Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:25:29.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lymph node yield in treatment naïve cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: en bloc lymphadenectomy versus level-by-level dissection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

K Devaraja ,
K Pujary ,
B Ramaswamy ,
D R Nayak ,
N Kumar  and
D Nayak
K Devaraja*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, India
K Pujary
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, India
B Ramaswamy
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, India
D R Nayak
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, India
N Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, India
D Nayak
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr K Devaraja, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, Karnataka, India – 576104 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield.

Methods

This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020.

Results

From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.

Keywords

Head And Neck CancerSquamous Cell CancerNeck DissectionLymph NodesOral CancerLarynx
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 135 , Issue 4 , April 2021 , pp. 359 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr K Devaraja takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, Siegel, RL, Torre, LA, Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dandekar, M, Tuljapurkar, V, Dhar, H, Panwar, A, D'Cruz, AK. Head and neck cancers in India. J Surg Oncol 2017;115:555–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devaraja, K, Aggarwal, S, Verma, SS, Gupta, SC. Clinico-pathological peculiarities of human papilloma virus driven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive update. Life Sci 2020;245:117383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Cruz, AK, Vaish, R, Kapre, N, Dandekar, M, Gupta, S, Hawaldar, R et al. Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:521–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchison, IL, Ridout, F, Cheung, SMY, Shah, N, Hardee, P, Surwald, C et al. Nationwide randomised trial evaluating elective neck dissection for early stage oral cancer (SEND study) with meta-analysis and concurrent real-world cohort. Br J Cancer 2019;121:827–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majercakova, K, Valero, C, López, M, García, J, Farré, N, Quer, M et al. Postoperative staging of the neck dissection using extracapsular spread and lymph node ratio as prognostic factors in HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral Oncol 2018;77:37–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lop, J, Rigó, A, Codina, A, de Juan, J, Quer, M, León, X. Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cN0 patients with occult metastatic neck nodes. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2018;69:156–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lydiatt, WM, Patel, SG, O'Sullivan, B, Brandwein, MS, Ridge, JA, Migliacci, JC et al. Head and neck cancers - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:122–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, X, Zhao, M, Zhou, L, Zhang, M, Cao, P, Tao, L. Significance of examined lymph nodes number and metastatic lymph nodes ratio in overall survival and adjuvant treatment decision in resected laryngeal carcinoma. Cancer Med 2020;9:3006–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshraghi Samani, R, Shirkhoda, M, Hadji, M, Beheshtifard, F, Hamedani, SMMG, Momen, A et al. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in survival of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Res Med Sci 2018;23:35Google ScholarPubMed
Safi, A-F, Kauke, M, Grandoch, A, Nickenig, H-J, Zöller, J, Kreppel, M. The importance of lymph node ratio for patients with mandibular infiltration of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:1007–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaber, JJ, Zender, CA, Mehta, V, Davis, K, Ferris, RL, Lavertu, P et al. Multi-institutional investigation of the prognostic value of lymph nodal yield in advanced-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2014;36:1446–52Google Scholar
Cheraghlou, S, Otremba, M, Kuo Yu, P, Agogo, GO, Hersey, D, Judson, BL. Prognostic value of lymph node yield and density in head and neck malignancies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;158:1016–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Kort, WWB, Maas, SLN, Van Es, RJJ, Willems, SM. Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Head Neck 2019;41:2801–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdeyrim, A, He, S, Zhang, Y, Mamtali, G, Asla, A, Yusup, M et al. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;49:31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebrahimi, A, Clark, JR, Amit, M, Yen, TC, Liao, C-T, Kowalski, LP et al. Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3049–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmi, YP, Takes, RP, Alon, EE, Nixon, IJ, López, F, de Bree, R et al. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2018;40:1082–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Y, Bin-Manie, M, Roh, J-L, Cho, K-J, Lee, YS, Choi, S-H et al. Metastatic lymph node burden predictive of survival in patients undergoing primary surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019;145:2565–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muttagi, SS, Patil, BR, Godhi, AS, Arora, DK, Hallikerimath, SR, Kale, AD. Clinico-pathological factors affecting lymph node yield in Indian patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of mandibular gingivo-buccal sulcus. Indian J Cancer 2016;53:239–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zenga, J, Divi, V, Stadler, M, Massey, B, Campbell, B, Shukla, M et al. Lymph node yield, depth of invasion, and survival in node-negative oral cavity cancer. Oral Oncol 2019;98:125–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Ridder, M, Marres, CCM, Smeele, LE, van den Brekel, MWM, Hauptmann, M, Balm, AJM et al. A critical evaluation of lymph node ratio in head and neck cancer. Virchows Arch 2016;469:635–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marres, CCM, de Ridder, M, Hegger, I, van Velthuysen, MLF, Hauptmann, M, Navran, A et al. The influence of nodal yield in neck dissections on lymph node ratio in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2014;50:59–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, C-T, Hsueh, C, Lee, L-Y, Lin, C-Y, Fan, K-H, Wang, H-M et al. Neck dissection field and lymph node density predict prognosis in patients with oral cavity cancer and pathological node metastases treated with adjuvant therapy. Oral Oncol 2012;48:329–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, KT, Shaha, AR, Medina, JE, Califano, JA, Wolf, GT, Ferlito, A et al. Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:536–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dulguerov, P, Broglie, MA, Henke, G, Siano, M, Putora, PM, Simon, C et al. A review of controversial issues in the management of head and neck cancer: a Swiss multidisciplinary and multi-institutional patterns of care study - part 1 (head and neck surgery). Front Oncol 2019;9:1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, MC, Goldenberg, D. AHNS Series: do you know your guidelines? Principles of surgery for head and neck cancer: a review of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Head Neck 2017;39:791–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, AJ, Perryman, M, Goodwin, S, Penn, J, Villwock, MR, Bur, AM et al. Pathology protocol increases lymph node yield in neck dissection for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2020;42:2872–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, C, Nicolai, P, Paderno, A, Dietz, A. Best practice in surgical treatment of malignant head and neck tumors. Front Oncol 2020;10:140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramer, JD, Speedy, SE, Ferris, RL, Rademaker, AW, Patel, UA, Samant, S. National evaluation of multidisciplinary quality metrics for head and neck cancer. Cancer 2017;123:4372–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippert, D, Dang, P, Cannon, D, Harari, PM, McCulloch, TM, Hoffman, MR et al. Lymph node yield in therapeutic neck dissection: impact of dissection levels and prior radiotherapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017;126:762–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, PAS, Miller, ED, Moore, MG. Preoperative radiotherapy decreases lymph node yield of neck dissections for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147:278–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, T, Kanaan, O, Höing, B, Dominas, N, Lang, S, Mattheis, S. The role of elective neck dissection during salvage laryngectomy - a retrospective analysis [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2018;97:694–701Google Scholar
NCCN Clinical practice guidelines. In: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx#site [28 July 2020]Google Scholar
Spillane, AJ, Winstanley, J, Thompson, JF. Lymph node ratio in melanoma: a marker of variation in surgical quality? Cancer 2009;115:2384–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghasemi, A, Zahediasl, S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2012;10:486–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochon, J, Gondan, M, Kieser, M. To test or not to test: preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwak, SG, Kim, JH. Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017;70:144–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batsakis, J. The lymph node yield in neck dissections: a mean of 35 nodes is excellent, but variance is much too wide. Why? Adv Anat Pathol 2002;9:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahm, FS. Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: the basic concept and the practical use. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016;69:8–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, R, Kiers, HAL, Johnson, A. Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Front Psychol 2012;3:137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, CO, Morris, PE, Richler, JJ. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen 2012;141:2–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trafimow, D. The intelligibility of r or r (2) as an effect size statistic: dichotomous variables. Front Psychol 2015;6:294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pou, JD, Barton, BM, Lawlor, CM, Frederick, CH, Moore, BA, Hasney, CP. Minimum lymph node yield in elective level I-III neck dissection. Laryngoscope 2017;127:2070–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merz, S, Timmesfeld, N, Stuck, BA, Wiegand, S. Impact of lymph node yield on outcome of patients with head and neck cancer and pN0 neck. Anticancer Res 2018;38:5347–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawilowsky, S. New effect size rules of thumb. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 2009;8:597–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969Google Scholar
Ho, AS, Kim, S, Tighiouart, M, Gudino, C, Mita, A, Scher, KS et al. Metastatic lymph node burden and survival in oral cavity cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3601–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, AS, Kim, S, Tighiouart, M, Gudino, C, Mita, A, Scher, KS et al. Association of quantitative metastatic lymph node burden with survival in hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:985–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemieux, A, Kedarisetty, S, Raju, S, Orosco, R, Coffey, C. Lymph node yield as a predictor of survival in pathologically node negative oral cavity carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;154:465–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, GV, McGaw, B, Smith, ML. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1981Google Scholar
Lim, YC, Koo, BS, Choi, EC. Bilateral neck node metastasis: a predictor of isolated distant metastasis in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma after primary curative surgery. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1576–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, T, Kerr, SJ, Giddings, CEB. Prophylactic dissection of level V in primary mucosal SCC in the clinically N positive neck: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2017;127:2074–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Z, Xu, QS, Qin, LZ, Li, H, Han, Z. Predicting radiotherapy necessity in tongue cancer using lymph node yield. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1062–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iocca, O, Farcomeni, A, De Virgilio, A, Di Maio, P, Golusinski, P, Malvezzi, L et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019;14:100324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed