Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:12:55.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hoarseness: its spectrum, associations and management in a tertiary care centre in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2022

M C Sheth*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
R R Paul
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
R Karuppusami
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
S S Mathews
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
R R Anbuselvi
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Meet Chetan Sheth, Dr Liang Voice Program, University of Sydney, Level 5 D18 – Susan Wakil Health Building, Western Ave, Level 2 main entrance, Camperdown, NSW2006, Australia E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To determine the demographic, aetiopathological and diagnostic profiles of patients presenting with hoarseness to a laryngology unit of a tertiary care centre in India.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted.

Results

The 1033 patients who presented with dysphonia showed a male predominance (70 per cent), high rates of malignancy (18 per cent), late presentation (mean, 24 months) and poor follow-up trends (53 per cent with 3 months’ follow up), which contrasts with data from developed countries. The patient population hailed from different states in India and neighbouring countries around India, serving as a good sample for the subcontinent. The majority (67 per cent) were managed conservatively; however, surgical management was the preferred choice for those who presented with airway stenosis (91 per cent) and laryngeal trauma (75 per cent). Significant associations between vocal professionalism level and co-morbidities and dysphonia aetiopathologies are discussed.

Conclusion

These findings give insight into the trends of hoarseness in the developing Indian subcontinent, which can aid understanding and management.

Type
Main Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

The voice is vital for effective communication. A sharp rise in advances in technology and instrumentation has aided our understanding of the physiology of voice, airway and swallowing. Around a third of the total population depend on their voice as a primary work tool, and 1 per cent of the world's population suffer from hoarseness or dysphonia at least once in their lifetime.Reference Behlau, Zambon and Madazio1,Reference Reiter, Hoffmann, Pickhard and Brosch2 Data on hoarseness as a symptom are available in the literature, with excellent guidelines being laid down regarding its patterns, triaging and management in the developed countries.Reference Stachler, Francis, Schwartz, Damask, Digoy and Krouse3 Patterns of dysphonia in the developing and underdeveloped world are varied, as optimal voice drops down in the priority list of health concerns.

Our study aimed to determine the epidemiology and the general management methods undertaken for common laryngology problems at our institute in India. The large sample size of this study, covering a population from a wide geographical region, gives us an idea about the pattern of hoarseness as a symptom and the scope of laryngology in the developing countries of the Indian subcontinent.

Materials and methods

Patients

Between January 2017 and December 2017, all patients with hoarseness who presented to the laryngology out-patient clinic and who underwent rigid or flexible laryngoscopy to diagnose the underlying cause were included in the study. There were no exclusion criteria. This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India after approval by the institutional review board and the ethics committee (institutional review board number: 12587).

Methodology

Data for this retrospective observational study were retrieved from the computerised hospital information processing system. A detailed information profile was prepared for each individual, which included demographic and clinical information. Voice users were classified as level 1 users – elite voice performers or professionals (singers, theatre artists and performers), level 2 users – vocal professionals (e.g. clergy, radio jockeys, presenters, teachers), level 3 users – non-vocal professionals (e.g. doctors, lawyers, nurses, pharmacists) and level 4 users – non-vocal non-professionals.

Statistical analysis

The data were entered using EpiData software, version 3.1. All analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software, version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). For continuous data, descriptive statistics of mean (standard deviation) and range were presented. For categorical data, numbers of patients and percentages were presented. The chi-square and Fisher's exact test (less cell count) were applied to find associations between categorical variables. All tests were two-sided at the α = 0.05 level of significance.

Results

Epidemiology

Of a total of 8320 new patients who attended the laryngology unit, 1033 presented with a change in voice and underwent laryngoscopy. The incidence of hoarseness in the patients seen at our unit was 12.4 per cent.

Among these patients with hoarseness, 70 per cent were males and 30 per cent females. The patients’ mean age was 46 ± 14.3 years (range, 10–91 years). The mean duration of hoarseness was 23 months, ranging from immediate onset of hoarseness (1 day) to 40 years.

The geographical distribution of the patients was wide, although the majority were from East India and Bangladesh. Other countries included neighbouring Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Nepal (Figure 1). Over a third of these patients (36.4 per cent) had a documented history of treatment or opinion from elsewhere before coming to our centre.

Fig. 1. Geographical distribution of patients with hoarseness.

Risk factors and co-morbidities

Use of tobacco was recorded in 35.24 per cent, whereas only 7.6 per cent of patients admitted to consuming alcohol. The systemic illnesses documented were hypertension (16.2 per cent), diabetes (15.4 per cent), pulmonary pathology (12.9 per cent) and concomitant thyroid abnormalities (11.4 per cent).

Voice user levels

The majority of patients (50.73 per cent) were non-vocal non-professional voice users; only 3.2 per cent were level 1 voice users (elite voice performers) (Table 1).

Table 1. Study population demographics and baseline characteristics*

*Total n = 1033. Polyps, nodules, cysts, scars and sulci, arytenoid granuloma, Reinke's oedema, ectasia. Puberphonia, muscle tension dysphonia, psychogenic. **Bacterial, viral, fungal laryngitis. §Haemangioma, papillomas, nerve sheath tumours. SD = standard deviation; RT = radiotherapy

Diagnosis

On histopathology, the majority of cases (82 per cent) were non-malignant (Table 1). Of the malignancies, squamous cell carcinoma was the most common (n = 177); two were variants of squamous cell carcinoma and the other eight were non-squamous.

The non-malignant conditions included benign mucosal lesions (e.g. polyps, nodules, cysts, scars or sulci, granulomas) (Figure 2), which accounted for the majority of cases (50.7 per cent, n = 473). The precise percentage distribution for each of these conditions was difficult to obtain, as there were many with more than one condition. For example, a large number of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux, chronic laryngitis, polyps and scars had co-existing keratosis too.

Fig. 2. Distribution of benign vocal fold mucosal lesions. VF = vocal fold

A significant number of patients were diagnosed with vocal fold palsy (n = 105), with iatrogenic causes (32 per cent) being most common (Figure 3). Sixty-nine patients had pre-malignant leucoplakia or keratotic lesions; along with malignancies, such lesions contributed around 25 per cent of the total case load with hoarseness. The benign tumours (n = 11) seen were laryngeal papilloma, haemangiomas and nerve sheath tumours.

Fig. 3. Aetiology of vocal fold palsy or immobility.

Of the 33 patients with neurogenic dysphonia, 10 had spasmodic dysphonia; the remaining cases were caused by Parkinson's disease, myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, motor neurone disease, tremor and stroke. Muscle tension dysphonia (n = 20) and puberphonia (n = 12) were the most common functional voice disorders (n = 40). Regarding infective causes, 10 patients had laryngeal tuberculosis (TB) and 11 had fungal laryngitis.

Management

A total of 337 patients (33 per cent) were managed surgically, while 696 (67 per cent) were managed conservatively, with 565 patients requiring voice therapy. Only 39 per cent of patients with keratosis (n = 27) underwent a surgical procedure. A large proportion of patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (71 per cent, n = 125) opted for non-surgical management in the form of radiation or chemotherapy (organ preservation protocol). The majority of those with laryngeal trauma (75 per cent, n = 9), and 91 per cent of those with stenosis (n = 31), needed surgical intervention; only 18 per cent (n = 19) with nerve palsy opted for any form of surgical intervention.

Associations

In this study, we attempted to look for associations between risks and co-morbidities, voice user levels and diagnoses. We found significant associations between: level 3 and 4 voice users and polyps (p < 0.001) as well as keratotic pre-malignant lesion formation (p < 0.025); voice user level 1 and 2 and nodules (p < 0.004); voice user level 2 and 4 and scars and sulci (p < 0.009); and voice user level 2 and cysts (p < 0.034) (Table 2).

Table 2. Aetiology and voice user level associations

Voice user categories: level 1 – elite voice performers or professionals, level 2 – vocal professionals, level 3 users – non-vocal professionals, and level 4 users – non-vocal non-professionals. *Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05)

We also observed a significant association between pulmonary co-morbidities and the presence of keratotic laryngeal lesions (p = 0.008). In most cases (80 per cent), laryngeal TB was secondary to pulmonary TB. As expected, there was a significant association between tobacco use (92.5 per cent were smokers) and laryngeal malignancies (p < 0.001). Smoking was also significantly associated with the formation of pre-malignant lesions (p = 0.02) and scars (p < 0.005).

In our population, we found significant associations between hypertension and the presence of nodules (p = 0.002) and polyps (p = 0.03), and between autoimmune disease and the presence of airway stenosis (p = 0.01). The presence of thyroid disorders and diabetes did not show an association with any voice pathology.

After the initial consultation, 42 per cent of patients (n = 434) required cross-referrals for optimal management, and 565 underwent speech therapy. Only 53 per cent (n = 547) of the study patients had a minimum follow up of three months.

Discussion

Hoarseness may result from a wide variety of causes. Laryngologists have to work with other medical sub-specialties as well as speech and language pathologists, whose contribution is indispensable for optimal management in most cases of dysphonia, making treatment a multidisciplinary team effort.

Epidemiological differences

Data show that dysphonia has a point prevalence of around 1 per cent among patients seeking treatment, with a female predominance (63.4 per cent).Reference Reiter, Hoffmann, Pickhard and Brosch2,Reference Cohen, Kim, Roy, Asche and Courey4 Indian reports of smaller study groups (100–110 patients) showed lower incidence rates of hoarseness (less than 0.5 per cent) and a male predominance (51–89 per cent).Reference Baitha, Raizada, Singh, Puttewar and Chaturvedi5Reference Pal, Kaushal, Nagpure and Agarwal9 The majority of our patient population was male (70 per cent), and the incidence of hoarseness in our study was 12.4 per cent. While the high incidence is probably a result of having a specialised laryngology sub-specialty unit, it also highlights the scope for laryngology in this country. The male predominance, as against the literature in Western, more developed countries, may point towards the perceived lack of importance and limited attention given to non-emergent medical issues in women, regardless of whether the conditions affect quality of life.

Among 80 per cent of Indian patients, the average duration of hoarseness as a presenting complaint has been reported to be around 12 months,Reference Baitha, Raizada, Singh, Puttewar and Chaturvedi5 as compared with 1–3 months in more than 60 per cent of patients in Western literature.Reference Stachler, Francis, Schwartz, Damask, Digoy and Krouse3,Reference Brouha, Tromp, de Leeuw, Hordijk and Winnubst10 In our study, we found the mean duration of presenting complaints to be 24 months, clearly indicating a delay in seeking medical attention for hoarseness in the Indian subcontinent and a lack of awareness about the need to seek medical attention.

Diagnostic differences

Indian studies report a much lower rate of acute laryngitis (11–23 per cent vs around 40 per cent) and a much higher rate of malignant conditions (8–74 per cent vs around 2–3 per cent),Reference Baitha, Raizada, Singh, Puttewar and Chaturvedi5Reference Pal, Kaushal, Nagpure and Agarwal9 with similar percentages of vocal fold palsy (3–10 per cent) and chronic laryngitis (9–10 per cent), compared with international data.Reference Reiter, Hoffmann, Pickhard and Brosch2,Reference Cohen, Kim, Roy, Asche and Courey4 Benign vocal fold lesions reported in Indian literature range from 8 to 60 per cent,Reference Baitha, Raizada, Singh, Puttewar and Chaturvedi5Reference Pal, Kaushal, Nagpure and Agarwal9 compared with 10–31 per cent in Western literature.Reference Reiter, Hoffmann, Pickhard and Brosch2,Reference Cohen, Kim, Roy, Asche and Courey4 Our study showed the incidence of malignancy, vocal fold palsy and benign vocal fold lesions to be around 18 per cent, 10.5 per cent and 45 per cent, respectively.

