Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:27:06.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The inhaled pin inaccessible to the bronchoscope: a management conundrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2009

D V T Harischandra*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
J Swanevelder
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthetics, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
R K Firmin
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr D V T Harischandra, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK. Fax: +44 (0)116 2321720 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

The inhaled sharp foreign body is usually amenable to bronchoscopic extraction. When this fails, management poses a challenge. We present a logical approach to the inhaled pin inaccessible to the bronchoscope.

Case report:

A 12-year-old girl presented to the accident and emergency unit after accidentally inhaling a pin. Multiple attempts with both rigid and flexible bronchoscopy failed to access the pin, which had lodged distally in the anteromedial basal segment of the left lung. Eventually, the pin was extracted at thoracotomy.

Conclusion:

We discuss the reasons for extracting such pins, as opposed to leaving them in situ, and when to proceed from endoscopy to open surgery. Such knowledge is useful, not only to guide the multidisciplinary team in their combined approach to this unique challenge, but also to explain to the patient the rationale for the proposed treatment protocol.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the 6th Annual Academic Sessions of the College of Otorhinolaryngologists and Head and Neck Surgeons of Sri Lanka, 19 October 2008, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

References

1Murthy, PS, Ingle, VS, George, E, Ramakrishna, S, Shah, F-A. Sharp foreign bodies in the tracheobronchial tree. Am J Otolaryngol 2001;22:154–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Holinger, LD. Management of sharp and penetrating foreign bodies of the upper aerodigestive tract. Ann Otorhinolaryngol 1990;99:684–8Google ScholarPubMed
3Kaptanoglu, M, Dogan, K, Onen, A, Kunt, N. Turban pin aspiration; a potential risk for young Islamic girls. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;48:131–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Rafanan, AL, Mehta, AC. Bronchoscopy in foreign body removal. In: Wang, KP, Mehta, A, Turner, JF Jr, eds. Flexible Bronchoscopy, 2nd edn.Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004;205–6Google Scholar
5Shabb, B, Taha, AM, Hamada, F, Kanj, N. Straight pin aspiration in young women. J Trauma 1996;40:827–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Sersar, SI, Elshazli, MM, Abdel-Hakam, BB, Mahdy, M. Therapeutic approaches of inhaled veil pins in the Egyptians. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:347–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Sersar, IS, Hamza, UA, AbdelHameed, WA, AbdulMaaty, RA, Gowaeli, NN, Moussa, SA et al. Inhaled foreign bodies: management according to early or late presentation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:369–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar