Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-bmd9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T18:40:16.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managing epistaxis in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: a comprehensive narrative review of therapeutic horizons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Youssef El Sayed Ahmad*
Affiliation:
MedStar Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Maryland ENT, Baltimore, MD, USA LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Smile Kajal
Affiliation:
MedStar Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Maryland ENT, Baltimore, MD, USA LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Akaber Halawi
Affiliation:
MedStar Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Maryland ENT, Baltimore, MD, USA LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
*
Corresponding author: Youssef El Sayed Ahmad; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia is an autosomal dominant vascular disorder characterised by mucocutaneous telangiectasia, leading to recurrent epistaxis in nearly all affected individuals. Treatment strategies are broadly categorised into conservative, medical and surgical approaches. This study aimed to provide a concise summary of the existing literature on epistaxis associated with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Methods

The Medline/PubMed database was searched for relevant articles using the keywords ‘hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia’, ‘Osler-Weber-Rendu’ and ‘epistaxis’.

Results

Out of 93 reviewed articles, 59 contained pertinent information. Interventions were categorised into self-delivered therapy, intravenous treatment, in-office procedures and surgical intervention.

Conclusion

A stepwise approach to managing epistaxis in patients with HHT involves a gradual escalation of treatments, starting with conservative measures and progressing to more invasive interventions as necessary. Topical oils can be efficient and intranasal bevacizumab injection shows promise, but more data are needed. Surgical options range from bipolar cautery and laser therapy to complete closure of the nasal cavity. Proper patient selection remains crucial.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Introduction

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasis(HHT) is an autosomal dominant vascular disorder with incomplete penetrance that is characterised by mucocutaneous telangiectasis. Involvement of the nasal lining leads to recurrent treatment-resistant nose bleeds. Additional diagnostic criteria include disease in a first-degree relative and visceral arterio-venous malformations.Reference McDonald, Stevenson, Adam, Mirzaa, Pagon, Wallace, Bean and Gripp1 The Curaçao criteria are summarised in Table 1.Reference Shovlin, Guttmacher, Buscarini, Faughnan, Hyland and Westermann2 When the clinical picture is incomplete, identification of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in ACVRL1, ENG, GDF2, and SMAD4 genes is diagnostic.Reference Tunkel, Anne, Payne, Ishman, Rosenfeld and Abramson3

Table 1. The Curaçao Diagnostic Criteria for hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia

The highest prevalence of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasis, 1 in 1331, is seen in the Afro-Caribbean residents of the Netherlands Antilles.Reference Westermann, Rosina, De Vries and de Coteau4 The prevalence in North America, Europe and Japan ranges between 1 in 5000 and 1 in 10 000.Reference McDonald, Stevenson, Adam, Mirzaa, Pagon, Wallace, Bean and Gripp1, Reference Silvain, Thévenot, Colle, Vilgrain, Dupuis-Girod and Buscarini5Reference Dakeishi, Shioya, Wada, Shindo, Otaka and Manabe7

Almost all patients will suffer from epistaxis during their lifespan and more than half will do so before the age of 20 years.Reference Westermann, Rosina, De Vries and de Coteau4, Reference Plauchu, de Chadarévian, Bideau and Robert8, Reference Chin, Rotenberg and Witterick9 The recurrent nose bleeds will lead eventually to anaemia, resulting in a significant increase in medical costs and a decrease in quality of life (QoL).Reference Tunkel, Anne, Payne, Ishman, Rosenfeld and Abramson3, Reference Loaëc, Morinière, Hitier, Ferrant, Plauchu and Babin10 A strong correlation was found between age and poor QoL, highlighting the increasing burden of the disease over time.Reference Loaëc, Morinière, Hitier, Ferrant, Plauchu and Babin10

Since its description by OslerReference Osler11, WeberReference Weber12 and RenduReference Rendu13 more than 100 years ago, myriad hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis management strategies have been reported. In the acute setting, the Airway Breathing Circulation (ABC) approach should be implemented and packing with resorbable material is preferred.Reference Tunkel, Anne, Payne, Ishman, Rosenfeld and Abramson3 This article aims to review and summarise the recent literature.

Methods

We thoroughly searched Medline/PubMed to identify relevant articles published in the last 15 years. Keywords included ‘hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia’, ‘Osler-Weber-Rendu’ and ‘epistaxis’. Abstracts were reviewed and those focusing on epistaxis management were selected.

Overall, 59 articles were examined in depth by 2 reviewers independently. The pertinent findings are summarised in this article.

Self-delivered therapy

Droege et al. published a survey about self-packing.Reference Droege, Lueb, Thangavelu, Stuck, Lang and Geisthoff14 Out of the 588 responders, almost two-thirds self-performed nasal packing, 52 per cent of them using medical packing and the rest using only tissues. The highest score on the Glasgow Benefit Inventory was achieved when using a pneumatic packing device, despite this being more painful.

