Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:15:17.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human tissue, human tubes and metal screws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

The arguments surrounding the collection and use of human tissue are complex and cover the fields of bioethics, health economics, primary research, tissue transplantation and genetics, amongst others. It is clear that formal processes and regulation are required in this field. In this issue of The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Warner and colleaguesReference Warner, Birchall and Lowdell1 discuss the practicalities of tissue banking and present a proposed framework protocol for this process.

The story of Chevalier Jackson told in this issueReference Giddings, Rimmer and Weir2 is truly inspirational. The authors are correct in proposing that this man has done more for children's services than any other otolaryngologist. He was a true innovator, dedicated to the treatment of all, regardless of means. He was a prolific publisher and pioneered measures to reduce the incidence of caustic oesophageal strictures. He also pioneered important methods of treatment that substantially reduced the mortality and morbidity arising from inhaled foreign bodies and diphtheria.

One of the modern scourges of developed countries is obesity.Reference Wang, McPherson, Marsh, Gortmaker and Brown3 In addition to preventative efforts aimed at tackling this problem, the treatment of many conditions must be modified in obese patients. Darley and MikulecReference Darley and Mikulec4 investigate modification of the application of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) technology in obese patients by the use of a longer, 8.5 mm osseointegrated abutment. They conclude that although the longer abutment has potential for use in patients with thick subcutaneous soft tissue, it does act at a calculated mechanical disadvantage putting the implant under greater stress. This paper adds to previous articles documenting the incidence and management of complications in patients with BAHAs.Reference Shamil, Topsakal and Grolman5, Reference Wallberg, Granström, Tjellström and Stalfors6

References

1Warner, E, Birchall, M, Lowdell, MW. Tissue banking in ENT: challenges and methods. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:630637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Giddings, CEB, Rimmer, J, Weir, N. Chevalier Jackson: pioneer and protector of children. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:638642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Wang, WC, McPherson, K, Marsh, T, Gortmaker, SL, Brown, B. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet 2011;378:815–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Darley, MD, Mikulec, AA. Survival of the 8.5 mm osseointegrated abutment, and its utility in the obese patient. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:643649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Shamil, E, Topsakal, V, Grolman, W. Management of repeated trauma to bone-anchored hearing aids in a paediatric patient. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:200–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wallberg, E, Granström, G, Tjellström, A, Stalfors, J. Implant survival rate in bone-anchored hearing aid users: long-term results. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:1131–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed