Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:55:39.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meta-analytic comparison of robotic and transoral laser surgical procedures in supraglottic carcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2019

M B Asik ,
B Satar  and
M Serdar
M B Asik*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Health Sciences University, Gulhane Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
B Satar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Health Sciences University, Gulhane Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
M Serdar
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Acibadem Mehmet Aydinlar University, Ankara, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Dr M Burak Asik, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Gulhane Research and Training Hospital, 06018 Etlik, Ankara, Turkey E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To assess published reports of oncological surgical success rates in patients who underwent transoral laser supraglottic surgery and robotic surgery for supraglottic cancer.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted and a meta-analysis of published data was performed. PubMed, Sage, Medline and Cochrane data sources were investigated. Overall survival rates, disease-specific survival rates, additional treatments and recurrence rates were investigated to determine the success of the surgical procedures.

Results

The meta-analysis included 24 studies; 1617 studies were excluded. There were no statistically significant differences between the transoral laser supraglottic surgery and transoral robotic supraglottic surgery groups in terms of overall survival (77.0 per cent and 82.4 per cent respectively) and disease-specific survival (75.8 per cent and 87.0 per cent respectively). There was recurrence in 164 out of 832 patients (19.7 per cent) in the transoral laser supraglottic surgery group and in only 6 out of 66 patients (9 per cent) in the transoral robotic supraglottic surgery group.

Conclusion

Transoral laser surgery and robotic surgery appear to have comparable and acceptable oncological success rates.