Because turbulent airflow is believed to be traumatic to the telangiectasis, reversible nasal occlusion is considered when other therapy fails. Woolford et al. reported on three patients with recalcitrant epistaxis that decreased significantly after using a Silastic nasal obturator. While this study did not specify how long the obturator was applied throughout the day, patients commented that they preferred to remove the obturator while eating to restore their sense of smell.Reference Woolford, Loke and Bateman15 In another study, 20 patients undergoing laser therapy at regular intervals performed nasal occlusion with a hypoallergenic tape for 5 hours a day. After 3 months, the epistaxis severity score decreased by 1.16 points and haemoglobin remained stable.Reference Wirsching, Haubner and Kühnel16

When 20 patients were prescribed sesame and/or rose geranium oil topical compound for a minimal duration of 3 months, the epistaxis severity score decreased by 1.81 (p < 0.0001). Although the mechanism of action is not quite clear, the benefit seems to be coming from the combination of nasal hydration and the formation of a durable protective layer.Reference Reh, Hur and Merlo17

Bevacizumab spray did not show superiority to placebo in a meta-analysis of three randomised, controlled trials (RCTs).Reference Hsu, Hsu, Bai, Cheng and Chen18

In an RCT, intranasal tranexamic acid and estriol showed no decrease in epistaxis frequency or duration. All groups, including placebo, improved the epistaxis severity score at weeks 12 and 24.Reference Whitehead, Sautter, McWilliams, Chakinala, Merlo and Johnson19 Tranexamic acid stabilises blood clots by inhibiting fibrinolysis. The mechanism of action of estriol is by inducing squamous metaplasia.Reference Whitehead, Sautter, McWilliams, Chakinala, Merlo and Johnson19

Tacrolimus exhibits anti-angiogenic properties by targeting the BMP9/ALK1/ENG/SMAD pathway.Reference Dupuis-Girod, Fargeton, Grobost, Rivière, Beaudoin and Decullier20 In a study, 50 patients were randomised for treatment with 0.1 g intranasally of 0.1 per cent tacrolimus twice a day versus placebo for 6 weeks. No significant difference in epistaxis duration and frequency was found six weeks after cessation of therapy. However, during treatment, this difference was significant. Since the toxicity of topical tacrolimus is not known, the authors did not recommend a longer treatment duration to maintain the observed benefit.Reference Dupuis-Girod, Fargeton, Grobost, Rivière, Beaudoin and Decullier20

de Jel et al. reported their experience with topical fluorouracil, known for its ability to promote the formation of scar tissue.Reference de Jel, Disch, Kroon, Mager and Verdam21 Six patients with haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis were treated on the side that bled the most with a 4.5-cm nasal tampon with 1 ml of 50 mg/g fluorouracil and 1 ml of normal saline. The same protocol was repeated once a week for four weeks. After treatment, there was a significant improvement in nasal mucosa score, epistaxis severity score and haemoglobin levels. No significant side effects were reported. The patient described a bad smell and dry sensation in the throat at the end of the treatment. The study did not include a control arm.Reference de Jel, Disch, Kroon, Mager and Verdam21

Non-selective beta blockers, namely propranolol, are used routinely to treat infantile haemangiomas. The possible mechanisms of action include both vasoconstrictive and antiangiogenic effects by reducing vascular endothelial growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis.Reference Mei-Zahav, Gendler, Bruckheimer, Prais, Birk and Watad22 In an RCT, twice-daily propranolol nasal gel showed superiority to placebo after eight weeks of treatment. In the treatment group (10 participants), the epistaxis severity score decreased from a mean of 6.50 ± 1.84 to 4.47 ± 1.75 (p = 0.004), haemoglobin numbers increased significantly and transfusion requirements decreased. None of these parameters changed significantly in the placebo group (10 participants).

This period was followed by an open-label eight-week study, in which seven participants from the treatment group and eight from the placebo group used propranolol gel twice daily for an additional eight weeks. The beneficial effect was preserved in the previously treated group and the epistaxis severity score improved significantly in the former placebo group (−1.99 ± 1.41, p = 0.005). No systemic side effects were observed. The most common side effect was a burning sensation that decreased with continued treatment.Reference Mei-Zahav, Gendler, Bruckheimer, Prais, Birk and Watad22

Thermosensitive intranasal timolol (0.1 per cent) gel for 8 weeks did not show definitive superiority to placebo. The epistaxis severity score and QoL improved in both groups. The authors concluded that the use of a thermosensitive gel with or without timolol is appropriate for patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.Reference Andorfer, Zeman, Koller, Zeller, Fischer and Seebauer23 Dupuis-Girod et al. used timolol spray and found no significant difference in outcome between the treatment and control groups.Reference Dupuis-Girod, Pitiot, Bergerot, Fargeton, Beaudoin and Decullier24

