Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:59:15.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A lip-reading assessment for profoundly deaf patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

L. F. A. Martin ,
G. M. Clark ,
P. M. Seligman  and
Y. C. Tong
L. F. A. Martin
Affiliation:
Melbourne, Australia
G. M. Clark*
Affiliation:
Melbourne, Australia
P. M. Seligman
Affiliation:
Melbourne, Australia
Y. C. Tong
Affiliation:
Melbourne, Australia
*
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 97 , Issue 4 , April 1983 , pp. 343 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boothroyd, A. (1968) Developments in Speech Audiometry. Sound, 2: 3–10.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. R., and Giolas, T. G. (1974) Sentence Intelligibility as a function of key word selection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 17: 631–637.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1961) Word and sentence tests for use in speech audiometry. Lancet, i: 197–199.Google Scholar
Fujikawa, S., and Owens, E. (1978) Hearing Aid Evaluations for Persons with Total Postlingual Hearing Loss. Archives of Otolaryngology, 104: 446–450.Google Scholar
Fujikawa, S., and Owens, E. (1979) Hearing Aid Evaluations for Persons with Postlingual Hearing Levels of 90–100db. Archives of Otolaryngology, 105: 662–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, J., and Barley, M. (1981) Speechreading, Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., and Elliott, L. L. (1977) Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61: 1337–1351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., and Lichten, W. (1951) The Intelligibility of Speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41: 329–335.Google Scholar
Owens, E., and Telleen, C. C. (1981) Speech Perception with Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants. Archives of Otolaryngology, 107: 160–163.Google Scholar
Plant, G. L. (1979) The use of tactile supplements in the rehabilitation of the deafened: a case study. Australian Journal of Audiology, 1: 76–82.Google Scholar
Raffin, M. J. M., and Thornton, A. R. (1980) Confidence Levels for differences between Speech-discrimination scores: a research note. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23: 5–18.Google Scholar
Risberg, A. (1974) The Importance of prosodic speech elements for the lipreader. Scandinavian Audiology Supplementum, 4: 253–264.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. R., and Raffin, M. J. M. (1978) Speech-discrimination scores modelled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21: 507–518.Google Scholar
Tong, Y. C., Black, R. C., Clark, G. M., Forster, I. C., Millar, J. B., O'Loughlin, B. J., and Patrick, J. F. (1979) Preliminary Report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 93: 679–693.Google Scholar
Tong, Y. C., Millar, J. B., Clark, G. M., Martin, L. F., Busby, P. A., and Patrick, J. F. (1980) Psychophysical and Speech perception studies on two multi-channel cochlear implant patients. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 94: 1241–1256.Google Scholar