Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:51:34.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insertion of middle-ear Silastic sheeting during tympanoplasty: hearing outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2010

S M Elmorsy  and
H E Amer
S M Elmorsy*
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
H E Amer
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Shawky M Elmorsy, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology, Mansoura University, PO 35516, Elgomhoria street, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Dakhlia, Egypt Fax: +20502267016 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To study the effect of Silastic® sheeting placed in the middle ear during tympanoplasty, including the effect on hearing.

Design:

Retrospective study.

Background:

Chronic inflammation of the middle ear is common. Surgical treatment sometimes results in middle-ear adhesions and hearing deterioration.

Materials and methods:

We selected 106 patients with chronic otitis media, middle-ear adhesions and intact ossicles, based on intra-operative findings. These patients underwent single-stage tympanoplasty either with or without insertion of Silastic sheeting. Audiometry was undertaken pre-operatively and one and 12 months post-operatively.

Results:

Patients who had undergone Silastic sheet insertion showed significantly better air conduction, bone conduction and air–bone gap averages one year post-operatively, compared with those who had not.

Keywords

Middle EarAdhesionsOtologic Surgical ProceduresTympanoplastySilastic
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 125 , Issue 5 , May 2011 , pp. 445 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Wullstein, H. Tympanoplasty; the problem of the free graft and the mucous membrane. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1960;71:363–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2House, HP. Polyethylene in middle ear surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1960;71:926–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Rambo, JHT. The use of paraffin to create a middle ear space in tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1961;71:612–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Tabb, HG. The surgical management of chronic ear disease, with special reference to staged surgery. Laryngoscope 1963;73:363–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Shea, MC. The use of Silastic in tympanoplasty surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 1981;6:125–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Farrior, JB. Principles of surgery in tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy. Laryngoscope 1966;76:816–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Austin, DF. Types and indications of staging. Arch Otolaryngol 1969;89:235–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Sheeny, JL, Crabtree, JA. Tympanoplasty: staging the operation. Laryngoscope 1973;83:1594–621Google Scholar
9Liening, DA, McGath, JH, Mckinney, L. Comparison of polydioxanone and silicone plastic in the prevention of adhesive otitis media in the Mongolian gerbil. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;112:303–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Ng, M,Linthicum, FH Jr.Long-term effects of silastic sheeting in the middle ear. Laryngoscope 1992;102:1097–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Schoonjans, F, Zalata, A, Depuydt, C, Comhaire, F. MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1995;48:257–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Fayad, JN, House, JW. Silastic sheeting in the middle ear. Ear Nose Throat J 2004;83:732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Courteney-Harris, RG, Ford, GR, Ganiwalla, TM, Mangat, KS. Closure of tympanic membrane perforation after the removal of Goode-type tympanostomy tubes: the use of silastic sheeting. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:960–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14McDonald, TJ, Facer, GW, Clark, JL. Surgical treatment of stenosis of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1986;96:830–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Zeitoun, H, Sandhu, GS, Kuo, M, Macnamara, M. A randomized prospective trial to compare four different ear packs following permeatal middle ear surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:140–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Randhawa, PS, Choa, DI. A novel way of cutting Silastic sheeting. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:400–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Gibb, AG. Non suppurative otitis media. Scott-Brown's Diseases of E.N.T., 4th edn.London: Butterworths, 1978;2:193–235Google Scholar
18Fish, U, May, J. Tympanoplasty, Mastoidectomy and Stapes Surgery. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2008;44–6Google Scholar