In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase IIIB study involving 22 patients, the effects of 1 g of tranexamic acid administered three times daily were compared with those of a placebo over a period of 6 months. Despite the treatment, haemoglobin levels remained statistically unchanged. However, a significant 54 per cent reduction in epistaxis was observed. It is important to note that the treatment effect was heterogenous and the distribution of epistaxis scores was notably skewed.Reference Geisthoff, Seyfert, Kübler, Bieg, Plinkert and König25 In a similar study with 118 patients, tranexamic acid led to a 17.3 per cent reduction in the duration of epistaxis, although there was no significant change in the frequency of epistaxis compared with placebo.Reference Gaillard, Dupuis-Girod, Boutitie, Rivière, Morinière and Hatron26 A 2019 meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between tranexamic acid and placebo.Reference Hsu, Hsu, Bai, Cheng and Chen18

Oral oestrogen for three months showed no improvement in haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis frequency or duration.Reference Hsu, Hsu, Bai, Cheng and Chen18

Anti-oestrogen agents are used in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia patients because it is believed that oestrogen, when binding to its receptors, triggers the formation of blood vessels. Blocking this interaction aims to halt or reverse the formation of telangiectasis. In a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial aiming to investigate the effectiveness of tamoxifen in treating haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis, 25 patients were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen 20 mg daily or a placebo for 6 months. Based on the grading system suggested by Bergler et al.Reference Bergler, Sadick, Gotte, Riedel and Hörmann27 tamoxifen was significantly more effective in reducing the frequency (p = 0.01) and severity (p = 0.049) of epistaxis compared with the placebo. Additionally, tamoxifen led to a non-significant increase in haemoglobin levels in some patients. One patient in the treatment arm developed an ovarian cyst that resolved spontaneously.Reference Yaniv, Preis, Hadar, Shvero and Haddad28

Contis et al. reported on their experience with systemic propranolol.Reference Contis, Gensous, Viallard, Goizet, Léauté-Labrèze and Duffau29 The study included a retrospective group of 10 patients already on propranolol for cardiac or neurological reasons and another prospective group of 11 patients. In the former group, the epistaxis severity score significantly decreased from a median of 8.3 (range, 7.98–9.44) to 4.5 (range, 4.31–6.61) (p = 0.003) with a median duration of treatment of 16.5 months (range, 12–22.75 months). In the latter group, with a dose of 40 mg twice daily, the median cumulative duration of epistaxis per month was reduced from 2.8 hours (range, 2.28–7.56 hours) to 0.71 hours (range, 0.27–3.76 hours) after 3 months of treatment (p < 0.0001). The median number of epistaxis episodes per month decreased from 27 episodes per month (range, 15–56 episodes per month) to 14.5 episodes per month (range, 8–27 episodes per month) (p < 0.0001) at 3 months and the median number of days without epistaxis per month increased from 9 days (range, 5–18 days) to 17 days (range, 11.5–23.5 days) after 3 months of treatment (p = 0.01). The epistaxis severity score was not reported in the prospective group.Reference Contis, Gensous, Viallard, Goizet, Léauté-Labrèze and Duffau29

Oral itraconazole, an antifungal drug with inhibiting effects on vascular endothelial growth factor, 200 mg daily for 16 weeks, significantly decreased the epistaxis severity score and the monthly epistaxis frequency. However, haemoglobin levels did not significantly change. Four out of 21 patients prematurely interrupted the study, 3 of them for mild or moderate side effects.Reference Kroon, Snijder, Hosman, Vorselaars, Disch and Post30

Intravenous treatment

The pathogenic effects of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia are largely driven by vascular endothelial growth factor. Research has shown that normalising vascular endothelial growth factor levels can effectively prevent arterio-venous malformations in mice lacking Acvrl1.Reference Han, Choe, Kim, Acharya, Keselowsky and Sorg31 Consequently, bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor signalling, has become a promising therapeutic candidate.Reference Kritharis, Al-Samkari and Kuter32