Indian data indicate a 1–5 per cent incidence of laryngeal TB.Reference Baitha, Raizada, Singh, Puttewar and Chaturvedi5Reference Batra, Motwani and Sagar7 Up to 14.5 per cent of head and neck TB cases have been reported to have laryngeal involvement.Reference Prasad, Sreedharan, Chakravarthy and Prasad11 While all 32 cases of laryngeal TB reported by Bhat et al.Reference Bhat, Latha, Upadhya and Hegde12 had pulmonary involvement, only 20 per cent of laryngeal TB patients reported by Gandhi et al.Reference Gandhi, Kulkarni, Mishra and Thekedar13 showed systemic involvement. With 8 out of 10 cases of laryngeal TB (80 per cent) being secondary to pulmonary TB, our findings were similar to those of Lim et al., where the majority had secondary laryngeal TB.Reference Lim, Kim, Choi, Kim, Kim and Choi14

Voice user level data

Voice professionals, such as teachers, broadcasters and musicians, whose professions are reliant on their voice, appear to be most at risk of developing a voice disorder.Reference Koufman and Isaacson15Reference Timmermans, De Bodt, Wuyts, Boudewijns, Clement and Peeters17 Although level 1 voice users are typically well-qualified voice users, others often have insufficient or no voice use and vocal hygiene training, making them more likely to adopt inappropriate voice production techniques. Indian studies have reported that most dysphonic patients can be categorised as a level 4 voice user.Reference Batra, Motwani and Sagar7Reference Pal, Kaushal, Nagpure and Agarwal9 That was also seen in this study, clearly illustrating the need for voice and vocal hygiene education in the general population. In a Belgian study, functional voice disorders (41 per cent), vocal fold nodules or hypertrophy (15 per cent), and reflux, laryngitis or inflammation (11 per cent) were found to be the most common pathologies among professional voice users.Reference Van Houtte, Van Lierde, D'Haeseleer and Claeys18

No studies correlating voice user levels or co-morbidities with pathology were found in the Indian literature search. We observed some interesting, statistically significant associations. First, vocal nodules among both level 1 and 2 voice users suggest that overuse with a lack of adequate rest could be a contributing factor among trained individuals. Second, among level 3 and 4 voice users, vocal polyps were more common, suggesting that sudden phonotrauma causes hoarseness in untrained voice users. Third, vocal cysts were seen more frequently in level 2 voice users.

Co-morbidities, habit-forming substances and dysphonia

Apart from well-proven correlations between tobacco use and laryngeal malignancies,Reference Sapkota, Gajalakshmi, Jetly, Roychowdhury, Dikshit and Brennan19Reference Bobdey, Jain and Balasubramanium22 there are few significant associations between systemic co-morbidities and laryngeal pathologies in South Asian literature. In our patients, tobacco use was significantly associated not only with the presence of laryngeal malignancies, but also with pre-malignant or keratotic lesions, scars and nodules.

Chronic cough has been postulated to be related to an increased prevalence of benign vocal fold lesions.Reference Adessa, Xiao, Hull, Bowen, Milstein and Benninger23 The phonotrauma caused by the classical smoker's cough because of the chemical and thermal irritation, or because of underlying pulmonary co-morbidities, leads to increased keratinisation of delicate vocal fold epithelium, which could be the reason for these lesions.Reference Adessa, Xiao, Hull, Bowen, Milstein and Benninger23 This could explain why we found not only smoking but also pulmonary co-morbidities to be significantly associated with the presence of keratotic lesions on the vocal folds.

  • This study, with a large sample and wide geographical distribution, provides a good overview of hoarseness in the Indian subcontinent

  • Compared to Western literature, the data show large delays and male predominance in seeking medical attention

  • This indicates that optimal voice is low on the list of health priorities in the subcontinent

  • Significant associations were found between vocal professionalism level and co-morbidities and dysphonia aetiopathologies

  • These associations might not imply clinical causation, but could be important for clinical management

The association of personality types with the formation of nodules and polyps has been extensively discussed in literature.Reference El Uali Abeida, Fernández Liesa, Vallés Varela, García Campayo, Rueda Gormedino and Ortiz García24Reference Yano, Ichimura, Hoshino and Nozue29 In our cohort, the association of hypertension with vocal nodules as well as polyps could be the result of voice abuse and misuse in these individuals who are more subject to stress and tend to become anxious or angry.

