Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:57:02.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hearing and vestibular rehabilitation, with a focus on the elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2017 

The increasing proportion of our patients in the ‘elderly’ age group in the developed world has effects on ENT as well as every other branch of medicine. In The Journal of Laryngology & Otology in the recent past, we have looked at a variety of topics of particular interest to the otolaryngologist and geriatrician, including pharyngeal pouch,Reference Stewart and Sen 1 vestibular dysfunction and presbyacusis,Reference Tan, Tang, Lo and Yeak 2 , Reference Luscher, Theilgard and Edholm 3 and cochlear implantation.Reference Hilly, Hwang, Smith, Shipp, Nedzelski and Chen 4 In this issue, an auditory brainstem response study focuses on the mechanism of hearing difficulty in the elderly, especially in noisy surroundings, comparing the elderly and young adults.Reference Ansari, Rangasayee and Ansari 5 This revealed significantly lower amplitudes and increased latencies in brainstem responses in the elderly, indicating that subcortical mechanisms are involved in this deficiency. With regard to the frequent need for vestibular rehabilitation therapies in the elderly, it is disappointing but perhaps not surprising that elderly males are apparently more likely to fail to complete vestibular rehabilitation programmes than their younger counterparts.Reference Soto-Varela, Faraldo-García, Del-Río-Valeiras, Rossi-Izquierdo, Vaamonde-Sánchez-Andrade and Gayoso-Diz 6 Vestibular rehabilitation programmes may not be inexpensive, but bone-anchored hearing aids are an established and necessarily expensive aid to hearing impairment rehabilitation. The review paper from Manchester helps us to understand why the take-up of this technology is not always as high as might be hoped for.Reference Powell, Wearden, Pardesi and Green 7 The authors call for much more evidence to help providers focus their efforts appropriately and to help patients take advantage of what could help them a great deal.

This issue of The Journal has papers on both adult and paediatric subglottic stenosis. Sharma and colleagues describe a decade of experience in balloon dilatation at Great Ormond Street Hospital, which has considerable advantages over open surgery in these challenging cases.Reference Sharma, Gupta, Wyatt, Albert and Hartley 8 These authors provide practical guidance on the technique based on 166 cases. Nicolli and colleagues, from Pennsylvania, describe a retrospective case–control study in adults, in which they identify obesity and diabetes mellitus as risk factors for the development of subglottic stenosis.Reference Nicolli, Carey, Farquhar, Haft, Alfonso and Mirza 9 These papers complement a paper from New Delhi published in 2014, which investigated the aetiology and management of subglottic stenosis.Reference Pookamala, Thakar, Puri, Singh, Kumar and Sharma 10

Ear trauma is a topic that is often neglected. Song et al. help redress this with a detailed study of patients with temporal bone fractures that spare the otic capsule.Reference Song, Jun and Kim 11 Happy reading!

References

1 Stewart, K, Sen, P. Pharyngeal pouch management: an historical review. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:116–20Google Scholar
2 Tan, JL, Tang, J, Lo, S, Yeak, S. Investigating the risk factors of vestibular dysfunction and the relationship with presbyacusis in Singapore. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:816–21Google Scholar
3 Luscher, M, Theilgard, S, Edholm, B. Prevalence and characteristics of diagnostic groups amongst 1034 patients seen in ENT practice for dizziness. J Laryngol Otol 2014;128:128–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Hilly, O, Hwang, E, Smith, L, Shipp, D, Nedzelski, JM, Chen, JM et al. Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: stability of outcome over time. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:706–11Google Scholar
5 Ansari, MS, Rangasayee, R, Ansari, MA. Neurophysiological aspects of brainstem processing of speech stimuli in audiometric-normal geriatric population. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:239–44Google Scholar
6 Soto-Varela, A, Faraldo-García, A, Del-Río-Valeiras, M, Rossi-Izquierdo, M, Vaamonde-Sánchez-Andrade, I, Gayoso-Diz, P et al. Adherence of older people with instability in vestibular rehabilitation programmes: prediction criteria. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:232–8Google Scholar
7 Powell, R, Wearden, A, Pardesi, SM, Green, K. Understanding the low uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids: a review. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:190201 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Sharma, SD, Gupta, SL, Wyatt, M, Albert, D, Hartley, B. Safe balloon sizing for endoscopic dilatation of subglottic stenosis in children. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:268–72Google Scholar
9 Nicolli, EA, Carey, RM, Farquhar, D, Haft, S, Alfonso, KP, Mirza, N. Risk factors for adult acquired subglottic stenosis. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:264–7Google Scholar
10 Pookamala, S, Thakar, A, Puri, K, Singh, P, Kumar, R, Sharma, SC. Acquired subglottic stenosis: aetiological profile and treatment results. J Laryngol Otol 2014;128:641–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Song, SW, Jun, BC, Kim, H. Clinical features and radiological evaluation of otic capsule sparing temporal bone fractures. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:209–14Google Scholar