The International HHT Intravenous Bevacizumab Investigative Team study of Bleeding (InHIBIT-Bleed) evaluated the efficacy of intravenous bevacizumab on haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. In total, 143 patients were included in the epistaxis analysis. The mean epistaxis severity score decreased by 3.37 points after treatment and clinically meaningful reduction in epistaxis, defined as an epistaxis severity score reduction of 0.71 or more post-treatment, was achieved in 92 per cent of patients. The reduction was noticeable after three months of treatment. Mean haemoglobin increased and the need for transfusion decreased after treatment. However, this is the effect of a combined reduction in epistaxis and GI bleeding. Overall, 12 patients (5 per cent) discontinued bevacizumab because of adverse events.Reference Al-Samkari, Kasthuri, Parambil, Albitar, Almodallal and Vázquez33 The adverse effects of bevacizumab may include hypertension, proteinuria, venous thromboembolism, intestinal perforation and poor wound healing. Paradoxically, bevacizumab is associated with a significant risk of epistaxis in non-hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia patients.Reference Kritharis, Al-Samkari and Kuter32

A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic bevacizumab therapy in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia found that, regardless of willingness to pay, the addition of long-term intravenous bevacizumab to the current standard of care improves the quality-adjusted life expectancy of patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia and appears to be a cost-saving intervention compared with the current standard of care alone.Reference Wang, Ito, Waldron, Butt, Zhang and Krumholz34

The Dutch hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia expertise centre evaluated the efficacy of tacrolimus on haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis. In this study, 25 patients received 1 mg of tacrolimus a day for 20 weeks. The daily dose was adjusted for a trough level between 2 and 3 μg/l. Two patients did not continue the study due to serious side effects and two due to non-serious side effects. Epistaxis severity score, duration and severity of epistaxis decreased significantly, especially in the group with no GI bleeding. Haemoglobin levels did not change significantly in patients with epistaxis or GI bleeding alone.Reference Hessels, Kroon, Boerman, Nelissen, Grutters and Snijder35

Pazopanib, a highly selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, dramatically improved epistaxis in a patient with haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis not responding to multiple courses of intravenous bevacizumab.Reference Parambil, Woodard and Koc36

In-office procedures

Multiple regimens of submucosal bevacizumab injections have been suggested, most ranging between 25 and 100 mg. In an RCT on 15 patients (9 in the treatment arm, 6 in the placebo arm) receiving a single injection of 100 mg of submucosal bevacizumab, there was a trend at 3 months towards better visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, better epistaxis severity score and a decrease in daily minutes of epistaxis. None of these changes reached statistical significance when compared with placebo. The study was underpowered because the required number of participants, in theory, cannot be reached in practice. Side effects included high blood pressure (one event), rhinitis (one event), three days of whole-body tingling (one event) and nasal tip itching (one event).Reference Riss, Burian, Wolf, Kranebitter, Kaider and Arnoldner37

Another recent RCT compared bevacizumab to saline injections in patients undergoing surgical cauterisation for haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis. The minimal clinically important difference of the epistaxis severity score was set at 0.71. Thirty-seven patients were included and all received a single injection. The additive benefit of bevacizumab over saline exceeded the minimal clinically important difference at one, two and four months, but the difference was not statistically significant.Reference Khanwalkar, Rathor, Read, Paknezhad, Ma and Hwang38

Karnezis and Davidson published efficacy data on 10 patients receiving 100 mg of bevacizumab submucosally and 5 patients receiving both submucosal and intranasal bevacizumab.Reference Karnezis and Davidson39 Twelve patients were treated concurrently with a potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser. After a mean period of follow up of 4.1 months (range,1.15–19.15 months), the epistaxis severity score decreased from 7.0 (standard deviation (SD) = 2.1) to 2.9 (SD = 1.7) (p < 0.0001). The same group reported safety data showing that combined treatment of the cartilaginous septum with bevacizumab injections and laser therapy resulted in high rates of septal perforation.Reference Chen, Karnezis and Davidson40

A recent meta-analysis of 7 studies (3 nasal spray, 3 intranasal injection only, 1 intranasal injection and laser) showed an improvement in the epistaxis severity score (Weighted Mean Deviation = −0.22, 95 per cent confidence interval (−0.38, −0.05), p = 0.01]. There was no significant effect on epistaxis duration and frequency.Reference Chen, Zhang, Chen, Wang, Chen and Liao41

In a recent systematic review of 196 patients, sclerotherapy led to an improvement in haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis in all of the 7 included studies. Three studies reported outcomes on an epistaxis severity score scale, three used the Bergler-Sadick scale and one study used subjective surveys. This heterogeneity in reporting outcomes precluded formal meta-analysis.Reference Thiele, Abdel-Aty, Marks, Lal and Marino42

In a retrospective chart review of 36 adults and 153 treatment sessions, no post-procedural visual loss, deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus, transient ischaemic attack and/or stroke, or anaphylaxis were encountered. Reported complications included per-procedure bleeding, mostly mild, and some post-injection nasal, cheek and eye pain. Less frequent complications include nasal congestion, sneezing and vasovagal responses.Reference Hanks, Hunter, Goding and Boyer43

Surgical intervention

Ghaheri et al. described their experience with bipolar electrocautery.Reference Ghaheri, Fong and Hwang44 Over 8 years, 42 bipolar procedures were performed over 18 patients. The laser was used as an adjunct in 22 procedures. Nine patients required more than one intervention. The average time interval to follow-up surgery was 7.5 months. No septal perforation or synechia were noted.Reference Ghaheri, Fong and Hwang44

In a systematic review in 2020 with a total of 362 patients, argon and neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser therapy was around 90 per cent effective in reducing haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis frequency and severity. Neodymium-doped YAG laser therapy seems to be more efficient for severe epistaxis than argon laser therapy. Diode laser therapy was significantly inferior, with a 71.1 per cent success rate.Reference Abiri, Goshtasbi, Maducdoc, Sahyouni, Wang and Kuan45 No post-operative complications were described with these three laser types.Reference Lennox, Harries, Lund and Howard46Reference Fiorella, Lillo and Fiorella48

In an RCT, coblation and a KTP laser were found to be equally effective in controlling haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis. Nasal obstruction VAS scores were significantly lower in the coblation group.Reference Luk, Mace, Bhandarkar and Sautter49 Rotenberg et al. had equally good results in 37 patients they treated with coblation over 3 years.Reference Rotenberg, Noyek and Chin50 Three of their patients suffered from a septal perforation. They all had multiple septal cauterisations in the past. In a case series of five patients, haemostasis was found to be difficult to achieve with coblation in a patient with severe disease.Reference Joshi, Woodworth and Carney51

For severe refractory disease, septodermoplasty is an option. It has the advantage of replacing a large area of diseased mucosa. Telangiectasias can re-grow on the skin graft.Reference Chin, Rotenberg and Witterick9 However, the need for laser therapy after septodermoplasty decreased significantly, from 1.83 ± 1.99 to 0.78 ± 0.85 laser treatments in a study spanning over 60 months.Reference Harvey, Kanagalingam and Lund52 To balance the risks of septal perforation, increased crusting, decreased cessation of airflow, loss of olfaction and the precipitation of atrophic rhinitis, Harvey et al. beleive that a septodermoplasty is suitable for patients with less than six months of epistaxis control after three laser treatments.Reference Harvey, Kanagalingam and Lund52

Super-selective embolisation of branches of the external carotid artery achieved immediate haemostasis in 12 of 14 patients with refractory haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis. In addition, 11 of 12 patients available for the 24-month follow up reported a reduction in frequency and severity of epistaxis.Reference Trojanowski, Jargiello, Trojanowska and Klatka53 Compared with idiopathic epistaxis, haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis requires multiple endovascular and surgical treatments over time.Reference Layton, Kallmes, Gray and Cloft54

In a study by Dabiri et al. where bilateral endonasal cauterisation of branches of the sphenopalatine, anterior and posterior ethmoids was performed, the epistaxis severity score decreased by more than 50 per cent in 4 of 5 participants at 9 months.Reference Dabiri, Fakhoury, Choufani, Mine and Hassid55 The one patient that did not fall into this category had the posterior ethmoid cauterised only on one side because of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The contralateral artery was shown to be involved in the epistaxis at pre-operative angiography. One of 5 patients maintained a more than 50 per cent reduction of epistaxis severity score 12 months after the surgery. All patients had embolisation of the Sphenopalatine artery (SPA) before the surgical intervention.

In another study, 43 patients with severe intractable haemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis underwent surgical nasal closure (38 bilateral, 5 unilateral (patient’s choice)).Reference Richer, Geisthoff, Livada, Ward, Johnson and Mainka56 Seven patients were lost to follow up. Thirty of 36 patients experienced a complete cessation of epistaxis and 5 patients experienced minor posterior epistaxis. Post-operative haemoglobin data was available for 16 patients. There was an average increase of 4.68 g/dl. Furthermore, all patients reported feeling better after the surgery and that they would rather have the side effects of Young’s procedure (xerostomia, anosmia or decreased taste) than epistaxis.Reference Richer, Geisthoff, Livada, Ward, Johnson and Mainka56

Another article examined the outcome of surgical nasal closure in 100 patients (87 bilateral, 13 unilateral). Ten patients developed small pinholes that led to bleeding. These were managed successfully with primary closure and nasolabial flap (two patients). Two cases were less successful, one due to prior radiotherapy and surgery for basal cell carcinoma of the external nose. Post-operative follow up ranged from 6 months to 22 years, with a mean of 8.4 years. Of the 87 patients who underwent bilateral closure, 79 (91 per cent) achieved complete cessation of bleeding. Epistaxis score as proposed by Al-Deen and Bachmann-HarildstadReference Al-Deen and Bachmann-Harildstad57 was available for 50 of the patients who underwent bilateral closure. It dropped from a mean of 9.42 pre-operatively to 0.54 post-operatively, with a high effect size indicating substantial improvement. Common post-operative complaints included decreased sense of smell and taste (40 per cent), fatigue (14 per cent), sleep disturbances (12 per cent) and ear fullness (10 per cent). Nasal obstruction was less common (14 per cent) and some patients required additional treatments for mouth dryness (10 per cent). In addition, 12 per cent of patients mentioned embarrassment even though the closure was not usually visible. Every patient interviewed indicated that they would choose to undergo the procedure again and would recommend it to others in similar situations.Reference Lund, Darby, Rimmer, Amin and Husain58

In a case report, a patient had an epistaxis episode despite Young’s procedure. Even with bilateral embolisation, haemostasis could not be achieved. Reversal of Young’s procedure had to be performed so traditional packing could be done.Reference Ting, Remenschneider and Holbrook59

  • Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia is a genetic vascular disorder with recurrent epistaxis, anaemia and decreased quality of life that is prevalent in Afro-Caribbean populations of the Netherlands Antilles

  • The Curaçao criteria are essential for diagnosis

  • Self-treatments such as nasal packing, occlusion and topical oils vary in success; bevacizumab and intranasal tranexamic acid sprays are less effective

  • Submucosal bevacizumab injections are a promising, minimally invasive option for managing epistaxis, balancing efficacy with manageable side effects, but further research is needed

  • Intravenous bevacizumab and tacrolimus improve epistaxis and haemoglobin levels; pazopanib shows dramatic improvement in refractory cases

  • Effective surgical interventions include laser therapies, coblation, septodermoplasty, super-selective embolisation and bilateral nasal closure, with laser therapy most recommended

Conclusion

Almost all patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia will suffer from epistaxis that could range from mild to severe and life-threatening. The disease is progressive, hence the importance of a stepwise approach. Simple measures such as topical oils can be efficient. More disease-specific medical therapy, such as bevacizumab injections, offers a balance between efficiency, ease of access and side effects. However, data in the literature are limited because of the rare nature of the disease. When surgical intervention is indicated, the consensus in the literature is to rely on laser therapy, although bipolar cautery is a reasonable option. As a last resort, surgical closure of the nasal cavity is a highly efficient treatment accepted by a carefully selected group of patients.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Youssef El Sayed Ahmad takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

