000 points on the TM surface, and demonstrates the complex modal response of the TM surface in response to frequencies as high as 20 kHz. The TM motions induced by sound of a few kHz and less assess the presence of multiple conductive disorders, including ossicular fixations or interruptions, as well as the presence of several cochlear conductive disorders. Recent clinical and basic research led to a re-evaluation of the ‘two-window’ model of the inner ear, which occurred in the presence of evidence for pathological ‘third windows’ that result from abnormalities in the bone around the inner-ear fluids.

Conclusions: Advances in measurement tools increased our understanding of the workings of the normal and pathological middle ear. (1) Spatially uniform sound-induced TM motions dominate the response to sound, and TM motions near the ossicular attachment contributes most to ossicular stimulation at high sound frequencies. (2) Multiple clinical techniques aid the pre-surgical diagnosis of ossicular and inner-ear conductive hearing disorders. (3) Normal inner-ear third windows explain multiple lines of evidence associated with non-ossicular stimulation of the inner ear.