Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:42:12.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term viability of transplanted ossicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

J. Lang ,
A. G. Kerr  and
G. D. L. Smyth
J. Lang
Affiliation:
Belfast
A. G. Kerr*
Affiliation:
Belfast
G. D. L. Smyth
Affiliation:
Belfast
*
Alan G. Kerr, F.R.C.S., Consultant ENT Surgeon, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA. Northern Ireland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Doubt has been raised about the long-term suitability of ossicular implants in tympanoplasty. Twenty-three ossicular implants that had been in the middle ear for a mean duration of 9.6 years were examined histologically by light microscopy. Although there were only two specimens showing subtotal replacement of the dead ossicular implant by new bone, the structural integrity of all implants was maintained and there was no evidence of overt osteoclastic bone resorption. Therefore our findings support the concept of prolonged survival of ossicular implants in the middle ear and we do not see any good reason for abandoning their use in reconstructive tympanoplasty.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 100 , Issue 7 , July 1986 , pp. 741 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frootko, N. J. (1984) Allograft rejection in the middle ear of the rat. MSc Thesis. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
House, W. F., Patterson, M. E. and Linthicum, F. H. (1966) Incus homografts in chronic ear surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology, 84: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, A. G. and Smyth, G. D. L. (1971) The fate of transplanted ossicles. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 85: 337–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuijpers, W. and Broek, P. van den (1975) Biological consideration for the use of homograft tympanic membranes and ossicles. Acta Otolaryngology, 80: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuijpers, W., Veldman, J. E. and Broek, P. van den (1984) Experimental models for reconstructive ear surgery. Immunobiology, Autoimmunity and Transplantation in Otolaryngology, pp. 177–186.Google Scholar
Robin, P. E. and Clegg, R. T. (1980) Homografts in tympanoplasty: will they be a disaster? An experimental study. Clinical Otolaryngology, 5: 311–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuknecht, H. F. and Shi, S. R. (1985) Surgical pathology of middle ear implants. Laryngoscope, 95: 149–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, G. D. L., Kerr, A. G. and Hassard, T. H. (1977) Homograft materials in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 10, No. 3: 563–580.Google ScholarPubMed