McDonald, J, Stevenson, DA. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. In: Adam, MP, Mirzaa, GM, Pagon, RA, Wallace, SE, Bean, LJ, Gripp, KW et al., eds. GeneReviews. Seattle: University of Washington, 1993Google Scholar
Shovlin, CL, Guttmacher, AE, Buscarini, E, Faughnan, ME, Hyland, RH, Westermann, CJJ, et al. Diagnostic criteria for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome). Am J Med Genet 2000;91:66–7Google Scholar
Tunkel, DE, Anne, S, Payne, SC, Ishman, SL, Rosenfeld, RM, Abramson, PJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline: nosebleed (epistaxis). Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2020;162:S138Google Scholar
Westermann, CJJ, Rosina, AF, De Vries, V, de Coteau, PA. The prevalence and manifestations of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia in the Afro-Caribbean population of the Netherlands Antilles: a family screening. Am J Med Genet A 2003;116A:324–8Google Scholar
Silvain, C, Thévenot, T, Colle, I, Vilgrain, V, Dupuis-Girod, S, Buscarini, E, et al. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and liver involvement. Vascular liver diseases: position papers from the francophone network for vascular liver diseases, the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF), and ERN-rare liver. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2020;44:426–32Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, AD, Vase, P, Green, A. Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: a population-based study of prevalence and mortality in Danish patients. J Intern Med 1999;245:31–9Google Scholar
Dakeishi, M, Shioya, T, Wada, Y, Shindo, T, Otaka, K, Manabe, M, et al. Genetic epidemiology of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia in a local community in the northern part of Japan. Hum Mutat 2002;19:140–8Google Scholar
Plauchu, H, de Chadarévian, JP, Bideau, A, Robert, JM. Age-related clinical profile of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia in an epidemiologically recruited population. Am J Med Genet 1989;32:291–7Google Scholar
Chin, CJ, Rotenberg, BW, Witterick, IJ. Epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: an evidence based review of surgical management. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;45:3Google Scholar
Loaëc, M, Morinière, S, Hitier, M, Ferrant, O, Plauchu, H, Babin, E. Psychosocial quality of life in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia patients. Rhinology 2011;49:164–7Google Scholar
Osler, W. Landmarks in Medical Genetics: Classic Papers with Commentaries Peter S. Harper. New York: Oxford University Press 2004;336.Google Scholar
Weber, FP. Multiple hereditary developmental angiomata with recurring epistaxis. Proc R Soc Med 1908;1:65–6Google Scholar
Rendu, M. Epistaxis repetes chez un sujet porteur de petits angiomies cutaneset muqueux. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris 1886;13:731–3Google Scholar
Droege, F, Lueb, C, Thangavelu, K, Stuck, BA, Lang, S, Geisthoff, U. Nasal self-packing for epistaxis in Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia increases quality of life. Rhinology 2019;57:231–9Google Scholar
Woolford, TJ, Loke, D, Bateman, ND. The use of a nasal obturator in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: an alternative to Young’s procedure. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:455–6Google Scholar
Wirsching, KEC, Haubner, F, Kühnel, TS. Influence of temporary nasal occlusion (tNO) on epistaxis frequency in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:1891–6Google Scholar
Reh, DD, Hur, K, Merlo, CA. Efficacy of a topical sesame/rose geranium oil compound in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia associated epistaxis. Laryngoscope 2013;123:820–2Google Scholar
Hsu, YP, Hsu, CW, Bai, CH, Cheng, SW, Chen, C. Medical treatment for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;160:2235Google Scholar
Whitehead, KJ, Sautter, NB, McWilliams, JP, Chakinala, MM, Merlo, CA, Johnson, MH, et al. Effect of topical intranasal therapy on epistaxis frequency in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;316:943–51Google Scholar
Dupuis-Girod, S, Fargeton, AE, Grobost, V, Rivière, S, Beaudoin, M, Decullier, E, et al. Efficacy and safety of a 0.1% tacrolimus nasal ointment as a treatment for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. J Clin Med 2020;9:1262Google Scholar
de Jel, DVC, Disch, FJM, Kroon, S, Mager, JJ, Verdam, FJ. Intranasal Efudix reduces epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Angiogenesis 2020;23:271–4Google Scholar
Mei-Zahav, M, Gendler, Y, Bruckheimer, E, Prais, D, Birk, E, Watad, M, et al. Topical propranolol improves epistaxis control in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT): a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Med 2020;9:3130Google Scholar
Andorfer, KEC, Zeman, F, Koller, M, Zeller, J, Fischer, R, Seebauer, CT, et al. TIMolol nasal spray as a treatment for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (TIM-HHT): a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, cross-over trial. Pharmaceutics 2022;14:2335Google Scholar
Dupuis-Girod, S, Pitiot, V, Bergerot, C, Fargeton, AE, Beaudoin, M, Decullier, E, et al. Efficacy of Timolol nasal spray as a treatment for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Sci Rep 2019;9:11986Google Scholar
Geisthoff, UW, Seyfert, UT, Kübler, M, Bieg, B, Plinkert, PK, König, J. Treatment of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia with tranexamic acid: a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over phase IIIB study. Thromb Res 2014;134:565–71Google Scholar
Gaillard, S, Dupuis-Girod, S, Boutitie, F, Rivière, S, Morinière, S, Hatron, PY, et al. Tranexamic acid for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patients: a European cross-over controlled trial in a rare disease. J Thromb Haemost 2014;12:1494–502Google Scholar
Bergler, W, Sadick, H, Gotte, K, Riedel, F, Hörmann, K. Topical estrogens combined with argon plasma coagulation in the management of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:222–8Google Scholar
Yaniv, E, Preis, M, Hadar, T, Shvero, J, Haddad, M. Antiestrogen therapy for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Laryngoscope 2009;119:284–8Google Scholar
Contis, A, Gensous, N, Viallard, JF, Goizet, C, Léauté-Labrèze, C, Duffau, P. Efficacy and safety of propranolol for epistaxis in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: retrospective, then prospective study, in a total of 21 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:911–7Google Scholar