Systemic TB was seen in 80 per cent of our patients with laryngeal TB, supporting the data indicating that isolated or primary laryngeal TB is uncommon.Reference Lim, Kim, Choi, Kim, Kim and Choi14,Reference Reis, Reis, da Costa, Lucena, Schubach and Oliveira30

An association between airway stenosis and autoimmune conditions has also been described in the literature (e.g. granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Churg–Strauss syndrome, immunoglobulin G4 disease, and idiopathic subglottic stenosis).Reference Aarnæs, Sandvik and Brøndbo31Reference Kobraei, Song, Mathisen, Deshpande and Mark36 Patients present with hoarseness, cough or breathing difficulty either to the otolaryngologist or to the rheumatologist. After the initial management, the patients often need to be monitored every three to six months, as they tend to relapse.

Conclusion

This study, with its large sample size and the inclusion of patients from a wide geographical area, provides a good overview of hoarseness as a symptom in the developing Indian subcontinent. The hoarseness seen in our tertiary care referral centre was predominantly chronic, with acute-onset dysphonia being largely iatrogenic or traumatic in nature. An optimal voice seems to be lower on the list of health concerns in the subcontinent, especially among women. Polyps, nodules, malignancies and vocal fold palsies remain the major diagnoses, with scars and keratosis contributing a considerable number. A multidisciplinary approach to voice problems is often needed.

In addition to the commonly known associations between professional voice users and vocal fold nodules, and between tobacco use and malignancy and pre-malignant lesions, there appear to be interesting associations between hypertension and phonotraumatic lesions, between pulmonary co-morbidities and keratotic lesions, and between non-vocal professionals and non-professionals (voice user levels 3 and 4) and polyp formation. Even though these associations do not necessarily imply causation, exploring them further may provide useful information for management of these conditions. We hope that larger, multi-centre studies of hoarseness will be conducted in the future to understand this largely under-reported and under-emphasised symptom in our subcontinent.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Departments of Biostatistics and the Department of Computerised Hospital Information Services at Christian Medical College, Vellore, India, for their expertise with analysis and data collection respectively.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Dr M C Sheth takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Behlau, M, Zambon, F, Madazio, G. Managing dysphonia in occupational voice users. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;22:188–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, R, Hoffmann, TK, Pickhard, A, Brosch, S. Hoarseness—causes and treatments. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2015;112:329–37Google ScholarPubMed
Stachler, RJ, Francis, DO, Schwartz, SR, Damask, CC, Digoy, GP, Krouse, HJ et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia) (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;158:S142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, SM, Kim, J, Roy, N, Asche, C, Courey, M. Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment-seeking population. Laryngoscope 2012;122:343–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baitha, S, Raizada, RM, Singh, AKK, Puttewar, MP, Chaturvedi, VN. Clinical profile of hoarseness of voice. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;54:141810.1007/BF02910998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, SK, Chattopadhyay, S, Bora, H, Mukherjee, PB. Microlaryngoscopic study of 100 cases of hoarseness of voice. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;53:270–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batra, K, Motwani, G, Sagar, PC. Functional voice disorders and their occurrence in 100 patients of hoarseness as seen on fibreoptic laryngoscopy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;56:91–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soni, S, Chouksey, S. A study of clinicopathological profile of patients of hoarseness of voice presenting to tertiary care hospital. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;69:244–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pal, KS, Kaushal, AK, Nagpure, PS, Agarwal, G. Etiopathological study of 100 patients of hoarseness of voice: in a rural based hospital. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:40–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouha, XDR, Tromp, DM, de Leeuw, JRJ, Hordijk, G-J, Winnubst, JAM. Laryngeal cancer patients: analysis of patient delay at different tumor stages. Head Neck 2005;27:289–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, KC, Sreedharan, S, Chakravarthy, Y, Prasad, SC. Tuberculosis in the head and neck: experience in India. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:979–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhat, VK, Latha, P, Upadhya, D, Hegde, J. Clinicopathological review of tubercular laryngitis in 32 cases of pulmonary Kochs. Am J Otolaryngol 2009;30:327–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandhi, S, Kulkarni, S, Mishra, P, Thekedar, P. Tuberculosis of larynx revisited: a report on clinical characteristics in 10 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;64:244–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, J-Y, Kim, K-M, Choi, EC, Kim, Y-H, Kim, HS, Choi, H-S. Current clinical propensity of laryngeal tuberculosis: review of 60 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:838–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koufman, JA, Isaacson, G. The spectrum of vocal dysfunction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991;24:985–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koufman, JA, Blalock, PD. Vocal fatigue and dysphonia in the professional voice user: Bogart-Bacall syndrome. Laryngoscope 1988;98:493–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmermans, B, De Bodt, MS, Wuyts, FL, Boudewijns, A, Clement, G, Peeters, A et al. Poor voice quality in future elite vocal performers and professional voice users. J Voice 2002;16:372–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Houtte, E, Van Lierde, K, D'Haeseleer, E, Claeys, S. The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking population with dysphonia. Laryngoscope 2010;120:306–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapkota, A, Gajalakshmi, V, Jetly, DH, Roychowdhury, S, Dikshit, RP, Brennan, P et al. Smokeless tobacco and increased risk of hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers: a multicentric case–control study from India. Int J Cancer 2007;121:1793–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, DN, Abdulkader, RS, Gupta, PC. Smokeless tobacco-associated cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Indian studies. Int J Cancer 2016;138:1368–7910.1002/ijc.29884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talamini, R, Bosetti, C, La Vecchia, C, Dal Maso, L, Levi, F, Bidoli, E et al. Combined effect of tobacco and alcohol on laryngeal cancer risk: a case–control study. Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:957–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobdey, S, Jain, A, Balasubramanium, G. Epidemiological review of laryngeal cancer: an Indian perspective. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2015;36:154–60Google ScholarPubMed
Adessa, M, Xiao, R, Hull, D, Bowen, AJ, Milstein, CF, Benninger, MS et al. Benign vocal fold lesions in patients with chronic cough. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;162:322–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Uali Abeida, M, Fernández Liesa, R, Vallés Varela, H, García Campayo, J, Rueda Gormedino, P, Ortiz García, A. Study of the influence of psychological factors in the etiology of vocal nodules in women. J Voice 2013;27:129.e15–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karkos, PD, McCormick, M. The etiology of vocal fold nodules in adults. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;17:420–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JM, Roy, N, Dietrich, M. Personality, psychological factors, and behavioral tendencies in children with vocal nodules: a systematic review. J Voice 2019;33:945.e1–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattei, A, Revis, J, Giovanni, A. Personality traits inventory in patients with vocal nodules. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:1911–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratajczak, J, Grzywacz, K, Wojdas, A, Rapiejko, P, Jurkiewicz, D. Role of psychological factors in pathogenesis of disturbances of voice caused with vocal nodules [in Polish]. Otolaryngol Pol 2008;62:758–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yano, J, Ichimura, K, Hoshino, T, Nozue, M. Personality factors in pathogenesis of polyps and nodules of vocal cords. Auris Nasus Larynx 1982;9:105–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, JGC, Reis, CSM, da Costa, DCS, Lucena, MM, Schubach, A de O, Oliveira, R de VC et al. Factors associated with clinical and topographical features of laryngeal tuberculosis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aarnæs, MT, Sandvik, L, Brøndbo, K. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis: an epidemiological single-center study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:2225–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aravena, C, Almeida, FA, Mukhopadhyay, S, Ghosh, S, Lorenz, RR, Murthy, SC et al. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis: a review. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:1100–1110.21037/jtd.2019.11.43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelbard, A, Francis, DO, Sandulache, VC, Simmons, JC, Donovan, DT, Ongkasuwan, J. Causes and consequences of adult laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope 2015;125:1137–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluth, MB, Shinners, PA, Kasperbauer, JL. Subglottic stenosis associated with Wegener's granulomatosis. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1304–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsushima, K, Ohira, S, Matsui, H, Fukuo, A, Honma, N, Wada, K et al. IgG4-related disease with pseudotumor formation in the larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx 2020;47:305–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobraei, EM, Song, TH, Mathisen, DJ, Deshpande, V, Mark, EJ. Immunoglobulin G4-related disease presenting as an obstructing tracheal mass: consideration of surgical indications. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:e91–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geographical distribution of patients with hoarseness.

Figure 1

Table 1. Study population demographics and baseline characteristics*

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Distribution of benign vocal fold mucosal lesions. VF = vocal fold

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Aetiology of vocal fold palsy or immobility.

Figure 4

Table 2. Aetiology and voice user level associations