Keywords

LaryngectomyLasersSurvivalCancerLarynx
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 5 , May 2019 , pp. 404 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr M B Asik takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Ambrosch, P, Kron, M, Steiner, W. Carbon dioxide laser microsurgery for early supraglottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:680–8Google Scholar
2Fink, DS, Sibley, H, Kunduk, M, Schexnaildre, M, Sutton, C, Kakade-Pawar, A et al. Functional outcomes after salvage transoral laser microsurgery for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:606–11Google Scholar
3Chiesa Estomba, CM, Betainces Reinoso, FA, Lorenzo Lorenzo, AI, Farina Conde, JL, Araujo Nores, J, Santidiran Hidalgo, C. Functional outcomes of supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma treated by transoral laser microsurgery compared with horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy in patients younger and older than 65 years. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2016;36:450–8Google Scholar
4Canis, M, Ihler, F, Martin, A, Wolff, HA, Matthias, C, Steiner, W. Organ preservation in T4a laryngeal cancer: is transoral microsurgery an option? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:2719–27Google Scholar
5Eckel, HE. Endoscopic laser resection of supraglottic carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:681–7Google Scholar
6González-Márquez, R, Rodrigo, JP, Llorente, JL, Alvarez-Marcos, C, Díaz, JP, Suárez, C. Transoral CO2 laser surgery for supraglottic cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:2081–6Google Scholar
7Olsen, SM, Moore, EJ, Koch, CA, Price, DL, Kasperbauer, JL, Olsen, KD. Transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 2012;33:379–84Google Scholar
8Byrd, JK, Ferris, RL. Is there a role for robotic surgery in the treatment of head and neck cancer? Curr Treat Options Oncol 2016;17:29Google Scholar
9Scola, B, Fernandez-Vega, M, Martinez, T, Fernandez-Vega, S, Ramirez, C. Management of cancer of the supraglottis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 200;124:195–8Google Scholar
10Canis, M, Ihler, F, Martin, A, Wolff, HA, Matthias, C, Steiner, W. Results of 226 patients with T3 laryngeal carcinoma after treatment with transoral laser microsurgery. Head Neck 2014;36:652–9Google Scholar
11Pantazis, D, Liapi, G, Kostarelos, D, Kyriazis, G, Pantazis, TL, Riga, M. Glottic and supraglottic pT3 squamous cell carcinoma: outcomes with transoral laser microsurgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1983–90Google Scholar
12Park, YM, Kim, WS, Byeon, HK, Lee, SY, Kim, SH. Surgical techniques and treatment outcomes of transoral robotic supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2013;123:670–7Google Scholar
13Hinni, ML, Salassa, JR, Grant, DG, Pearson, BW, Hayden, RE, Martin, A et al. Transoral laser microsurgery for advanced laryngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:1198–204Google Scholar
14Meulemans, J, Vanclooster, C, Vauterin, T, D'heygere, E, Nuyts, S, Clement, PM et al. Up-front and salvage transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: a Belgian multicenter retrospective case series. Front Oncol 2017;9:7–15Google Scholar
15Wilkie, MD, Lightbody, KA, Lythgoe, D, Tandon, S, Lancaster, J, Jones, TM. Transoral laser microsurgery for early and moderately advanced laryngeal cancers: outcomes from a single centralised United Kingdom centre. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:695–704Google Scholar
16Park, YM, Byeon, HK, Chung, HP, Choi, EC, Kim, SH. Comparison of treatment outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and supraglottic partial laryngectomy: our experience with seventeen and seventeen patients respectively. Clin Otolaryngol 2013;38:270–4Google Scholar
17Mendelsohn, AH, Remacle, M, Van Der Vorst, S, Bachy, V, Lawson, G. Outcomes following transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2013;123:208–14Google Scholar
18Rudert, HH, Werner, JA, Hoft, S. Transoral carbon dioxide laser resection of supraglottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:819–27Google Scholar
19Hong, JC, Kim, SW, Lee, HS, Han, YJ, Park, HS, Lee, KD. Salvage transoral laser supraglottic laryngectomy after radiation failure: a report of seven cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:85–90Google Scholar
20Peretti, G, Piazza, C, Ansarin, M, De Benedetto, L, Cocco, D, Cattaneo, A et al. Transoral CO2 laser microsurgery for Tis-T3 supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267:1735–42Google Scholar
21Csanády, M, Czigner, J, Vass, G, Jóri, J. Transoral CO2 laser management for selected supraglottic tumors and neck dissection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1181–6Google Scholar
22Peretti, G, Piazza, C, Penco, S, Santori, G, Del Bon, F, Garofolo, S et al. Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for selected T3 glottic and supraglottic cancers. Head Neck 2016;38:1107–12Google Scholar
23Grant, DG, Salassa, JR, Hinni, ML, Pearson, BW, Hayden, RE, Perry, WC. Transoral laser microsurgery for recurrent laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:606–13Google Scholar
24Hutcheson, KA, Jantharapattana, K, Barringer, DA, Lewin, JS, Holsinger, FC. Functional and oncologic outcomes of primary versus salvage transoral laser microsurgery for supraglottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012;121:664–70Google Scholar
25Agrawal, A, Moon, J, Davis, RK, Sakr, WA, Giri, SP, Valentino, J et al. ; Southwest Oncology Group. Transoral carbon dioxide laser supraglottic laryngectomy and irradiation in stage I, II, and III squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx: report of Southwest Oncology Group Phase 2 Trial S9709. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:1044–50Google Scholar
26Piazza, C, Barbieri, D, Del Bon, F, Grazioli, P, Perotti, P, Paderno, A et al. Functional outcomes after different types of transoral supraglottic laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2016;126:1131–5Google Scholar
27Remacle, M, Ricci-Maccarini, A, Matar, N, Lawson, G, Pieri, F, Bachy, V et al. Reliability and efficacy of a new CO2 laser hollow fiber: a prospective study of 39 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:917–21Google Scholar
28Remacle, M, Hassan, F, Cohen, D, Lawson, G, Delos, M. New computer-guided scanner for improving CO2 laser assisted microincision. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:113–19Google Scholar
29Genden, EM, O'Malley, BW Jr, Weinstein, GS, Stucken, CL, Selber, JC, Rinaldo, A et al. Transoral robotic surgery: role in the management of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Head Neck 2012;34:886–93Google Scholar
30Cabanillas, R, Rodrigo, JP, Llorente, JL, Suárez, V, Ortega, P, Suárez, C. Functional outcomes of transoral laser surgery of supraglottic carcinoma compared with a transcervical approach. Head Neck 2004;26:653–9Google Scholar
31Valls-Mateus, M, Ortega, A, Blanch, JL, Sabater, F, Bernal-Sprekelsen, M, Vilaseca, I. Long-term quality of life after transoral laser microsurgery for laryngeal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2016;114:789–95Google Scholar
32Solares, CA, Strome, M. Transoral robot-assisted CO2 laser supraglottic laryngectomy: experimental and clinical data. Laryngoscope 2007;117:817–20Google Scholar
33Weinstein, GS, O'Malley, BW Jr, Snyder, W, Sherman, E, Quon, H. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:19–23Google Scholar