Kroon, S, Snijder, RJ, Hosman, AE, Vorselaars, VMM, Disch, FJM, Post, MC, et al. Oral itraconazole for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a proof of concept study. Angiogenesis 2021; 24:379–86Google Scholar
Han, C, Choe, SW, Kim, YH, Acharya, AP, Keselowsky, BG, Sorg, BS, et al. VEGF neutralization can prevent and normalize arteriovenous malformations in an animal model for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia 2. Angiogenesis 2014;17:823–30Google Scholar
Kritharis, A, Al-Samkari, H, Kuter, DJ. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: diagnosis and management from the hematologist’s perspective. Haematologica 2018;103:1433–43Google Scholar
Al-Samkari, H, Kasthuri, RS, Parambil, JG, Albitar, HA, Almodallal, YA, Vázquez, C, et al. An international, multicenter study of intravenous bevacizumab for bleeding in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: the InHIBIT-Bleed study. Haematologica 2021;106:2161–9Google Scholar
Wang, D, Ito, S, Waldron, C, Butt, A, Zhang, E, Krumholz, HM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab therapy in the care of patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Blood Adv 2024;8:2835–45Google Scholar
Hessels, J, Kroon, S, Boerman, S, Nelissen, RC, Grutters, JC, Snijder, RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as treatment for bleeding caused by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: an open-label, pilot study. J Clin Med 2022;11:5280Google Scholar
Parambil, JG, Woodard, TD, Koc, ON. Pazopanib effective for bevacizumab-unresponsive epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Laryngoscope 2018;128:2234–6Google Scholar
Riss, D, Burian, M, Wolf, A, Kranebitter, V, Kaider, A, Arnoldner, C. Intranasal submucosal bevacizumab for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Head Neck 2015;37:783–7Google Scholar
Khanwalkar, AR, Rathor, A, Read, AK, Paknezhad, H, Ma, Y, Hwang, PH. Randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial of effect of bevacizumab injection in management of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patients undergoing surgical cauterization. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022;12:1034–42Google Scholar
Karnezis, TT, Davidson, TM. Efficacy of intranasal Bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-associated epistaxis. Laryngoscope 2011;121:636–8Google Scholar
Chen, S, Karnezis, T, Davidson, TM. Safety of intranasal Bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-associated epistaxis. Laryngoscope 2011;121:644–6Google Scholar
Chen, H, Zhang, Z, Chen, X, Wang, C, Chen, M, Liao, H, et al. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia epistaxis. Front Pharmacol 2023;14:1089847Google Scholar
Thiele, B, Abdel-Aty, Y, Marks, L, Lal, D, Marino, M. Sclerotherapy for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis: a systematic review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023;132:8290Google Scholar
Hanks, JE, Hunter, D, Goding, GS, Boyer, HC. Complications from office sclerotherapy for epistaxis due to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT or Osler-Weber-Rendu). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:422–7Google Scholar
Ghaheri, BA, Fong, KJ, Hwang, PH. The utility of bipolar electrocautery in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:1006–9Google Scholar
Abiri, A, Goshtasbi, K, Maducdoc, M, Sahyouni, R, Wang, MB, Kuan, EC. Laser-assisted control of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a systematic review. Lasers Surg Med 2020;52:293300Google Scholar
Lennox, PA, Harries, M, Lund, VJ, Howard, DJ. A retrospective study of the role of the argon laser in the management of epistaxis secondary to hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:34–7Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Cao, L, Wei, C. Randomized controlled trial comparing Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation and bipolar electrocautery in the management of epistaxis. Lasers Med Sci 2017;32:1587–93Google Scholar
Fiorella, ML, Lillo, L, Fiorella, R. Diode laser in the treatment of epistaxis in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012;32:164–9Google Scholar
Luk, L, Mace, JC, Bhandarkar, ND, Sautter, NB. Comparison of electrosurgical plasma coagulation and potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser photocoagulation for treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:640–5Google Scholar
Rotenberg, B, Noyek, S, Chin, CJ. Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia lesions: ‘How I do it.’ Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015;29:226–7Google Scholar
Joshi, H, Woodworth, BA, Carney, AS. Coblation for epistaxis management in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: a multicentre case series. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:1176–80Google Scholar
Harvey, RJ, Kanagalingam, J, Lund, VJ. The impact of septodermoplasty and potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser therapy in the treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:182–7Google Scholar
Trojanowski, P, Jargiello, T, Trojanowska, A, Klatka, J. Epistaxis in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia treated with selective arterial embolization. Acta Radiol 2011;52:846–9Google Scholar
Layton, KF, Kallmes, DF, Gray, LA, Cloft, HJ. Endovascular treatment of epistaxis in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:885–8Google Scholar
Dabiri, J, Fakhoury, R, Choufani, G, Mine, B, Hassid, S. Cauterization for epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. B-ENT 2016;12:916Google Scholar
Richer, SL, Geisthoff, UW, Livada, N, Ward, PD, Johnson, L, Mainka, A, et al. The Young’s procedure for severe epistaxis from hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26:401–4Google Scholar
Al-Deen, S, Bachmann-Harildstad, G. A grading scale for epistaxis in hereditary haemorrhagic teleangectasia. Rhinology 2008;46:281–4Google Scholar
Lund, VJ, Darby, Y, Rimmer, J, Amin, M, Husain, S. Nasal closure for severe hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia in 100 patients. The Lund modification of the Young’s procedure: a 22-year experience. Rhinology 2017;55:135–41Google Scholar
Ting, JY, Remenschneider, A, Holbrook, EH. Management of severe epistaxis after Young’s procedure: a case report. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013;3:334–7Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. The Curaçao Diagnostic Criteria for hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia